Is Rio, The Man for United?

How do you know this didnt happen ?

Yeah, its Ed's fault billionaire owners have invested and rival clubs have finally amde up ground on us commercially.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
5 of the 6 teams who finished immediately below United in 2012/13 finished above United in 2018/19.

Therefore, Ed has overseen United being caught up commercially and on the pitch by teams who we had a head start on. That isn't a sign of someone doing a good job to me.

omment by Super Ed (U22147)
posted 3 minutes ago

How do you know this didnt happen ?

....................

Because you pulled the comments out of your ar$e.

comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 3 minutes ago
Yeah, its Ed's fault billionaire owners have invested and rival clubs have finally amde up ground on us commercially.

.................

What rival clubs have made up on us commercially?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Liverpool, Spurs, Chelsea and Arsenal aren't outspending us. If we were buying players according to a coherent plan and managing them well, we would be blowing all of those clubs away. If you look at the expenditure:points ratio we'd be in the relegation places.

comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 22 minutes ago
omment by Super Ed (U22147)
posted 3 minutes ago

How do you know this didnt happen ?

....................

Because you pulled the comments out of your ar$e.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm still interested in what people think Ed should do in that situation. Ink ow you wont answer though because the answer is obvious and proves my point that we dont LNOW Ed didnt try.

I'm still interested in what people think Ed should do in that situation.

............

No one cares about what you are interested in. That is why no one has bothered to reply to that question.

What Ed shouldn't have done is extend Jose's contract.

You have had the answer to your next question explained to you before, by Elvis.

Thought as much.

The fact is, If faced with those kind of demands, Ed would be right to .over on from.thise players. You wont say that though as youd prefer to pretend Ed disnt back Jose.

The funny thing with that is that by insisting Ed didnt back Jose, without a shred of evidence, you are discrediting your other claims about Ed.

🤭

Thought as much.

..............

You don't think at all. It is your major flaw.

....................

The funny thing with that is that by insisting Ed didnt back Jose, without a shred of evidence

......................

You keep ignoring the evidence.

comment by Super Ed (U22147)
posted 9 minutes ago
Thought as much.

The fact is, If faced with those kind of demands, Ed would be right to .over on from.thise players. You wont say that though as youd prefer to pretend Ed disnt back Jose.

The funny thing with that is that by insisting Ed didnt back Jose, without a shred of evidence, you are discrediting your other claims about Ed.

🤭
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If Ed wasn't going to back Jose (which could well have been the correct course of action) giving him a new contract was madness. It doesn't show the control and planning I'd expect from a man in his position.

comment by Super Ed (U22147)
posted 8 hours, 30 minutes ago
comment by The Lambeau Leap (U21050)
posted 53 minutes ago
This site is so much more enjoyable without RDD hijacking every damned thread. Honestly, it's enough to make you not want to contribute an opinion knowing he's on the thread.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I don’t need to grow a pair. I’m just stating the facts as I see them. Mainly that you’re a tiresome bore.