posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
A representative conversation from Q2 2024:
Poster 1: ETH deserves the sack for spending so much money on Antony, Hojlund and Mount.
Poster 2: Ten Hag deserves the sack because he's proven himself unable to do anything about the tactical issues that keep getting exploited by opponents again and again. But bad transfer decisions are primarily on the club. Actually, there's evidence that ETH is just one voice in the decision making process around transfers, but whatever the truth about how much influence he has, it's a terrible leadership structure if we are asking the coach to lead recruitment. Either the club lacks the expertise to identify what are good and bad transfer targets or it is failing to act on that knowledge. Either way, that's on the club, and the incoming Ineos leadership needs to rectify this whoever replaces ETH.
Poster 1: Mate, you can't admit ETH needs to be sacked because you can't admit you're wrong.
Poster 2: I literally wrote ETH needs to be sacked.
Poster 1: Just keep making excuses for your guy. One day you'll realise I was right.
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
comment by Robb Cunha (U22716)
posted 1 hour, 58 minutes ago
Somewhere SE85 is walking down the road like Richard Ashcroft in the Bittersweet symphony video
------------------------------------------------------------
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 8 minutes ago
A representative conversation from Q2 2024:
Poster 1: ETH deserves the sack for spending so much money on Antony, Hojlund and Mount.
Poster 2: Ten Hag deserves the sack because he's proven himself unable to do anything about the tactical issues that keep getting exploited by opponents again and again. But bad transfer decisions are primarily on the club. Actually, there's evidence that ETH is just one voice in the decision making process around transfers, but whatever the truth about how much influence he has, it's a terrible leadership structure if we are asking the coach to lead recruitment. Either the club lacks the expertise to identify what are good and bad transfer targets or it is failing to act on that knowledge. Either way, that's on the club, and the incoming Ineos leadership needs to rectify this whoever replaces ETH.
Poster 1: Mate, you can't admit ETH needs to be sacked because you can't admit you're wrong.
Poster 2: I literally wrote ETH needs to be sacked.
Poster 1: Just keep making excuses for your guy. One day you'll realise I was right.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You missed the stuff about the players being much better than they were showing and that it was a coaching issue, and that when he’s replaced we’d get much better.
Fast forward a few months, the amnesia set in, and the players were never good enough to begin with and that no manager could get them higher than 15th or win two league matches in a row.
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
comment by Robb Cunha (U22716)
posted 1 hour, 58 minutes ago
Somewhere SE85 is walking down the road like Richard Ashcroft in the Bittersweet symphony video
—
More likely crying tears of joy. And using them as lube to wasaank with
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 28 minutes ago
A representative conversation from Q2 2024:
Poster 1: ETH deserves the sack for spending so much money on Antony, Hojlund and Mount.
Poster 2: Ten Hag deserves the sack because he's proven himself unable to do anything about the tactical issues that keep getting exploited by opponents again and again. But bad transfer decisions are primarily on the club. Actually, there's evidence that ETH is just one voice in the decision making process around transfers, but whatever the truth about how much influence he has, it's a terrible leadership structure if we are asking the coach to lead recruitment. Either the club lacks the expertise to identify what are good and bad transfer targets or it is failing to act on that knowledge. Either way, that's on the club, and the incoming Ineos leadership needs to rectify this whoever replaces ETH.
Poster 1: Mate, you can't admit ETH needs to be sacked because you can't admit you're wrong.
Poster 2: I literally wrote ETH needs to be sacked.
Poster 1: Just keep making excuses for your guy. One day you'll realise I was right.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep, exactly this
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
comment by Baz tard - ineos your face (U19119)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Robb Cunha (U22716)
posted 1 hour, 58 minutes ago
Somewhere SE85 is walking down the road like Richard Ashcroft in the Bittersweet symphony video
—
More likely crying tears of joy. And using them as lube to wasaank with
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I love a good wasaank, really hits the spot
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
comment by Ali - 🇪🇦 🏴 (U1192)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by Baz tard - ineos your face (U19119)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Robb Cunha (U22716)
posted 1 hour, 58 minutes ago
Somewhere SE85 is walking down the road like Richard Ashcroft in the Bittersweet symphony video
—
More likely crying tears of joy. And using them as lube to wasaank with
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I love a good wasaank, really hits the spot
----------------------------------------------------------------------
depends on how good an aim you have
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
A representative conversation from Q2 2024:
Poster 1: ETH deserves the sack for spending so much money on Antony, Hojlund and Mount.
Poster 2: Ten Hag deserves the sack because he's proven himself unable to do anything about the tactical issues that keep getting exploited by opponents again and again. But bad transfer decisions are primarily on the club. Actually, there's evidence that ETH is just one voice in the decision making process around transfers, but whatever the truth about how much influence he has, it's a terrible leadership structure if we are asking the coach to lead recruitment. Either the club lacks the expertise to identify what are good and bad transfer targets or it is failing to act on that knowledge. Either way, that's on the club, and the incoming Ineos leadership needs to rectify this whoever replaces ETH.
Poster 1: Mate, you can't admit ETH needs to be sacked because you can't admit you're wrong.
Poster 2: I literally wrote ETH needs to be sacked.
Poster 1: Just keep making excuses for your guy. One day you'll realise I was right.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you reckon SE-85 has the self-awareness?
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
Do you reckon SE-85 has the self-awareness?
---------------------------------------------
I'm surprised that everyone jumped to the conclusion I was referring to a specific member of the forum.
Sign in if you want to comment
We broke Erik
Page 2 of 2
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
A representative conversation from Q2 2024:
Poster 1: ETH deserves the sack for spending so much money on Antony, Hojlund and Mount.
Poster 2: Ten Hag deserves the sack because he's proven himself unable to do anything about the tactical issues that keep getting exploited by opponents again and again. But bad transfer decisions are primarily on the club. Actually, there's evidence that ETH is just one voice in the decision making process around transfers, but whatever the truth about how much influence he has, it's a terrible leadership structure if we are asking the coach to lead recruitment. Either the club lacks the expertise to identify what are good and bad transfer targets or it is failing to act on that knowledge. Either way, that's on the club, and the incoming Ineos leadership needs to rectify this whoever replaces ETH.
Poster 1: Mate, you can't admit ETH needs to be sacked because you can't admit you're wrong.
Poster 2: I literally wrote ETH needs to be sacked.
Poster 1: Just keep making excuses for your guy. One day you'll realise I was right.
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
comment by Robb Cunha (U22716)
posted 1 hour, 58 minutes ago
Somewhere SE85 is walking down the road like Richard Ashcroft in the Bittersweet symphony video
------------------------------------------------------------
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 8 minutes ago
A representative conversation from Q2 2024:
Poster 1: ETH deserves the sack for spending so much money on Antony, Hojlund and Mount.
Poster 2: Ten Hag deserves the sack because he's proven himself unable to do anything about the tactical issues that keep getting exploited by opponents again and again. But bad transfer decisions are primarily on the club. Actually, there's evidence that ETH is just one voice in the decision making process around transfers, but whatever the truth about how much influence he has, it's a terrible leadership structure if we are asking the coach to lead recruitment. Either the club lacks the expertise to identify what are good and bad transfer targets or it is failing to act on that knowledge. Either way, that's on the club, and the incoming Ineos leadership needs to rectify this whoever replaces ETH.
Poster 1: Mate, you can't admit ETH needs to be sacked because you can't admit you're wrong.
Poster 2: I literally wrote ETH needs to be sacked.
Poster 1: Just keep making excuses for your guy. One day you'll realise I was right.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You missed the stuff about the players being much better than they were showing and that it was a coaching issue, and that when he’s replaced we’d get much better.
Fast forward a few months, the amnesia set in, and the players were never good enough to begin with and that no manager could get them higher than 15th or win two league matches in a row.
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
comment by Robb Cunha (U22716)
posted 1 hour, 58 minutes ago
Somewhere SE85 is walking down the road like Richard Ashcroft in the Bittersweet symphony video
—
More likely crying tears of joy. And using them as lube to wasaank with
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 28 minutes ago
A representative conversation from Q2 2024:
Poster 1: ETH deserves the sack for spending so much money on Antony, Hojlund and Mount.
Poster 2: Ten Hag deserves the sack because he's proven himself unable to do anything about the tactical issues that keep getting exploited by opponents again and again. But bad transfer decisions are primarily on the club. Actually, there's evidence that ETH is just one voice in the decision making process around transfers, but whatever the truth about how much influence he has, it's a terrible leadership structure if we are asking the coach to lead recruitment. Either the club lacks the expertise to identify what are good and bad transfer targets or it is failing to act on that knowledge. Either way, that's on the club, and the incoming Ineos leadership needs to rectify this whoever replaces ETH.
Poster 1: Mate, you can't admit ETH needs to be sacked because you can't admit you're wrong.
Poster 2: I literally wrote ETH needs to be sacked.
Poster 1: Just keep making excuses for your guy. One day you'll realise I was right.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep, exactly this
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
comment by Baz tard - ineos your face (U19119)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Robb Cunha (U22716)
posted 1 hour, 58 minutes ago
Somewhere SE85 is walking down the road like Richard Ashcroft in the Bittersweet symphony video
—
More likely crying tears of joy. And using them as lube to wasaank with
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I love a good wasaank, really hits the spot
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
comment by Ali - 🇪🇦 🏴 (U1192)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by Baz tard - ineos your face (U19119)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Robb Cunha (U22716)
posted 1 hour, 58 minutes ago
Somewhere SE85 is walking down the road like Richard Ashcroft in the Bittersweet symphony video
—
More likely crying tears of joy. And using them as lube to wasaank with
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I love a good wasaank, really hits the spot
----------------------------------------------------------------------
depends on how good an aim you have
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
A representative conversation from Q2 2024:
Poster 1: ETH deserves the sack for spending so much money on Antony, Hojlund and Mount.
Poster 2: Ten Hag deserves the sack because he's proven himself unable to do anything about the tactical issues that keep getting exploited by opponents again and again. But bad transfer decisions are primarily on the club. Actually, there's evidence that ETH is just one voice in the decision making process around transfers, but whatever the truth about how much influence he has, it's a terrible leadership structure if we are asking the coach to lead recruitment. Either the club lacks the expertise to identify what are good and bad transfer targets or it is failing to act on that knowledge. Either way, that's on the club, and the incoming Ineos leadership needs to rectify this whoever replaces ETH.
Poster 1: Mate, you can't admit ETH needs to be sacked because you can't admit you're wrong.
Poster 2: I literally wrote ETH needs to be sacked.
Poster 1: Just keep making excuses for your guy. One day you'll realise I was right.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you reckon SE-85 has the self-awareness?
posted 3 weeks, 4 days ago
Do you reckon SE-85 has the self-awareness?
---------------------------------------------
I'm surprised that everyone jumped to the conclusion I was referring to a specific member of the forum.
Page 2 of 2