Every Newco should start in division 3. End of.
My thoughts are you're an incredibly boring cant.
Bravis,
Are you actually stalking me? You are one creepy guy, I hope you know that.
Get in the rule book so there's none of this uncertainty in the future.
Wouldn't wish this on any club.
If it was St Mirren or Inverness, I don't think we'd even entertain an SPL vote. It'd be SFL3 or nothing.
But if it's Celtic or Rangers, then it's understandable that the authorities would try to keep each of them in the league. By the way I'm saying it's understandable, I'm not saying it's right. Just every club should start at the bottom, that's the rules.
"Just every club should start at the bottom, that's the rules."
Thats the problem Henrik, its not int he rules, there are no rules that cover this at all!
If by creating a newco peer clubs are bumped out of monies the newco should be barred from ALL Scottish football.
Hector,
That would suit me, that allows us to move to England.
1-0 United after 3 minutes. Get the Dundee in the SPL asap
mitre
I don't believe we were talking about Rangers.
But seeing as you personalized it, neither the FA nor UEFA would allow such a move.
I doubt the other clubs would do that Mitre
Just get it in the rules for the future.
Div 3 for all newco s
"But seeing as you personalized it, neither the FA nor UEFA would allow such a move."
Thats not strictly speaking true. The FA's stance has always been a 'no' due to us being with the SFA. You are stating we would not be.
Uefa allow it when you are not allowed in your nearest FA.
Its not going to happen though.
No it's not, but to get back on topic, we should have a rule that say's yer barred until you pay the clubs you owe regardless of incarnation.
call in the football debts owed to rangers
that'll cover it
that say's yer barred until you pay the clubs you owe regardless of incarnation.
==
Is 'yer barred' a legal term???
Yes though in a Nirvana like state you would be correct.
I would be a bit concerned that football clubs get preferential treatment though ie why should they get their money and others go without?
plenty hector
I believe we're owed circa half a mill more than we owe
3 million from Everton and 900k from the SPL
CANT THINK OF ANYTHING ELSE.
If that's right, why are you in this situation?
Because Whyte stole 9 million from the employees of Rangers
6 million from the club via the dodgy loan
and 4 million in cash.
He has done well out of it.
Money aint due yet?
or else mibbe clubs will just bump us cos we've liquidated,like the players did
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
New NewCo to SPL?
Page 1 of 1
posted on 14/7/12
Every Newco should start in division 3. End of.
posted on 14/7/12
My thoughts are you're an incredibly boring cant.
posted on 14/7/12
Bravis,
Are you actually stalking me? You are one creepy guy, I hope you know that.
posted on 14/7/12
Division 3.
posted on 14/7/12
Get in the rule book so there's none of this uncertainty in the future.
Wouldn't wish this on any club.
posted on 14/7/12
has to be div 3. end of
posted on 14/7/12
If it was St Mirren or Inverness, I don't think we'd even entertain an SPL vote. It'd be SFL3 or nothing.
But if it's Celtic or Rangers, then it's understandable that the authorities would try to keep each of them in the league. By the way I'm saying it's understandable, I'm not saying it's right. Just every club should start at the bottom, that's the rules.
posted on 14/7/12
"Just every club should start at the bottom, that's the rules."
Thats the problem Henrik, its not int he rules, there are no rules that cover this at all!
posted on 14/7/12
If by creating a newco peer clubs are bumped out of monies the newco should be barred from ALL Scottish football.
posted on 14/7/12
Hector,
That would suit me, that allows us to move to England.
posted on 14/7/12
1-0 United after 3 minutes. Get the Dundee in the SPL asap
posted on 14/7/12
mitre
I don't believe we were talking about Rangers.
But seeing as you personalized it, neither the FA nor UEFA would allow such a move.
posted on 14/7/12
I doubt the other clubs would do that Mitre
Just get it in the rules for the future.
Div 3 for all newco s
posted on 14/7/12
"But seeing as you personalized it, neither the FA nor UEFA would allow such a move."
Thats not strictly speaking true. The FA's stance has always been a 'no' due to us being with the SFA. You are stating we would not be.
Uefa allow it when you are not allowed in your nearest FA.
Its not going to happen though.
posted on 14/7/12
No it's not, but to get back on topic, we should have a rule that say's yer barred until you pay the clubs you owe regardless of incarnation.
posted on 14/7/12
call in the football debts owed to rangers
that'll cover it
posted on 14/7/12
Who owes Rangers?
posted on 14/7/12
that say's yer barred until you pay the clubs you owe regardless of incarnation.
==
Is 'yer barred' a legal term???
Yes though in a Nirvana like state you would be correct.
I would be a bit concerned that football clubs get preferential treatment though ie why should they get their money and others go without?
posted on 14/7/12
plenty hector
I believe we're owed circa half a mill more than we owe
posted on 14/7/12
3 million from Everton and 900k from the SPL
CANT THINK OF ANYTHING ELSE.
posted on 14/7/12
If that's right, why are you in this situation?
posted on 14/7/12
Because Whyte stole 9 million from the employees of Rangers
6 million from the club via the dodgy loan
and 4 million in cash.
He has done well out of it.
posted on 14/7/12
Money aint due yet?
or else mibbe clubs will just bump us cos we've liquidated,like the players did
Page 1 of 1