or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 16 comments are related to an article called:

Effing VAR

Page 1 of 1

posted on 27/10/19

https://mobile.twitter.com/arsenalistrator/status/1188520682860232706

How is that a foul by Chambers

posted on 27/10/19

comment by 4everanarsenalfan (U20629)
posted 2 minutes ago
https://mobile.twitter.com/arsenalistrator/status/1188520682860232706

How is that a foul by Chambers
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly!

comment by OwO (U18355)

posted on 27/10/19

Wait what?! That’s what it was disallowed for?

posted on 27/10/19

comment by Bats (U18355)
posted 1 minute ago
Wait what?! That’s what it was disallowed for?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
By VAR no less. Atkinson, for all his rubbish reffing, initially allowed the resulting goal to stand.

posted on 27/10/19

Why the referee doesn't go and view the incident on the screen is beyond me. So what it means is you effectively have 2 refs running football matches, the on field ref and the var ref.

posted on 27/10/19

I remember them saying that they won't use the screen when they introduced VAR... they'd only have the team "advising" the ref. Which begs the question - why is screen the there?!

posted on 27/10/19

Well the person who allowed that VAR decusion is an illegitimate motherfuc*ing son of a b*tch

posted on 27/10/19

comment by gunnersaurus rex (U21846)
posted 2 minutes ago
Why the referee doesn't go and view the incident on the screen is beyond me. So what it means is you effectively have 2 refs running football matches, the on field ref and the var ref.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You have tonqonder who is in charge of implementing VAR.

Must be a 10 year old on a PlayStation. It can't be adults behind this farce.

posted on 27/10/19

*to wonder.

posted on 27/10/19

VAR just allows Mike Riley to cheat us even more.

comment by OwO (U18355)

posted on 27/10/19

comment by Peace and Quiet (U22014)
posted 24 minutes ago
Well the person who allowed that VAR decusion is an illegitimate motherfuc*ing son of a b*tch
----------------------------------------------------------------------

posted on 27/10/19

Last week it was only for clear and obvious and we were robbed a penalty against Sheffield United. This week the ref interferes in a very debatable foul. Its pure corruption and what a shock barely anything has been said about it

posted on 27/10/19

comment by The One (U22189)
posted 14 minutes ago
Last week it was only for clear and obvious and we were robbed a penalty against Sheffield United. This week the ref interferes in a very debatable foul. Its pure corruption and what a shock barely anything has been said about it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How the Watford pen appeal against Spurs wasn't a clear and obvious error but this apparently was is a mystery

posted on 27/10/19

comment by The One (U22189)
posted 30 minutes ago
Last week it was only for clear and obvious and we were robbed a penalty against Sheffield United. This week the ref interferes in a very debatable foul. Its pure corruption and what a shock barely anything has been said about it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The ref didn't interfere. He let the goal stand. VAR interfered.

posted on 27/10/19

comment by Maul Person (U12977)
posted 54 minutes ago
comment by The One (U22189)
posted 30 minutes ago
Last week it was only for clear and obvious and we were robbed a penalty against Sheffield United. This week the ref interferes in a very debatable foul. Its pure corruption and what a shock barely anything has been said about it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The ref didn't interfere. He let the goal stand. VAR interfered.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, the ref using var. Did you think it was a robot making the calls?

posted on 27/10/19

comment by The One (U22189)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by Maul Person (U12977)
posted 54 minutes ago
comment by The One (U22189)
posted 30 minutes ago
Last week it was only for clear and obvious and we were robbed a penalty against Sheffield United. This week the ref interferes in a very debatable foul. Its pure corruption and what a shock barely anything has been said about it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The ref didn't interfere. He let the goal stand. VAR interfered.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, the ref using var. Did you think it was a robot making the calls?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well if I thought VAR was a robot, then I probably would...

Page 1 of 1

Sign in if you want to comment