comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 1 minute ago
You can’t compare the 2 situations - one is a fact, seen by millions, the other is alleged by one person with zero other evidence - these are the facts.

——————————

Oh dear lord. It’s going to start again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I thought the same

A new slant here. It’s like Trump going back to Pennsylvania with another new lawsuit.

comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 4 minutes ago
Accept the culture of the country in which you reside, and that country will welcome people from different cultures with open arms.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye, but the French










Joking.

comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by CutMeAndIBleedRed (U7593)
posted 2 minutes ago
You can’t compare the 2 situations - one is a fact, seen by millions, the other is alleged by one person with zero other evidence - these are the facts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You sure can’t compare them. One was from a racist with a history of despicable anti social behavior like spiting and biting and cheating and the other wasn’t.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s irrelevant information, but the outcome is the same - they are incomparable.

comment by Clockwork Red (U4892)
posted 56 seconds ago
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 1 minute ago
You can’t compare the 2 situations - one is a fact, seen by millions, the other is alleged by one person with zero other evidence - these are the facts.

——————————

Oh dear lord. It’s going to start again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I thought the same

A new slant here. It’s like Trump going back to Pennsylvania with another new lawsuit.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
New slant? Nothing has changed in the Suarez situation and the other case is totally unrelated - don’t see a new slant?

That’s irrelevant information,

..

But it is correct. The boy Nibbles had previous. Lots of previous.

Do context and intent matter anymore?.

Being from NI we get all sorts of banter, names, slagging and wind ups, but if it is not intended to hurt or offend, can we not be adults and see incidents in context, rather than stick racist labels to everything.

comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 49 seconds ago
That’s irrelevant information,

..

But it is correct. The boy Nibbles had previous. Lots of previous.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If he’d bitten Evra then that would be totally relevant! Him being a bit ‘bitey’ isn’t relevant in the Evra case 🤣

comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 2 minutes ago
That’s irrelevant information,

..

But it is correct. The boy Nibbles had previous. Lots of previous.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nibbles could eat an apple through a letter box.

And he bit our defender, then scored.

comment by CutMeAndIBleedRed (U7593)
posted 39 seconds ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 49 seconds ago
That’s irrelevant information,

..

But it is correct. The boy Nibbles had previous. Lots of previous.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If he’d bitten Evra then that would be totally relevant! Him being a bit ‘bitey’ isn’t relevant in the Evra case 🤣
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did he only bite white?

comment by thebluebellsarablue (U9292)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 2 minutes ago
That’s irrelevant information,

..

But it is correct. The boy Nibbles had previous. Lots of previous.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nibbles could eat an apple through a letter box.

And he bit our defender, then scored.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Come on - he had a little friendly chew on his arm - people are so sensitive these days! 😉🤣

comment by thebluebellsarablue (U9292)
posted 44 seconds ago
comment by CutMeAndIBleedRed (U7593)
posted 39 seconds ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 49 seconds ago
That’s irrelevant information,

..

But it is correct. The boy Nibbles had previous. Lots of previous.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If he’d bitten Evra then that would be totally relevant! Him being a bit ‘bitey’ isn’t relevant in the Evra case 🤣
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did he only bite white?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair point - might be able to build a case on that!

comment by thebluebellsarablue (U9292)

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did he only bite white?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
once you bite white, the rest taste like sh!te

comment by CutMeAndIBleedRed (U7593)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Clockwork Red (U4892)
posted 56 seconds ago
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 1 minute ago
You can’t compare the 2 situations - one is a fact, seen by millions, the other is alleged by one person with zero other evidence - these are the facts.

——————————

Oh dear lord. It’s going to start again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I thought the same

A new slant here. It’s like Trump going back to Pennsylvania with another new lawsuit.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
New slant? Nothing has changed in the Suarez situation and the other case is totally unrelated - don’t see a new slant?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

“New slant” in that other Liverpool fans on here have taken the approach of ignoring context and claiming that same word = same situation = same reaction. You seem to be implying that we don’t even know if the Suarez one happened at all.

Believe me, I know the two are not materially related; it’s part of what I’ve been arguing throughout.

So the new line is that he’s racist because he DIDNT bite Evra, which is his preferred method of depravity!

comment by CutMeAndIBleedRed (U7593)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by thebluebellsarablue (U9292)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 2 minutes ago
That’s irrelevant information,

..

But it is correct. The boy Nibbles had previous. Lots of previous.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nibbles could eat an apple through a letter box.

And he bit our defender, then scored.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Come on - he had a little friendly chew on his arm - people are so sensitive these days! 😉🤣
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Haha.

It was his goal after that ripped my knitting.

comment by Clockwork Red (U4892)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by CutMeAndIBleedRed (U7593)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Clockwork Red (U4892)
posted 56 seconds ago
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 1 minute ago
You can’t compare the 2 situations - one is a fact, seen by millions, the other is alleged by one person with zero other evidence - these are the facts.

——————————

Oh dear lord. It’s going to start again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I thought the same

A new slant here. It’s like Trump going back to Pennsylvania with another new lawsuit.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
New slant? Nothing has changed in the Suarez situation and the other case is totally unrelated - don’t see a new slant?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

“New slant” in that other Liverpool fans on here have taken the approach of ignoring context and claiming that same word = same situation = same reaction. You seem to be implying that we don’t even know if the Suarez one happened at all.

Believe me, I know the two are not materially related; it’s part of what I’ve been arguing throughout.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
I see - on that front my slant is different then. One is proved, one isn’t. It’s like comparing snakes with ghosts (try’s to move conversation onto existence of ghosts!) 🤣

comment by CutMeAndIBleedRed (U7593)
posted 1 minute ago
So the new line is that he’s racist because he DIDNT bite Evra, which is his preferred method of depravity!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I am sure someone will go that route, lol

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Haha.

It was his goal after that ripped my knitting.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
‘Ripped my knitting’ 🤣🤣🤣🤣

If he’d bitten Evra then that would be totally relevant.

....

Anti social behavior is always relevant in things like this. The big toothed one just decided to change his modus operandi.

Cutme’s comment suggests that he hasn’t yet realised, after almost a decade since it happened, that Suarez himself has said that he used the word “negro”

Cutme is well behind the times, both in terms of this thread and the incident that took place with Suarez.

But for what it’s worth, the Cavani incident yesterday has nothing whatsoever to do with what happened between Suarez and Evra.

comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 2 seconds ago
If he’d bitten Evra then that would be totally relevant.

....

Anti social behavior is always relevant in things like this. The big toothed one just decided to change his modus operandi.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah - think that would be a stretch!

Indeed Ripleys. Nibbles admitted his offenses to the FA. It was all in the report that the dips read, but sort of skipped over the damning parts.

comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 1 minute ago
Cutme’s comment suggests that he hasn’t yet realised, after almost a decade since it happened, that Suarez himself has said that he used the word “negro”

Cutme is well behind the times, both in terms of this thread and the incident that took place with Suarez.

But for what it’s worth, the Cavani incident yesterday has nothing whatsoever to do with what happened between Suarez and Evra.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not really - I’m aware of the facts, but as context seems to be the main point, my point still stands - unless I’ve missed Suarez saying he said it in a racist way rather than a way common in his culture?

comment by CutMeAndIBleedRed (U7593)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 2 seconds ago
If he’d bitten Evra then that would be totally relevant.

....

Anti social behavior is always relevant in things like this. The big toothed one just decided to change his modus operandi.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah - think that would be a stretch!
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You are not from Liverpool are you? Otherwise you would be more familiar with how a court works.

comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 5 seconds ago
Indeed Ripleys. Nibbles admitted his offenses to the FA. It was all in the report that the dips read, but sort of skipped over the damning parts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have missed that indeed - could you point me towards it so I can educate myself please. All I’ve read is him
saying he said the word in a way common in his culture and not in the negative way accused of? (That’s a genuine request as I don’t want to be ignorant of all the facts).

I want to be clear that I am not saying he didn’t, or did say the things Evra said he said, just that it is still one mans word against another (As far as I’m aware) which will probably (without to time travel) be proven either way.