or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 842602 comments are related to an article called:

THE Arsenal Thread

Page 33149 of 33705

comment by Tu Meke (U3732)

posted on 1/7/25

comment by Passion Power - Make 1984 fiction again(U8398) (U8398)
posted 3 minutes ago
who was suppose to cover for Odegaard
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Who, trossard? Think you're getting him mixed up with vieira

posted on 1/7/25

comment by Passion Power - Make 1984 fiction again(U8398) (U8398)
posted 2 minutes ago
who was suppose to cover for Odegaard
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Arteta said it was meant to be Ethan. But obviously he wasn't ready in begining Sep last season. So he tweaked the formation to 4-4-2 using Trossard/Havertz to drop into midfield on either side. Havertz used to drop behind Saka and Trossard behing Martinelli. Didn't work all that well.

posted on 1/7/25

@HandofArsenal
Noni Madueke -

- Arsenal

The club have been speaking to his reps the past few weeks. The club hold genuine interest in Noni but talks are not advanced on personal terms. No proposal made to the player either as of today.

- Chelsea

Club officials have denied any bid being made.

- Player side

The player has expressed interest in our project but has reservations about competing with Saka. Furthermore, the player is not keen on playing LW either.

In truth, the interest is genuine but as of today its as you were.
2:02 PM

comment by Peebs (U3245)

posted on 1/7/25

Ffs end this nonsense NOW

posted on 1/7/25

"The player has expressed interest in our project but has reservations about competing with Saka."

posted on 1/7/25

hopefully it won't get more serious Pete

posted on 1/7/25

I doubt Arteta wanted to buy him to compete with Saka. Cover maybe.

I will be relieved if it is just part of Berta's due diligence.

I much prefer Rodrygo.

posted on 1/7/25

No seriously what's the deal behind these Chelsea signings every season?

It's not like they are taking our players. We are constantly buying their left overs.

Definitely needs investigating

posted on 1/7/25

Chelsea are in a vulnerable position every season because of the long contracts their players are on. Makes it easier to get one if any clubs fancies a player.

posted on 1/7/25

comment by Jenius99 (U4918)
posted 1 minute ago
Chelsea are in a vulnerable position every season because of the long contracts their players are on. Makes it easier to get one if any clubs fancies a player.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What you on about.

We have been buying Chelsea players since the wenger days.

Spending 65M and 50M on Madueke would be criminal

posted on 1/7/25

comment by Castor Troy (U8700)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Jenius99 (U4918)
posted 1 minute ago
Chelsea are in a vulnerable position every season because of the long contracts their players are on. Makes it easier to get one if any clubs fancies a player.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What you on about.

We have been buying Chelsea players since the wenger days.

Spending 65M and 50M on Madueke would be criminal
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I am talking about now. If you want to talk of 'Roman' times there are different reasons. Dj has pointed them out before like no real rivalry unlike with Spurs and players of a good calibre (when Chelsea used to compete for top trophies) wanting to stay in London.

posted on 1/7/25

So why are Chelsea not buying our left overs?

posted on 1/7/25

At the moment?

posted on 1/7/25

If the players are not good enough for Chelsea, they shouldn't be good enough for us

posted on 1/7/25

Well at the moment, Chelsea have a tonn of players, we don't really

posted on 1/7/25

Fans are actually defending this model of buying Chelsea rejects every season

posted on 1/7/25

who said I'm defending it, I just answered your question on why we don't sell to them

posted on 1/7/25

I don't think you are getting the point. Chelsea don't have a choice. All their players are for sale and have to be because of PSR.

posted on 1/7/25

comment by Passion Power - Make 1984 fiction again(U8398) (U8398)
posted 46 seconds ago
who said I'm defending it, I just answered your question on why we don't sell to them
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chelsea have spent a forunte on buying Bournemouth players recently . They are always buying.

posted on 1/7/25

comment by Jenius99 (U4918)
posted 1 second ago
I don't think you are getting the point. Chelsea don't have a choice. All their players are for sale and have to be because of PSR.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah that's all good but why are we the club always helping them out?

posted on 1/7/25

comment by Castor Troy (U8700)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by Jenius99 (U4918)
posted 1 second ago
I don't think you are getting the point. Chelsea don't have a choice. All their players are for sale and have to be because of PSR.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah that's all good but why are we the club always helping them out?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Arteta fancies some of their players. It's much easier getting a player out of Chelsea than some of the clubs abroad.

posted on 1/7/25

Another day another Castor meltdown.

comment by Peebs (U3245)

posted on 1/7/25

DJ wishes Castors goo could melt down his face

posted on 1/7/25

comment by Castor Troy (U8700)
posted 31 minutes ago
comment by Passion Power - Make 1984 fiction again(U8398) (U8398)
posted 46 seconds ago
who said I'm defending it, I just answered your question on why we don't sell to them
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chelsea have spent a forunte on buying Bournemouth players recently . They are always buying.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
you mean Brighton?

posted on 1/7/25

comment by Passion Power - Make 1984 fiction again(U8398) (U8398)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Castor Troy (U8700)
posted 31 minutes ago
comment by Passion Power - Make 1984 fiction again(U8398) (U8398)
posted 46 seconds ago
who said I'm defending it, I just answered your question on why we don't sell to them
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chelsea have spent a forunte on buying Bournemouth players recently . They are always buying.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
you mean Brighton?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Also who do we have to sell? we can't even give our players away let alone sell them

Page 33149 of 33705

Sign in if you want to comment