comment by フレッド - #TWENTYTIMES (U3979)
posted 1 day, 5 hours ago
I don’t understand why we don’t use all the money we are spending into a dedicated facility. A big complex, perfectly comfortable (these aren’t prisoners) with sleeping accommodation, places to eat, things to do, educational opportunities, medical facilities etc but have it secured and keep people detained until such a time that their application has been processed.

I don’t understand why it can’t be done. Converting these military barracks is going to cost a fortune and rather than small quantities you’re adding hundreds of asylum seekers to very small towns which just can’t be the answer.

Build a dedicated facility and build an UK asylum processing unit in Calais to stop the small boat crossing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You say they aren't prisoners but want to build a prison for them.
What you've described is a low to medium security PRISON.

comment by Robbing Hoody - No Halloween this year, the horror Is Rëal (U6374)
posted 9 hours, 10 minutes ago
I’ve said to you before, you’re just not really geared up to talk about these things. It’s just not for you, sorry.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Even on the rare instance he realises it, he'll just completely disappear and ignore any reference back to the conversation, without actually wondering why he became unable to logically defend his point anymore.

It'd be funny if he wasn't emblematic of a serious problem within the country.

Fackinell Ifark is still going at this

Not one of you has even bothered to address the article point, youve joined the thread and proceeded to attempt to throw the article off topic, by focusing your attentions on me as the author.

? why do you even bother to engage ?

Back to the point of the article

Why are undocumented people being allowed into UK society & join the population?

Do you feel that this policy is in the best interests of UK security & wellbeing?

Even the thickest amongst you should be able to answer these very simple basic questions?

Or is it a case you are all suffering with a form of group attention deficit disorder

The topic has been discussed on here ad infinitum. This article is an attention seeking sheetpost, like all your articles. People can see through this "look at me and comment on my article bullsheet" and they don't want to to be a part of it.

Furthermore, you never come out with any good or strong points to discuss. You seem to think your articles are pertinent when actually they are like a nursery school debate on what colour of plasticine to use.

I don't want to waste my time answering your stoopid questions which are asked on here everyday and answered. I'd rather expose your attention seeking Marilyn Monroe dress blown up by the wind look at me antics.

"Not one of you has even bothered to address the article point"

This is a lie, I suggest you have a read back through your own sharticle

comment by Supreme Leader Mamba (U1282)
posted 4 hours, 28 minutes ago
The topic has been discussed on here ad infinitum. This article is an attention seeking sheetpost, like all your articles. People can see through this "look at me and comment on my article bullsheet" and they don't want to to be a part of it.

Furthermore, you never come out with any good or strong points to discuss. You seem to think your articles are pertinent when actually they are like a nursery school debate on what colour of plasticine to use.

I don't want to waste my time answering your stoopid questions which are asked on here everyday and answered. I'd rather expose your attention seeking Marilyn Monroe dress blown up by the wind look at me antics.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
100%

He articulayes what he doesn't like but doesnt have any concrete ideas on what to do about them. Offer any counter nareative or idea and he ignores completely or goes off on irrelevant tangents. Childish stuff.

The articles always appear the same way and thats fine, no issue if thats what you choose to do but it seems you already have your opinions and thoughts but phrase them to seem like you are looking for open and honest debate when you aren't really?

Obvs each to their own but perhaps if you were a tad more honest on YOUR beliefs and thoughts from the first post it might make them better?

Fair comment Piff.

He either ignores those whive addressed the OP or replies in laughing smiley's. Now he's bleating.about no.one taking him seriously

If he walks like a duck and quacks like one then wtf does he expect?

As I have explained not one of you has addressed the point raised in the article

You as a group are a very unpleasant bunch

You should try changing the record for once

As has been explained to you multiple times, nobody wants to engage because it's pointless, you're not interested in conversation, whenever someone does engages with you with a relevant counterpoint you vanish or smiley, so boring.