wudda, cudda, shudda.
Not getting hung up about how much he would cost. KSE stumped up £106m for the player they wanted.
The good bit is "Bruno is receptive to the idea of joining Arsenal."
Yea but who’s the source? A random bloke on twitter ain’t it
Who knows abt twitter these days? This bloke has 218k followers.
I'm warming up to getting Isak, he can play RW right?
As Havertz is mostly available, I think we can cover the few games he's unavailable due to injury
Havertz will flop next season. Bookmark it
comment by Billy Bonkers (U3245)
posted about a minute ago
Havertz will flop next season. Bookmark it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
why don't you just back your player
Havertz works because he drops back into midfield and allows Odegaard to assume the Bergkamp role in some games. Or stays as no.9 to long balls on others.
So he doesn't need to score 20 goals a season.
But if Jesus goes, I think we will need another developed striker. You can then risk Obi-Martins as 3rd choice.
obi is not ready even for the Under 21, get Isak, he can cover for Saka too
It is what I was hinting at pp. But would need Jesus to go. If we keep Jesus we will need to get a more development striker till Obi is ready.
But yeah I would be looking at a striker who can fill wide or in the middle. Which is why I suppose we are still linked to Gyökeres as well.
Isak isn't available according to Newcastle. But if we do need to go to €100m I would personally get Osimhen.
Can't see Newcastle selling both Bruno and Isak. And even if they do, can't see us getting both
If it's just one i prefer Isak, i can't stand Bruno. Isak is more like an Arteta signing and would fit right in with us.
comment by Jenius99 (U4918)
posted about 2 hours ago
It is what I was hinting at pp. But would need Jesus to go. If we keep Jesus we will need to get a more development striker till Obi is ready.
But yeah I would be looking at a striker who can fill wide or in the middle. Which is why I suppose we are still linked to Gyökeres as well.
Isak isn't available according to Newcastle. But if we do need to go to €100m I would personally get Osimhen.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Gyökeres is a big risk for that price, look at Núñez, he may turn out to be good but it's still risky
Osimhen is another risk, i really wasn't impressed with him at AFCON, isn't he going to PSG anyway?
Isak is the less riskier choice apart from his injuries, he can also play on the right too
I see Pete killed the thread again
comment by Passion Power - Make 1984 fiction again (U8398)
posted 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
If it's just one i prefer Isak, i can't stand Bruno. Isak is more like an Arteta signing and would fit right in with us.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How is Isak more like an arteta signing? Arteta barely signs attackers
comment by Tu Meke (U3732)
posted 29 minutes ago
comment by Passion Power - Make 1984 fiction again (U8398)
posted 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
If it's just one i prefer Isak, i can't stand Bruno. Isak is more like an Arteta signing and would fit right in with us.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How is Isak more like an arteta signing? Arteta barely signs attackers
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just his play and movement i think suits us better than an oshimen, yes in the Afcon he didn't get much service but he was also poor at bringing others into the game, the subs did more in 5mins than he did all game.
also isak can play RW quite well
Arteta has signed Jesus and havertz.
Is Reiss Nelson better than Sancho
comment by Tu Meke (U3732)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Passion Power - Make 1984 fiction again (U8398)
posted 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
If it's just one i prefer Isak, i can't stand Bruno. Isak is more like an Arteta signing and would fit right in with us.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How is Isak more like an arteta signing? Arteta barely signs attackers
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Not entirely correct, Isak does fit the profile of a fluid, interchangeable positional player
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted less than a minute ago
Is Reiss Nelson better than Sancho
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thinking of winding up the already depressed Utd fans?
Sign in if you want to comment
The Arsenal Thread
Page 30319 of 30467
30320 | 30321 | 30322 | 30323 | 30324
posted 3 weeks ago
wudda, cudda, shudda.
Not getting hung up about how much he would cost. KSE stumped up £106m for the player they wanted.
The good bit is "Bruno is receptive to the idea of joining Arsenal."
posted 3 weeks ago
Yea but who’s the source? A random bloke on twitter ain’t it
posted 3 weeks ago
Who knows abt twitter these days? This bloke has 218k followers.
posted 3 weeks ago
I'm warming up to getting Isak, he can play RW right?
As Havertz is mostly available, I think we can cover the few games he's unavailable due to injury
posted 3 weeks ago
90% bots
posted 3 weeks ago
Havertz will flop next season. Bookmark it
posted 3 weeks ago
and Romano. 🤷
posted 3 weeks ago
comment by Billy Bonkers (U3245)
posted about a minute ago
Havertz will flop next season. Bookmark it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
why don't you just back your player
posted 3 weeks ago
😳
posted 3 weeks ago
Havertz works because he drops back into midfield and allows Odegaard to assume the Bergkamp role in some games. Or stays as no.9 to long balls on others.
So he doesn't need to score 20 goals a season.
But if Jesus goes, I think we will need another developed striker. You can then risk Obi-Martins as 3rd choice.
posted 3 weeks ago
obi is not ready even for the Under 21, get Isak, he can cover for Saka too
posted 3 weeks ago
It is what I was hinting at pp. But would need Jesus to go. If we keep Jesus we will need to get a more development striker till Obi is ready.
But yeah I would be looking at a striker who can fill wide or in the middle. Which is why I suppose we are still linked to Gyökeres as well.
Isak isn't available according to Newcastle. But if we do need to go to €100m I would personally get Osimhen.
posted 3 weeks ago
Can't see Newcastle selling both Bruno and Isak. And even if they do, can't see us getting both
posted 3 weeks ago
If it's just one i prefer Isak, i can't stand Bruno. Isak is more like an Arteta signing and would fit right in with us.
posted 3 weeks ago
comment by Jenius99 (U4918)
posted about 2 hours ago
It is what I was hinting at pp. But would need Jesus to go. If we keep Jesus we will need to get a more development striker till Obi is ready.
But yeah I would be looking at a striker who can fill wide or in the middle. Which is why I suppose we are still linked to Gyökeres as well.
Isak isn't available according to Newcastle. But if we do need to go to €100m I would personally get Osimhen.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Gyökeres is a big risk for that price, look at Núñez, he may turn out to be good but it's still risky
Osimhen is another risk, i really wasn't impressed with him at AFCON, isn't he going to PSG anyway?
Isak is the less riskier choice apart from his injuries, he can also play on the right too
posted 3 weeks ago
Morata
posted 3 weeks ago
&
posted 3 weeks ago
Lukaku
posted 3 weeks ago
PIVOT
posted 3 weeks ago
I see Pete killed the thread again
posted 3 weeks ago
comment by Passion Power - Make 1984 fiction again (U8398)
posted 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
If it's just one i prefer Isak, i can't stand Bruno. Isak is more like an Arteta signing and would fit right in with us.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How is Isak more like an arteta signing? Arteta barely signs attackers
posted 3 weeks ago
comment by Tu Meke (U3732)
posted 29 minutes ago
comment by Passion Power - Make 1984 fiction again (U8398)
posted 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
If it's just one i prefer Isak, i can't stand Bruno. Isak is more like an Arteta signing and would fit right in with us.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How is Isak more like an arteta signing? Arteta barely signs attackers
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just his play and movement i think suits us better than an oshimen, yes in the Afcon he didn't get much service but he was also poor at bringing others into the game, the subs did more in 5mins than he did all game.
also isak can play RW quite well
Arteta has signed Jesus and havertz.
posted 3 weeks ago
Is Reiss Nelson better than Sancho
posted 3 weeks ago
comment by Tu Meke (U3732)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Passion Power - Make 1984 fiction again (U8398)
posted 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
If it's just one i prefer Isak, i can't stand Bruno. Isak is more like an Arteta signing and would fit right in with us.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How is Isak more like an arteta signing? Arteta barely signs attackers
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Not entirely correct, Isak does fit the profile of a fluid, interchangeable positional player
posted 3 weeks ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted less than a minute ago
Is Reiss Nelson better than Sancho
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thinking of winding up the already depressed Utd fans?
Page 30319 of 30467
30320 | 30321 | 30322 | 30323 | 30324