comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - Son of the Soil (U1282)
posted 44 seconds ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 13 minutes ago
Imagine how many bungs will be involved if they include this ‘legacy’ BS.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed. I can see Man City getting in on legacy even though they have none. Would be typical and your owners are not adverse to the idea of paying money under the table.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Really? We’ve just just been through a lengthy court battle with UEFA and their bent mates and won.

Considering the shame Liverpool brought on UEFA and the rest of football in 1985, a lot of money must have changed hands to get them back up there

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 33 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - Son of the Soil (U1282)
posted 44 seconds ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 13 minutes ago
Imagine how many bungs will be involved if they include this ‘legacy’ BS.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed. I can see Man City getting in on legacy even though they have none. Would be typical and your owners are not adverse to the idea of paying money under the table.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Really? We’ve just just been through a lengthy court battle with UEFA and their bent mates and won.

Considering the shame Liverpool brought on UEFA and the rest of football in 1985, a lot of money must have changed hands to get them back up there
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A heysel dig. Very classy and relevant. If money changed hands why was Liverpool still banned? Obviously City paid off the judges to get off scot free. You can pay people off but but you can't fool people. Your owners modus operandi is well known worldwide.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Feckin hell, has this guy always been such a twаt?

Yes.

We were having a decent debate til that Thorgen tosspot turned up with his childish claims..As soon as I stated some FACTS he got the hump.

Fekin mardarse.

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 10 minutes ago
We were having a decent debate til that Thorgen tosspot turned up with his childish claims..As soon as I stated some FACTS he got the hump.

Fekin mardarse.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Interesting take on things.

What I see is a not too subtle jab at city’s big spending owners followed by you acting like a complete Feckin twаt running around shouting “hysel!” “Murderers!”

Obviously City paid off the judges to get off scot free. You can pay people off but but you can't fool people. Your owners modus operandi is well known worldwide
-----------------------------------------------------

So you think that's a valid comment?

City fought a long and damaging battle against UEFA corruption and obviously mud sticks with a section of people who are blind to the facts.

You might not like some home truths being thrown up about your fans, I don't like a skipful of bull$hit being thrown at mine.

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 10 minutes ago
Obviously City paid off the judges to get off scot free. You can pay people off but but you can't fool people. Your owners modus operandi is well known worldwide
-----------------------------------------------------

So you think that's a valid comment?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Dont try to put words in my mouth or make assumptions about my thoughts.

I think your reaction to a jab was totally disproportionate and pretty childish at best.

I dont care for your “home truths” as you’re simply using it to point score, which is a pretty cretinous thing to do.

comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - Son of the Soil (U1282)
posted 44 seconds ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 13 minutes ago
Imagine how many bungs will be involved if they include this ‘legacy’ BS.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed. I can see Man City getting in on legacy even though they have none. Would be typical and your owners are not adverse to the idea of paying money under the table.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Really? We’ve just just been through a lengthy court battle with UEFA and their bent mates and won.

Considering the shame Liverpool brought on UEFA and the rest of football in 1985, a lot of money must have changed hands to get them back up there
=======================

..and that's not point scoring?

I hadn't mentioned another English club up until that point, I was highlighting UEFA corruption until your mate barged in.

I'll leave you cretins to it, you deserve each other.

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 hours, 12 minutes ago

Obviously City paid off the judges to get off scot free. You can pay people off but but you can't fool people. Your owners modus operandi is well known worldwide
-----------------------------------------------------

So you think that's a valid comment?
=====
This comment was made AFTER you brought up Heysel. Whether you admit it or not there is no justification for bringing up Heysel. You did it because that's you.

Using Heysel to point score. Disgusting.

Legacy teams wud b:
Real Madrid
Milan
Liverpool
Bayern Munich

but its still a buncha bs.

especially the part were 'top' teams cannot transfer players between each other so wil instead strip all the few best players away from 'lesser' teams even more than now.