Mount is already the best, most contributory, midfield option at the club
-------------------------------
Has he been helping out around the treatment rooms or something?
I think both Sterling and Sancho will need to take a massive wage cut for this transfer swap to happen.
Mount is already the best, most contributory, midfield option at the club
--------------------
Wtf
Even by your batshīt standards that is friggin mental
comment by Joshua The King Of Kings Zirkzee (U10026)
posted 1 hour, 27 minutes ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 8 minutes ago
As an aside, I'm not sure whether Sterling's form has dropped off a cliff, or if it's more a case of going from a side which executes loads of perfectly choreographed collective attacking moves per match to a club in total disarray. He moved from football's most efficient chance creating machine to Boehly's Chelsea. Of course he's not going to be as productive.
The issue, of course, is that United's attacking strategies are more Chelsea than City.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sterling’s movement is vastly superior to anyone we have in the squad. We’ve got issues with creativity, but the movement of our forwards is waaaank as well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is very true.
I don't want Sterling on the whole, but I've always rated him and there'd be some positives:
- He's better than Sancho, for the reasons described above
- I don't think Chelsea are in a position to ask for any fee.
- We're apparently looking to do that thing that other teams normally do to us, where Chelsea pay a chunk of his wages.
Considering the above I don't think I'd be that cut up about it tbh.
Being reported by BBC as well now, although it does say any deal is on United's terms.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/c62rwryz8x6o
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Joshua The King Of Kings Zirkzee (U10026)
posted 1 hour, 27 minutes ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 8 minutes ago
As an aside, I'm not sure whether Sterling's form has dropped off a cliff, or if it's more a case of going from a side which executes loads of perfectly choreographed collective attacking moves per match to a club in total disarray. He moved from football's most efficient chance creating machine to Boehly's Chelsea. Of course he's not going to be as productive.
The issue, of course, is that United's attacking strategies are more Chelsea than City.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sterling’s movement is vastly superior to anyone we have in the squad. We’ve got issues with creativity, but the movement of our forwards is waaaank as well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is very true.
I don't want Sterling on the whole, but I've always rated him and there'd be some positives:
- He's better than Sancho, for the reasons described above
- I don't think Chelsea are in a position to ask for any fee.
- We're apparently looking to do that thing that other teams normally do to us, where Chelsea pay a chunk of his wages.
Considering the above I don't think I'd be that cut up about it tbh.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If we could work out a favourable loan deal it would be decent business. Gives us more quality in attack but without having to commit to a permanent deal, and we can then revisit the attack next summer.
comment by Arctic Monkey (U14534)
posted 29 minutes ago
Being reported by BBC as well now, although it does say any deal is on United's terms.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/c62rwryz8x6o
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its clear we hold all the cards in this relationship. Their manager was obviously not smart with his comments. What we need to figure out is how we arrange it.
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 1 hour ago
Mount is already the best, most contributory, midfield option at the club
--------------------
Wtf
Even by your batshīt standards that is friggin mental
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Definitely an exaggeration but whenever mount plays for you guys you look better
His pressing from the front , which he is very intelligent in doing , is great
Yeah he doesnt get on the pitch enough but he definitely makes you a better team
Goals and assists will come if he can stay fit
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 1 hour ago
Mount is already the best, most contributory, midfield option at the club
--------------------
Wtf
Even by your batshīt standards that is friggin mental
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Definitely an exaggeration but whenever mount plays for you guys you look better
His pressing from the front , which he is very intelligent in doing , is great
Yeah he doesnt get on the pitch enough but he definitely makes you a better team
Goals and assists will come if he can stay fit
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't disagree. My biggest problem with him is his fitness
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 5 hours, 15 minutes ago
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 5 minutes ago
I tell you who united need right now…
He is in the French league tearing it up. But for stupid politics he should be here.
Greenwood heading straight to Madrid or Barcelona in a few years bookmark this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why weren't Real or Barca in for him this summer?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A doofus question
Listen, you peasants might not thank me but get the contract out, put it on the table, let Sterling sign it and let him write whatever number he wants to put on there given what he's done with his career and let him sign the contract and go, INEOS's at the wheel, they are doing it, doing their thing, Man United are BACK!
Never mind Ivan Toney.
They just bought another keeper for 17m.
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 14 minutes ago
Never mind Ivan Toney.
They just bought another keeper for 17m.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
eh, who?
comment by kinsang (U3346)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 14 minutes ago
Never mind Ivan Toney.
They just bought another keeper for 17m.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
eh, who?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike Penders.
Yeah me neither.
Fcking hell I thought you were joking
IMO Ivan Toney is overated, the pens pad his stats a bit.
Tbf, Penders is staying at Genk for the season - it's one of those, hopefully he turns out great, but if not, we won't lose much on him (£17 million for a big club prob isn't deemed that much these days). It's the type of thing most clubs are doing, altho Chelsea do take it to the next level.
Rumours online now that we are in for Toney. No idea if they are credible.
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 1 minute ago
Rumours online now that we are in for Toney. No idea if they are credible.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rio's done the nod...
https://x.com/rioferdy5/status/1828542706827555043
comment by Diafol Coch 77 🏴 (U2462)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 1 minute ago
Rumours online now that we are in for Toney. No idea if they are credible.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rio's done the nod...
https://x.com/rioferdy5/status/1828542706827555043
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Great. It worked out so well the last time Rio was smug about a transfer.
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 1 hour, 43 minutes ago
comment by Diafol Coch 77 🏴 (U2462)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 1 minute ago
Rumours online now that we are in for Toney. No idea if they are credible.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rio's done the nod...
https://x.com/rioferdy5/status/1828542706827555043
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Great. It worked out so well the last time Rio was smug about a transfer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sign in if you want to comment
Ivan Toney to Chelsea
Page 4 of 4
posted on 27/8/24
Mount is already the best, most contributory, midfield option at the club
-------------------------------
Has he been helping out around the treatment rooms or something?
posted on 27/8/24
I think both Sterling and Sancho will need to take a massive wage cut for this transfer swap to happen.
posted on 27/8/24
Mount is already the best, most contributory, midfield option at the club
--------------------
Wtf
Even by your batshīt standards that is friggin mental
posted on 27/8/24
comment by Joshua The King Of Kings Zirkzee (U10026)
posted 1 hour, 27 minutes ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 8 minutes ago
As an aside, I'm not sure whether Sterling's form has dropped off a cliff, or if it's more a case of going from a side which executes loads of perfectly choreographed collective attacking moves per match to a club in total disarray. He moved from football's most efficient chance creating machine to Boehly's Chelsea. Of course he's not going to be as productive.
The issue, of course, is that United's attacking strategies are more Chelsea than City.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sterling’s movement is vastly superior to anyone we have in the squad. We’ve got issues with creativity, but the movement of our forwards is waaaank as well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is very true.
I don't want Sterling on the whole, but I've always rated him and there'd be some positives:
- He's better than Sancho, for the reasons described above
- I don't think Chelsea are in a position to ask for any fee.
- We're apparently looking to do that thing that other teams normally do to us, where Chelsea pay a chunk of his wages.
Considering the above I don't think I'd be that cut up about it tbh.
posted on 27/8/24
Being reported by BBC as well now, although it does say any deal is on United's terms.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/c62rwryz8x6o
posted on 27/8/24
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Joshua The King Of Kings Zirkzee (U10026)
posted 1 hour, 27 minutes ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 8 minutes ago
As an aside, I'm not sure whether Sterling's form has dropped off a cliff, or if it's more a case of going from a side which executes loads of perfectly choreographed collective attacking moves per match to a club in total disarray. He moved from football's most efficient chance creating machine to Boehly's Chelsea. Of course he's not going to be as productive.
The issue, of course, is that United's attacking strategies are more Chelsea than City.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sterling’s movement is vastly superior to anyone we have in the squad. We’ve got issues with creativity, but the movement of our forwards is waaaank as well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is very true.
I don't want Sterling on the whole, but I've always rated him and there'd be some positives:
- He's better than Sancho, for the reasons described above
- I don't think Chelsea are in a position to ask for any fee.
- We're apparently looking to do that thing that other teams normally do to us, where Chelsea pay a chunk of his wages.
Considering the above I don't think I'd be that cut up about it tbh.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If we could work out a favourable loan deal it would be decent business. Gives us more quality in attack but without having to commit to a permanent deal, and we can then revisit the attack next summer.
posted on 27/8/24
comment by Arctic Monkey (U14534)
posted 29 minutes ago
Being reported by BBC as well now, although it does say any deal is on United's terms.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/c62rwryz8x6o
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its clear we hold all the cards in this relationship. Their manager was obviously not smart with his comments. What we need to figure out is how we arrange it.
posted on 27/8/24
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 1 hour ago
Mount is already the best, most contributory, midfield option at the club
--------------------
Wtf
Even by your batshīt standards that is friggin mental
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Definitely an exaggeration but whenever mount plays for you guys you look better
His pressing from the front , which he is very intelligent in doing , is great
Yeah he doesnt get on the pitch enough but he definitely makes you a better team
Goals and assists will come if he can stay fit
posted on 27/8/24
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 1 hour ago
Mount is already the best, most contributory, midfield option at the club
--------------------
Wtf
Even by your batshīt standards that is friggin mental
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Definitely an exaggeration but whenever mount plays for you guys you look better
His pressing from the front , which he is very intelligent in doing , is great
Yeah he doesnt get on the pitch enough but he definitely makes you a better team
Goals and assists will come if he can stay fit
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't disagree. My biggest problem with him is his fitness
posted on 27/8/24
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 5 hours, 15 minutes ago
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 5 minutes ago
I tell you who united need right now…
He is in the French league tearing it up. But for stupid politics he should be here.
Greenwood heading straight to Madrid or Barcelona in a few years bookmark this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why weren't Real or Barca in for him this summer?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A doofus question
posted on 27/8/24
Listen, you peasants might not thank me but get the contract out, put it on the table, let Sterling sign it and let him write whatever number he wants to put on there given what he's done with his career and let him sign the contract and go, INEOS's at the wheel, they are doing it, doing their thing, Man United are BACK!
posted on 28/8/24
Never mind Ivan Toney.
They just bought another keeper for 17m.
posted on 28/8/24
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 14 minutes ago
Never mind Ivan Toney.
They just bought another keeper for 17m.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
eh, who?
posted on 28/8/24
comment by kinsang (U3346)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 14 minutes ago
Never mind Ivan Toney.
They just bought another keeper for 17m.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
eh, who?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike Penders.
Yeah me neither.
posted on 28/8/24
Fcking hell I thought you were joking
posted on 28/8/24
IMO Ivan Toney is overated, the pens pad his stats a bit.
posted on 28/8/24
Tbf, Penders is staying at Genk for the season - it's one of those, hopefully he turns out great, but if not, we won't lose much on him (£17 million for a big club prob isn't deemed that much these days). It's the type of thing most clubs are doing, altho Chelsea do take it to the next level.
posted on 28/8/24
Rumours online now that we are in for Toney. No idea if they are credible.
posted on 28/8/24
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 1 minute ago
Rumours online now that we are in for Toney. No idea if they are credible.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rio's done the nod...
https://x.com/rioferdy5/status/1828542706827555043
posted on 28/8/24
comment by Diafol Coch 77 🏴 (U2462)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 1 minute ago
Rumours online now that we are in for Toney. No idea if they are credible.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rio's done the nod...
https://x.com/rioferdy5/status/1828542706827555043
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Great. It worked out so well the last time Rio was smug about a transfer.
posted on 28/8/24
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 1 hour, 43 minutes ago
comment by Diafol Coch 77 🏴 (U2462)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 1 minute ago
Rumours online now that we are in for Toney. No idea if they are credible.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rio's done the nod...
https://x.com/rioferdy5/status/1828542706827555043
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Great. It worked out so well the last time Rio was smug about a transfer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 4 of 4