All of those need replacing. In reality, they won`t be.
Spurs will never win anything if that is the core of the team, they will always lose to any half decent side in a semi or a final if they were to get there. Simply not good enough.
Ebdo I like you mate but was a blatant for for Kane’s “goal” today. Bigger question is why Kane done it. Stupid decision
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 1 minute ago
Ebdo I like you mate but was a blatant for for Kane’s “goal” today. Bigger question is why Kane done it. Stupid decision
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can disagree but I'm not having that it was a blatant foul. It is at the very least debatable.
Fair enough mate. To me it looks like Kane’s trying to get the advantage by pushing him and he did, hence the goal. Rightly chalked off imo
comment by Edbo (U17933)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 1 minute ago
Ebdo I like you mate but was a blatant for for Kane’s “goal” today. Bigger question is why Kane done it. Stupid decision
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can disagree but I'm not having that it was a blatant foul. It is at the very least debatable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah absolutely not a blatant free kick
LOL if that was a blatant foul, then Thiago`s was a blatant dive. The ref shafted Spurs by disallowing that goal. May not have made a difference. But every decision over the past three games has gone in Chelsea`s favour.
comment by Edbo (U17933)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 1 minute ago
Ebdo I like you mate but was a blatant for for Kane’s “goal” today. Bigger question is why Kane done it. Stupid decision
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can disagree but I'm not having that it was a blatant foul. It is at the very least debatable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Debatable" is probs fair?
Depends on what team you support, I would have been pashed off with the call but it was a 50/50 call imo amyway
comment by palmers_spur (U8896)
posted 2 minutes ago
Did you go Nick ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep on the picadilly line home now mate. Would be interested to see how many bans are thrown out from the distortion in the shed upper by the east stand. Been a long time since I’ve seen so many punches thrown at footy. Did you go?
Supporters not distortion? Strange iPhone
comment by Insufferable-Piffle, just in case, I'm so... (U4388)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Edbo (U17933)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 1 minute ago
Ebdo I like you mate but was a blatant for for Kane’s “goal” today. Bigger question is why Kane done it. Stupid decision
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can disagree but I'm not having that it was a blatant foul. It is at the very least debatable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Debatable" is probs fair?
Depends on what team you support, I would have been pashed off with the call but it was a 50/50 call imo amyway
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That would 100 per cent not been ruled out had Chelsea, Liverpool, City or United scored it.
It’s a boring pointless fixture. Doesn’t matter how good we are or how bad they are. Or how bad we are and how good they are. Spurs at Chelsea is a home win. That’s fixture could play 100 times and spurs might win 3. Maybe
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by palmers_spur (U8896)
posted 2 minutes ago
Did you go Nick ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep on the picadilly line home now mate. Would be interested to see how many bans are thrown out from the distortion in the shed upper by the east stand. Been a long time since I’ve seen so many punches thrown at footy. Did you go?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No mate. Don’t really get to away games. I was at the home game in September though unfortunately
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by Insufferable-Piffle, just in case, I'm so... (U4388)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Edbo (U17933)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 1 minute ago
Ebdo I like you mate but was a blatant for for Kane’s “goal” today. Bigger question is why Kane done it. Stupid decision
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can disagree but I'm not having that it was a blatant foul. It is at the very least debatable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Debatable" is probs fair?
Depends on what team you support, I would have been pashed off with the call but it was a 50/50 call imo amyway
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That would 100 per cent not been ruled out had Chelsea, Liverpool, City or United scored it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I disagree there but as I said it depends on what team you support?
Can understand why Spurs fans are pashed off though but as a neutral I could see why the ref gave it but that's obvs imo only
Meh
Glad I missed the game, pretty predictable. Didn't deserve anything but pretty unlucky to have Kanes goal ruled out and went 1 0 down because of a worldie, fair play.
Still in a good position with other big games to turn up it.
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by palmers_spur (U8896)
posted 2 minutes ago
Did you go Nick ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep on the picadilly line home now mate. Would be interested to see how many bans are thrown out from the distortion in the shed upper by the east stand. Been a long time since I’ve seen so many punches thrown at footy. Did you go?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My mate told me about this. security must've been crap?
(He hopes)
The line up was so passive. This fixture is touch enough for us as it is, just have a go. Chelsea are hard enough yo score against and with the quality of our defenders we're never keeping them out all game.
Glad for the intl break and for hopefully 2 key men to be back.
comment by Phenom (U20037)
posted 49 seconds ago
Glad for the intl break and for hopefully 2 key men to be back.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You miss Son big time, even off form he offers something that is missing when he's not in the line up
comment by Edbo (U17933)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by palmers_spur (U8896)
posted 2 minutes ago
Did you go Nick ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep on the picadilly line home now mate. Would be interested to see how many bans are thrown out from the distortion in the shed upper by the east stand. Been a long time since I’ve seen so many punches thrown at footy. Did you go?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My mate told me about this. security must've been crap?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There’s a line of stewards between, but there was encroachment let’s say and several punches thrown. A few chelsea fans east upper and several spurs fans shed upper and over hands thrown. A few stewards on receiving end unfortunately
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Insufferable-Piffle, just in case, I'm so... (U4388)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Edbo (U17933)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 1 minute ago
Ebdo I like you mate but was a blatant for for Kane’s “goal” today. Bigger question is why Kane done it. Stupid decision
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can disagree but I'm not having that it was a blatant foul. It is at the very least debatable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Debatable" is probs fair?
Depends on what team you support, I would have been pashed off with the call but it was a 50/50 call imo amyway
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That would 100 per cent not been ruled out had Chelsea, Liverpool, City or United scored it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not aware of chelsea getting many beneficial decisions tbh
comment by Insufferable-Piffle, just in case, I'm sorry! (U4388)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Phenom (U20037)
posted 49 seconds ago
Glad for the intl break and for hopefully 2 key men to be back.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You miss Son big time, even off form he offers something that is missing when he's not in the line up
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Great player obvs and probably biggest big game player but wouldn't have stopped us losing that game.
Hope you enjoyed your day Nick, must be way more confident of hanging in to 3rd at worst now.
If I were a blue the spurs game would be one I'd always go to, guaranteed win and atmosphere of derby
Sign in if you want to comment
Last Six Games Against Chelsea = 0 Goals
Page 1 of 3
posted on 23/1/22
All of those need replacing. In reality, they won`t be.
Spurs will never win anything if that is the core of the team, they will always lose to any half decent side in a semi or a final if they were to get there. Simply not good enough.
posted on 23/1/22
Ebdo I like you mate but was a blatant for for Kane’s “goal” today. Bigger question is why Kane done it. Stupid decision
posted on 23/1/22
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 23/1/22
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 1 minute ago
Ebdo I like you mate but was a blatant for for Kane’s “goal” today. Bigger question is why Kane done it. Stupid decision
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can disagree but I'm not having that it was a blatant foul. It is at the very least debatable.
posted on 23/1/22
Fair enough mate. To me it looks like Kane’s trying to get the advantage by pushing him and he did, hence the goal. Rightly chalked off imo
posted on 23/1/22
comment by Edbo (U17933)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 1 minute ago
Ebdo I like you mate but was a blatant for for Kane’s “goal” today. Bigger question is why Kane done it. Stupid decision
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can disagree but I'm not having that it was a blatant foul. It is at the very least debatable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah absolutely not a blatant free kick
posted on 23/1/22
Did you go Nick ?
posted on 23/1/22
LOL if that was a blatant foul, then Thiago`s was a blatant dive. The ref shafted Spurs by disallowing that goal. May not have made a difference. But every decision over the past three games has gone in Chelsea`s favour.
posted on 23/1/22
What other decisions?
posted on 23/1/22
comment by Edbo (U17933)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 1 minute ago
Ebdo I like you mate but was a blatant for for Kane’s “goal” today. Bigger question is why Kane done it. Stupid decision
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can disagree but I'm not having that it was a blatant foul. It is at the very least debatable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Debatable" is probs fair?
Depends on what team you support, I would have been pashed off with the call but it was a 50/50 call imo amyway
posted on 23/1/22
comment by palmers_spur (U8896)
posted 2 minutes ago
Did you go Nick ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep on the picadilly line home now mate. Would be interested to see how many bans are thrown out from the distortion in the shed upper by the east stand. Been a long time since I’ve seen so many punches thrown at footy. Did you go?
posted on 23/1/22
Supporters not distortion? Strange iPhone
posted on 23/1/22
comment by Insufferable-Piffle, just in case, I'm so... (U4388)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Edbo (U17933)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 1 minute ago
Ebdo I like you mate but was a blatant for for Kane’s “goal” today. Bigger question is why Kane done it. Stupid decision
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can disagree but I'm not having that it was a blatant foul. It is at the very least debatable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Debatable" is probs fair?
Depends on what team you support, I would have been pashed off with the call but it was a 50/50 call imo amyway
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That would 100 per cent not been ruled out had Chelsea, Liverpool, City or United scored it.
posted on 23/1/22
It’s a boring pointless fixture. Doesn’t matter how good we are or how bad they are. Or how bad we are and how good they are. Spurs at Chelsea is a home win. That’s fixture could play 100 times and spurs might win 3. Maybe
posted on 23/1/22
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by palmers_spur (U8896)
posted 2 minutes ago
Did you go Nick ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep on the picadilly line home now mate. Would be interested to see how many bans are thrown out from the distortion in the shed upper by the east stand. Been a long time since I’ve seen so many punches thrown at footy. Did you go?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No mate. Don’t really get to away games. I was at the home game in September though unfortunately
posted on 23/1/22
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by Insufferable-Piffle, just in case, I'm so... (U4388)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Edbo (U17933)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 1 minute ago
Ebdo I like you mate but was a blatant for for Kane’s “goal” today. Bigger question is why Kane done it. Stupid decision
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can disagree but I'm not having that it was a blatant foul. It is at the very least debatable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Debatable" is probs fair?
Depends on what team you support, I would have been pashed off with the call but it was a 50/50 call imo amyway
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That would 100 per cent not been ruled out had Chelsea, Liverpool, City or United scored it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I disagree there but as I said it depends on what team you support?
Can understand why Spurs fans are pashed off though but as a neutral I could see why the ref gave it but that's obvs imo only
posted on 23/1/22
Meh
Glad I missed the game, pretty predictable. Didn't deserve anything but pretty unlucky to have Kanes goal ruled out and went 1 0 down because of a worldie, fair play.
Still in a good position with other big games to turn up it.
posted on 23/1/22
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by palmers_spur (U8896)
posted 2 minutes ago
Did you go Nick ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep on the picadilly line home now mate. Would be interested to see how many bans are thrown out from the distortion in the shed upper by the east stand. Been a long time since I’ve seen so many punches thrown at footy. Did you go?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My mate told me about this. security must've been crap?
posted on 23/1/22
(He hopes)
The line up was so passive. This fixture is touch enough for us as it is, just have a go. Chelsea are hard enough yo score against and with the quality of our defenders we're never keeping them out all game.
posted on 23/1/22
Glad for the intl break and for hopefully 2 key men to be back.
posted on 23/1/22
comment by Phenom (U20037)
posted 49 seconds ago
Glad for the intl break and for hopefully 2 key men to be back.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You miss Son big time, even off form he offers something that is missing when he's not in the line up
posted on 23/1/22
comment by Edbo (U17933)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by palmers_spur (U8896)
posted 2 minutes ago
Did you go Nick ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep on the picadilly line home now mate. Would be interested to see how many bans are thrown out from the distortion in the shed upper by the east stand. Been a long time since I’ve seen so many punches thrown at footy. Did you go?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My mate told me about this. security must've been crap?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There’s a line of stewards between, but there was encroachment let’s say and several punches thrown. A few chelsea fans east upper and several spurs fans shed upper and over hands thrown. A few stewards on receiving end unfortunately
posted on 23/1/22
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Insufferable-Piffle, just in case, I'm so... (U4388)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Edbo (U17933)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 1 minute ago
Ebdo I like you mate but was a blatant for for Kane’s “goal” today. Bigger question is why Kane done it. Stupid decision
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can disagree but I'm not having that it was a blatant foul. It is at the very least debatable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Debatable" is probs fair?
Depends on what team you support, I would have been pashed off with the call but it was a 50/50 call imo amyway
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That would 100 per cent not been ruled out had Chelsea, Liverpool, City or United scored it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not aware of chelsea getting many beneficial decisions tbh
posted on 23/1/22
comment by Insufferable-Piffle, just in case, I'm sorry! (U4388)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Phenom (U20037)
posted 49 seconds ago
Glad for the intl break and for hopefully 2 key men to be back.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You miss Son big time, even off form he offers something that is missing when he's not in the line up
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Great player obvs and probably biggest big game player but wouldn't have stopped us losing that game.
posted on 23/1/22
Hope you enjoyed your day Nick, must be way more confident of hanging in to 3rd at worst now.
If I were a blue the spurs game would be one I'd always go to, guaranteed win and atmosphere of derby
Page 1 of 3