Replacing Tanganga with Chalobah seems pointless

Chalobah is better than Tanganga tbf but Chelsea surely wouldn't sell cheap, so it does seem like a lot of money for a relatively marginal gain

Is there really any point of rumours about players joining Spurs from Chelsea? When did that last happen?

comment by The Hybrid Doos (U10416)
posted 1 hour, 17 minutes ago
Replacing Tanganga with Chalobah seems pointless
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He’s double the player than tanganga.

comment by MourOUTho (U22347)
posted 32 minutes ago
Is there really any point of rumours about players joining Spurs from Chelsea? When did that last happen?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Poyet for £3 million, there was Cudicini on a free.

Some on here really underrated Jesus

Blasphemy

Especially you Mandy

Seems unlikely. I married a Catholic.

comment by MK (U9129)
posted 33 minutes ago
Some on here really underrated Jesus
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Always wanted him over Richarlison

However not sure he would have started for us and he's probably already arsenals best player.

Good move for both parties unfortunately

comment by Amanda Hugginkiss (U11574)
posted 23 minutes ago
Seems unlikely. I married a Catholic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How many cats you got?

comment by Phenom (U20037)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by Amanda Hugginkiss (U11574)
posted 23 minutes ago
Seems unlikely. I married a Catholic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How many cats you got?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He said Catholic, not cataholic

comment by MK (U9129)
posted about an hour ago
Some on here really underrated Jesus
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Gooners done good business, look good, unfortunately

I'm not getting excited. They've only played fodder so far.

Yeah, lost count of how many times people have overhyped Arsenal after a few good results on flat tracks, only for them to fall apart as usual against good sides

And/or over the winter when their namby pamby players don't fancy it

When they start playing Thursday/Sunday is when we'll see what we're made of

they're made of*

I don’t think we’d beat them if we played them next weekend tbh.

Still think they are weak squad wise though

Lloris
Sanchez Dier Lenglet
Emerson Bissouma Bentancur Sessegnon
Kulusevski Kane Richarlison

For next weekend ^

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Ace (U22861)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by MK (U9129)
posted 4 minutes ago
Lloris
Sanchez Dier Lenglet
Emerson Bissouma Bentancur Sessegnon
Kulusevski Kane Richarlison
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think Davies has been very decent so far, any reason to drop him?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not drop just give Lenglet a chance. We also have whu on weds too which is only a 3 day turn around ( hence Sessegnon starting rather than perisic )

comment by MK (U9129)
posted 3 hours, 35 minutes ago
I don’t think we’d beat them if we played them next weekend tbh.

Still think they are weak squad wise though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep their first eleven is good and today they were impressive, especially Jesus but a few injuries and we will see. Takes alot of energy to play like that.

As Chris says lets see how they get on when the ropey kicks in. A few of their players are injury prone.

Looking forward to Conte giving more minutes to the new signings. After ten games hopefully he will know more about who the strongest eleven is. Feels like every game so far the cracks in certain players who have started are beginning to show.

Jesus is very good and I think he’d suit us better than Richarlison (I think Richarlison would suit them better) but he’s not a reliable goalscorer at the end of the day