It’s a bit odd for Ziyech to be useless 90% of the time, yet someone who actually (for all his faults) is capable of scoring is completely abandoned.
Tammy has been a big loss. For me it’s most likely he is not playing because of some sort of disagreement perhaps to do with Tammy leaving in summer. But it’s a shame to be losing him as a goalscoring option as a result
comment by Vorsprung durch Tuchel (U1641)
posted 35 minutes ago
Tammy has been a big loss. For me it’s most likely he is not playing because of some sort of disagreement perhaps to do with Tammy leaving in summer. But it’s a shame to be losing him as a goalscoring option as a result
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I read there were issues between him and the club over a new contract. As he wants a silly contract like the one you gave CHO.
It would explain why he’s not been involved much. He’s not very good, but it seems odd that he’s not been given more opportunities given your struggles in front of goal. So external factors would make sense as to why he isn’t playing.
comment by Scott The King McTominay (U10026)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Vorsprung durch Tuchel (U1641)
posted 35 minutes ago
Tammy has been a big loss. For me it’s most likely he is not playing because of some sort of disagreement perhaps to do with Tammy leaving in summer. But it’s a shame to be losing him as a goalscoring option as a result
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I read there were issues between him and the club over a new contract. As he wants a silly contract like the one you gave CHO.
It would explain why he’s not been involved much. He’s not very good, but it seems odd that he’s not been given more opportunities given your struggles in front of goal. So external factors would make sense as to why he isn’t playing.
--------------------------------------------------------
99% sure this Abraham thing is a contractual issue between him & the club. Otherwise of course he'd be in & around the squad.
The OP knows this, but opening that can of worms brings into question whether CHO's 120k/w contract was a good idea.... which is STRICTLY OFF LIMITS!
Comment deleted by Article Creator
If it were contractual as you all erroneously claim, then Tammy wouldn't have got the minutes at the start of Tuchel' reign or limited mins recently against West Ham or Fulham. He'd be out of the squad permanently. Fullstop.
I expected such 🐂💩 logic to defend Tuchel' wrongdoings.
As for Callum' contract...that is/was a well deserved wage package that merited and reflects Hudson-Odoi' capabilities and high ceiling (no-one is going to tell me otherwise).
Add to fact that...Bayern actively coveted him and offered a record fee (+ £90k p/w) at the time for a teenager in his final year of contract...
Wages fully justified on that basis.
Tammy allegedly wanting parity is fair, given his quality contributions stepping up to this level over the past months.
No can of worms
comment by Devil (U6522)
posted 36 minutes ago
comment by Scott The King McTominay (U10026)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Vorsprung durch Tuchel (U1641)
posted 35 minutes ago
Tammy has been a big loss. For me it’s most likely he is not playing because of some sort of disagreement perhaps to do with Tammy leaving in summer. But it’s a shame to be losing him as a goalscoring option as a result
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I read there were issues between him and the club over a new contract. As he wants a silly contract like the one you gave CHO.
It would explain why he’s not been involved much. He’s not very good, but it seems odd that he’s not been given more opportunities given your struggles in front of goal. So external factors would make sense as to why he isn’t playing.
--------------------------------------------------------
99% sure this Abraham thing is a contractual issue between him & the club. Otherwise of course he'd be in & around the squad.
The OP knows this, but opening that can of worms brings into question whether CHO's 120k/w contract was a good idea.... which is STRICTLY OFF LIMITS!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was predicted that it would cause some issues when he was handed that contract. One of the few instances where Chelsea have facked up their contract management - you’re generally pretty good in this regard.
comment by Scott The King McTominay (U10026)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Devil (U6522)
posted 36 minutes ago
comment by Scott The King McTominay (U10026)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Vorsprung durch Tuchel (U1641)
posted 35 minutes ago
Tammy has been a big loss. For me it’s most likely he is not playing because of some sort of disagreement perhaps to do with Tammy leaving in summer. But it’s a shame to be losing him as a goalscoring option as a result
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I read there were issues between him and the club over a new contract. As he wants a silly contract like the one you gave CHO.
It would explain why he’s not been involved much. He’s not very good, but it seems odd that he’s not been given more opportunities given your struggles in front of goal. So external factors would make sense as to why he isn’t playing.
--------------------------------------------------------
99% sure this Abraham thing is a contractual issue between him & the club. Otherwise of course he'd be in & around the squad.
The OP knows this, but opening that can of worms brings into question whether CHO's 120k/w contract was a good idea.... which is STRICTLY OFF LIMITS!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was predicted that it would cause some issues when he was handed that contract. One of the few instances where Chelsea have facked up their contract management - you’re generally pretty good in this regard.
------------------------------------------------
Tbf he had us over a barrel (with the Bayern interest & length) & drove in no lube style. Respect him, gotta look out for #1. The clubs fault for being in that position to begin with
Tammy allegedly wanting parity is fair, given his quality contributions stepping up to this level over the past months.
--------------------------------------------------
That statement in isolation is true, frankly I'd want more if I was Abraham, which is the problem.
Indeed, cannot really blame the player in that position. But it looks like Chelsea misjudged it, especially as CHO hasn’t really kicked on since getting into the first team (though that injury is hard to foresee).
Frustrating, Wenger project type player. The step up will probably happen, but will be maddeningly slow.
There was no excuse fir not having Tammy at least on the bench for yesterday or a good few of other recent games. I don't mind tunnel persisting with timo but I cannot appreciate in any way shape or fir his treatment if Tammy.
Devil, I wonder if a loan might serve him well.
I think Chelsea are still trying to figure out how they go about doing things with their youth integration.
I think that’s where they lag behind United and Arsenal, despite having a superior academy. There’s obviously more to it than just having the talent.
Could do. He does need a period where he's still in a team regardless of form, but the profile of clubs that'll give him that luxury I'm guessing won't pay half his wages let alone close to the full amount - so it's a risk.
I’m sure Chelsea could cover most of his wages if they really want him to get regular games on loan.
Tuchel will be sacked when Chelsea finish potless and in 5th.
comment by Finally scraped a point. (U16263)
posted 17 minutes ago
Tuchel will be sacked when Chelsea finish potless and in 5th.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, what do you reckon, 20 years time?
comment by JFDI (U1657)
There was no excuse for not having Tammy at least on the bench for yesterday or a good few of other recent games. I don't mind tunnel persisting with timo but I cannot appreciate in any way shape or fir his treatment if Tammy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1393826067522244611/pu/vid/1280x720/ntQUkpwzdSUU-FrB.mp4
That was Tuchel response to the exclusion of Tammy.
Bearing in mind there were TWO LBs on the bench over our top scorer, in a squad of Twenty! (not eighteen). "Hard decisions". Gormless
Comment deleted by Article Creator
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Tuchel, that's the price you pay...
Page 1 of 1
posted on 16/5/21
posted on 16/5/21
It’s a bit odd for Ziyech to be useless 90% of the time, yet someone who actually (for all his faults) is capable of scoring is completely abandoned.
posted on 16/5/21
Tammy has been a big loss. For me it’s most likely he is not playing because of some sort of disagreement perhaps to do with Tammy leaving in summer. But it’s a shame to be losing him as a goalscoring option as a result
posted on 16/5/21
comment by Vorsprung durch Tuchel (U1641)
posted 35 minutes ago
Tammy has been a big loss. For me it’s most likely he is not playing because of some sort of disagreement perhaps to do with Tammy leaving in summer. But it’s a shame to be losing him as a goalscoring option as a result
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I read there were issues between him and the club over a new contract. As he wants a silly contract like the one you gave CHO.
It would explain why he’s not been involved much. He’s not very good, but it seems odd that he’s not been given more opportunities given your struggles in front of goal. So external factors would make sense as to why he isn’t playing.
posted on 16/5/21
comment by Scott The King McTominay (U10026)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Vorsprung durch Tuchel (U1641)
posted 35 minutes ago
Tammy has been a big loss. For me it’s most likely he is not playing because of some sort of disagreement perhaps to do with Tammy leaving in summer. But it’s a shame to be losing him as a goalscoring option as a result
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I read there were issues between him and the club over a new contract. As he wants a silly contract like the one you gave CHO.
It would explain why he’s not been involved much. He’s not very good, but it seems odd that he’s not been given more opportunities given your struggles in front of goal. So external factors would make sense as to why he isn’t playing.
--------------------------------------------------------
99% sure this Abraham thing is a contractual issue between him & the club. Otherwise of course he'd be in & around the squad.
The OP knows this, but opening that can of worms brings into question whether CHO's 120k/w contract was a good idea.... which is STRICTLY OFF LIMITS!
posted on 16/5/21
Comment deleted by Article Creator
posted on 16/5/21
If it were contractual as you all erroneously claim, then Tammy wouldn't have got the minutes at the start of Tuchel' reign or limited mins recently against West Ham or Fulham. He'd be out of the squad permanently. Fullstop.
I expected such 🐂💩 logic to defend Tuchel' wrongdoings.
As for Callum' contract...that is/was a well deserved wage package that merited and reflects Hudson-Odoi' capabilities and high ceiling (no-one is going to tell me otherwise).
Add to fact that...Bayern actively coveted him and offered a record fee (+ £90k p/w) at the time for a teenager in his final year of contract...
Wages fully justified on that basis.
Tammy allegedly wanting parity is fair, given his quality contributions stepping up to this level over the past months.
No can of worms
posted on 16/5/21
comment by Devil (U6522)
posted 36 minutes ago
comment by Scott The King McTominay (U10026)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Vorsprung durch Tuchel (U1641)
posted 35 minutes ago
Tammy has been a big loss. For me it’s most likely he is not playing because of some sort of disagreement perhaps to do with Tammy leaving in summer. But it’s a shame to be losing him as a goalscoring option as a result
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I read there were issues between him and the club over a new contract. As he wants a silly contract like the one you gave CHO.
It would explain why he’s not been involved much. He’s not very good, but it seems odd that he’s not been given more opportunities given your struggles in front of goal. So external factors would make sense as to why he isn’t playing.
--------------------------------------------------------
99% sure this Abraham thing is a contractual issue between him & the club. Otherwise of course he'd be in & around the squad.
The OP knows this, but opening that can of worms brings into question whether CHO's 120k/w contract was a good idea.... which is STRICTLY OFF LIMITS!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was predicted that it would cause some issues when he was handed that contract. One of the few instances where Chelsea have facked up their contract management - you’re generally pretty good in this regard.
posted on 16/5/21
comment by Scott The King McTominay (U10026)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Devil (U6522)
posted 36 minutes ago
comment by Scott The King McTominay (U10026)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Vorsprung durch Tuchel (U1641)
posted 35 minutes ago
Tammy has been a big loss. For me it’s most likely he is not playing because of some sort of disagreement perhaps to do with Tammy leaving in summer. But it’s a shame to be losing him as a goalscoring option as a result
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I read there were issues between him and the club over a new contract. As he wants a silly contract like the one you gave CHO.
It would explain why he’s not been involved much. He’s not very good, but it seems odd that he’s not been given more opportunities given your struggles in front of goal. So external factors would make sense as to why he isn’t playing.
--------------------------------------------------------
99% sure this Abraham thing is a contractual issue between him & the club. Otherwise of course he'd be in & around the squad.
The OP knows this, but opening that can of worms brings into question whether CHO's 120k/w contract was a good idea.... which is STRICTLY OFF LIMITS!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was predicted that it would cause some issues when he was handed that contract. One of the few instances where Chelsea have facked up their contract management - you’re generally pretty good in this regard.
------------------------------------------------
Tbf he had us over a barrel (with the Bayern interest & length) & drove in no lube style. Respect him, gotta look out for #1. The clubs fault for being in that position to begin with
posted on 16/5/21
Tammy allegedly wanting parity is fair, given his quality contributions stepping up to this level over the past months.
--------------------------------------------------
That statement in isolation is true, frankly I'd want more if I was Abraham, which is the problem.
posted on 16/5/21
Indeed, cannot really blame the player in that position. But it looks like Chelsea misjudged it, especially as CHO hasn’t really kicked on since getting into the first team (though that injury is hard to foresee).
posted on 16/5/21
Frustrating, Wenger project type player. The step up will probably happen, but will be maddeningly slow.
posted on 16/5/21
There was no excuse fir not having Tammy at least on the bench for yesterday or a good few of other recent games. I don't mind tunnel persisting with timo but I cannot appreciate in any way shape or fir his treatment if Tammy.
posted on 16/5/21
Devil, I wonder if a loan might serve him well.
I think Chelsea are still trying to figure out how they go about doing things with their youth integration.
I think that’s where they lag behind United and Arsenal, despite having a superior academy. There’s obviously more to it than just having the talent.
posted on 16/5/21
Could do. He does need a period where he's still in a team regardless of form, but the profile of clubs that'll give him that luxury I'm guessing won't pay half his wages let alone close to the full amount - so it's a risk.
posted on 16/5/21
I’m sure Chelsea could cover most of his wages if they really want him to get regular games on loan.
posted on 16/5/21
Tuchel will be sacked when Chelsea finish potless and in 5th.
posted on 16/5/21
comment by Finally scraped a point. (U16263)
posted 17 minutes ago
Tuchel will be sacked when Chelsea finish potless and in 5th.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, what do you reckon, 20 years time?
posted on 16/5/21
comment by JFDI (U1657)
There was no excuse for not having Tammy at least on the bench for yesterday or a good few of other recent games. I don't mind tunnel persisting with timo but I cannot appreciate in any way shape or fir his treatment if Tammy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1393826067522244611/pu/vid/1280x720/ntQUkpwzdSUU-FrB.mp4
That was Tuchel response to the exclusion of Tammy.
Bearing in mind there were TWO LBs on the bench over our top scorer, in a squad of Twenty! (not eighteen). "Hard decisions". Gormless
posted on 16/5/21
Comment deleted by Article Creator
Page 1 of 1