comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Magnum (2 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Magnum (2 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 38 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by Call Sign (U3627)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 12 minutes ago
On a completely different issue, I see UEFA president Aleksander Ceferin is saying that the rules on multi-club ownership "need a rethink"
Aye very good mate
You've got Jim Radcliffe and a Qatari consortium looking at buying Man Utd......Jim Radcliffe already owns Nice, and any Qatari ownership bid would have the top man at PSG, Nasser al-Khelaifi heavily involved.
Could potentially mean PSG and Man Utd both being owned by the same folk, which would breach UEFA rules, so both clubs couldn't play in the Champions League for example.
Pretty obvious why Ceferin is coming out with this then isnt it?
Before the Super League carry on, Ceferin's best pal was Andrea Agnelli, top man at Juve and chairman of the ECA. Agnelli $hat all over Ceferin and UEFA with the Super League proposals, but one of the big clubs that took fck all to do with the Super League, along with Bayern, were PSG.
So yer Nasser al-Khelaifi at PSG is now Ceferin's best pal, and he is now also the chairman of the ECA, replacing Agnelli.....oh and guess what, any change to the multi club ownership rules would obviously benefit him and the Qatari's if they were to take over Man Utd.
I tell ye....they are corrupt bastirts the lot of them
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you trying to say that people in positions of power and influence deliberately misuse it to benefit themselves and their preferred clubs???
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm saying its pretty clear that people in positions of power and influence deliberately misuse it to benefit themselves and their allies.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good that you're finally getting on board with this idea.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No chance missed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You guys 🤣🤣🤣🤣
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well......to echo Magnums point from the other day...its Rangers who are constantly fighting all the battles with the authorities in Scotland, the rest of the clubs mainly seem to be in alignment
I would imagine for a club to get preferential treatment from employees of the governing bodies....said club would have to have decent relations with the governing bodies....they wouldn't be fighting them at every turn as Magnum put it
Surely that would suggest that every club other than Rangers were the governing bodies "cronies", would it not?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Talk about stretching a point 🤣🤣🤣
i mean, your ex manager admitted you could only buy better players through tax avoidance and still they done all they could to protect you.
to even have the gaul to consider a vote to allow straight access to the top tier was an embarrassment
never mind the nice judge telling us better players doesn't give a sporting advantage..
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided... (U10636)
posted 11 minutes ago
Rumours that the police are pushing to have no away fans at either of the remaining OF games.
WTF has this got to do with Sting anyway?!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rangers pretty much did this anyway when we battered them at Ibrox for a few years on the bounce
comment by JFK (U8919)
posted 2 minutes ago
i mean, your ex manager admitted you could only buy better players through tax avoidance and still they done all they could to protect you.
to even have the gaul to consider a vote to allow straight access to the top tier was an embarrassment
never mind the nice judge telling us better players doesn't give a sporting advantage..
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet its Rangers who want rid of the guy at the top of one of these bodies because he has made it plain as day, on numerous occasions, that he is incompetent...with some of the carry on above, that he was directly responsible for, being evidence of that.
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by JFK (U8919)
posted 2 minutes ago
i mean, your ex manager admitted you could only buy better players through tax avoidance and still they done all they could to protect you.
to even have the gaul to consider a vote to allow straight access to the top tier was an embarrassment
never mind the nice judge telling us better players doesn't give a sporting advantage..
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet its Rangers who want rid of the guy at the top of one of these bodies because he has made it plain as day, on numerous occasions, that he is incompetent...with some of the carry on above, that he was directly responsible for, being evidence of that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're showing signs of a slow but steady decline.
Go out for a walk.
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by JFK (U8919)
posted 2 minutes ago
i mean, your ex manager admitted you could only buy better players through tax avoidance and still they done all they could to protect you.
to even have the gaul to consider a vote to allow straight access to the top tier was an embarrassment
never mind the nice judge telling us better players doesn't give a sporting advantage..
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet its Rangers who want rid of the guy at the top of one of these bodies because he has made it plain as day, on numerous occasions, that he is incompetent...with some of the carry on above, that he was directly responsible for, being evidence of that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You are now arguing against your own corruption comments.
Jim Farry - Rangers fan, held up paperwork to prevent Celtic signing players
Gordon Smith - Head of SFA role - former Rangers player
Hugh Dallas - head of referees - Rangers fan who socialised with Rangers management
Andrew Dallas - referee - as above
John Beaton - referee - member of Rangers supporters club
Now when Rangers went bust and had to apply to join the league set up why were they allowed to join ahead of other clubs who had the necessary paperwork?
Why would Rangers ever want rid of Chief Execs like the above? Yet they want rid of Doncaster for "incompetence".
For the record I don't actually think any of the referees are corrupt but as Stevie eloquently called out that it is a disgrace in football when people are in a position to be able to influence things to progress their club ahead of others...
you missed ogilivie,
the guy who took an EBT from them
comment by Call Sign (U3627)
posted 1 hour, 14 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by JFK (U8919)
posted 2 minutes ago
i mean, your ex manager admitted you could only buy better players through tax avoidance and still they done all they could to protect you.
to even have the gaul to consider a vote to allow straight access to the top tier was an embarrassment
never mind the nice judge telling us better players doesn't give a sporting advantage..
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet its Rangers who want rid of the guy at the top of one of these bodies because he has made it plain as day, on numerous occasions, that he is incompetent...with some of the carry on above, that he was directly responsible for, being evidence of that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You are now arguing against your own corruption comments.
Jim Farry - Rangers fan, held up paperwork to prevent Celtic signing players
Gordon Smith - Head of SFA role - former Rangers player
Hugh Dallas - head of referees - Rangers fan who socialised with Rangers management
Andrew Dallas - referee - as above
John Beaton - referee - member of Rangers supporters club
Now when Rangers went bust and had to apply to join the league set up why were they allowed to join ahead of other clubs who had the necessary paperwork?
Why would Rangers ever want rid of Chief Execs like the above? Yet they want rid of Doncaster for "incompetence".
For the record I don't actually think any of the referees are corrupt but as Stevie eloquently called out that it is a disgrace in football when people are in a position to be able to influence things to progress their club ahead of others...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
OW OW OWWWWWWWWWW <MOONHOWLING>
comment by Magnum (2 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 1 hour, 28 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by JFK (U8919)
posted 2 minutes ago
i mean, your ex manager admitted you could only buy better players through tax avoidance and still they done all they could to protect you.
to even have the gaul to consider a vote to allow straight access to the top tier was an embarrassment
never mind the nice judge telling us better players doesn't give a sporting advantage..
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet its Rangers who want rid of the guy at the top of one of these bodies because he has made it plain as day, on numerous occasions, that he is incompetent...with some of the carry on above, that he was directly responsible for, being evidence of that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're showing signs of a slow but steady decline.
Go out for a walk.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it July already?
Here what about that American businessbird who gave Rangers a KB? They were all like crawling on their belly, whining and scraping for her to peg them and she was like “Naw. Bolt, you fat toolbags”.
Admittedly I haven’t yet read quite all of finer details of the story.
Well it is a marvelous night for a moonhowl.
Here we go...talk about moonhowling
Jim Farry...rightly sacked for what he did, fcking idiot
Gordon Smith, Hugh Dallas, Andrew Dallas, John Beaton....implicated because they are "Rangers men"....ffs that's pathetic.
Simply having an association with Rangers doesn't mean they are corrupt as fck.....I mean, are you saying that anyone with a Celtic association that was ever involved at the top of our governing bodies, or within the referee setup, was clearly a corrupt bastirt that favoured Celtic.....I mean honestly? ffs
As for the events of 2012.......all you lot see is "preferential treatment for Rangers"
The facts are....Rangers were a cashcow that the governing bodies didn't want to lose...so they fought tooth and nail to:
1. Keep Rangers within the league system
2. Place them as high up the league ladder so they were back in the SPL as soon as possible.
The minute this happened....it was evident the blame for all this $hit was always going to be laid at the doors of Ibrox...yet Rangers, in no way, had the authority or the influence to make the SPL, SFA and SFL do what they did...they did it all themselves, because it was in their own financial interests to do so......the only thing they "preferred" was keeping the money within the system. Exact same $hit would have happened if Celtic were the club that make a cvnt of their finances and ended up in such a pickle
If Rangers really had so much power and influence over the governing bodies of this country, why didn't we remain an SPL club? Would have been a case of picking up the phone and making the call surely?
Thought as much. It is only inappropriate when it isn't Rangers.
Ah the Rangers cashcow. The blue pound. All of they teams that went out of business because Rangers weren't in the top flight. Let's list them-
Thanks for reading
I think it’s fairly reasonable to lay all the blame on all that $hit at Rangers door isn’t it?
They caused all of it.
Cause the fans of all the other clubs rallied against rangers and the SFA.
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
I think it’s fairly reasonable to lay all the blame on all that $hit at Rangers door isn’t it?
They caused all of it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly
If Rangers didn't exist then none of that nonsense would have happened. Simples
"Thought as much. It is only inappropriate when it isn't Rangers"
You really need to listen to yourself by the way
Ceferin is looking after himself and his allies
When it was Agnelli, it was him....now it's Nasser al-Khelaifi
Matters not a jot that's it's PSG or Juventus...it's guys that happen to be in alignment with what he wants...and have power though being head of the ECA
What possible use would a skint Rangers in league 3 be to the authorities other than to make money from the TV audience they bring...if it wasn't for that, we would have been out on our erse and rightly so
I say again...the authorities decided what happened in 2012...Rangers were at the mercy of all of that.
In the same vein....what possible good would it do for the SPFL for Rangers to win the league over anyone else, to the extent that they got the refs to give them generous calls...other than this stupid notion that they are all Rangers fans?
It's pathetic this $hite
Tripping yourself up there Stevie to explain why it is bad except when Rangers are involved.
It's enjoyable watching, keep going
Usual OF semi final being played on the Sunday on another embarrassment of a fwcked up pitch.
Showpiece game eh?
I truly despair at times.
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 3 minutes ago
Usual OF semi final being played on the Sunday on another embarrassment of a fwcked up pitch.
Showpiece game eh?
I truly despair at times.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kiltwalk in Glasgow on the same day.
I've tickets for Sir Ranulph Fiennes that night in Glasgow too
comment by Call Sign (U3627)
posted 54 minutes ago
Tripping yourself up there Stevie to explain why it is bad except when Rangers are involved.
It's enjoyable watching, keep going
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm really not but you keep insisting as much
If Rangers didn't exist
—-
Eh. So about that…
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 hour, 9 minutes ago
Usual OF semi final being played on the Sunday on another embarrassment of a fwcked up pitch.
Showpiece game eh?
I truly despair at times.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd sooner play it at parkhead with a 50/50 split than the cowfield it will be after the first semi
comment by PointyBirds (U21890)
posted 25 minutes ago
If Rangers didn't exist
—-
Eh. So about that…
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Poor Rangers
comment by I'm not as think as you drunk I am.......Schizophrenia was my idea!.....No it wasn't!.....You are never alone with a Schizo :D (U2115)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 hour, 9 minutes ago
Usual OF semi final being played on the Sunday on another embarrassment of a fwcked up pitch.
Showpiece game eh?
I truly despair at times.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd sooner play it at parkhead with a 50/50 split than the cowfield it will be after the first semi
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Better at Murrayfield. Neutral venue.
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by I'm not as think as you drunk I am.......Schizophrenia was my idea!.....No it wasn't!.....You are never alone with a Schizo :D (U2115)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 hour, 9 minutes ago
Usual OF semi final being played on the Sunday on another embarrassment of a fwcked up pitch.
Showpiece game eh?
I truly despair at times.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd sooner play it at parkhead with a 50/50 split than the cowfield it will be after the first semi
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Better at Murrayfield. Neutral venue.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The trains back would be carnage 🤣🤣🤣
Sign in if you want to comment
THE GAP AND SIGNINGS
Page 4 of 5
posted on 16/3/23
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Magnum (2 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Magnum (2 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 38 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by Call Sign (U3627)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 12 minutes ago
On a completely different issue, I see UEFA president Aleksander Ceferin is saying that the rules on multi-club ownership "need a rethink"
Aye very good mate
You've got Jim Radcliffe and a Qatari consortium looking at buying Man Utd......Jim Radcliffe already owns Nice, and any Qatari ownership bid would have the top man at PSG, Nasser al-Khelaifi heavily involved.
Could potentially mean PSG and Man Utd both being owned by the same folk, which would breach UEFA rules, so both clubs couldn't play in the Champions League for example.
Pretty obvious why Ceferin is coming out with this then isnt it?
Before the Super League carry on, Ceferin's best pal was Andrea Agnelli, top man at Juve and chairman of the ECA. Agnelli $hat all over Ceferin and UEFA with the Super League proposals, but one of the big clubs that took fck all to do with the Super League, along with Bayern, were PSG.
So yer Nasser al-Khelaifi at PSG is now Ceferin's best pal, and he is now also the chairman of the ECA, replacing Agnelli.....oh and guess what, any change to the multi club ownership rules would obviously benefit him and the Qatari's if they were to take over Man Utd.
I tell ye....they are corrupt bastirts the lot of them
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you trying to say that people in positions of power and influence deliberately misuse it to benefit themselves and their preferred clubs???
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm saying its pretty clear that people in positions of power and influence deliberately misuse it to benefit themselves and their allies.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good that you're finally getting on board with this idea.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No chance missed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You guys 🤣🤣🤣🤣
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well......to echo Magnums point from the other day...its Rangers who are constantly fighting all the battles with the authorities in Scotland, the rest of the clubs mainly seem to be in alignment
I would imagine for a club to get preferential treatment from employees of the governing bodies....said club would have to have decent relations with the governing bodies....they wouldn't be fighting them at every turn as Magnum put it
Surely that would suggest that every club other than Rangers were the governing bodies "cronies", would it not?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Talk about stretching a point 🤣🤣🤣
posted on 16/3/23
i mean, your ex manager admitted you could only buy better players through tax avoidance and still they done all they could to protect you.
to even have the gaul to consider a vote to allow straight access to the top tier was an embarrassment
never mind the nice judge telling us better players doesn't give a sporting advantage..
posted on 16/3/23
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided... (U10636)
posted 11 minutes ago
Rumours that the police are pushing to have no away fans at either of the remaining OF games.
WTF has this got to do with Sting anyway?!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rangers pretty much did this anyway when we battered them at Ibrox for a few years on the bounce
posted on 16/3/23
comment by JFK (U8919)
posted 2 minutes ago
i mean, your ex manager admitted you could only buy better players through tax avoidance and still they done all they could to protect you.
to even have the gaul to consider a vote to allow straight access to the top tier was an embarrassment
never mind the nice judge telling us better players doesn't give a sporting advantage..
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet its Rangers who want rid of the guy at the top of one of these bodies because he has made it plain as day, on numerous occasions, that he is incompetent...with some of the carry on above, that he was directly responsible for, being evidence of that.
posted on 16/3/23
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by JFK (U8919)
posted 2 minutes ago
i mean, your ex manager admitted you could only buy better players through tax avoidance and still they done all they could to protect you.
to even have the gaul to consider a vote to allow straight access to the top tier was an embarrassment
never mind the nice judge telling us better players doesn't give a sporting advantage..
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet its Rangers who want rid of the guy at the top of one of these bodies because he has made it plain as day, on numerous occasions, that he is incompetent...with some of the carry on above, that he was directly responsible for, being evidence of that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're showing signs of a slow but steady decline.
Go out for a walk.
posted on 16/3/23
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by JFK (U8919)
posted 2 minutes ago
i mean, your ex manager admitted you could only buy better players through tax avoidance and still they done all they could to protect you.
to even have the gaul to consider a vote to allow straight access to the top tier was an embarrassment
never mind the nice judge telling us better players doesn't give a sporting advantage..
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet its Rangers who want rid of the guy at the top of one of these bodies because he has made it plain as day, on numerous occasions, that he is incompetent...with some of the carry on above, that he was directly responsible for, being evidence of that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You are now arguing against your own corruption comments.
Jim Farry - Rangers fan, held up paperwork to prevent Celtic signing players
Gordon Smith - Head of SFA role - former Rangers player
Hugh Dallas - head of referees - Rangers fan who socialised with Rangers management
Andrew Dallas - referee - as above
John Beaton - referee - member of Rangers supporters club
Now when Rangers went bust and had to apply to join the league set up why were they allowed to join ahead of other clubs who had the necessary paperwork?
Why would Rangers ever want rid of Chief Execs like the above? Yet they want rid of Doncaster for "incompetence".
For the record I don't actually think any of the referees are corrupt but as Stevie eloquently called out that it is a disgrace in football when people are in a position to be able to influence things to progress their club ahead of others...
posted on 16/3/23
you missed ogilivie,
the guy who took an EBT from them
posted on 16/3/23
comment by Call Sign (U3627)
posted 1 hour, 14 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by JFK (U8919)
posted 2 minutes ago
i mean, your ex manager admitted you could only buy better players through tax avoidance and still they done all they could to protect you.
to even have the gaul to consider a vote to allow straight access to the top tier was an embarrassment
never mind the nice judge telling us better players doesn't give a sporting advantage..
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet its Rangers who want rid of the guy at the top of one of these bodies because he has made it plain as day, on numerous occasions, that he is incompetent...with some of the carry on above, that he was directly responsible for, being evidence of that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You are now arguing against your own corruption comments.
Jim Farry - Rangers fan, held up paperwork to prevent Celtic signing players
Gordon Smith - Head of SFA role - former Rangers player
Hugh Dallas - head of referees - Rangers fan who socialised with Rangers management
Andrew Dallas - referee - as above
John Beaton - referee - member of Rangers supporters club
Now when Rangers went bust and had to apply to join the league set up why were they allowed to join ahead of other clubs who had the necessary paperwork?
Why would Rangers ever want rid of Chief Execs like the above? Yet they want rid of Doncaster for "incompetence".
For the record I don't actually think any of the referees are corrupt but as Stevie eloquently called out that it is a disgrace in football when people are in a position to be able to influence things to progress their club ahead of others...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
OW OW OWWWWWWWWWW <MOONHOWLING>
posted on 16/3/23
comment by Magnum (2 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 1 hour, 28 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by JFK (U8919)
posted 2 minutes ago
i mean, your ex manager admitted you could only buy better players through tax avoidance and still they done all they could to protect you.
to even have the gaul to consider a vote to allow straight access to the top tier was an embarrassment
never mind the nice judge telling us better players doesn't give a sporting advantage..
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet its Rangers who want rid of the guy at the top of one of these bodies because he has made it plain as day, on numerous occasions, that he is incompetent...with some of the carry on above, that he was directly responsible for, being evidence of that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're showing signs of a slow but steady decline.
Go out for a walk.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it July already?
Here what about that American businessbird who gave Rangers a KB? They were all like crawling on their belly, whining and scraping for her to peg them and she was like “Naw. Bolt, you fat toolbags”.
Admittedly I haven’t yet read quite all of finer details of the story.
posted on 16/3/23
Well it is a marvelous night for a moonhowl.
posted on 16/3/23
Here we go...talk about moonhowling
Jim Farry...rightly sacked for what he did, fcking idiot
Gordon Smith, Hugh Dallas, Andrew Dallas, John Beaton....implicated because they are "Rangers men"....ffs that's pathetic.
Simply having an association with Rangers doesn't mean they are corrupt as fck.....I mean, are you saying that anyone with a Celtic association that was ever involved at the top of our governing bodies, or within the referee setup, was clearly a corrupt bastirt that favoured Celtic.....I mean honestly? ffs
As for the events of 2012.......all you lot see is "preferential treatment for Rangers"
The facts are....Rangers were a cashcow that the governing bodies didn't want to lose...so they fought tooth and nail to:
1. Keep Rangers within the league system
2. Place them as high up the league ladder so they were back in the SPL as soon as possible.
The minute this happened....it was evident the blame for all this $hit was always going to be laid at the doors of Ibrox...yet Rangers, in no way, had the authority or the influence to make the SPL, SFA and SFL do what they did...they did it all themselves, because it was in their own financial interests to do so......the only thing they "preferred" was keeping the money within the system. Exact same $hit would have happened if Celtic were the club that make a cvnt of their finances and ended up in such a pickle
If Rangers really had so much power and influence over the governing bodies of this country, why didn't we remain an SPL club? Would have been a case of picking up the phone and making the call surely?
posted on 16/3/23
Thought as much. It is only inappropriate when it isn't Rangers.
Ah the Rangers cashcow. The blue pound. All of they teams that went out of business because Rangers weren't in the top flight. Let's list them-
Thanks for reading
posted on 16/3/23
I think it’s fairly reasonable to lay all the blame on all that $hit at Rangers door isn’t it?
They caused all of it.
posted on 16/3/23
Cause the fans of all the other clubs rallied against rangers and the SFA.
posted on 16/3/23
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
I think it’s fairly reasonable to lay all the blame on all that $hit at Rangers door isn’t it?
They caused all of it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly
If Rangers didn't exist then none of that nonsense would have happened. Simples
posted on 16/3/23
"Thought as much. It is only inappropriate when it isn't Rangers"
You really need to listen to yourself by the way
Ceferin is looking after himself and his allies
When it was Agnelli, it was him....now it's Nasser al-Khelaifi
Matters not a jot that's it's PSG or Juventus...it's guys that happen to be in alignment with what he wants...and have power though being head of the ECA
What possible use would a skint Rangers in league 3 be to the authorities other than to make money from the TV audience they bring...if it wasn't for that, we would have been out on our erse and rightly so
I say again...the authorities decided what happened in 2012...Rangers were at the mercy of all of that.
In the same vein....what possible good would it do for the SPFL for Rangers to win the league over anyone else, to the extent that they got the refs to give them generous calls...other than this stupid notion that they are all Rangers fans?
It's pathetic this $hite
posted on 16/3/23
Tripping yourself up there Stevie to explain why it is bad except when Rangers are involved.
It's enjoyable watching, keep going
posted on 16/3/23
Usual OF semi final being played on the Sunday on another embarrassment of a fwcked up pitch.
Showpiece game eh?
I truly despair at times.
posted on 16/3/23
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 3 minutes ago
Usual OF semi final being played on the Sunday on another embarrassment of a fwcked up pitch.
Showpiece game eh?
I truly despair at times.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kiltwalk in Glasgow on the same day.
I've tickets for Sir Ranulph Fiennes that night in Glasgow too
posted on 16/3/23
comment by Call Sign (U3627)
posted 54 minutes ago
Tripping yourself up there Stevie to explain why it is bad except when Rangers are involved.
It's enjoyable watching, keep going
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm really not but you keep insisting as much
posted on 16/3/23
If Rangers didn't exist
—-
Eh. So about that…
posted on 16/3/23
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 hour, 9 minutes ago
Usual OF semi final being played on the Sunday on another embarrassment of a fwcked up pitch.
Showpiece game eh?
I truly despair at times.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd sooner play it at parkhead with a 50/50 split than the cowfield it will be after the first semi
posted on 16/3/23
comment by PointyBirds (U21890)
posted 25 minutes ago
If Rangers didn't exist
—-
Eh. So about that…
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Poor Rangers
posted on 16/3/23
comment by I'm not as think as you drunk I am.......Schizophrenia was my idea!.....No it wasn't!.....You are never alone with a Schizo :D (U2115)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 hour, 9 minutes ago
Usual OF semi final being played on the Sunday on another embarrassment of a fwcked up pitch.
Showpiece game eh?
I truly despair at times.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd sooner play it at parkhead with a 50/50 split than the cowfield it will be after the first semi
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Better at Murrayfield. Neutral venue.
posted on 16/3/23
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by I'm not as think as you drunk I am.......Schizophrenia was my idea!.....No it wasn't!.....You are never alone with a Schizo :D (U2115)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 hour, 9 minutes ago
Usual OF semi final being played on the Sunday on another embarrassment of a fwcked up pitch.
Showpiece game eh?
I truly despair at times.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd sooner play it at parkhead with a 50/50 split than the cowfield it will be after the first semi
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Better at Murrayfield. Neutral venue.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The trains back would be carnage 🤣🤣🤣
Page 4 of 5