Scholes wasn't a leader, he was a footballer. The greatest footballer to ever play in the Premiership

TBH If I had to choose I'll go for Keane. Good player.

x4, its obvious now that you are making your comments whilst under the influence.

Lets chat when you are sober.

keane better than viera?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Keane was more a prison no holds barred hacker than a footballer

The greatest player to ever play in the EPL is still playing guys.

Giggs (and i am an Arsenal fan). If you dont believe he is the best ever then it could only be because you think its Thierry, but thats another debate now aint it?

The greatest player to ever play in the EPL is still playing guys.
______________________________
I disagree
He's the most decorated though.

both greats, should have played together but it never happened. But in all truth both are still behind Scholes and Giggs as true greats of the game!

Liverpool are our rivals, city are just noisy neighbours (U6419)
City are more than just your noisy neighbours,they are the power in Manchester now they are the team to Beat,like the Chavs are the team to beat in London.

City are more than just your noisy neighbours,they are the power in Manchester now they are the team to Beat.


I reckon you're in a minority one there with that statement.

only recently City have become a force, give then a chance,it was the same with the Chavs, it took them around 2 seasons with Roman in charge to find the right Manger then BOOM they havent looked back since,whether u like it or not City will win the Tiltle and many other Trophys with their Sugar daddy in charge by the looks of it he's like Roman he want Trophys NOW.

with the Chavs, it took them around 2 seasons with Roman in charge to find the right Manger then BOOM they havent looked back since

They've won three league titles, to United's four, got through six managers and still haven't won the Champions League.

I seem to remember us winning more titles then Chelsea have since roman, while I agree there money has helped make them better, they still haven't overtaken us. City will have to wait

Liverpool are our rivals, city are just noisy neighbours (U6419)
how long did it take Fergie to win the League Title

Im not sure fergie had oil barrons millions in the late 1980's

u havent answered my Question,how many years did it take Fergie to win the Title?

how long did it take Fergie to win the League Title

What point exactly are you trying to make there? If it's supposed to be a comparison between Ferguson and Mancini, then you could have at least posted a comparison between what the two spent in their first 18 months in charge at the club.

x4 (U9335)
ill answer it for u shall i it took him him 5 years, mourinho won the Title in his first season and Ancelotti won the double in his first season and Wenger in his second season,im not saying what Fergie has done at UTD aint Remarkable because it is,but City will be the team to beat in the coming seasons just like the Chavs were with their Sugar daddy,without them they would be nowhere and the Title would be between ARSENAL and UTD.

But there situations aren't the same in anyway, united were a midtable club lacking any real stars, Mancini walked into the club when they were absolutely loaded and had his pick of any player he wants in the world. Comparing them in your way is short sighted and silly

Why is there so much talk, when a one-word answer will suffice?

Keane.