comment by Passion Power - Make 1984 fiction again(U8398) (U8398)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Tu mEze (U3732)
posted 3 minutes ago
There's only 3 points separating 2nd and 11th
----------------------------------------------------------------------
a bit mad that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
12th now.

I don't want west ham to go down

Fack West Ham. Damaged our title hopes more than once and were the only team to beat us in the League at the Emirates in the first couple of seasons. And Brooking.

I see things clearly as it is, whereas you defend all these racist types for some strange reason. Charlie Kirk didn't like Martin Luther King, I wonder why that is

comment by Snooker_49 (U10665)
posted less than a minute ago
I see things clearly as it is, whereas you defend all these racist types for some strange reason. Charlie Kirk didn't like Martin Luther King, I wonder why that is
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Political differences probably.

Ooofffftt, Wilson SOT.

PENALTY!!!

Touched the ball!!!!

As obvious as you are going to get. I hope they don't do that touch chit.

If this isn't overturned then lil'Dermy G and Howie Webb will have a lot of explaining to do.

Touchline review. Overturn incoming.

Going to be unpopular.

NewVARstle

Who will be the first club to get a slight touch of the ball but still have a penalty given against them... And which of the top6 will we be playing when it happens 🥸

Just confirms what an awful decision it was to give Brighton a penalty against us last season, and what a dishonourable caaaant Howard Webb is for defending the decision.

comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Snooker_49 (U10665)
posted less than a minute ago
I see things clearly as it is, whereas you defend all these racist types for some strange reason. Charlie Kirk didn't like Martin Luther King, I wonder why that is
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Political differences probably.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Martin Luther King was actually a Republican, but there were apparently dark things about his life that could come out in the few years, like rape and stuff

It had nothing to do with him being black, it was mainly his moral differences while MLK was supposedly a reverend. That's why you have to check things before blindly calling someone a racist.

All black men are rapists and stuff.

Was west ham the 1st club to beat us at the emirates?

Yeah DJs man Marlon Harewood

comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 2 minutes ago
Just confirms what an awful decision it was to give Brighton a penalty against us last season, and what a dishonourable caaaant Howard Webb is for defending the decision.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Saliba didn't get the ball, the ball got him 🎯

comment by Passion Power - Make 1984 fiction again(U8398) (U8398)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Snooker_49 (U10665)
posted less than a minute ago
I see things clearly as it is, whereas you defend all these racist types for some strange reason. Charlie Kirk didn't like Martin Luther King, I wonder why that is
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Political differences probably.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Martin Luther King was actually a Republican, but there were apparently dark things about his life that could come out in the few years, like rape and stuff

It had nothing to do with him being black, it was mainly his moral differences while MLK was supposedly a reverend. That's why you have to check things before blindly calling someone a racist.




----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why is it on to blindly call MLK a rapist but not ok to call Charlie Kirk a racist?

Kirk said quite a lot of racist things btw, he was particularly derogatory about black women

Crouchy being the most logical person in this convo

West Ham don't deserve to be behind.

comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Passion Power - Make 1984 fiction again(U8398) (U8398)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Snooker_49 (U10665)
posted less than a minute ago
I see things clearly as it is, whereas you defend all these racist types for some strange reason. Charlie Kirk didn't like Martin Luther King, I wonder why that is
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Political differences probably.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Martin Luther King was actually a Republican, but there were apparently dark things about his life that could come out in the few years, like rape and stuff

It had nothing to do with him being black, it was mainly his moral differences while MLK was supposedly a reverend. That's why you have to check things before blindly calling someone a racist.




----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why is it on to blindly call MLK a rapist but not ok to call Charlie Kirk a racist?

Kirk said quite a lot of racist things btw, he was particularly derogatory about black women
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He didn't say it blindly, it's a known rumour unfortunately. I've known about it for years.

He never said anything derogatory about black women, he criticised 4 women who are black when talking about DEI but no way he was talking about all black women. Again, do your research

Post again