Clubs are doing smarter deals and getting better at balancing the books.
City plus +74. Who does it include?
Our net spend is 0 because over the last two years its been something like 200m.
All figures from
https://www.theguardian.com/football/ng-interactive/2022/jul/06/football-transfer-window-summer-2022-mens-deals-premier-league-la-liga-bundesliga-serie-a-ligue-1-club-guides
comment by (K̇ash) I'm still the Mané - Free Palestine 🇵🇸 (U1108)
posted 7 minutes ago
City plus +74. Who does it include?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Out - Sterling, Jesus, Zinchencko = 120m?
In - Haaland, Phillips, Alvarez = £110m ?
comment by Frenkie van de Hag (U22703)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by (K̇ash) I'm still the Mané - Free Palestine 🇵🇸 (U1108)
posted 7 minutes ago
City plus +74. Who does it include?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Out - Sterling, Jesus, Zinchencko = 120m?
In - Haaland, Phillips, Alvarez = £110m ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
City are pretty good at getting fees for youngsters. Southampton signed a couple of them for decent fees and I'm sure there have been others too
comment by Frenkie van de Hag (U22703)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by (K̇ash) I'm still the Mané - Free Palestine 🇵🇸 (U1108)
posted 7 minutes ago
City plus +74. Who does it include?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Out - Sterling, Jesus, Zinchencko = 120m?
In - Haaland, Phillips, Alvarez = £110m ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Alvarez was signed last year and loaned out.
Guardian has their in as
Haaland
Phillips
Ortega
93.5m
outs as
Sterling
Jesus
Zinchenko
Lavia
Bazanu
Porro
Gyabi
Ikatura
Muric
167ish in.
comment by Frenkie van de Hag (U22703)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by (K̇ash) I'm still the Mané - Free Palestine 🇵🇸 (U1108)
posted 7 minutes ago
City plus +74. Who does it include?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Out - Sterling, Jesus, Zinchencko = 120m?
In - Haaland, Phillips, Alvarez = £110m ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Alvarez was signed in January and loaned out, I believe. They've also sold Lavia, Bazunu, Pedro Porro, and Darko Gyabi for 5m+ each.
comment by merrysupersteve (relaxed about the situation) (U1132)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Frenkie van de Hag (U22703)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by (K̇ash) I'm still the Mané - Free Palestine 🇵🇸 (U1108)
posted 7 minutes ago
City plus +74. Who does it include?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Out - Sterling, Jesus, Zinchencko = 120m?
In - Haaland, Phillips, Alvarez = £110m ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
City are pretty good at getting fees for youngsters. Southampton signed a couple of them for decent fees and I'm sure there have been others too
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think they paid 12 million for the keeper Bazunu
Can't believe we have spent £51m and only have Frenkie De Jong to show for it.
Leicester haven't bought anyone and could easily lose Schmeichel, Tielemans, Maddison and Fofana over the next week.
Chelsea could easily top £200m if they bring in 2-3 more players they've been linked with. Doesn't seem like they can actually sell anyone either, just loans.
Transfermarkt claim City have spent £98m and sold off £144m worth of players.
https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/manchester-city/transfers/verein/281
City always lie about figures. Lets not forget the £20m each Haaland's dad and agent received
City spent £93m on Haaland.
comment by Boudewijn Pahlplatz (U15867)
posted 4 minutes ago
City spent £93m on Haaland.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
itll be the initial fee paid to the club not inc addons or agent fees. Dortmund got 51m but city are expect to pay 90 + with all agent fees etc.
comment by manutd1982 (U6633)
posted 9 minutes ago
Transfermarkt claim City have spent £98m and sold off £144m worth of players.
https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/manchester-city/transfers/verein/281
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For some reason that list hasn't got Lavia and Bazuna transfers to Southampton on it.
comment by manutd1982 (U6633)
posted 9 minutes ago
Transfermarkt claim City have spent £98m and sold off £144m worth of players.
https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/manchester-city/transfers/verein/281
----------------------------------------------------------------------
transfermarkt have started crediting sales of youngsters to the clubs u23 pages. kinda skews things. check man city u23s
https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/manchester-city-u23/transfers/verein/9265
30m is there
comment by InBefore (U20589)
posted 17 seconds ago
comment by Boudewijn Pahlplatz (U15867)
posted 4 minutes ago
City spent £93m on Haaland.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
itll be the initial fee paid to the club not inc addons or agent fees. Dortmund got 51m but city are expect to pay 90 + with all agent fees etc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Same deal with Pogba when he left Juve to go to United. Juve only got £60m for Pogba which is what they wanted. A clear £60m profit. The rest went to other parties.
The money that went to Haalands agent wasn't an 'agent fee'. It was a fixed amount which was part of Haalands contract agreed between Haaland, his agent and Dortmund. Something the buying club had to pay in order to secure his transfer. Much like with Pogba.
comment by manutd1982 (U6633)
posted 21 minutes ago
Transfermarkt claim City have spent £98m and sold off £144m worth of players.
https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/manchester-city/transfers/verein/281
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Missing Lavia and Banzanu.
Transfermarkt attribute funds to B teams from transfers so not the best for this.
Even if City did pay extra for 40m for Haaland they would still be the tightest board in the country this summer.
Do those figures (OP) include wages?
As if only the transfer fee, they don't really give the full outlay for the player.
No i suppose we have to assume that wage budgets remain at around the same levels of previous season or within sight of at least.
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 9 minutes ago
No i suppose we have to assume that wage budgets remain at around the same levels of previous season or within sight of at least.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If the total outlay (transfer fee plus amortised wages) was available, would give a more accurate reflection on the total outlay for the player.
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Who do you think ... (U3126)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 9 minutes ago
No i suppose we have to assume that wage budgets remain at around the same levels of previous season or within sight of at least.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If the total outlay (transfer fee plus amortised wages) was available, would give a more accurate reflection on the total outlay for the player.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What do you mean by “amortised wages”?
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Who do you think ... (U3126)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 9 minutes ago
No i suppose we have to assume that wage budgets remain at around the same levels of previous season or within sight of at least.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If the total outlay (transfer fee plus amortised wages) was available, would give a more accurate reflection on the total outlay for the player.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What do you mean by “amortised wages”?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good explainer:
https://priceoffootball.com/football-transfers-and-creative-accounting-protect-me-from-what-i-want/
Sign in if you want to comment
Premier League spending
Page 1 of 2
posted on 3/8/22
Clubs are doing smarter deals and getting better at balancing the books.
posted on 3/8/22
City plus +74. Who does it include?
posted on 3/8/22
Our net spend is 0 because over the last two years its been something like 200m.
posted on 3/8/22
All figures from
https://www.theguardian.com/football/ng-interactive/2022/jul/06/football-transfer-window-summer-2022-mens-deals-premier-league-la-liga-bundesliga-serie-a-ligue-1-club-guides
posted on 3/8/22
comment by (K̇ash) I'm still the Mané - Free Palestine 🇵🇸 (U1108)
posted 7 minutes ago
City plus +74. Who does it include?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Out - Sterling, Jesus, Zinchencko = 120m?
In - Haaland, Phillips, Alvarez = £110m ?
posted on 3/8/22
comment by Frenkie van de Hag (U22703)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by (K̇ash) I'm still the Mané - Free Palestine 🇵🇸 (U1108)
posted 7 minutes ago
City plus +74. Who does it include?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Out - Sterling, Jesus, Zinchencko = 120m?
In - Haaland, Phillips, Alvarez = £110m ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
City are pretty good at getting fees for youngsters. Southampton signed a couple of them for decent fees and I'm sure there have been others too
posted on 3/8/22
comment by Frenkie van de Hag (U22703)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by (K̇ash) I'm still the Mané - Free Palestine 🇵🇸 (U1108)
posted 7 minutes ago
City plus +74. Who does it include?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Out - Sterling, Jesus, Zinchencko = 120m?
In - Haaland, Phillips, Alvarez = £110m ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Alvarez was signed last year and loaned out.
Guardian has their in as
Haaland
Phillips
Ortega
93.5m
outs as
Sterling
Jesus
Zinchenko
Lavia
Bazanu
Porro
Gyabi
Ikatura
Muric
167ish in.
posted on 3/8/22
comment by Frenkie van de Hag (U22703)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by (K̇ash) I'm still the Mané - Free Palestine 🇵🇸 (U1108)
posted 7 minutes ago
City plus +74. Who does it include?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Out - Sterling, Jesus, Zinchencko = 120m?
In - Haaland, Phillips, Alvarez = £110m ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Alvarez was signed in January and loaned out, I believe. They've also sold Lavia, Bazunu, Pedro Porro, and Darko Gyabi for 5m+ each.
posted on 3/8/22
comment by merrysupersteve (relaxed about the situation) (U1132)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Frenkie van de Hag (U22703)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by (K̇ash) I'm still the Mané - Free Palestine 🇵🇸 (U1108)
posted 7 minutes ago
City plus +74. Who does it include?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Out - Sterling, Jesus, Zinchencko = 120m?
In - Haaland, Phillips, Alvarez = £110m ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
City are pretty good at getting fees for youngsters. Southampton signed a couple of them for decent fees and I'm sure there have been others too
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think they paid 12 million for the keeper Bazunu
posted on 3/8/22
Can't believe we have spent £51m and only have Frenkie De Jong to show for it.
posted on 3/8/22
Leicester haven't bought anyone and could easily lose Schmeichel, Tielemans, Maddison and Fofana over the next week.
Chelsea could easily top £200m if they bring in 2-3 more players they've been linked with. Doesn't seem like they can actually sell anyone either, just loans.
posted on 3/8/22
Transfermarkt claim City have spent £98m and sold off £144m worth of players.
https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/manchester-city/transfers/verein/281
posted on 3/8/22
City always lie about figures. Lets not forget the £20m each Haaland's dad and agent received
posted on 3/8/22
City spent £93m on Haaland.
posted on 3/8/22
comment by Boudewijn Pahlplatz (U15867)
posted 4 minutes ago
City spent £93m on Haaland.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
itll be the initial fee paid to the club not inc addons or agent fees. Dortmund got 51m but city are expect to pay 90 + with all agent fees etc.
posted on 3/8/22
comment by manutd1982 (U6633)
posted 9 minutes ago
Transfermarkt claim City have spent £98m and sold off £144m worth of players.
https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/manchester-city/transfers/verein/281
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For some reason that list hasn't got Lavia and Bazuna transfers to Southampton on it.
posted on 3/8/22
comment by manutd1982 (U6633)
posted 9 minutes ago
Transfermarkt claim City have spent £98m and sold off £144m worth of players.
https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/manchester-city/transfers/verein/281
----------------------------------------------------------------------
transfermarkt have started crediting sales of youngsters to the clubs u23 pages. kinda skews things. check man city u23s
https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/manchester-city-u23/transfers/verein/9265
30m is there
posted on 3/8/22
comment by InBefore (U20589)
posted 17 seconds ago
comment by Boudewijn Pahlplatz (U15867)
posted 4 minutes ago
City spent £93m on Haaland.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
itll be the initial fee paid to the club not inc addons or agent fees. Dortmund got 51m but city are expect to pay 90 + with all agent fees etc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Same deal with Pogba when he left Juve to go to United. Juve only got £60m for Pogba which is what they wanted. A clear £60m profit. The rest went to other parties.
The money that went to Haalands agent wasn't an 'agent fee'. It was a fixed amount which was part of Haalands contract agreed between Haaland, his agent and Dortmund. Something the buying club had to pay in order to secure his transfer. Much like with Pogba.
posted on 3/8/22
comment by manutd1982 (U6633)
posted 21 minutes ago
Transfermarkt claim City have spent £98m and sold off £144m worth of players.
https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/manchester-city/transfers/verein/281
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Missing Lavia and Banzanu.
Transfermarkt attribute funds to B teams from transfers so not the best for this.
posted on 3/8/22
Even if City did pay extra for 40m for Haaland they would still be the tightest board in the country this summer.
posted on 3/8/22
Do those figures (OP) include wages?
As if only the transfer fee, they don't really give the full outlay for the player.
posted on 3/8/22
No i suppose we have to assume that wage budgets remain at around the same levels of previous season or within sight of at least.
posted on 3/8/22
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 9 minutes ago
No i suppose we have to assume that wage budgets remain at around the same levels of previous season or within sight of at least.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If the total outlay (transfer fee plus amortised wages) was available, would give a more accurate reflection on the total outlay for the player.
posted on 3/8/22
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Who do you think ... (U3126)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 9 minutes ago
No i suppose we have to assume that wage budgets remain at around the same levels of previous season or within sight of at least.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If the total outlay (transfer fee plus amortised wages) was available, would give a more accurate reflection on the total outlay for the player.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What do you mean by “amortised wages”?
posted on 3/8/22
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Who do you think ... (U3126)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 9 minutes ago
No i suppose we have to assume that wage budgets remain at around the same levels of previous season or within sight of at least.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If the total outlay (transfer fee plus amortised wages) was available, would give a more accurate reflection on the total outlay for the player.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What do you mean by “amortised wages”?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good explainer:
https://priceoffootball.com/football-transfers-and-creative-accounting-protect-me-from-what-i-want/
Page 1 of 2