comment by chooshanguru (U21387)
posted 31 minutes ago
Thank you viru and afridi for saying what I am
Saying not clear why other people upset and some Pakistan fan two hahaha
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Choos u r a brilliant poster.
The biggest point here is if anyone remembers millions of incidents with our sports like for example Ronaldo’s wink, if the decisions go against us, our media would NEVER let it go. Every minute of the day, that Stokes deflection would be shown, we would be reminded of the rules until they were printed on our foreheads.
Our fans can still accept that decisions like this happen in Sport and the best team won the tournament, but our media never lets it go. This is undeniable in my opinion.
Jt this is what I said other day two because English can by hypocrite to many times and don’t release sometimes bexUas in own little world
comment by chooshanguru (U21387)
posted 12 minutes ago
Jt this is what I said other day two because English can by hypocrite to many times and don’t release sometimes bexUas in own little world
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Brilliant.
It was a 1 in 1000 chance that this rule would ever be used. Has there ever been a game where a super over was tied? Not sure what people would have preferred. Another super over, adds probably another 30 mins. At some stage a winner has to be decided. A penalty shootout extra pen is another minute.
The boundary rule seems as fair as any way. Somebody had to win and the game had to finish at some time. Everyone knew the rules going into it.
I honestly think that a tie after the super over should mean the team higher in the table winning as long as this rules are explicit beforehand
England were higher in the table.
My only issue is the rule with the Stokes deflection/overthrow, with 2 Umpires on the field, TV Umpire and it being a World Cup Final, this should be known by someone at least.
To be fair, I didn't know the rule, but then I am not an Umpire.
comment by Everywhere you go always take Lamela with you.... (U7905)
posted 10 minutes ago
It was a 1 in 1000 chance that this rule would ever be used. Has there ever been a game where a super over was tied? Not sure what people would have preferred. Another super over, adds probably another 30 mins. At some stage a winner has to be decided. A penalty shootout extra pen is another minute.
The boundary rule seems as fair as any way. Somebody had to win and the game had to finish at some time. Everyone knew the rules going into it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Another super over does not add 30 mins. It cricket end of the day. They play all day so another 10-15 mins makes no difference. In the future they need to look at another super over if we get this rare scenario again.
In the past if the game was tied the team who took the most wickets won. That is more satisfying than boundaries but i'd still rather see an outright winner.
Keep play super over until winner is found doesn’t matter about time will take just 15 min more
Well done Pakistan now open airspace to India for flights
What for ?,they won't let that loser cricket team back in anyway !
The spirit of confusion is strong in this one.
comment by chooshanguru (U21387)
posted 10 hours, 32 minutes ago
Keep play super over until winner is found doesn’t matter about time will take just 15 min more
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But they aren't the rules, so England won fairly. Wind ya neck in.
Under previous rules NZ would
have won through losing less wickets.
But England won coz of more boundaries
Deal with it
comment by chooshanguru (U21387)
posted 1 day, 16 hours ago
India not cheat Kash bexUas played with tactics Pakistan only team to blame for Pakistan loose. India are the best team and play with great passion and deserve to be in final at least. You think this important when you don’t open airspace for India how can you want favour from India then. Be fair and offer will be fair
----------------------------------------------------------------------
India disappointed hugely in semi final
3 cheap wickets
Out of 1.5 billion, India yet to produce a bowler that can bowl close to 100 mph.
can someone please tell choos, You spell lose with 1 o.. Thanks!
Unless his trousers are falling down again! then yes they are loose!
I am ok with other fan having go at my English because I am still learning.
Can some1 tell liverpool that you don’t suppose to use CAPITAL letter in middle of sentence. Thanks you!
comment by chooshanguru (U21387)
posted 31 minutes ago
I am ok with other fan having go at my English because I am still learning.
Can some1 tell liverpool that you don’t suppose to use CAPITAL letter in middle of sentence. Thanks you!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Brilliant reply
Yep liverpoolwhoelse just got owned!
Choos:
30,000 odd attended Imran;s conference in USA in contrast to 18k at Modi conference, Overseas Pakistans are 1/10th to Overseas India's.
Sign in if you want to comment
Well done all team
Page 3 of 3
posted on 16/7/19
comment by chooshanguru (U21387)
posted 31 minutes ago
Thank you viru and afridi for saying what I am
Saying not clear why other people upset and some Pakistan fan two hahaha
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Choos u r a brilliant poster.
posted on 16/7/19
The biggest point here is if anyone remembers millions of incidents with our sports like for example Ronaldo’s wink, if the decisions go against us, our media would NEVER let it go. Every minute of the day, that Stokes deflection would be shown, we would be reminded of the rules until they were printed on our foreheads.
Our fans can still accept that decisions like this happen in Sport and the best team won the tournament, but our media never lets it go. This is undeniable in my opinion.
posted on 16/7/19
Jt this is what I said other day two because English can by hypocrite to many times and don’t release sometimes bexUas in own little world
posted on 16/7/19
comment by chooshanguru (U21387)
posted 12 minutes ago
Jt this is what I said other day two because English can by hypocrite to many times and don’t release sometimes bexUas in own little world
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Brilliant.
posted on 16/7/19
It was a 1 in 1000 chance that this rule would ever be used. Has there ever been a game where a super over was tied? Not sure what people would have preferred. Another super over, adds probably another 30 mins. At some stage a winner has to be decided. A penalty shootout extra pen is another minute.
The boundary rule seems as fair as any way. Somebody had to win and the game had to finish at some time. Everyone knew the rules going into it.
posted on 16/7/19
I honestly think that a tie after the super over should mean the team higher in the table winning as long as this rules are explicit beforehand
England were higher in the table.
My only issue is the rule with the Stokes deflection/overthrow, with 2 Umpires on the field, TV Umpire and it being a World Cup Final, this should be known by someone at least.
To be fair, I didn't know the rule, but then I am not an Umpire.
posted on 16/7/19
comment by Everywhere you go always take Lamela with you.... (U7905)
posted 10 minutes ago
It was a 1 in 1000 chance that this rule would ever be used. Has there ever been a game where a super over was tied? Not sure what people would have preferred. Another super over, adds probably another 30 mins. At some stage a winner has to be decided. A penalty shootout extra pen is another minute.
The boundary rule seems as fair as any way. Somebody had to win and the game had to finish at some time. Everyone knew the rules going into it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Another super over does not add 30 mins. It cricket end of the day. They play all day so another 10-15 mins makes no difference. In the future they need to look at another super over if we get this rare scenario again.
In the past if the game was tied the team who took the most wickets won. That is more satisfying than boundaries but i'd still rather see an outright winner.
posted on 16/7/19
Keep play super over until winner is found doesn’t matter about time will take just 15 min more
posted on 16/7/19
Well done Pakistan now open airspace to India for flights
posted on 16/7/19
What for ?,they won't let that loser cricket team back in anyway !
posted on 16/7/19
The spirit of confusion is strong in this one.
posted on 16/7/19
comment by chooshanguru (U21387)
posted 10 hours, 32 minutes ago
Keep play super over until winner is found doesn’t matter about time will take just 15 min more
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But they aren't the rules, so England won fairly. Wind ya neck in.
posted on 17/7/19
Under previous rules NZ would
have won through losing less wickets.
But England won coz of more boundaries
Deal with it
posted on 17/7/19
comment by chooshanguru (U21387)
posted 1 day, 16 hours ago
India not cheat Kash bexUas played with tactics Pakistan only team to blame for Pakistan loose. India are the best team and play with great passion and deserve to be in final at least. You think this important when you don’t open airspace for India how can you want favour from India then. Be fair and offer will be fair
----------------------------------------------------------------------
India disappointed hugely in semi final
3 cheap wickets
posted on 17/7/19
Out of 1.5 billion, India yet to produce a bowler that can bowl close to 100 mph.
posted on 17/7/19
can someone please tell choos, You spell lose with 1 o.. Thanks!
Unless his trousers are falling down again! then yes they are loose!
posted on 17/7/19
I am ok with other fan having go at my English because I am still learning.
Can some1 tell liverpool that you don’t suppose to use CAPITAL letter in middle of sentence. Thanks you!
posted on 17/7/19
comment by chooshanguru (U21387)
posted 31 minutes ago
I am ok with other fan having go at my English because I am still learning.
Can some1 tell liverpool that you don’t suppose to use CAPITAL letter in middle of sentence. Thanks you!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Brilliant reply
posted on 17/7/19
Yep liverpoolwhoelse just got owned!
posted on 22/7/19
Choos:
30,000 odd attended Imran;s conference in USA in contrast to 18k at Modi conference, Overseas Pakistans are 1/10th to Overseas India's.
Page 3 of 3