or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 332 comments are related to an article called:

Gus Poyet - bitter about Liverpool?

Page 11 of 14

posted on 21/2/20

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 21/2/20

If you don’t believe you’re wrong Fields then you’re beyond help.

It’s a fact that asking ‘who is that comment aimed at’ in no way implies that I think it was aimed at me.

posted on 21/2/20

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 18 seconds ago
If you don’t believe you’re wrong Fields then you’re beyond help.

It’s a fact that asking ‘who is that comment aimed at’ in no way implies that I think it was aimed at me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Right whatever. Moving on.

Show me where I’ve don’t this;

“ Have a look back at your posts to see why this is an argument. Entirely your doinf.”

posted on 21/2/20

No, not moving on.

If you can’t admit that is correct then why do you think I’d debate a separate point with you?

It’s pointless isn’t it?

posted on 21/2/20

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 30 seconds ago
No, not moving on.

If you can’t admit that is correct then why do you think I’d debate a separate point with you?

It’s pointless isn’t it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would I admit anything when you ignore basic questions, asked way before you’re little ‘admit your wrong’ diatribe?

I asked the question before, you ignored and are now demanding I jump through hoops in order to get an answer to my question. You couldn’t make this up.

Truth is you’ve got nothing on your original comment and are using ‘admit you’re wrong’ as a delaying tactic.

I’ll reiterate. This was a decent article with decent debate until you did what you do and derailed it. Shame.

posted on 21/2/20

Because it’s the only reason we’re even having this conversation.

You have derailed this. You took a reasonable question, incorrectly assumed I meant something else and it became an argument.

Entirely your fault.

posted on 21/2/20

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 seconds ago
Because it’s the only reason we’re even having this conversation.

You have derailed this. You took a reasonable question, incorrectly assumed I meant something else and it became an argument.

Entirely your fault.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
See, can’t admit when you’re wrong. The very thing you accuse others of.

You got the wrong end of the stick. I answered your ‘reasonable’ question and you could’ve just moved on. But here we are, again. Winston is trotting out the cliches because you’ve got nothing left. Always descends to this with you.

How long before you go running to Admins?

posted on 21/2/20

Thing is, I can admit when I’m and have done so on this thread.

You’re the one who can’t admit when he’s wrong.

This conversation is happening because you can’t admit your own mistake and sure enough, the thread is ruined.

Now you’re getting upset and going down the personal route.

Your behaviour towards me on here has been pathetic. You’re a grown man, facking act like it.

posted on 21/2/20

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
Thing is, I can admit when I’m and have done so on this thread.

You’re the one who can’t admit when he’s wrong.

This conversation is happening because you can’t admit your own mistake and sure enough, the thread is ruined.

Now you’re getting upset and going down the personal route.

Your behaviour towards me on here has been pathetic. You’re a grown man, facking act like it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah the usual cliches, yawn.

Based on the fact you haven’t answered my question at the tenth time of asking I can only surmise one thing. You were talking shiite. Fair enough, not the first time.

Down the personal route? Getting upset? Behave

I’m not the one that’s made false accusations then refused to back them up.

I stand by you thinking my post was aimed at you, despite no evidence to show it was, otherwise you wouldn’t have asked if it was.

You preaching to others falls on deaf ears kiddo. Do you wonder why?

posted on 21/2/20

You stand by an incorrect comment.

Just proves there’s no point in debating anything else with you.

I asked the question because I wanted to know who it was aimed at. It was perfectly reasonable and instead of just answering it, you threw your toys across the room and ruined the thread.

Come back when you have the maturity to admit you’re wrong, because currently all you are is a keyboard warrior who has derailed a perfectly good thread.

Spend some time reading back your contribution on here and the other thread. You should be embarrassed by how you’ve done behaved.

posted on 21/2/20

Winston did you get Mamba banned? What did he do?

posted on 21/2/20

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 21/2/20

comment by ttliv87 (U11882)
posted 5 minutes ago
This is a similar season to City's 17/18 title win when they had no challenger, yet no-one was doing anything to belittle their achievements that season, if anything they went the other way and many said it was the best PL team ever. So yes it is bitterness.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't. I think the league has been regressing for years. City and Liverpool are extroadinary teams but no way they get 100 points 10 years ago imo.

posted on 21/2/20

Winston I think you were out of order to ripley on this thread. Not a good look. Just saying.

posted on 21/2/20

comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 21 minutes ago
Winston did you get Mamba banned? What did he do?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

What a ridiculous question. I’ve no idea what the situation is but if someone is banned from the site then it’s presumably based on something they’ve done, not me.

posted on 21/2/20

comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 58 seconds ago
comment by ttliv87 (U11882)
posted 5 minutes ago
This is a similar season to City's 17/18 title win when they had no challenger, yet no-one was doing anything to belittle their achievements that season, if anything they went the other way and many said it was the best PL team ever. So yes it is bitterness.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't. I think the league has been regressing for years. City and Liverpool are extroadinary teams but no way they get 100 points 10 years ago imo.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Either way even if they did, there is no way sheffield utd get this high 10 years ago, no way leicester even won the league imo a couple years back in most years.
Worst Chelsea side we have had man for man since probably 1998.

posted on 21/2/20

comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 54 seconds ago
Winston I think you were out of order to ripley on this thread. Not a good look. Just saying.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

And I completely disagree - he came on with no intention of discussing the subject and only to derail the thread.

He got what he deserved.

posted on 21/2/20

comment by ttliv87 (U11882)
posted 9 minutes ago
This is a similar season to City's 17/18 title win when they had no challenger, yet no-one was doing anything to belittle their achievements that season, if anything they went the other way and many said it was the best PL team ever. So yes it is bitterness.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Right, so why would Poyet be bitter about Liverpool winning the league?

posted on 21/2/20

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 53 seconds ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 54 seconds ago
Winston I think you were out of order to ripley on this thread. Not a good look. Just saying.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

And I completely disagree - he came on with no intention of discussing the subject and only to derail the thread.

He got what he deserved.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
na mate, he came on obviously said what he said but you could have just ignored it, or moved on, you did start calling him a prrriiik

posted on 21/2/20

comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 53 seconds ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 54 seconds ago
Winston I think you were out of order to ripley on this thread. Not a good look. Just saying.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

And I completely disagree - he came on with no intention of discussing the subject and only to derail the thread.

He got what he deserved.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
na mate, he came on obviously said what he said but you could have just ignored it, or moved on, you did start calling him a prrriiik
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Actually, I replied politely a couple of times and then he said the most ridiculous thing I’ve seen all year on here - clearly on the wind up and trying to derail the thread, and that’s when I had a pop.

posted on 21/2/20

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 21/2/20

That’s a lie, GT.

He was posting off topic comments. I gave him a chance and he blew it.

If I joined a thread and did what he did, I’d expect an annoyed OP.

posted on 21/2/20

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 21/2/20

Ripley's a quality poster.

No one is safe!

posted on 21/2/20

I suggest you check back to look at my initial replies GT, no overreaction there.

And there’s a difference between discussing something slightly different to joining a thread just to tell the OP it’s a pointless discussion over and over again.

It came to a head when he blatantly contradicted himself with one of the most stupid comments I’ve seen on here and couldn’t even admit if properly.

He was behaving poorly and got what he deserved, no question.

Page 11 of 14

Sign in if you want to comment