What next ban dying? Pc gone mad
Let's face it the experts still haven't a clue.
Why oh why have they have not worked on a vaccine when corona has being a virus just waiting to happen,
Because we are ruled by imbeciles worldwide.
comment by RB&W "PPE for NHS heroes" (U21434)
posted 23 minutes ago
Why is the World in lockdown due to a virus that's killing a third less per day than what is legally killing the populace on a daily basis.
++
Can you really not work this out?
Do you know the difference between a disease which affects an individual and and a virus which is contagious?
Or a persons right choice to choose life.
Are you American?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If cigarettes were banned from tomorrow then potentially 20,000 deaths per day could be saved.
Why would anyone be against saving 3 times more lives per day than this current pandemic?
comment by Ollie Crankshaw (U1734)
posted 3 minutes ago
What next ban dying? Pc gone mad
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh I fecking wish.
Stick me on a trial and I'm serious.
We need guns to shoot the virus
comment by Ollie Crankshaw (U1734)
posted 5 minutes ago
What next ban dying? Pc gone mad
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ban births would be my choice.
comment by Ollie Crankshaw (U1734)
posted 36 seconds ago
We need guns to shoot the virus
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A good shot would do it but not not the lad who tried to take Reagan out.
Maybe give John Lennons shooter day release 👌
It's important to look at the matter in a serious way. I saw a study that found that a much higher percentage of gay people smoke than straight people I don't know why maybe to do with a habit of having something in their mouth. Anyway, I digress. But the fact is that gay people produce less children because they can't reproduce with eachother so they actually create less deaths because they create less births. So technically the more you smoke, the less people die.
Posts like this worryingly confirm that even after blanket news coverage, all types of warnings and information online, some people STILL don’t understand how Coronavirus is spread, and we’re coming to the end of our fourth week of lockdown.
It’s not comparable with smoking.
Where is Stretty when we need him? He will be able to explain how this virus has been able to spread all aflat the world
comment by BruceAndPally (U8201)
posted 29 seconds ago
Posts like this worryingly confirm that even after blanket news coverage, all types of warnings and information online, some people STILL don’t understand how Coronavirus is spread, and we’re coming to the end of our fourth week of lockdown.
It’s not comparable with smoking.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have I said it's comparable with covid-19.
What I am saying is,look at what has happened over the last 3 months compared to what's happened over the last 50-60-70-80 years.
So far more 3x if not more people die from smoking than covid-19.It's as simple as that
It's being proven that smokers are taking the pee out of the virus.
Can't find my rizla's
Is it time that we banned people from choosing to get covid-19?
comment by Why have cotton when you can have silk. (U22200)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
Let's face it the experts still haven't a clue.
Why oh why have they have not worked on a vaccine when corona has being a virus just waiting to happen,
Because we are ruled by imbeciles worldwide.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This comment is imbecile, it's called a novel virus for a reason
I get your point with smoking. But the fact that Covid-19 is already at this stage, having existed for 4 months, and is already up to a third as many times death rate as smoking, tells you how lethal it is.
No point in whataboutery. We have the fastest growing killer since Spanish Influenza here. And in terms of banning smoking outright, see how well that does, in terms of withdrawal. Not feasible
Smoking is voluntary,dying from Covid -19 isn't. Pointless comparison,but hey,it got you some attention,and a lot of 1 stars. Idiot.
comment by Ollie Crankshaw (U1734)
posted 4 hours, 23 minutes ago
Is it time that we banned people from choosing to get covid-19?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I agree. I can't go to my local supermarket without seeing people get it.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
As to the question why it doesn’t get banned, people don’t want to be fully controlled by their governments.
If we were to ban smoking, next comes drinking, then driving cars, then eating various types of food, then any activity that carries risk etc etc
According to UNICEF, 8,000,000 children under the age of 15 die each year due to living in extreme poverty.
I’m sure I read somewhere that living in poverty isn’t voluntary either?
We need to ban poverty. I suggest we shut down the world economy in order to protest against it.
America has now lost 700 jobs for every death from CV19. The cure is worse than the disease.
comment by LoneWolf - Rebel Without A Cause (U22026)
posted 20 minutes ago
According to UNICEF, 8,000,000 children under the age of 15 die each year due to living in extreme poverty.
I’m sure I read somewhere that living in poverty isn’t voluntary either?
We need to ban poverty. I suggest we shut down the world economy in order to protest against it.
America has now lost 700 jobs for every death from CV19. The cure is worse than the disease.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Technically most people don't need jobs to survive. Just need enough food to be produced (by someone), access to clean water and safe accommodation. The job part for most is down to a specific model that may well fail.
This poster is clearly thick.
How many lives would be saved if alcohol and cars were banned? Both contribute to millions of people dying worldwide.
Also, most everything we do is contributing to climate change, which could kill billions... ban almost everything
Alcohol kills 4 million a year and causes human suffering at a level tobacco cannot come close to without counting broken families and social problems, accidents on the roads, home or work where alcohol kills people who haven't drunk it etc. Complete innocents.
Obesity kills 3 million a year. By this logic you have to be stupid to be obese.
Ban Alcohol and obesity Now!!
I'm grateful to alcohol and obesity for reducing the stupid quota in the world.
Sign in if you want to comment
seven million people per year die from
Page 2 of 3
posted on 19/4/20
What next ban dying? Pc gone mad
posted on 19/4/20
Let's face it the experts still haven't a clue.
Why oh why have they have not worked on a vaccine when corona has being a virus just waiting to happen,
Because we are ruled by imbeciles worldwide.
posted on 19/4/20
comment by RB&W "PPE for NHS heroes" (U21434)
posted 23 minutes ago
Why is the World in lockdown due to a virus that's killing a third less per day than what is legally killing the populace on a daily basis.
++
Can you really not work this out?
Do you know the difference between a disease which affects an individual and and a virus which is contagious?
Or a persons right choice to choose life.
Are you American?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If cigarettes were banned from tomorrow then potentially 20,000 deaths per day could be saved.
Why would anyone be against saving 3 times more lives per day than this current pandemic?
posted on 19/4/20
comment by Ollie Crankshaw (U1734)
posted 3 minutes ago
What next ban dying? Pc gone mad
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh I fecking wish.
Stick me on a trial and I'm serious.
posted on 19/4/20
We need guns to shoot the virus
posted on 19/4/20
comment by Ollie Crankshaw (U1734)
posted 5 minutes ago
What next ban dying? Pc gone mad
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ban births would be my choice.
posted on 19/4/20
comment by Ollie Crankshaw (U1734)
posted 36 seconds ago
We need guns to shoot the virus
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A good shot would do it but not not the lad who tried to take Reagan out.
Maybe give John Lennons shooter day release 👌
posted on 19/4/20
It's important to look at the matter in a serious way. I saw a study that found that a much higher percentage of gay people smoke than straight people I don't know why maybe to do with a habit of having something in their mouth. Anyway, I digress. But the fact is that gay people produce less children because they can't reproduce with eachother so they actually create less deaths because they create less births. So technically the more you smoke, the less people die.
posted on 19/4/20
Posts like this worryingly confirm that even after blanket news coverage, all types of warnings and information online, some people STILL don’t understand how Coronavirus is spread, and we’re coming to the end of our fourth week of lockdown.
It’s not comparable with smoking.
posted on 19/4/20
Where is Stretty when we need him? He will be able to explain how this virus has been able to spread all aflat the world
posted on 19/4/20
comment by BruceAndPally (U8201)
posted 29 seconds ago
Posts like this worryingly confirm that even after blanket news coverage, all types of warnings and information online, some people STILL don’t understand how Coronavirus is spread, and we’re coming to the end of our fourth week of lockdown.
It’s not comparable with smoking.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have I said it's comparable with covid-19.
What I am saying is,look at what has happened over the last 3 months compared to what's happened over the last 50-60-70-80 years.
So far more 3x if not more people die from smoking than covid-19.It's as simple as that
posted on 19/4/20
It's being proven that smokers are taking the pee out of the virus.
Can't find my rizla's
posted on 19/4/20
Is it time that we banned people from choosing to get covid-19?
posted on 19/4/20
comment by Why have cotton when you can have silk. (U22200)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
Let's face it the experts still haven't a clue.
Why oh why have they have not worked on a vaccine when corona has being a virus just waiting to happen,
Because we are ruled by imbeciles worldwide.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This comment is imbecile, it's called a novel virus for a reason
posted on 19/4/20
I get your point with smoking. But the fact that Covid-19 is already at this stage, having existed for 4 months, and is already up to a third as many times death rate as smoking, tells you how lethal it is.
No point in whataboutery. We have the fastest growing killer since Spanish Influenza here. And in terms of banning smoking outright, see how well that does, in terms of withdrawal. Not feasible
posted on 19/4/20
Smoking is voluntary,dying from Covid -19 isn't. Pointless comparison,but hey,it got you some attention,and a lot of 1 stars. Idiot.
posted on 19/4/20
comment by Ollie Crankshaw (U1734)
posted 4 hours, 23 minutes ago
Is it time that we banned people from choosing to get covid-19?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I agree. I can't go to my local supermarket without seeing people get it.
posted on 19/4/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 19/4/20
As to the question why it doesn’t get banned, people don’t want to be fully controlled by their governments.
If we were to ban smoking, next comes drinking, then driving cars, then eating various types of food, then any activity that carries risk etc etc
posted on 19/4/20
According to UNICEF, 8,000,000 children under the age of 15 die each year due to living in extreme poverty.
I’m sure I read somewhere that living in poverty isn’t voluntary either?
We need to ban poverty. I suggest we shut down the world economy in order to protest against it.
America has now lost 700 jobs for every death from CV19. The cure is worse than the disease.
posted on 19/4/20
comment by LoneWolf - Rebel Without A Cause (U22026)
posted 20 minutes ago
According to UNICEF, 8,000,000 children under the age of 15 die each year due to living in extreme poverty.
I’m sure I read somewhere that living in poverty isn’t voluntary either?
We need to ban poverty. I suggest we shut down the world economy in order to protest against it.
America has now lost 700 jobs for every death from CV19. The cure is worse than the disease.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Technically most people don't need jobs to survive. Just need enough food to be produced (by someone), access to clean water and safe accommodation. The job part for most is down to a specific model that may well fail.
posted on 19/4/20
This poster is clearly thick.
posted on 19/4/20
How many lives would be saved if alcohol and cars were banned? Both contribute to millions of people dying worldwide.
posted on 19/4/20
Also, most everything we do is contributing to climate change, which could kill billions... ban almost everything
posted on 19/4/20
Alcohol kills 4 million a year and causes human suffering at a level tobacco cannot come close to without counting broken families and social problems, accidents on the roads, home or work where alcohol kills people who haven't drunk it etc. Complete innocents.
Obesity kills 3 million a year. By this logic you have to be stupid to be obese.
Ban Alcohol and obesity Now!!
I'm grateful to alcohol and obesity for reducing the stupid quota in the world.
Page 2 of 3