or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 95 comments are related to an article called:

New stadium looks likely

Page 2 of 4

posted on 8/3/24

comment by Champers - Pow! Right in the kisser (U6859)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by RB&W - One man down, One nil up (U21434)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Baz tard - Ineos your face, proud owner of the 100k comment, fack you Michael Edward’s and your 5m, th (U19119)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by RB&W - One man down, One nil up (U21434)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Baz tard - Ineos your face, proud owner of the 100k comment, fack you Michael Edward’s and your 5m, th (U19119)
posted 1 minute ago
That said, is it reasonable to want him to self-fund a stadium? He owns what - 29%? - of the club.



The club should fund it. No PL club should be using tax payers money given the amount they rake in each year. I can’t think of a less worthy use
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Manchester Council indirectly built City a new stadium with public money
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know, they shouldn’t have. West Ham also similar.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Andy Burhnam and Tom Ross have been appointed on the Task Force. Looks like tax payers money could be spent in this project. It will create hundreds of new jobs so it will be good news for Greater Manchester
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not a single penny should come from the taxpayer. If you can spend hundreds of millions of pounds on players every season, then you can pay for your own stadium upgrades.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This

posted on 8/3/24

Same goes for any club

posted on 8/3/24

I wonder what Tory darling, Seb Coe thinks he'll get out of the deal?

You'll probably end up playing in London if he gets his way.

posted on 8/3/24

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
I wonder what Tory darling, Seb Coe thinks he'll get out of the deal?

You'll probably end up playing in London if he gets his way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
it will be another athletics stadium in Manchester if Coe has anything to do with it.

posted on 8/3/24

Can’t believe the idea of tax payers funding a stadium for a football club is getting any traction whatsoever.

posted on 8/3/24

comment by JonVeron (U6514)
posted 5 hours, 6 minutes ago
I’ll be absolutely gutted if they go for a new stadium.
Surely OT isn’t that far gone that it can’t be rejuvenated into a fantastic stadium?

And using taxpayers money, well that’s embarrassing.

So disillusioned and distanced from this once great club, these days
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What kind of state was Madrids ground in? Don’t a fantastic job on that.

posted on 8/3/24

comment by Baz tard - Ineos your face, proud owner of the 100k comment, fack you Michael Edward’s and your 5m, th (U19119)
posted 6 hours, 22 minutes ago
Big Jim, billionaire using tax payers money…
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Probably contributed FARRRR more than you and I, and taken much less out.

posted on 8/3/24

comment by FFS Mike. (U1170)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by JonVeron (U6514)
posted 5 hours, 6 minutes ago
I’ll be absolutely gutted if they go for a new stadium.
Surely OT isn’t that far gone that it can’t be rejuvenated into a fantastic stadium?

And using taxpayers money, well that’s embarrassing.

So disillusioned and distanced from this once great club, these days
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What kind of state was Madrids ground in? Don’t a fantastic job on that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
OT cant even be a basic bowl shaped stadium without re-building underground railway stations and infrastructure and buying out many families out of their own homes on Station Road. Its a non starter to compare its potential to what Madrid have created with a retractable roof.

If United want a magical stadium to compete with the very best... it needs rebuiding furter back from its current location. Which is actually possible.

posted on 9/3/24

*Railway Road

posted on 9/3/24

comment by RB&W - One man down, One nil up (U21434)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by FFS Mike. (U1170)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by JonVeron (U6514)
posted 5 hours, 6 minutes ago
I’ll be absolutely gutted if they go for a new stadium.
Surely OT isn’t that far gone that it can’t be rejuvenated into a fantastic stadium?

And using taxpayers money, well that’s embarrassing.

So disillusioned and distanced from this once great club, these days
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What kind of state was Madrids ground in? Don’t a fantastic job on that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
OT cant even be a basic bowl shaped stadium without re-building underground railway stations and infrastructure and buying out many families out of their own homes on Station Road. Its a non starter to compare its potential to what Madrid have created with a retractable roof.

If United want a magical stadium to compete with the very best... it needs rebuiding furter back from its current location. Which is actually possible.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Biggest in Britain. Its only whinging fans and pundits maoning about the 'facilities'

posted on 9/3/24

comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RB&W - One man down, One nil up (U21434)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by FFS Mike. (U1170)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by JonVeron (U6514)
posted 5 hours, 6 minutes ago
I’ll be absolutely gutted if they go for a new stadium.
Surely OT isn’t that far gone that it can’t be rejuvenated into a fantastic stadium?

And using taxpayers money, well that’s embarrassing.

So disillusioned and distanced from this once great club, these days
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What kind of state was Madrids ground in? Don’t a fantastic job on that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
OT cant even be a basic bowl shaped stadium without re-building underground railway stations and infrastructure and buying out many families out of their own homes on Station Road. Its a non starter to compare its potential to what Madrid have created Biggest in Britain. Its only whinging fans and pundits maoning about the 'facilities'
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is. Mainly by fans that have never visited the existing stadium and probably never will.

I dont sit in OT everyweek and think what a chithole this building is. I think, here we go again, what kind of a chitshow am I getting today.

posted on 9/3/24

comment by RB&W - One man down, One nil up (U21434)
posted 9 hours, 36 minutes ago
comment by Baz tard - Ineos your face, proud owner of the 100k comment, fack you Michael Edward’s and your 5m, th (U19119)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by RB&W - One man down, One nil up (U21434)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Baz tard - Ineos your face, proud owner of the 100k comment, fack you Michael Edward’s and your 5m, th (U19119)
posted 1 minute ago
That said, is it reasonable to want him to self-fund a stadium? He owns what - 29%? - of the club.



The club should fund it. No PL club should be using tax payers money given the amount they rake in each year. I can’t think of a less worthy use
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Manchester Council indirectly built City a new stadium with public money
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know, they shouldn’t have. West Ham also similar.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Andy Burhnam and Tom Ross have been appointed on the Task Force. Looks like tax payers money could be spent in this project. It will create hundreds of new jobs so it will be good news for Greater Manchester
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What a load of nonsense, it’ll create new jobs whoever pays it. One of the biggest clubs in the world trying to rip off the man in the street. No doubt they’ll put ticket prices up to get whatever money they do put in themselves just to double down.

It’s utterly shameless.

posted on 9/3/24

comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 5 hours, 24 minutes ago
comment by Baz tard - Ineos your face, proud owner of the 100k comment, fack you Michael Edward’s and your 5m, th (U19119)
posted 6 hours, 22 minutes ago
Big Jim, billionaire using tax payers money…
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Probably contributed FARRRR more than you and I, and taken much less out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s incredibly embarrassing justification.

posted on 9/3/24

First thing on a Saturday and Term is angry again.

This time about something that hasn’t actually happened.

posted on 9/3/24

What I’ve read seems fair comment to me.

It’s a huge project and should involve regeneration of the area, not just the stadium.

Obviously they’ll look at financing options. That would be true of any capital investment on this scale. That doesn’t mean public money necessarily. There’s a lot of naivety on display here.

posted on 9/3/24

Lord Coe is a weird choice. Its his arrogance that saw the OS built with no plan for the future. The Olympic Legacy fund had to pour another 280m in to convert it for West Ham who rent it for relative peanuts. Its original budget almost doubled. All tax payers money

At least the Etihad was developed with a vision about how it would not be a costly white elephant

I wouldn't trust this guys opinion whatsoever. Jobs for the boys.

posted on 9/3/24

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
First thing on a Saturday and Term is angry again.

This time about something that hasn’t actually happened.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m not even replying to you and yet here you are. I think it’s safe to say that we all know who the sad little man is.

posted on 9/3/24

comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
First thing on a Saturday and Term is angry again.

This time about something that hasn’t actually happened.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m not even replying to you and yet here you are. I think it’s safe to say that we all know who the sad little man is.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I’m commenting on an article about United’s new stadium.

Wasn’t surprised to see you foaming at the mouth as usual, but it’s even funnier when it’s about something that hasn’t actually happened.

posted on 9/3/24

comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 8 hours, 8 minutes ago
comment by Baz tard - Ineos your face, proud owner of the 100k comment, fack you Michael Edward’s and your 5m, th (U19119)
posted 6 hours, 22 minutes ago
Big Jim, billionaire using tax payers money…
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Probably contributed FARRRR more than you and I, and taken much less out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I doubt it. He’ll have avoided paying as much as possible, any loophole, probably another reason why he wanted brexit. Does he even live in the uk?

posted on 9/3/24

There's a lot of premature indignation here. Public money being spent on the wider regeneration project is quite likely and if done well, likely to have public good. If that is part of the project, then it makes it easier for the club to raise private money to finance the stadium, because better infrastructure and a thriving area around the stadium make the stadium business model much more viable.

posted on 9/3/24

comment by Baz tard - Ineos your face, proud owner of the 100k comment, fack you Michael Edward’s and your 5m, th (U19119)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 8 hours, 8 minutes ago
comment by Baz tard - Ineos your face, proud owner of the 100k comment, fack you Michael Edward’s and your 5m, th (U19119)
posted 6 hours, 22 minutes ago
Big Jim, billionaire using tax payers money…
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Probably contributed FARRRR more than you and I, and taken much less out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I doubt it. He’ll have avoided paying as much as possible, any loophole, probably another reason why he wanted brexit. Does he even live in the uk?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Lives in Monaco I think.

In his lifetime he’s paid loads more than any of us, but now he’s a tax dodging greedy caant.

comment by Scouse (U9675)

posted on 9/3/24

That Brexit supporting caant was bragging about his new Grenadier being built in Britain, until he built it in France. Probably got an EU passport too like Farage?

I hate the hypocritical caants.

comment by Keano (U11635)

posted on 9/3/24

What a deal for the glazers ! Years of greed, incompetence and neglect rewarded with a brand new state of the art stadium funded by UK tax payers.

As said previously the same thing happened in Tampa in the 90's when the tax payers funded a new stadium for them as a result of them threatening to move the Buccaneers to another city.

posted on 9/3/24

His decision to quit Britain came soon after he was knighted by the Queen for “services to business and investment”, and the UK voted to leave the European Union.

Ratcliffe, the founder and chief executive of petrochemicals company Ineos, was an ardent supporter of the vote leave campaign, declaring that the UK would thrive without red tape from Brussels.

posted on 9/3/24

comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 3 hours, 14 minutes ago
comment by RB&W - One man down, One nil up (U21434)
posted 9 hours, 36 minutes ago
comment by Baz tard - Ineos your face, proud owner of the 100k comment, fack you Michael Edward’s and your 5m, th (U19119)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by RB&W - One man down, One nil up (U21434)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Baz tard - Ineos your face, proud owner of the 100k comment, fack you Michael Edward’s and your 5m, th (U19119)
posted 1 minute ago
That said, is it reasonable to want him to self-fund a stadium? He owns what - 29%? - of the club.



The club should fund it. No PL club should be using tax payers money given the amount they rake in each year. I can’t think of a less worthy use
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Manchester Council indirectly built City a new stadium with public money
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know, they shouldn’t have. West Ham also similar.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Andy Burhnam and Tom Ross have been appointed on the Task Force. Looks like tax payers money could be spent in this project. It will create hundreds of new jobs so it will be good news for Greater Manchester
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What a load of nonsense, it’ll create new jobs whoever pays it. One of the biggest clubs in the world trying to rip off the man in the street. No doubt they’ll put ticket prices up to get whatever money they do put in themselves just to double down.

It’s utterly shameless.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
its a regenerating of a whole area around Old Trafford Gorse Hill and will probably be extended over the canal into Media City. Its a massive project that will affect, employ, and benefit many many people. It would be a sandal if Public and Private money wasnt involved in this project to create more stakeholders than just MUFC

Page 2 of 4

Sign in if you want to comment