ubad9jagooner .VAR : don't get the hype ! (U7978)
It’s an anti Man City conspiracy
comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 5 minutes ago
ubad9jagooner .VAR : don't get the hype ! (U7978)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We will soon come to the point where the players cannot celebrate a goal until the clowns up there looking at the screen confirm it is a goal.
It's not VAR. The guys behind VAR are confusing
Last week at West Ham, a similar ridiculous decision cancelled a goal because a shoulder blade was offside.
comment by mancini (U7179)
posted 2 minutes ago
Last week at West Ham, a similar ridiculous decision cancelled a goal because a shoulder blade was offside.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Offside is offside - Cant criticise VAR for enforcing the rules correctly
You’ll get a VAR call in your favour soon don’t worry, will probably be against us. It’s just a good job for your sakes that it was not brought in back when you had Pires and Henry diving all over the shop for penalties back in the day.
Hit his hand rules are rules. Ref applied it. Correct call. Move on. If there was no VAR people be moaning about the ref and getting offside calls wrong etc.
comment by BH_Spurs (U10357)
posted 3 minutes ago
You’ll get a VAR call in your favour soon don’t worry, will probably be against us. It’s just a good job for your sakes that it was not brought in back when you had Pires and Henry diving all over the shop for penalties back in the day.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You support a club that has Dele Alli on its book and wum about diving.
comment by The Goofy One (U16087)
posted 1 minute ago
Hit his hand rules are rules. Ref applied it. Correct call. Move on. If there was no VAR people be moaning about the ref and getting offside calls wrong etc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So why was the penalty call against Spurs ignored. Why was the so called “best referee in England” not overruled?
comment by ubad9jagooner .Ramsey : don't get the hype ! (U7978)
posted 49 seconds ago
comment by The Goofy One (U16087)
posted 1 minute ago
Hit his hand rules are rules. Ref applied it. Correct call. Move on. If there was no VAR people be moaning about the ref and getting offside calls wrong etc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So why was the penalty call against Spurs ignored. Why was the so called “best referee in England” not overruled?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I can say the same about liverpool versus chelsea why didnt mane get pen why dint they review abrahams dive etc etc. But he handled it and decision was correct you can argue about why it was not used for other situations but they got this call right
Spurs got a draw because of VAR
It hit his hand which if it hadn't, what happened would not have happened the way it happened and even if it had happened it would have happened inna different manner.
But seriously, the bigger problem isn't the rule, its the lack of consistency. If they can pick one and stick with it and apply it in all games then that should bring some sanity back.
comment by Klopptimus Prime - Die Unerträglichen (U1282)
posted 7 minutes ago
It hit his hand which if it hadn't, what happened would not have happened the way it happened and even if it had happened it would have happened inna different manner.
But seriously, the bigger problem isn't the rule, its the lack of consistency. If they can pick one and stick with it and apply it in all games then that should bring some sanity back.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes totally agree. But then that is the same argument from back in the days when Alan Shearer would moan on motd about ref consistency etc. Some people are now acting like ref in the good all days applied the rules consistently all the time. They have just moved on to inconsistency with technology
comment by Klopptimus Prime - Die Unerträglichen (U1282)
posted 3 minutes ago
It hit his hand which if it hadn't, what happened would not have happened the way it happened and even if it had happened it would have happened inna different manner.
But seriously, the bigger problem isn't the rule, its the lack of consistency. If they can pick one and stick with it and apply it in all games then that should bring some sanity back.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A spurs player ( I think Skipp) was momentarily tugging on Laporte before the ball grazed the former arm.
Question is : which infringement do you call first?
Footballs fooked
As a neutral, the game was an absolute joy to watch. Man city dominating, Tottenham coming back into it.
The penalty.. any referee worth his salt should see that's a penalty. Then to have it looked at and conclude it's still not a penalty is farcical
As for the handball. Absolute joke. There will be no point celebrating goals in the future for fear of a var check in a prior phase of play.
89 minutes of the game was fantastic
1 minute of VAR ruined the whole spectacle
comment by BH_Spurs (U10357)
posted 45 minutes ago
You’ll get a VAR call in your favour soon don’t worry, will probably be against us. It’s just a good job for your sakes that it was not brought in back when you had Pires and Henry diving all over the shop for penalties back in the day.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
pot kettle black from a fan of sir Harry Kane
comment by The Goofy One (U16087)
posted 45 minutes ago
Hit his hand rules are rules. Ref applied it. Correct call. Move on. If there was no VAR people be moaning about the ref and getting offside calls wrong etc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed. Sounds like the poster is watching Spurs more than his own team. Oh and how original. A gooner slagging off VAR when it goes Spurs way.
had he ball grazed a spurs player in the same manner would it be enough to give a penalty, well obviously for the yeah sayers it is.
I thought City were exempt from var
Clearly not
Not sure why VAR gets blamed. Surely it’s the execution of it? It’s still in early stages but it’ll get better. Refs won’t get better. But it’s a positive move in the right direction. Too much money involved for it teams to lose out due to a silly human error.
VAR is total crap IMO bad decisions have always been part and parcel of the game until managers, players and fans started whining like little girls every time there was a wrong decision.
Should have left the damned game as it was and even tho VAR has benefited Spurs twice now at city I still dont want it.
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
VAR
Page 1 of 1
posted on 17/8/19
ubad9jagooner .VAR : don't get the hype ! (U7978)
posted on 17/8/19
It’s an anti Man City conspiracy
posted on 17/8/19
comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 5 minutes ago
ubad9jagooner .VAR : don't get the hype ! (U7978)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We will soon come to the point where the players cannot celebrate a goal until the clowns up there looking at the screen confirm it is a goal.
posted on 17/8/19
It's not VAR. The guys behind VAR are confusing
posted on 17/8/19
Last week at West Ham, a similar ridiculous decision cancelled a goal because a shoulder blade was offside.
posted on 17/8/19
comment by mancini (U7179)
posted 2 minutes ago
Last week at West Ham, a similar ridiculous decision cancelled a goal because a shoulder blade was offside.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Offside is offside - Cant criticise VAR for enforcing the rules correctly
posted on 17/8/19
You’ll get a VAR call in your favour soon don’t worry, will probably be against us. It’s just a good job for your sakes that it was not brought in back when you had Pires and Henry diving all over the shop for penalties back in the day.
posted on 17/8/19
Hit his hand rules are rules. Ref applied it. Correct call. Move on. If there was no VAR people be moaning about the ref and getting offside calls wrong etc.
posted on 17/8/19
comment by BH_Spurs (U10357)
posted 3 minutes ago
You’ll get a VAR call in your favour soon don’t worry, will probably be against us. It’s just a good job for your sakes that it was not brought in back when you had Pires and Henry diving all over the shop for penalties back in the day.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You support a club that has Dele Alli on its book and wum about diving.
posted on 17/8/19
comment by The Goofy One (U16087)
posted 1 minute ago
Hit his hand rules are rules. Ref applied it. Correct call. Move on. If there was no VAR people be moaning about the ref and getting offside calls wrong etc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So why was the penalty call against Spurs ignored. Why was the so called “best referee in England” not overruled?
posted on 17/8/19
comment by ubad9jagooner .Ramsey : don't get the hype ! (U7978)
posted 49 seconds ago
comment by The Goofy One (U16087)
posted 1 minute ago
Hit his hand rules are rules. Ref applied it. Correct call. Move on. If there was no VAR people be moaning about the ref and getting offside calls wrong etc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So why was the penalty call against Spurs ignored. Why was the so called “best referee in England” not overruled?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I can say the same about liverpool versus chelsea why didnt mane get pen why dint they review abrahams dive etc etc. But he handled it and decision was correct you can argue about why it was not used for other situations but they got this call right
posted on 17/8/19
Spurs got a draw because of VAR
posted on 17/8/19
It hit his hand which if it hadn't, what happened would not have happened the way it happened and even if it had happened it would have happened inna different manner.
But seriously, the bigger problem isn't the rule, its the lack of consistency. If they can pick one and stick with it and apply it in all games then that should bring some sanity back.
posted on 17/8/19
comment by Klopptimus Prime - Die Unerträglichen (U1282)
posted 7 minutes ago
It hit his hand which if it hadn't, what happened would not have happened the way it happened and even if it had happened it would have happened inna different manner.
But seriously, the bigger problem isn't the rule, its the lack of consistency. If they can pick one and stick with it and apply it in all games then that should bring some sanity back.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes totally agree. But then that is the same argument from back in the days when Alan Shearer would moan on motd about ref consistency etc. Some people are now acting like ref in the good all days applied the rules consistently all the time. They have just moved on to inconsistency with technology
posted on 17/8/19
comment by Klopptimus Prime - Die Unerträglichen (U1282)
posted 3 minutes ago
It hit his hand which if it hadn't, what happened would not have happened the way it happened and even if it had happened it would have happened inna different manner.
But seriously, the bigger problem isn't the rule, its the lack of consistency. If they can pick one and stick with it and apply it in all games then that should bring some sanity back.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A spurs player ( I think Skipp) was momentarily tugging on Laporte before the ball grazed the former arm.
Question is : which infringement do you call first?
posted on 17/8/19
Footballs fooked
As a neutral, the game was an absolute joy to watch. Man city dominating, Tottenham coming back into it.
The penalty.. any referee worth his salt should see that's a penalty. Then to have it looked at and conclude it's still not a penalty is farcical
As for the handball. Absolute joke. There will be no point celebrating goals in the future for fear of a var check in a prior phase of play.
89 minutes of the game was fantastic
1 minute of VAR ruined the whole spectacle
posted on 17/8/19
comment by BH_Spurs (U10357)
posted 45 minutes ago
You’ll get a VAR call in your favour soon don’t worry, will probably be against us. It’s just a good job for your sakes that it was not brought in back when you had Pires and Henry diving all over the shop for penalties back in the day.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
pot kettle black from a fan of sir Harry Kane
posted on 17/8/19
comment by The Goofy One (U16087)
posted 45 minutes ago
Hit his hand rules are rules. Ref applied it. Correct call. Move on. If there was no VAR people be moaning about the ref and getting offside calls wrong etc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed. Sounds like the poster is watching Spurs more than his own team. Oh and how original. A gooner slagging off VAR when it goes Spurs way.
posted on 17/8/19
had he ball grazed a spurs player in the same manner would it be enough to give a penalty, well obviously for the yeah sayers it is.
posted on 18/8/19
I thought City were exempt from var
Clearly not
posted on 18/8/19
Not sure why VAR gets blamed. Surely it’s the execution of it? It’s still in early stages but it’ll get better. Refs won’t get better. But it’s a positive move in the right direction. Too much money involved for it teams to lose out due to a silly human error.
posted on 18/8/19
VAR is total crap IMO bad decisions have always been part and parcel of the game until managers, players and fans started whining like little girls every time there was a wrong decision.
Should have left the damned game as it was and even tho VAR has benefited Spurs twice now at city I still dont want it.
Page 1 of 1