De Zerbi has backed the move/player too, so expect it to happen in next day or two:
According to reports, Marseille manager Roberto De Zerbi - who quit Brighton at the end of the season - said: "I don't know his [Greenwood's] past.
"I don't know exactly what happened. Honestly, I don't like interfering in players' lives. I have nothing to say about this.
"The only thing I can tell you - it doesn't matter who the player is. Once he signs for the club where I work, so here, they become like my children. I protect them against all the odds."
The Italian, who spent two years at Brighton, said Greenwood had not yet been signed "so there's no point in talking" but added: "What I can say is that he is a champion, an international level player."
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 45 minutes ago
comment by rosso says the time has come to unlock the unlimited Pote-ntial of the Fernçalvenoo triumvirate (U17054)
posted 13 hours, 35 minutes ago
comment by Don Draper's dandruff (U20155)
posted 41 minutes ago
comment by Bãleș left boot anti Dutch since 2024 (U22081)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 1 hour, 17 minutes ago
Mayor of Marseille's had a few words to say about it apparently...
https://x.com/Sport_Witness/status/1810742709512020080
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair play. You don't want your city to look like a bunch of caants
----------------------------------------------------------------------
he's really giving it both barrels, probably libellous, but doesn't seem to give a merde
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s only libellous if Greenwood really wants to argue in a court of law that he didn’t beat his girlfriend.
And I don’t think he really wants to do that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whichever club he goes to, there are going to be people that voice their concerns over the move. The bigger the club, the more people are going to be against it.
Everything that we are hearing is that he wants this move, so I reckon it will get done, irrespective of the Mayor's comments.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Everything we are hearing???
The Guardian are saying that that deal is agreed pending personal terms:
The deal is for a guaranteed €27.6m plus €4m in add-ons and if the 22-year-old can come to contractual agreement with Marseille and joins, his troubled United career will end. It is understood the sell-on clause is 40-50% of any fee.
Not a bad bit of business for someone that was never going to be able to play for us again after that audio was released. Think we've done ok here.
I wonder what role he will play at Marseille
comment by Jim Duffy (U1734)
posted 15 minutes ago
I wonder what role he will play at Marseille
----------------------------------------------------------------------
His.role? Play maker surely?
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 19 minutes ago
The Guardian are saying that that deal is agreed pending personal terms:
The deal is for a guaranteed €27.6m plus €4m in add-ons and if the 22-year-old can come to contractual agreement with Marseille and joins, his troubled United career will end. It is understood the sell-on clause is 40-50% of any fee.
Not a bad bit of business for someone that was never going to be able to play for us again after that audio was released. Think we've done ok here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nonsense.
He is better than anything we have, and shoukd cost any buying clubs £60-70m.
Terrible deal to appease the softy, modern day fan.
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 19 minutes ago
The Guardian are saying that that deal is agreed pending personal terms:
The deal is for a guaranteed €27.6m plus €4m in add-ons and if the 22-year-old can come to contractual agreement with Marseille and joins, his troubled United career will end. It is understood the sell-on clause is 40-50% of any fee.
Not a bad bit of business for someone that was never going to be able to play for us again after that audio was released. Think we've done ok here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nonsense.
He is better than anything we have, and shoukd cost any buying clubs £60-70m.
Terrible deal to appease the softy, modern day fan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
See? You can have an opinion and I back your right to do so but calling those who disagree “softly” is wrong, different points can be made
comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 2 hours, 44 minutes ago
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 19 minutes ago
The Guardian are saying that that deal is agreed pending personal terms:
The deal is for a guaranteed €27.6m plus €4m in add-ons and if the 22-year-old can come to contractual agreement with Marseille and joins, his troubled United career will end. It is understood the sell-on clause is 40-50% of any fee.
Not a bad bit of business for someone that was never going to be able to play for us again after that audio was released. Think we've done ok here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nonsense.
He is better than anything we have, and shoukd cost any buying clubs £60-70m.
Terrible deal to appease the softy, modern day fan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
See? You can have an opinion and I back your right to do so but calling those who disagree “softly” is wrong, different points can be made
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think its wrong.
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 2 hours, 44 minutes ago
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 19 minutes ago
The Guardian are saying that that deal is agreed pending personal terms:
The deal is for a guaranteed €27.6m plus €4m in add-ons and if the 22-year-old can come to contractual agreement with Marseille and joins, his troubled United career will end. It is understood the sell-on clause is 40-50% of any fee.
Not a bad bit of business for someone that was never going to be able to play for us again after that audio was released. Think we've done ok here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nonsense.
He is better than anything we have, and shoukd cost any buying clubs £60-70m.
Terrible deal to appease the softy, modern day fan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
See? You can have an opinion and I back your right to do so but calling those who disagree “softly” is wrong, different points can be made
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think its wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's because you are a moron
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 47 minutes ago
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 2 hours, 44 minutes ago
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 19 minutes ago
The Guardian are saying that that deal is agreed pending personal terms:
The deal is for a guaranteed €27.6m plus €4m in add-ons and if the 22-year-old can come to contractual agreement with Marseille and joins, his troubled United career will end. It is understood the sell-on clause is 40-50% of any fee.
Not a bad bit of business for someone that was never going to be able to play for us again after that audio was released. Think we've done ok here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nonsense.
He is better than anything we have, and shoukd cost any buying clubs £60-70m.
Terrible deal to appease the softy, modern day fan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
See? You can have an opinion and I back your right to do so but calling those who disagree “softly” is wrong, different points can be made
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think its wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's because you are a moron
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course he is a moron. Greenwood is damaged goods. To get about £25m and 40-50% on the sell on clause was/is good business
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 15 hours, 43 minutes ago
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 47 minutes ago
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 2 hours, 44 minutes ago
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 19 minutes ago
The Guardian are saying that that deal is agreed pending personal terms:
The deal is for a guaranteed €27.6m plus €4m in add-ons and if the 22-year-old can come to contractual agreement with Marseille and joins, his troubled United career will end. It is understood the sell-on clause is 40-50% of any fee.
Not a bad bit of business for someone that was never going to be able to play for us again after that audio was released. Think we've done ok here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nonsense.
He is better than anything we have, and shoukd cost any buying clubs £60-70m.
Terrible deal to appease the softy, modern day fan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
See? You can have an opinion and I back your right to do so but calling those who disagree “softly” is wrong, different points can be made
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think its wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's because you are a moron
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course he is a moron. Greenwood is damaged goods. To get about £25m and 40-50% on the sell on clause was/is good business
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He isnt damaged goods. He is a brilliant footballer. Its the softies that can't look beyond an off field allegation.
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 43 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 15 hours, 43 minutes ago
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 47 minutes ago
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 2 hours, 44 minutes ago
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 19 minutes ago
The Guardian are saying that that deal is agreed pending personal terms:
The deal is for a guaranteed €27.6m plus €4m in add-ons and if the 22-year-old can come to contractual agreement with Marseille and joins, his troubled United career will end. It is understood the sell-on clause is 40-50% of any fee.
Not a bad bit of business for someone that was never going to be able to play for us again after that audio was released. Think we've done ok here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nonsense.
He is better than anything we have, and shoukd cost any buying clubs £60-70m.
Terrible deal to appease the softy, modern day fan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
See? You can have an opinion and I back your right to do so but calling those who disagree “softly” is wrong, different points can be made
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think its wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's because you are a moron
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course he is a moron. Greenwood is damaged goods. To get about £25m and 40-50% on the sell on clause was/is good business
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He isnt damaged goods. He is a brilliant footballer. Its the softies that can't look beyond an off field allegation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If he isn't damaged goods then why is the Mayor of Marseille against his signing? Why are United even selling him? Why aren't the best clubs interested in signing him? Why has he been dropped by a load of sponsors?
Of all the dumb things you have said, that is right up there.
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 3 hours, 45 minutes ago
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 43 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 15 hours, 43 minutes ago
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 47 minutes ago
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 2 hours, 44 minutes ago
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 19 minutes ago
The Guardian are saying that that deal is agreed pending personal terms:
The deal is for a guaranteed €27.6m plus €4m in add-ons and if the 22-year-old can come to contractual agreement with Marseille and joins, his troubled United career will end. It is understood the sell-on clause is 40-50% of any fee.
Not a bad bit of business for someone that was never going to be able to play for us again after that audio was released. Think we've done ok here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nonsense.
He is better than anything we have, and shoukd cost any buying clubs £60-70m.
Terrible deal to appease the softy, modern day fan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
See? You can have an opinion and I back your right to do so but calling those who disagree “softly” is wrong, different points can be made
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think its wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's because you are a moron
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course he is a moron. Greenwood is damaged goods. To get about £25m and 40-50% on the sell on clause was/is good business
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He isnt damaged goods. He is a brilliant footballer. Its the softies that can't look beyond an off field allegation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If he isn't damaged goods then why is the Mayor of Marseille against his signing? Why are United even selling him? Why aren't the best clubs interested in signing him? Why has he been dropped by a load of sponsors?
Of all the dumb things you have said, that is right up there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because a bunch of hysterical softies have painted him as the devil himself, when really, all we know is, he spoke poorly to his partner.
Only real men are able to get their partner's legs up.
comment by Pun 🏴 (U21588)
posted 25 minutes ago
Only real men are able to get their partner's legs up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mate I’m that little of a man I need a harness to get hers up but then again I’m not a rock hard fellah like this guy is, I’m a softy and in more than one way
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 2 hours, 25 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 3 hours, 45 minutes ago
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 43 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 15 hours, 43 minutes ago
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 47 minutes ago
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 2 hours, 44 minutes ago
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 19 minutes ago
The Guardian are saying that that deal is agreed pending personal terms:
The deal is for a guaranteed €27.6m plus €4m in add-ons and if the 22-year-old can come to contractual agreement with Marseille and joins, his troubled United career will end. It is understood the sell-on clause is 40-50% of any fee.
Not a bad bit of business for someone that was never going to be able to play for us again after that audio was released. Think we've done ok here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nonsense.
He is better than anything we have, and shoukd cost any buying clubs £60-70m.
Terrible deal to appease the softy, modern day fan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
See? You can have an opinion and I back your right to do so but calling those who disagree “softly” is wrong, different points can be made
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think its wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's because you are a moron
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course he is a moron. Greenwood is damaged goods. To get about £25m and 40-50% on the sell on clause was/is good business
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He isnt damaged goods. He is a brilliant footballer. Its the softies that can't look beyond an off field allegation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If he isn't damaged goods then why is the Mayor of Marseille against his signing? Why are United even selling him? Why aren't the best clubs interested in signing him? Why has he been dropped by a load of sponsors?
Of all the dumb things you have said, that is right up there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because a bunch of hysterical softies have painted him as the devil himself, when really, all we know is, he spoke poorly to his partner.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your warped opinion doesn't alter the fact that he's damaged goods. Which is why we are getting rid. It's not even up for debate that he's damaged goods. But crack on.
He isnt damaged goods.
———
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 16 hours, 58 minutes ago
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 2 hours, 25 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 3 hours, 45 minutes ago
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 43 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 15 hours, 43 minutes ago
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 47 minutes ago
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 2 hours, 44 minutes ago
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 19 minutes ago
The Guardian are saying that that deal is agreed pending personal terms:
The deal is for a guaranteed €27.6m plus €4m in add-ons and if the 22-year-old can come to contractual agreement with Marseille and joins, his troubled United career will end. It is understood the sell-on clause is 40-50% of any fee.
Not a bad bit of business for someone that was never going to be able to play for us again after that audio was released. Think we've done ok here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nonsense.
He is better than anything we have, and shoukd cost any buying clubs £60-70m.
Terrible deal to appease the softy, modern day fan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
See? You can have an opinion and I back your right to do so but calling those who disagree “softly” is wrong, different points can be made
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think its wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's because you are a moron
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course he is a moron. Greenwood is damaged goods. To get about £25m and 40-50% on the sell on clause was/is good business
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He isnt damaged goods. He is a brilliant footballer. Its the softies that can't look beyond an off field allegation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If he isn't damaged goods then why is the Mayor of Marseille against his signing? Why are United even selling him? Why aren't the best clubs interested in signing him? Why has he been dropped by a load of sponsors?
Of all the dumb things you have said, that is right up there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because a bunch of hysterical softies have painted him as the devil himself, when really, all we know is, he spoke poorly to his partner.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your warped opinion doesn't alter the fact that he's damaged goods. Which is why we are getting rid. It's not even up for debate that he's damaged goods. But crack on.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My 'warped opinion' is the facts'
All we know ow for sure is he spoke to her poorly, but not enough that she can't forgive him amd move on.
Essentially, you are more of a victim than the 'victim' what's sort of man are you??
Considering for the deal was done, its taking a while to do.
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 1 hour, 28 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 16 hours, 58 minutes ago
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 2 hours, 25 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 3 hours, 45 minutes ago
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 43 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 15 hours, 43 minutes ago
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 47 minutes ago
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 2 hours, 44 minutes ago
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 19 minutes ago
The Guardian are saying that that deal is agreed pending personal terms:
The deal is for a guaranteed €27.6m plus €4m in add-ons and if the 22-year-old can come to contractual agreement with Marseille and joins, his troubled United career will end. It is understood the sell-on clause is 40-50% of any fee.
Not a bad bit of business for someone that was never going to be able to play for us again after that audio was released. Think we've done ok here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nonsense.
He is better than anything we have, and shoukd cost any buying clubs £60-70m.
Terrible deal to appease the softy, modern day fan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
See? You can have an opinion and I back your right to do so but calling those who disagree “softly” is wrong, different points can be made
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think its wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's because you are a moron
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course he is a moron. Greenwood is damaged goods. To get about £25m and 40-50% on the sell on clause was/is good business
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He isnt damaged goods. He is a brilliant footballer. Its the softies that can't look beyond an off field allegation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If he isn't damaged goods then why is the Mayor of Marseille against his signing? Why are United even selling him? Why aren't the best clubs interested in signing him? Why has he been dropped by a load of sponsors?
Of all the dumb things you have said, that is right up there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because a bunch of hysterical softies have painted him as the devil himself, when really, all we know is, he spoke poorly to his partner.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your warped opinion doesn't alter the fact that he's damaged goods. Which is why we are getting rid. It's not even up for debate that he's damaged goods. But crack on.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My 'warped opinion' is the facts'
All we know ow for sure is he spoke to her poorly, but not enough that she can't forgive him amd move on.
Essentially, you are more of a victim than the 'victim' what's sort of man are you??
Considering for the deal was done, its taking a while to do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Boring. Must try harder.
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 16 minutes ago
Stull not.done
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I wonder if its because the mayor has voiced his concerns? What with Greenwood being damaged goods an all?
Sign in if you want to comment
Goodbye Greenwood
Page 3 of 3
posted on 10/7/24
De Zerbi has backed the move/player too, so expect it to happen in next day or two:
According to reports, Marseille manager Roberto De Zerbi - who quit Brighton at the end of the season - said: "I don't know his [Greenwood's] past.
"I don't know exactly what happened. Honestly, I don't like interfering in players' lives. I have nothing to say about this.
"The only thing I can tell you - it doesn't matter who the player is. Once he signs for the club where I work, so here, they become like my children. I protect them against all the odds."
The Italian, who spent two years at Brighton, said Greenwood had not yet been signed "so there's no point in talking" but added: "What I can say is that he is a champion, an international level player."
posted on 10/7/24
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 45 minutes ago
comment by rosso says the time has come to unlock the unlimited Pote-ntial of the Fernçalvenoo triumvirate (U17054)
posted 13 hours, 35 minutes ago
comment by Don Draper's dandruff (U20155)
posted 41 minutes ago
comment by Bãleș left boot anti Dutch since 2024 (U22081)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 1 hour, 17 minutes ago
Mayor of Marseille's had a few words to say about it apparently...
https://x.com/Sport_Witness/status/1810742709512020080
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair play. You don't want your city to look like a bunch of caants
----------------------------------------------------------------------
he's really giving it both barrels, probably libellous, but doesn't seem to give a merde
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s only libellous if Greenwood really wants to argue in a court of law that he didn’t beat his girlfriend.
And I don’t think he really wants to do that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whichever club he goes to, there are going to be people that voice their concerns over the move. The bigger the club, the more people are going to be against it.
Everything that we are hearing is that he wants this move, so I reckon it will get done, irrespective of the Mayor's comments.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Everything we are hearing???
posted on 10/7/24
The Guardian are saying that that deal is agreed pending personal terms:
The deal is for a guaranteed €27.6m plus €4m in add-ons and if the 22-year-old can come to contractual agreement with Marseille and joins, his troubled United career will end. It is understood the sell-on clause is 40-50% of any fee.
Not a bad bit of business for someone that was never going to be able to play for us again after that audio was released. Think we've done ok here.
posted on 10/7/24
I wonder what role he will play at Marseille
posted on 10/7/24
comment by Jim Duffy (U1734)
posted 15 minutes ago
I wonder what role he will play at Marseille
----------------------------------------------------------------------
His.role? Play maker surely?
posted on 10/7/24
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 19 minutes ago
The Guardian are saying that that deal is agreed pending personal terms:
The deal is for a guaranteed €27.6m plus €4m in add-ons and if the 22-year-old can come to contractual agreement with Marseille and joins, his troubled United career will end. It is understood the sell-on clause is 40-50% of any fee.
Not a bad bit of business for someone that was never going to be able to play for us again after that audio was released. Think we've done ok here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nonsense.
He is better than anything we have, and shoukd cost any buying clubs £60-70m.
Terrible deal to appease the softy, modern day fan.
posted on 10/7/24
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 19 minutes ago
The Guardian are saying that that deal is agreed pending personal terms:
The deal is for a guaranteed €27.6m plus €4m in add-ons and if the 22-year-old can come to contractual agreement with Marseille and joins, his troubled United career will end. It is understood the sell-on clause is 40-50% of any fee.
Not a bad bit of business for someone that was never going to be able to play for us again after that audio was released. Think we've done ok here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nonsense.
He is better than anything we have, and shoukd cost any buying clubs £60-70m.
Terrible deal to appease the softy, modern day fan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
See? You can have an opinion and I back your right to do so but calling those who disagree “softly” is wrong, different points can be made
posted on 10/7/24
comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 2 hours, 44 minutes ago
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 19 minutes ago
The Guardian are saying that that deal is agreed pending personal terms:
The deal is for a guaranteed €27.6m plus €4m in add-ons and if the 22-year-old can come to contractual agreement with Marseille and joins, his troubled United career will end. It is understood the sell-on clause is 40-50% of any fee.
Not a bad bit of business for someone that was never going to be able to play for us again after that audio was released. Think we've done ok here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nonsense.
He is better than anything we have, and shoukd cost any buying clubs £60-70m.
Terrible deal to appease the softy, modern day fan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
See? You can have an opinion and I back your right to do so but calling those who disagree “softly” is wrong, different points can be made
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think its wrong.
posted on 10/7/24
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 2 hours, 44 minutes ago
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 19 minutes ago
The Guardian are saying that that deal is agreed pending personal terms:
The deal is for a guaranteed €27.6m plus €4m in add-ons and if the 22-year-old can come to contractual agreement with Marseille and joins, his troubled United career will end. It is understood the sell-on clause is 40-50% of any fee.
Not a bad bit of business for someone that was never going to be able to play for us again after that audio was released. Think we've done ok here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nonsense.
He is better than anything we have, and shoukd cost any buying clubs £60-70m.
Terrible deal to appease the softy, modern day fan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
See? You can have an opinion and I back your right to do so but calling those who disagree “softly” is wrong, different points can be made
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think its wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's because you are a moron
posted on 10/7/24
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 47 minutes ago
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 2 hours, 44 minutes ago
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 19 minutes ago
The Guardian are saying that that deal is agreed pending personal terms:
The deal is for a guaranteed €27.6m plus €4m in add-ons and if the 22-year-old can come to contractual agreement with Marseille and joins, his troubled United career will end. It is understood the sell-on clause is 40-50% of any fee.
Not a bad bit of business for someone that was never going to be able to play for us again after that audio was released. Think we've done ok here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nonsense.
He is better than anything we have, and shoukd cost any buying clubs £60-70m.
Terrible deal to appease the softy, modern day fan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
See? You can have an opinion and I back your right to do so but calling those who disagree “softly” is wrong, different points can be made
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think its wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's because you are a moron
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course he is a moron. Greenwood is damaged goods. To get about £25m and 40-50% on the sell on clause was/is good business
posted on 10/7/24
You guys never learn.
posted on 11/7/24
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 15 hours, 43 minutes ago
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 47 minutes ago
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 2 hours, 44 minutes ago
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 19 minutes ago
The Guardian are saying that that deal is agreed pending personal terms:
The deal is for a guaranteed €27.6m plus €4m in add-ons and if the 22-year-old can come to contractual agreement with Marseille and joins, his troubled United career will end. It is understood the sell-on clause is 40-50% of any fee.
Not a bad bit of business for someone that was never going to be able to play for us again after that audio was released. Think we've done ok here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nonsense.
He is better than anything we have, and shoukd cost any buying clubs £60-70m.
Terrible deal to appease the softy, modern day fan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
See? You can have an opinion and I back your right to do so but calling those who disagree “softly” is wrong, different points can be made
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think its wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's because you are a moron
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course he is a moron. Greenwood is damaged goods. To get about £25m and 40-50% on the sell on clause was/is good business
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He isnt damaged goods. He is a brilliant footballer. Its the softies that can't look beyond an off field allegation.
posted on 11/7/24
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 43 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 15 hours, 43 minutes ago
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 47 minutes ago
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 2 hours, 44 minutes ago
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 19 minutes ago
The Guardian are saying that that deal is agreed pending personal terms:
The deal is for a guaranteed €27.6m plus €4m in add-ons and if the 22-year-old can come to contractual agreement with Marseille and joins, his troubled United career will end. It is understood the sell-on clause is 40-50% of any fee.
Not a bad bit of business for someone that was never going to be able to play for us again after that audio was released. Think we've done ok here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nonsense.
He is better than anything we have, and shoukd cost any buying clubs £60-70m.
Terrible deal to appease the softy, modern day fan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
See? You can have an opinion and I back your right to do so but calling those who disagree “softly” is wrong, different points can be made
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think its wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's because you are a moron
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course he is a moron. Greenwood is damaged goods. To get about £25m and 40-50% on the sell on clause was/is good business
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He isnt damaged goods. He is a brilliant footballer. Its the softies that can't look beyond an off field allegation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If he isn't damaged goods then why is the Mayor of Marseille against his signing? Why are United even selling him? Why aren't the best clubs interested in signing him? Why has he been dropped by a load of sponsors?
Of all the dumb things you have said, that is right up there.
posted on 11/7/24
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 3 hours, 45 minutes ago
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 43 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 15 hours, 43 minutes ago
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 47 minutes ago
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 2 hours, 44 minutes ago
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 19 minutes ago
The Guardian are saying that that deal is agreed pending personal terms:
The deal is for a guaranteed €27.6m plus €4m in add-ons and if the 22-year-old can come to contractual agreement with Marseille and joins, his troubled United career will end. It is understood the sell-on clause is 40-50% of any fee.
Not a bad bit of business for someone that was never going to be able to play for us again after that audio was released. Think we've done ok here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nonsense.
He is better than anything we have, and shoukd cost any buying clubs £60-70m.
Terrible deal to appease the softy, modern day fan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
See? You can have an opinion and I back your right to do so but calling those who disagree “softly” is wrong, different points can be made
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think its wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's because you are a moron
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course he is a moron. Greenwood is damaged goods. To get about £25m and 40-50% on the sell on clause was/is good business
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He isnt damaged goods. He is a brilliant footballer. Its the softies that can't look beyond an off field allegation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If he isn't damaged goods then why is the Mayor of Marseille against his signing? Why are United even selling him? Why aren't the best clubs interested in signing him? Why has he been dropped by a load of sponsors?
Of all the dumb things you have said, that is right up there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because a bunch of hysterical softies have painted him as the devil himself, when really, all we know is, he spoke poorly to his partner.
posted on 11/7/24
Only real men are able to get their partner's legs up.
posted on 11/7/24
comment by Pun 🏴 (U21588)
posted 25 minutes ago
Only real men are able to get their partner's legs up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mate I’m that little of a man I need a harness to get hers up but then again I’m not a rock hard fellah like this guy is, I’m a softy and in more than one way
posted on 11/7/24
Piff
posted on 11/7/24
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 2 hours, 25 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 3 hours, 45 minutes ago
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 43 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 15 hours, 43 minutes ago
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 47 minutes ago
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 2 hours, 44 minutes ago
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 19 minutes ago
The Guardian are saying that that deal is agreed pending personal terms:
The deal is for a guaranteed €27.6m plus €4m in add-ons and if the 22-year-old can come to contractual agreement with Marseille and joins, his troubled United career will end. It is understood the sell-on clause is 40-50% of any fee.
Not a bad bit of business for someone that was never going to be able to play for us again after that audio was released. Think we've done ok here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nonsense.
He is better than anything we have, and shoukd cost any buying clubs £60-70m.
Terrible deal to appease the softy, modern day fan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
See? You can have an opinion and I back your right to do so but calling those who disagree “softly” is wrong, different points can be made
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think its wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's because you are a moron
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course he is a moron. Greenwood is damaged goods. To get about £25m and 40-50% on the sell on clause was/is good business
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He isnt damaged goods. He is a brilliant footballer. Its the softies that can't look beyond an off field allegation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If he isn't damaged goods then why is the Mayor of Marseille against his signing? Why are United even selling him? Why aren't the best clubs interested in signing him? Why has he been dropped by a load of sponsors?
Of all the dumb things you have said, that is right up there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because a bunch of hysterical softies have painted him as the devil himself, when really, all we know is, he spoke poorly to his partner.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your warped opinion doesn't alter the fact that he's damaged goods. Which is why we are getting rid. It's not even up for debate that he's damaged goods. But crack on.
posted on 11/7/24
He isnt damaged goods.
———
posted on 12/7/24
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 16 hours, 58 minutes ago
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 2 hours, 25 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 3 hours, 45 minutes ago
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 43 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 15 hours, 43 minutes ago
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 47 minutes ago
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 2 hours, 44 minutes ago
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 19 minutes ago
The Guardian are saying that that deal is agreed pending personal terms:
The deal is for a guaranteed €27.6m plus €4m in add-ons and if the 22-year-old can come to contractual agreement with Marseille and joins, his troubled United career will end. It is understood the sell-on clause is 40-50% of any fee.
Not a bad bit of business for someone that was never going to be able to play for us again after that audio was released. Think we've done ok here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nonsense.
He is better than anything we have, and shoukd cost any buying clubs £60-70m.
Terrible deal to appease the softy, modern day fan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
See? You can have an opinion and I back your right to do so but calling those who disagree “softly” is wrong, different points can be made
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think its wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's because you are a moron
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course he is a moron. Greenwood is damaged goods. To get about £25m and 40-50% on the sell on clause was/is good business
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He isnt damaged goods. He is a brilliant footballer. Its the softies that can't look beyond an off field allegation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If he isn't damaged goods then why is the Mayor of Marseille against his signing? Why are United even selling him? Why aren't the best clubs interested in signing him? Why has he been dropped by a load of sponsors?
Of all the dumb things you have said, that is right up there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because a bunch of hysterical softies have painted him as the devil himself, when really, all we know is, he spoke poorly to his partner.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your warped opinion doesn't alter the fact that he's damaged goods. Which is why we are getting rid. It's not even up for debate that he's damaged goods. But crack on.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My 'warped opinion' is the facts'
All we know ow for sure is he spoke to her poorly, but not enough that she can't forgive him amd move on.
Essentially, you are more of a victim than the 'victim' what's sort of man are you??
Considering for the deal was done, its taking a while to do.
posted on 12/7/24
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 1 hour, 28 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 16 hours, 58 minutes ago
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 2 hours, 25 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 3 hours, 45 minutes ago
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 43 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 15 hours, 43 minutes ago
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 47 minutes ago
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 2 hours, 44 minutes ago
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 19 minutes ago
The Guardian are saying that that deal is agreed pending personal terms:
The deal is for a guaranteed €27.6m plus €4m in add-ons and if the 22-year-old can come to contractual agreement with Marseille and joins, his troubled United career will end. It is understood the sell-on clause is 40-50% of any fee.
Not a bad bit of business for someone that was never going to be able to play for us again after that audio was released. Think we've done ok here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nonsense.
He is better than anything we have, and shoukd cost any buying clubs £60-70m.
Terrible deal to appease the softy, modern day fan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
See? You can have an opinion and I back your right to do so but calling those who disagree “softly” is wrong, different points can be made
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think its wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's because you are a moron
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course he is a moron. Greenwood is damaged goods. To get about £25m and 40-50% on the sell on clause was/is good business
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He isnt damaged goods. He is a brilliant footballer. Its the softies that can't look beyond an off field allegation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If he isn't damaged goods then why is the Mayor of Marseille against his signing? Why are United even selling him? Why aren't the best clubs interested in signing him? Why has he been dropped by a load of sponsors?
Of all the dumb things you have said, that is right up there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because a bunch of hysterical softies have painted him as the devil himself, when really, all we know is, he spoke poorly to his partner.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your warped opinion doesn't alter the fact that he's damaged goods. Which is why we are getting rid. It's not even up for debate that he's damaged goods. But crack on.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My 'warped opinion' is the facts'
All we know ow for sure is he spoke to her poorly, but not enough that she can't forgive him amd move on.
Essentially, you are more of a victim than the 'victim' what's sort of man are you??
Considering for the deal was done, its taking a while to do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Boring. Must try harder.
posted on 12/7/24
Stull not.done
posted on 12/7/24
comment by The Mainoo Man (U23147)
posted 16 minutes ago
Stull not.done
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I wonder if its because the mayor has voiced his concerns? What with Greenwood being damaged goods an all?
Page 3 of 3