or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 761658 comments are related to an article called:

The Arsenal Thread

Page 30319 of 30467

posted 3 weeks ago

wudda, cudda, shudda.

Not getting hung up about how much he would cost. KSE stumped up £106m for the player they wanted.

The good bit is "Bruno is receptive to the idea of joining Arsenal."

posted 3 weeks ago

Yea but who’s the source? A random bloke on twitter ain’t it

posted 3 weeks ago

Who knows abt twitter these days? This bloke has 218k followers.

posted 3 weeks ago

I'm warming up to getting Isak, he can play RW right?
As Havertz is mostly available, I think we can cover the few games he's unavailable due to injury

posted 3 weeks ago

90% bots

posted 3 weeks ago

Havertz will flop next season. Bookmark it

posted 3 weeks ago

and Romano. 🤷

posted 3 weeks ago

comment by Billy Bonkers (U3245)
posted about a minute ago
Havertz will flop next season. Bookmark it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
why don't you just back your player

posted 3 weeks ago

😳

posted 3 weeks ago

Havertz works because he drops back into midfield and allows Odegaard to assume the Bergkamp role in some games. Or stays as no.9 to long balls on others.

So he doesn't need to score 20 goals a season.

But if Jesus goes, I think we will need another developed striker. You can then risk Obi-Martins as 3rd choice.

posted 3 weeks ago

obi is not ready even for the Under 21, get Isak, he can cover for Saka too

posted 3 weeks ago

It is what I was hinting at pp. But would need Jesus to go. If we keep Jesus we will need to get a more development striker till Obi is ready.

But yeah I would be looking at a striker who can fill wide or in the middle. Which is why I suppose we are still linked to Gyökeres as well.

Isak isn't available according to Newcastle. But if we do need to go to €100m I would personally get Osimhen.

comment by Tu Meke (U3732)

posted 3 weeks ago

Can't see Newcastle selling both Bruno and Isak. And even if they do, can't see us getting both

posted 3 weeks ago

If it's just one i prefer Isak, i can't stand Bruno. Isak is more like an Arteta signing and would fit right in with us.

posted 3 weeks ago

comment by Jenius99 (U4918)
posted about 2 hours ago
It is what I was hinting at pp. But would need Jesus to go. If we keep Jesus we will need to get a more development striker till Obi is ready.

But yeah I would be looking at a striker who can fill wide or in the middle. Which is why I suppose we are still linked to Gyökeres as well.

Isak isn't available according to Newcastle. But if we do need to go to €100m I would personally get Osimhen.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Gyökeres is a big risk for that price, look at Núñez, he may turn out to be good but it's still risky
Osimhen is another risk, i really wasn't impressed with him at AFCON, isn't he going to PSG anyway?
Isak is the less riskier choice apart from his injuries, he can also play on the right too

posted 3 weeks ago

Morata

posted 3 weeks ago

&

posted 3 weeks ago

Lukaku

posted 3 weeks ago

PIVOT

posted 3 weeks ago

I see Pete killed the thread again

comment by Tu Meke (U3732)

posted 3 weeks ago

comment by Passion Power - Make 1984 fiction again (U8398)
posted 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
If it's just one i prefer Isak, i can't stand Bruno. Isak is more like an Arteta signing and would fit right in with us.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

How is Isak more like an arteta signing? Arteta barely signs attackers

posted 3 weeks ago

comment by Tu Meke (U3732)
posted 29 minutes ago
comment by Passion Power - Make 1984 fiction again (U8398)
posted 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
If it's just one i prefer Isak, i can't stand Bruno. Isak is more like an Arteta signing and would fit right in with us.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

How is Isak more like an arteta signing? Arteta barely signs attackers
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just his play and movement i think suits us better than an oshimen, yes in the Afcon he didn't get much service but he was also poor at bringing others into the game, the subs did more in 5mins than he did all game.
also isak can play RW quite well
Arteta has signed Jesus and havertz.

posted 3 weeks ago

Is Reiss Nelson better than Sancho

posted 3 weeks ago

comment by Tu Meke (U3732)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Passion Power - Make 1984 fiction again (U8398)
posted 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
If it's just one i prefer Isak, i can't stand Bruno. Isak is more like an Arteta signing and would fit right in with us.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

How is Isak more like an arteta signing? Arteta barely signs attackers
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Not entirely correct, Isak does fit the profile of a fluid, interchangeable positional player

posted 3 weeks ago

comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted less than a minute ago
Is Reiss Nelson better than Sancho
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thinking of winding up the already depressed Utd fans?

Page 30319 of 30467

Sign in if you want to comment