Comment deleted by Site Moderator

*there

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

is it really that hard for everyone to imagine an injury to the right leg will effect the left leg (and its propensity to injure) seems fairly straightforward. Obviously it might not have effected haaland in this way - i was more or less supporting dot's point that its not a ridiculous idea. If you are going to claim the medical opinion was biased fair enough but it was clearly believable enough to force through a claim

I got tendinitis in one knee from playing tennis too much one summer, then kept on playing anyway until my other knee just gave way under due to taking most of the weight.

Don't want to get in the argument again like i did the other day however I think Haaland deserved it. The coward stood over Keane and had a go at him whilst Keane had a serious injury. Even if Haaland didnt know he was injured at the time he never once apologised after. I probably would have done the same to haaland if i was Keane to be honest

If you are going to claim the medical opinion was biased fair enough but it was clearly believable enough to force through a claim
......................................

He lost his claim didn't he?

So in conclusion, assuming we don't know more than the medical experts that had all the evidence....

Wrong knee!

Then you share the same character flaw.

If i may contribute to the point in the OP:

Mourinho is a

It is amusing when I read about how faux offended SOME get about Keanes tackle, ffs it is football, are there a bunch injuries and hurt put on players for a variety of reasons, aye let us continue with the santization of the sport to the nth degree

Alf should have shut his mouth, Roy was always gonna take a chunk of him at some point, tough as it was I managed to continue with my life after the "Tackle"

Henryscat, who amongst us doesn't have any character flaws?

comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine (U5768)
posted 6 minutes ago
If you are going to claim the medical opinion was biased fair enough but it was clearly believable enough to force through a claim
......................................

He lost his claim didn't he?

So in conclusion, assuming we don't know more than the medical experts that had all the evidence....

Wrong knee!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
on an another note i work in insurance, and saw a claim this morning of a women against a shopping centre we cover. She had suffered a 1 inch laceration to her vágina during a wax there. Obviously we read it thinking she had somehow managed to sustain that injury from falling over before we discovered it was a wax and therefore not the shopping centres fault

comment by Insufferable-piffle, Shrimpers No1 3rd team fan (U4388)
posted 9 minutes ago
Henryscat, who amongst us doesn't have any character flaws?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Abolsutely no-one, silly question.

Bitc.hes be trippin'

comment by Blarmy - Not DC (U14547)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine (U5768)
posted 6 minutes ago
If you are going to claim the medical opinion was biased fair enough but it was clearly believable enough to force through a claim
......................................

He lost his claim didn't he?

So in conclusion, assuming we don't know more than the medical experts that had all the evidence....

Wrong knee!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
on an another note i work in insurance, and saw a claim this morning of a women against a shopping centre we cover. She had suffered a 1 inch laceration to her vágina during a wax there. Obviously we read it thinking she had somehow managed to sustain that injury from falling overbefore we discovered it was a wax and therefore not the shopping centres fault
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The lazy cow should shave herself. I just do not understand how people present their pubes to strangers to shave for them.

Yeah its quite strange, going in there like its a haircut or something... just trim the sides and a little bit off the top...

dont know if im the only one who thinks, on a girl, no hair down there at all looks weird.....

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by HenrysCat (U3608)



posted 1 hour, 14 minutes ago


Semantics

...........

Not the right word bud. You have your facts wrong, as most WUMs generally do.

Rap telling it like it is

RAP hasn't said a word.

Henryscat, who amongst us doesn't have any character flaws?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Abolsutely no-one, silly question.

Then why are you getting your knickers in a twist about Keanes you fud?

comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by HenrysCat (U3608)



posted 1 hour, 14 minutes ago


Semantics

...........

Not the right word bud. You have your facts wrong, as most WUMs generally do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not wumming. All I wanted to say was aside from 'that incident', I always liked him as a player - but you turn it into whatever suits you better.

Jeez, you really can't make a simple comment on here - I guess such brief written comments are easy to take badly, it's just sad that the first assumption by some is a 'WUM'.

comment by Insufferable-piffle, Shrimpers No1 3rd team fan (U4388)
posted 1 minute ago
Henryscat, who amongst us doesn't have any character flaws?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Abolsutely no-one, silly question.

Then why are you getting your knickers in a twist about Keanes you fud?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because his character flaw makes it reasonable and acceptable to intentionally break someone's leg.

Some flaws in people I find acceptable, some I do not - this is basic social interaction. Surely I'm not unique in this approach?!?

I'm not wumming.

..............

You were and you know it. Stop with the childish pretense.