comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 13 hours, 30 minutes ago
comment by Slack Alice (U9489)
posted 51 minutes ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 3 hours, 19 minutes ago
comment by Slack Alice (U9489)
posted 2 hours, 35 minutes ago
I don't get all the uproar. Like that captain the other week refusing to wear a pride armband. On what basis MUST he wear it? He's not contractually obliged to is he??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nobody claimed he must wear it. The FA doesn't state that all captains must wear it. They questioned why he didn't and disagreed with his excuse.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is his religion not important then? What about his beliefs?? Why are they less important than the beliefs of the radical left???
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think made up gods and subsequent rules from books created centuries ago are as important as real people, no.
I also don't think it's radical to support people, just a normal decent thing for people to do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Isnt having the freedom to choose also a normal decent thing.
He's made a silent choice, which is only being made less silent because he's been questioned on that choice. It's not as if he's wearing an armband that says homosexuals will burn in hell, he's just not actively promoting them
comment by Slack Alice (U9489)
posted 16 hours, 5 minutes ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 3 hours, 19 minutes ago
comment by Slack Alice (U9489)
posted 2 hours, 35 minutes ago
I don't get all the uproar. Like that captain the other week refusing to wear a pride armband. On what basis MUST he wear it? He's not contractually obliged to is he??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nobody claimed he must wear it. The FA doesn't state that all captains must wear it. They questioned why he didn't and disagreed with his excuse.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is his religion not important then? What about his beliefs?? Why are they less important than the beliefs of the radical left???
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm sure his club make an effort to accomodate and respect his beliefs, such as prayer rooms and time to prey, plus adhering to his diet in accordance with his beliefs. Rightly so, however asking what about his beliefs is a daft question.
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 4 hours, 13 minutes ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 13 hours, 30 minutes ago
comment by Slack Alice (U9489)
posted 51 minutes ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 3 hours, 19 minutes ago
comment by Slack Alice (U9489)
posted 2 hours, 35 minutes ago
I don't get all the uproar. Like that captain the other week refusing to wear a pride armband. On what basis MUST he wear it? He's not contractually obliged to is he??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nobody claimed he must wear it. The FA doesn't state that all captains must wear it. They questioned why he didn't and disagreed with his excuse.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is his religion not important then? What about his beliefs?? Why are they less important than the beliefs of the radical left???
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think made up gods and subsequent rules from books created centuries ago are as important as real people, no.
I also don't think it's radical to support people, just a normal decent thing for people to do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Isnt having the freedom to choose also a normal decent thing.
He's made a silent choice, which is only being made less silent because he's been questioned on that choice. It's not as if he's wearing an armband that says homosexuals will burn in hell, he's just not actively promoting them
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No I don't think it's decent to refuse to promote equality when you are in a great position to make a difference. I also don't think it's a massive deal. He had a choice, he used it but I certainly don't think it was the decent thing to do.
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 10 hours, 16 minutes ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 13 hours, 30 minutes ago
comment by Slack Alice (U9489)
posted 51 minutes ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 3 hours, 19 minutes ago
comment by Slack Alice (U9489)
posted 2 hours, 35 minutes ago
I don't get all the uproar. Like that captain the other week refusing to wear a pride armband. On what basis MUST he wear it? He's not contractually obliged to is he??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nobody claimed he must wear it. The FA doesn't state that all captains must wear it. They questioned why he didn't and disagreed with his excuse.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is his religion not important then? What about his beliefs?? Why are they less important than the beliefs of the radical left???
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think made up gods and subsequent rules from books created centuries ago are as important as real people, no.
I also don't think it's radical to support people, just a normal decent thing for people to do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Isnt having the freedom to choose also a normal decent thing.
He's made a silent choice, which is only being made less silent because he's been questioned on that choice. It's not as if he's wearing an armband that says homosexuals will burn in hell, he's just not actively promoting them
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I agree, personally if ANY group tried to bully me into doing this I would definitely not do it - even if I agreed with the cause, I mean seriously, f&&& right off... 🤷🏻♂️
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 10 hours, 23 minutes ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 13 hours, 30 minutes ago
comment by Slack Alice (U9489)
posted 51 minutes ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 3 hours, 19 minutes ago
comment by Slack Alice (U9489)
posted 2 hours, 35 minutes ago
I don't get all the uproar. Like that captain the other week refusing to wear a pride armband. On what basis MUST he wear it? He's not contractually obliged to is he??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nobody claimed he must wear it. The FA doesn't state that all captains must wear it. They questioned why he didn't and disagreed with his excuse.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is his religion not important then? What about his beliefs?? Why are they less important than the beliefs of the radical left???
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think made up gods and subsequent rules from books created centuries ago are as important as real people, no.
I also don't think it's radical to support people, just a normal decent thing for people to do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Isnt having the freedom to choose also a normal decent thing.
He's made a silent choice, which is only being made less silent because he's been questioned on that choice. It's not as if he's wearing an armband that says homosexuals will burn in hell, he's just not actively promoting them
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I assume you are talking about Ipswich's Sam Morsy, and yes 100% he is entitled to his beliefs just odd that he had no issues promoting gambling at previous clubs... odd as his religion would be against that?
itsa tuff situashun with lotsa gray area n moral ishoes
comment by Samus (Isle of) Arran (U22669)
posted 11 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 10 hours, 23 minutes ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 13 hours, 30 minutes ago
comment by Slack Alice (U9489)
posted 51 minutes ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 3 hours, 19 minutes ago
comment by Slack Alice (U9489)
posted 2 hours, 35 minutes ago
I don't get all the uproar. Like that captain the other week refusing to wear a pride armband. On what basis MUST he wear it? He's not contractually obliged to is he??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nobody claimed he must wear it. The FA doesn't state that all captains must wear it. They questioned why he didn't and disagreed with his excuse.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is his religion not important then? What about his beliefs?? Why are they less important than the beliefs of the radical left???
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think made up gods and subsequent rules from books created centuries ago are as important as real people, no.
I also don't think it's radical to support people, just a normal decent thing for people to do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Isnt having the freedom to choose also a normal decent thing.
He's made a silent choice, which is only being made less silent because he's been questioned on that choice. It's not as if he's wearing an armband that says homosexuals will burn in hell, he's just not actively promoting them
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I assume you are talking about Ipswich's Sam Morsy, and yes 100% he is entitled to his beliefs just odd that he had no issues promoting gambling at previous clubs... odd as his religion would be against that?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is nonsense because he is contractually obliged to wear Ipswich kit. He isn't obliged in any way shape or form to wear a pride armband.
Argument dismissed.
Sign in if you want to comment
FA: Shove the rainbow up your ***
Page 3 of 3
posted on 12/12/24
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 13 hours, 30 minutes ago
comment by Slack Alice (U9489)
posted 51 minutes ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 3 hours, 19 minutes ago
comment by Slack Alice (U9489)
posted 2 hours, 35 minutes ago
I don't get all the uproar. Like that captain the other week refusing to wear a pride armband. On what basis MUST he wear it? He's not contractually obliged to is he??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nobody claimed he must wear it. The FA doesn't state that all captains must wear it. They questioned why he didn't and disagreed with his excuse.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is his religion not important then? What about his beliefs?? Why are they less important than the beliefs of the radical left???
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think made up gods and subsequent rules from books created centuries ago are as important as real people, no.
I also don't think it's radical to support people, just a normal decent thing for people to do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Isnt having the freedom to choose also a normal decent thing.
He's made a silent choice, which is only being made less silent because he's been questioned on that choice. It's not as if he's wearing an armband that says homosexuals will burn in hell, he's just not actively promoting them
posted on 12/12/24
comment by Slack Alice (U9489)
posted 16 hours, 5 minutes ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 3 hours, 19 minutes ago
comment by Slack Alice (U9489)
posted 2 hours, 35 minutes ago
I don't get all the uproar. Like that captain the other week refusing to wear a pride armband. On what basis MUST he wear it? He's not contractually obliged to is he??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nobody claimed he must wear it. The FA doesn't state that all captains must wear it. They questioned why he didn't and disagreed with his excuse.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is his religion not important then? What about his beliefs?? Why are they less important than the beliefs of the radical left???
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm sure his club make an effort to accomodate and respect his beliefs, such as prayer rooms and time to prey, plus adhering to his diet in accordance with his beliefs. Rightly so, however asking what about his beliefs is a daft question.
posted on 12/12/24
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 4 hours, 13 minutes ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 13 hours, 30 minutes ago
comment by Slack Alice (U9489)
posted 51 minutes ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 3 hours, 19 minutes ago
comment by Slack Alice (U9489)
posted 2 hours, 35 minutes ago
I don't get all the uproar. Like that captain the other week refusing to wear a pride armband. On what basis MUST he wear it? He's not contractually obliged to is he??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nobody claimed he must wear it. The FA doesn't state that all captains must wear it. They questioned why he didn't and disagreed with his excuse.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is his religion not important then? What about his beliefs?? Why are they less important than the beliefs of the radical left???
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think made up gods and subsequent rules from books created centuries ago are as important as real people, no.
I also don't think it's radical to support people, just a normal decent thing for people to do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Isnt having the freedom to choose also a normal decent thing.
He's made a silent choice, which is only being made less silent because he's been questioned on that choice. It's not as if he's wearing an armband that says homosexuals will burn in hell, he's just not actively promoting them
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No I don't think it's decent to refuse to promote equality when you are in a great position to make a difference. I also don't think it's a massive deal. He had a choice, he used it but I certainly don't think it was the decent thing to do.
posted on 12/12/24
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 10 hours, 16 minutes ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 13 hours, 30 minutes ago
comment by Slack Alice (U9489)
posted 51 minutes ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 3 hours, 19 minutes ago
comment by Slack Alice (U9489)
posted 2 hours, 35 minutes ago
I don't get all the uproar. Like that captain the other week refusing to wear a pride armband. On what basis MUST he wear it? He's not contractually obliged to is he??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nobody claimed he must wear it. The FA doesn't state that all captains must wear it. They questioned why he didn't and disagreed with his excuse.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is his religion not important then? What about his beliefs?? Why are they less important than the beliefs of the radical left???
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think made up gods and subsequent rules from books created centuries ago are as important as real people, no.
I also don't think it's radical to support people, just a normal decent thing for people to do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Isnt having the freedom to choose also a normal decent thing.
He's made a silent choice, which is only being made less silent because he's been questioned on that choice. It's not as if he's wearing an armband that says homosexuals will burn in hell, he's just not actively promoting them
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I agree, personally if ANY group tried to bully me into doing this I would definitely not do it - even if I agreed with the cause, I mean seriously, f&&& right off... 🤷🏻♂️
posted on 12/12/24
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 10 hours, 23 minutes ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 13 hours, 30 minutes ago
comment by Slack Alice (U9489)
posted 51 minutes ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 3 hours, 19 minutes ago
comment by Slack Alice (U9489)
posted 2 hours, 35 minutes ago
I don't get all the uproar. Like that captain the other week refusing to wear a pride armband. On what basis MUST he wear it? He's not contractually obliged to is he??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nobody claimed he must wear it. The FA doesn't state that all captains must wear it. They questioned why he didn't and disagreed with his excuse.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is his religion not important then? What about his beliefs?? Why are they less important than the beliefs of the radical left???
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think made up gods and subsequent rules from books created centuries ago are as important as real people, no.
I also don't think it's radical to support people, just a normal decent thing for people to do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Isnt having the freedom to choose also a normal decent thing.
He's made a silent choice, which is only being made less silent because he's been questioned on that choice. It's not as if he's wearing an armband that says homosexuals will burn in hell, he's just not actively promoting them
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I assume you are talking about Ipswich's Sam Morsy, and yes 100% he is entitled to his beliefs just odd that he had no issues promoting gambling at previous clubs... odd as his religion would be against that?
posted on 12/12/24
itsa tuff situashun with lotsa gray area n moral ishoes
posted on 13/12/24
comment by Samus (Isle of) Arran (U22669)
posted 11 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 10 hours, 23 minutes ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 13 hours, 30 minutes ago
comment by Slack Alice (U9489)
posted 51 minutes ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 3 hours, 19 minutes ago
comment by Slack Alice (U9489)
posted 2 hours, 35 minutes ago
I don't get all the uproar. Like that captain the other week refusing to wear a pride armband. On what basis MUST he wear it? He's not contractually obliged to is he??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nobody claimed he must wear it. The FA doesn't state that all captains must wear it. They questioned why he didn't and disagreed with his excuse.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is his religion not important then? What about his beliefs?? Why are they less important than the beliefs of the radical left???
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think made up gods and subsequent rules from books created centuries ago are as important as real people, no.
I also don't think it's radical to support people, just a normal decent thing for people to do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Isnt having the freedom to choose also a normal decent thing.
He's made a silent choice, which is only being made less silent because he's been questioned on that choice. It's not as if he's wearing an armband that says homosexuals will burn in hell, he's just not actively promoting them
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I assume you are talking about Ipswich's Sam Morsy, and yes 100% he is entitled to his beliefs just odd that he had no issues promoting gambling at previous clubs... odd as his religion would be against that?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is nonsense because he is contractually obliged to wear Ipswich kit. He isn't obliged in any way shape or form to wear a pride armband.
Argument dismissed.
Page 3 of 3