City just waiting for Real Madrid to raise £200m
Very, very dodgy by City this. Doesn't surprise me at all with them though.
Haaland still massively de-tracts from City as a team overall. If he doesn't score he just sulks about the pitch offering zero. One of the reasons City have been so pathetic this season is because of him.
The op makes no sense, we’ve got no need at all to do it for amortisation reasons.
And it’s limited now anyway.
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 3 minutes ago
The op makes no sense, we’ve got no need at all to do it for amortisation reasons.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In any case you'd still have it pay over 5 years due to the updates rules too.
comment by Calafiori knows how to Partey (U21076)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 3 minutes ago
The op makes no sense, we’ve got no need at all to do it for amortisation reasons.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In any case you'd still have it pay over 5 years due to the updates rules too.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, I followed up that post making the same point.
Interesting that it was announced on the same day as City may sign another striker
Best demonstration of ‘no-one cares about City’ ever.
Let the pįss boiling begin
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
City following the Clearlake playbook I see
Page 1 of 1
posted on 17/1/25
City just waiting for Real Madrid to raise £200m
posted on 17/1/25
Very, very dodgy by City this. Doesn't surprise me at all with them though.
Haaland still massively de-tracts from City as a team overall. If he doesn't score he just sulks about the pitch offering zero. One of the reasons City have been so pathetic this season is because of him.
posted on 17/1/25
The op makes no sense, we’ve got no need at all to do it for amortisation reasons.
posted on 17/1/25
And it’s limited now anyway.
posted on 17/1/25
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 3 minutes ago
The op makes no sense, we’ve got no need at all to do it for amortisation reasons.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In any case you'd still have it pay over 5 years due to the updates rules too.
posted on 17/1/25
comment by Calafiori knows how to Partey (U21076)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 3 minutes ago
The op makes no sense, we’ve got no need at all to do it for amortisation reasons.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In any case you'd still have it pay over 5 years due to the updates rules too.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, I followed up that post making the same point.
posted on 17/1/25
Interesting that it was announced on the same day as City may sign another striker
posted on 17/1/25
Best demonstration of ‘no-one cares about City’ ever.
Let the pįss boiling begin
Page 1 of 1