But nukes would cause a radiation cloud that could blow over europe
Europe would step in at that point
comment by spyro-12 (U21947)
posted 2 hours, 10 minutes ago
And also interestly the west supports terroism. Although it isnt suprising considering we funded terrorists in syria and libya
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whut u mean “we”?
U live in Vkadivistock
comment by Timmy (U14278)
posted 1 hour, 39 minutes ago
But nukes would cause a radiation cloud that could blow over europe
Europe would step in at that point
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You should really understand what you’re talking about before spouting rubbish.
First of all, tactical nukes are pretty mild in their effects when compared to strategic nukes (the doomsday scenario clearly on your mind). You’re talking about a blast like Hiroshima that affects a radius of about 10 miles.
Also, Russia is closer than the rest of mainland Europe to Ukraine, why would Russia want a nuclear cloud of their own nation?
They’re lethal and I’m sure Ukraine are being careful about gathering in large numbers, but I really don’t see NATO going to war with Russia for a nuke designed to win a battle.
Also, Russia is closer than the rest of mainland Europe to Ukraine, why would Russia want a nuclear cloud of their own nation?
====
Exactly. Russia will never use nukes in Ukraine in any meaningful way because it means poisoning their own people one way or another but also because they would be first to be finished in a nuclear confrontation.
“Private diplomatic back channels, from Washington to the Kremlin, has made it clear that any use of even a tactical nuclear weapon over Ukraine will launch a catastrophic conventional NATO response, and reminds them that war-gaming has shown time and again that this would take no more 30-40 minutes.”
© New York Times.
comment by Timmy (U14278)
posted 1 hour, 39 minutes ago
But nukes would cause a radiation cloud that could blow over europe
Europe would step in at that point
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You should really understand what you’re talking about before spouting rubbish.
++++
I think this applies to every one on here who seems to have unique access to Putins and NATO battle plans and military and security proceedures, his advisors and General's state of minds and intentions.... Oh, and even Putins personal medical records
comment by RB&W - Whiteside has done it again (U21434)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Timmy (U14278)
posted 1 hour, 39 minutes ago
But nukes would cause a radiation cloud that could blow over europe
Europe would step in at that point
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You should really understand what you’re talking about before spouting rubbish.
++++
I think this applies to every one on here who seems to have unique access to Putins and NATO battle plans and military and security proceedures, his advisors and General's state of minds and intentions.... Oh, and even Putins personal medical records
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I said last night he was 70 and not in as good health as he once was. You seem to have taken exception to that, whilst it's just a fact that no 70 year old is as healthy as someone in the prime of their life. You read far far too much into that part of my comment tbh
Although if he was in ill health, they're not going to be shouting about it from the rooftops of the Kremlin, are they? They would do everything in their power to keep it secret
comment by merrysupersteve (relaxed about the situation) (U1132)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RB&W - Whiteside has done it again (U21434)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Timmy (U14278)
posted 1 hour, 39 minutes ago
But nukes would cause a radiation cloud that could blow over europe
Europe would step in at that point
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You should really understand what you’re talking about before spouting rubbish.
++++
I think this applies to every one on here who seems to have unique access to Putins and NATO battle plans and military and security proceedures, his advisors and General's state of minds and intentions.... Oh, and even Putins personal medical records
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I said last night he was 70 and not in as good health as he once was. You seem to have taken exception to that, whilst it's just a fact that no 70 year old is as healthy as someone in the prime of their life. You read far far too much into that part of my comment tbh
----------------------------------------------------------------------
youre too sensitive. Its not just you who talks crap about this conflict.My comment isnt just about you.
Sign in if you want to comment
‘Sick burn’
Page 3 of 3
posted on 9/10/22
But nukes would cause a radiation cloud that could blow over europe
Europe would step in at that point
posted on 9/10/22
comment by spyro-12 (U21947)
posted 2 hours, 10 minutes ago
And also interestly the west supports terroism. Although it isnt suprising considering we funded terrorists in syria and libya
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whut u mean “we”?
U live in Vkadivistock
posted on 9/10/22
comment by Timmy (U14278)
posted 1 hour, 39 minutes ago
But nukes would cause a radiation cloud that could blow over europe
Europe would step in at that point
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You should really understand what you’re talking about before spouting rubbish.
First of all, tactical nukes are pretty mild in their effects when compared to strategic nukes (the doomsday scenario clearly on your mind). You’re talking about a blast like Hiroshima that affects a radius of about 10 miles.
Also, Russia is closer than the rest of mainland Europe to Ukraine, why would Russia want a nuclear cloud of their own nation?
They’re lethal and I’m sure Ukraine are being careful about gathering in large numbers, but I really don’t see NATO going to war with Russia for a nuke designed to win a battle.
posted on 9/10/22
Also, Russia is closer than the rest of mainland Europe to Ukraine, why would Russia want a nuclear cloud of their own nation?
====
Exactly. Russia will never use nukes in Ukraine in any meaningful way because it means poisoning their own people one way or another but also because they would be first to be finished in a nuclear confrontation.
posted on 9/10/22
“Private diplomatic back channels, from Washington to the Kremlin, has made it clear that any use of even a tactical nuclear weapon over Ukraine will launch a catastrophic conventional NATO response, and reminds them that war-gaming has shown time and again that this would take no more 30-40 minutes.”
© New York Times.
posted on 9/10/22
comment by Timmy (U14278)
posted 1 hour, 39 minutes ago
But nukes would cause a radiation cloud that could blow over europe
Europe would step in at that point
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You should really understand what you’re talking about before spouting rubbish.
++++
I think this applies to every one on here who seems to have unique access to Putins and NATO battle plans and military and security proceedures, his advisors and General's state of minds and intentions.... Oh, and even Putins personal medical records
posted on 9/10/22
comment by RB&W - Whiteside has done it again (U21434)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Timmy (U14278)
posted 1 hour, 39 minutes ago
But nukes would cause a radiation cloud that could blow over europe
Europe would step in at that point
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You should really understand what you’re talking about before spouting rubbish.
++++
I think this applies to every one on here who seems to have unique access to Putins and NATO battle plans and military and security proceedures, his advisors and General's state of minds and intentions.... Oh, and even Putins personal medical records
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I said last night he was 70 and not in as good health as he once was. You seem to have taken exception to that, whilst it's just a fact that no 70 year old is as healthy as someone in the prime of their life. You read far far too much into that part of my comment tbh
posted on 9/10/22
Although if he was in ill health, they're not going to be shouting about it from the rooftops of the Kremlin, are they? They would do everything in their power to keep it secret
posted on 9/10/22
comment by merrysupersteve (relaxed about the situation) (U1132)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RB&W - Whiteside has done it again (U21434)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Timmy (U14278)
posted 1 hour, 39 minutes ago
But nukes would cause a radiation cloud that could blow over europe
Europe would step in at that point
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You should really understand what you’re talking about before spouting rubbish.
++++
I think this applies to every one on here who seems to have unique access to Putins and NATO battle plans and military and security proceedures, his advisors and General's state of minds and intentions.... Oh, and even Putins personal medical records
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I said last night he was 70 and not in as good health as he once was. You seem to have taken exception to that, whilst it's just a fact that no 70 year old is as healthy as someone in the prime of their life. You read far far too much into that part of my comment tbh
----------------------------------------------------------------------
youre too sensitive. Its not just you who talks crap about this conflict.My comment isnt just about you.
Page 3 of 3