comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by The FONZ (U23102)
posted 17 minutes ago
Nope not relevant as the 3 points were awarded incorrectly. But I think we need to move on - good luck for rest of season.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What's incorrect about awarding three points to the winning sides?
I get this is a WUM article, and you are looking for bites. But at least post correct Facts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not at all.
Why do people assume that if the goal would have stood (obviously correctly) then Liverpool would have won? If that goal stood then Spurs could have pushed forwars%d with more risk and ended up winning by more. They could have lost or drew. Every event changes future events and we will never know.
No one will ever know, but to say Liverpool would have won is stupid.
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 56 seconds ago
Why do people assume that if the goal would have stood (obviously correctly) then Liverpool would have won? If that goal stood then Spurs could have pushed forwars%d with more risk and ended up winning by more. They could have lost or drew. Every event changes future events and we will never know.
No one will ever know, but to say Liverpool would have won is stupid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think in rebuttal to that I would say that to beat a team that was unjustly down to 9 men, you still had to rely on a ladt minute own goal. So to deny we would have won is itself stupid
comment by GeniusGreaves (U1302)
posted 58 minutes ago
Think the op has got tunnel vision and a clearly biased approach to his illogical assertions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Standard Bin Dipper to be fair, 90% of them are like that
comment by The FONZ (U23102)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 56 seconds ago
Why do people assume that if the goal would have stood (obviously correctly) then Liverpool would have won? If that goal stood then Spurs could have pushed forwars%d with more risk and ended up winning by more. They could have lost or drew. Every event changes future events and we will never know.
No one will ever know, but to say Liverpool would have won is stupid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think in rebuttal to that I would say that to beat a team that was unjustly down to 9 men, you still had to rely on a ladt minute own goal. So to deny we would have won is itself stupid
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Shut up mate. You can have the ruled out goal, but you were justly down to 9.
comment by The FONZ (U23102)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 56 seconds ago
Why do people assume that if the goal would have stood (obviously correctly) then Liverpool would have won? If that goal stood then Spurs could have pushed forwars%d with more risk and ended up winning by more. They could have lost or drew. Every event changes future events and we will never know.
No one will ever know, but to say Liverpool would have won is stupid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think in rebuttal to that I would say that to beat a team that was unjustly down to 9 men, you still had to rely on a ladt minute own goal. So to deny we would have won is itself stupid
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I literally said all 3 results could have happened. Your article said you would have won. It's quite simple really.
You have won games as a result of referred decisions too.
comment by The FONZ (U23102)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 56 seconds ago
Why do people assume that if the goal would have stood (obviously correctly) then Liverpool would have won? If that goal stood then Spurs could have pushed forwars%d with more risk and ended up winning by more. They could have lost or drew. Every event changes future events and we will never know.
No one will ever know, but to say Liverpool would have won is stupid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think in rebuttal to that I would say that to beat a team that was unjustly down to 9 men, you still had to rely on a ladt minute own goal. So to deny we would have won is itself stupid
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There was nothing unjust about having 2 players sent off, Jota was let off with a yellow just before his dodgy booking.
The reason Saltypudlians cry so much on the extremely rare occasions they are on the wrong end of a bad decision is because they are so used to most decisions going in their favour, the list of bad decisions benefiting Varpool is endless.
Guys I don't think we are on the same page in terms of debating protocols so will scoot. Cheers
comment by The FONZ (U23102)
posted 4 minutes ago
Guys I don't think we are on the same page in terms of debating protocols so will scoot. Cheers
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah piiisss off, and don’t come back. Mug.
He's obviously on the Wum, and like all scousers thick as two planks.
Pranks aside.
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 1 hour, 32 minutes ago
He's obviously on the Wum, and like all scousers thick as two planks.
Pranks aside.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sandy construing others as on the WUM - the classic example of art imitating life. Nice - thanks!
Anyone believe this was accidentally put on the Spurs board?
Nah...me neither.
If a Spurs fan posted similar on the Varpool board, it would be taken down within seconds of going up, such is the mentality of the Saltypudlians
Why are people engaging with this brainless fool? GB's less intelligent brother and uncle.
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 59 seconds ago
Why are people engaging with this brainless fool? GB's less intelligent brother and uncle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's not very nice.
Sign in if you want to comment
Ten games in
Page 2 of 2
posted on 3/11/23
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by The FONZ (U23102)
posted 17 minutes ago
Nope not relevant as the 3 points were awarded incorrectly. But I think we need to move on - good luck for rest of season.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What's incorrect about awarding three points to the winning sides?
I get this is a WUM article, and you are looking for bites. But at least post correct Facts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not at all.
posted on 3/11/23
Why do people assume that if the goal would have stood (obviously correctly) then Liverpool would have won? If that goal stood then Spurs could have pushed forwars%d with more risk and ended up winning by more. They could have lost or drew. Every event changes future events and we will never know.
No one will ever know, but to say Liverpool would have won is stupid.
posted on 3/11/23
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 56 seconds ago
Why do people assume that if the goal would have stood (obviously correctly) then Liverpool would have won? If that goal stood then Spurs could have pushed forwars%d with more risk and ended up winning by more. They could have lost or drew. Every event changes future events and we will never know.
No one will ever know, but to say Liverpool would have won is stupid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think in rebuttal to that I would say that to beat a team that was unjustly down to 9 men, you still had to rely on a ladt minute own goal. So to deny we would have won is itself stupid
posted on 3/11/23
comment by GeniusGreaves (U1302)
posted 58 minutes ago
Think the op has got tunnel vision and a clearly biased approach to his illogical assertions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Standard Bin Dipper to be fair, 90% of them are like that
posted on 3/11/23
comment by The FONZ (U23102)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 56 seconds ago
Why do people assume that if the goal would have stood (obviously correctly) then Liverpool would have won? If that goal stood then Spurs could have pushed forwars%d with more risk and ended up winning by more. They could have lost or drew. Every event changes future events and we will never know.
No one will ever know, but to say Liverpool would have won is stupid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think in rebuttal to that I would say that to beat a team that was unjustly down to 9 men, you still had to rely on a ladt minute own goal. So to deny we would have won is itself stupid
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Shut up mate. You can have the ruled out goal, but you were justly down to 9.
posted on 3/11/23
comment by The FONZ (U23102)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 56 seconds ago
Why do people assume that if the goal would have stood (obviously correctly) then Liverpool would have won? If that goal stood then Spurs could have pushed forwars%d with more risk and ended up winning by more. They could have lost or drew. Every event changes future events and we will never know.
No one will ever know, but to say Liverpool would have won is stupid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think in rebuttal to that I would say that to beat a team that was unjustly down to 9 men, you still had to rely on a ladt minute own goal. So to deny we would have won is itself stupid
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I literally said all 3 results could have happened. Your article said you would have won. It's quite simple really.
You have won games as a result of referred decisions too.
posted on 3/11/23
comment by The FONZ (U23102)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 56 seconds ago
Why do people assume that if the goal would have stood (obviously correctly) then Liverpool would have won? If that goal stood then Spurs could have pushed forwars%d with more risk and ended up winning by more. They could have lost or drew. Every event changes future events and we will never know.
No one will ever know, but to say Liverpool would have won is stupid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think in rebuttal to that I would say that to beat a team that was unjustly down to 9 men, you still had to rely on a ladt minute own goal. So to deny we would have won is itself stupid
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There was nothing unjust about having 2 players sent off, Jota was let off with a yellow just before his dodgy booking.
The reason Saltypudlians cry so much on the extremely rare occasions they are on the wrong end of a bad decision is because they are so used to most decisions going in their favour, the list of bad decisions benefiting Varpool is endless.
posted on 3/11/23
Guys I don't think we are on the same page in terms of debating protocols so will scoot. Cheers
posted on 3/11/23
comment by The FONZ (U23102)
posted 4 minutes ago
Guys I don't think we are on the same page in terms of debating protocols so will scoot. Cheers
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah piiisss off, and don’t come back. Mug.
posted on 3/11/23
He's obviously on the Wum, and like all scousers thick as two planks.
Pranks aside.
posted on 3/11/23
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 1 hour, 32 minutes ago
He's obviously on the Wum, and like all scousers thick as two planks.
Pranks aside.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sandy construing others as on the WUM - the classic example of art imitating life. Nice - thanks!
posted on 3/11/23
Anyone believe this was accidentally put on the Spurs board?
Nah...me neither.
posted on 3/11/23
If a Spurs fan posted similar on the Varpool board, it would be taken down within seconds of going up, such is the mentality of the Saltypudlians
posted on 3/11/23
Why are people engaging with this brainless fool? GB's less intelligent brother and uncle.
posted on 3/11/23
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 59 seconds ago
Why are people engaging with this brainless fool? GB's less intelligent brother and uncle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's not very nice.
Page 2 of 2