Peebs finds him immoral and fundamental.

comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted about a minute ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 18 minutes ago
It is Ludacris, and nope.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ludicrous
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The BANTZ

Crooby listens to Bloc Party cos he is an independent woman from Shoreditch

Was good BANTZ if intentional

comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted less than a minute ago
Was good BANTZ if intentional
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Gonna plead the 5th

comment by Peebs (U3245)
posted less than a minute ago
Crooby listens to Bloc Party cos he is an independent woman from Shoreditch
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I only listen to Silent Alarm, the subsequent albums are low/mid

J99 only listens to instrumental versions of The Smiths because he finds Morrisey immoral and far from fundamental

Thread thoughts on Snooks new signature characteristic of naming songs linked to a previous post?

Yay or Nay?

comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted less than a minute ago
Thread thoughts on Snooks new signature characteristic of naming songs linked to a previous post?

Yay or Nay?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
UTTER TRASH

Nay

Oh. I like it. Shows a bit of personality. Not as good as "fk off ref", but still a "YAY" from me.

comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 57 seconds ago
Oh. I like it. Shows a bit of personality. Not as good as "fk off ref", but still a "YAY" from me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This makes you immoral and fundamentally ghe

So be it.

Yay(a Sanogo) from me.

https://www.thetimes.com/life-style/health-fitness/article/guide-to-beans-r9jjlspt0

The Times doing an article about beans... Written by someone called Peta Bee 🧐

No wonder he doesn't write articles on here anymore.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2025/11/07/jamie-carragher-rise-of-set-piece-cause-for-concern/

"Manchester City and Liverpool are responsible for the highest quality Premier League fixture ever."

"Arguments can rage between supporters of Manchester United, Arsenal and Chelsea about the drama of Sir Alex Ferguson taking on Arsène Wenger, or José Mourinho taking on the world. Their meetings made for brilliant entertainment."

"But for pure footballing excellence, City v Liverpool "

"Now, rather than absorb the standards set by Guardiola, especially, and seek innovative means of propelling the game, more Premier League coaches are looking to the past over redefining the future. We are in a period of regression."


-----
Isn't he one of the ones that blast managers for playing out the back when they don't have the personnel to do so?
So much wrong with this article

He and Neville are interested in clickbait and using their position to influence discourse that favours their clubs and brings down other (Neville counting us take 20 seconds to take a corner against Palace for example)

I'd suggest not reading it and not linking it tbh

What is the best game you've ever seen? I can't remember any citypool games tbh.

Arsenal v man utd at the Emirates in 2008 was brilliant. Both teams played such good football that day, Nasri scored 2

NLD derby games in the mid 2000s onwards were the best games for pure banter / entertainment

They haven't been very good recently, there was a period that the Arsenal v Spurs match was more exciting than those fixtures.

He's just trying to discredit us just in case we win the title.
He mentioned about our set piece/open goal rate, someone pointed out that that when Liverpool won the CL they too scored a lot from set pieces.

He's a professional bombaclat

Chris H and DJ both HATE the "socials"

Work socials?

socialists