Chelsea are boring. Deal with it Sheriff.
Chelsea, when they turn it on, are an absolute joy to watch.
Chelsea, when they park the bus and grind out a result, are absolutely abysmal to watch.
Which statement provokes more attention?
Chelsea are boring. Deal with it Sheriff.
----------------------------------------------
I'm sure their players are struggling to deal with it tonight.
They need a bigger stadium even the Hammers have better stadium next few seasons, small club on steroids.
sheriff the boring tag is nothing serious. Why a gooner would treat it as such is beyond me.
This is something I expected from Jose at a press conference feeling the need to defend his team of champions.
Lad has reacted angrier than the Chelsea fans
Fack off you fraud
The reaction there has been to a very simple terrace chant is ridiculous.
What a carve up of an article
2003/04 we won the title by 11 points. Not sure what point you are trying to make about the points difference other than the 97/98 was a far more exciting season.
Plus it should also be noted we played a lot of reserves for the last two games ahead of the Cup final in 98, losing both. The title was comfortably wrapped up, much like this season.
2001/02 is left out for no particular reason. Did you forget we won the PL that season?
Very strange article that uses statistics that have no relevance to the point trying to be made.
sheriff the boring tag is nothing serious. Why a gooner would treat it as such is beyond me.
-----------------------------------
On the contrary, a lot of people actually believe the drivel they spout.
comment by Sheriff John Brown - bring back David Dein (U7482)
posted 7 seconds ago
sheriff the boring tag is nothing serious. Why a gooner would treat it as such is beyond me.
-----------------------------------
On the contrary, a lot of people actually believe the drivel they spout.
----------------------------------------------------------------------Self awareness here from Sheriff
2003/04 we won the title by 11 points. Not sure what point you are trying to make about the points difference other than the 97/98 was a far more exciting season.
----------------------------------------------
The point is very clear. That this "boring" Chelsea could end with more points and score more goals than our much vaunted invincibles. Not really had to figure out, is it?
All these talks about May weather, what about April, I thought it was too cold for my likings. And the TV are all talking about ParkyYao while we have disasters all around the globe like they are Torries or something💪
comment by Sheriff John Brown - bring back David Dein (U7482)
posted 28 seconds ago
2003/04 we won the title by 11 points. Not sure what point you are trying to make about the points difference other than the 97/98 was a far more exciting season.
----------------------------------------------
The point is very clear. That this "boring" Chelsea could end with more points and score more goals than our much vaunted invincibles. Not really had to figure out, is it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you cannot even explain why you added two different seasons points together to make a comparison.
Clown will do anything to dig at Arsenal, time to stop playing into one of JA's greatest WUM trails of all time he isn't one of us
Also you can be very entertaining in two 3-0 wins whereas another team can win 7-0 one game and awful and boring in the next 5 games which still results in them having the superior goal difference.
Goals scored is no measure of entertainment. All about using your fackin eyes to assess what is entertaining or not throughout a season and if you think this Chelsea side is just as entertaining as The Invincibles... then you're clueless, lost, confused and a moron that needs serious help
What have Chelsea done to be deemed not boring?
So you cannot even explain why you added two different seasons points together to make a comparison.
------------------------------------------
I simply picked 2 of our historic sides in the PL era to compare cos I felt like using them for reference. It's bizarre you feel entitled to some explanation on why I picked them.
comment by Oxlade-Chambers (Inventor) (U6157)
posted 41 seconds ago
Clown will do anything to dig at Arsenal, time to stop playing into one of JA's greatest WUM trails of all time he isn't one of us
Also you can be very entertaining in two 3-0 wins whereas another team can win 7-0 one game and awful and boring in the next 5 games which still results in them having the superior goal difference.
Goals scored is no measure of entertainment. All about using your fackin eyes to assess what is entertaining or not throughout a season and if you think this Chelsea side is just as entertaining as The Invincibles... then you're clueless, lost, confused and a moron that needs serious help
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Preston North End are the invincibles you clown!
They didn't lose a league or cup game!
Also you can be very entertaining in two 3-0 wins whereas another team can win 7-0 one game and awful and boring in the next 5 games which still results in them having the superior goal difference.
-----------------------------------
A stupid argument. A 7-0 followed by a 1-0 still shows you're about as entertaining as a team with two 3-0 wins in the same fixtures.
Entertainment and Chelsea is a taboo no one in their right mind should ever utter.
Goals scored is no measure of entertainment. All about using your fackin eyes to assess what is entertaining or not throughout a season and if you think this Chelsea side is just as entertaining as The Invincibles... then you're clueless, lost, confused and a moron that needs serious help
------------------------------------
The most entertaining teams in history are prolific scorers. Goals are the most "objective" measure cos all other bs is subject to the personal bias of cretins like you. I would say watching Hazard is about as exciting as watching anything in the league.
Oh, and our '97/98 team was more boring than this Chelsea side. Easily.
comment by Scyther (U17162)
posted 5 minutes ago
What have Chelsea done to be deemed not boring?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What have utd done to be deemed not bang average?
comment by Sheriff John Brown - bring back David Dein (U7482)
posted 3 minutes ago
So you cannot even explain why you added two different seasons points together to make a comparison.
------------------------------------------
I simply picked 2 of our historic sides in the PL era to compare cos I felt like using them for reference. It's bizarre you feel entitled to some explanation on why I picked them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is bizarre that you think points difference equates to style of play.
The fact is the 97/98 was a far more exciting and interesting season than this. The 1 point difference between us and the team that was a year away from the treble does not make the Arsenal team of 97/98 boring, or indeed crap.
Again, you are not making a point with your ridiculous choices of stats to compare.
A nonsense article.
Sign in if you want to comment
Boring, boring Chelsea.
Page 1 of 7
6 | 7
posted on 3/5/15
Chelsea are boring
posted on 3/5/15
Chelsea are boring. Deal with it Sheriff.
posted on 3/5/15
Chelsea, when they turn it on, are an absolute joy to watch.
Chelsea, when they park the bus and grind out a result, are absolutely abysmal to watch.
Which statement provokes more attention?
posted on 3/5/15
Chelsea are boring. Deal with it Sheriff.
----------------------------------------------
I'm sure their players are struggling to deal with it tonight.
posted on 3/5/15
They need a bigger stadium even the Hammers have better stadium next few seasons, small club on steroids.
posted on 3/5/15
sheriff the boring tag is nothing serious. Why a gooner would treat it as such is beyond me.
This is something I expected from Jose at a press conference feeling the need to defend his team of champions.
posted on 3/5/15
Sheriff is anti-Arsenal
posted on 3/5/15
Lad has reacted angrier than the Chelsea fans
Fack off you fraud
posted on 3/5/15
The reaction there has been to a very simple terrace chant is ridiculous.
posted on 3/5/15
What a carve up of an article
2003/04 we won the title by 11 points. Not sure what point you are trying to make about the points difference other than the 97/98 was a far more exciting season.
Plus it should also be noted we played a lot of reserves for the last two games ahead of the Cup final in 98, losing both. The title was comfortably wrapped up, much like this season.
2001/02 is left out for no particular reason. Did you forget we won the PL that season?
Very strange article that uses statistics that have no relevance to the point trying to be made.
posted on 3/5/15
sheriff the boring tag is nothing serious. Why a gooner would treat it as such is beyond me.
-----------------------------------
On the contrary, a lot of people actually believe the drivel they spout.
posted on 3/5/15
comment by Sheriff John Brown - bring back David Dein (U7482)
posted 7 seconds ago
sheriff the boring tag is nothing serious. Why a gooner would treat it as such is beyond me.
-----------------------------------
On the contrary, a lot of people actually believe the drivel they spout.
----------------------------------------------------------------------Self awareness here from Sheriff
posted on 3/5/15
2003/04 we won the title by 11 points. Not sure what point you are trying to make about the points difference other than the 97/98 was a far more exciting season.
----------------------------------------------
The point is very clear. That this "boring" Chelsea could end with more points and score more goals than our much vaunted invincibles. Not really had to figure out, is it?
posted on 3/5/15
All these talks about May weather, what about April, I thought it was too cold for my likings. And the TV are all talking about ParkyYao while we have disasters all around the globe like they are Torries or something💪
posted on 3/5/15
comment by Sheriff John Brown - bring back David Dein (U7482)
posted 28 seconds ago
2003/04 we won the title by 11 points. Not sure what point you are trying to make about the points difference other than the 97/98 was a far more exciting season.
----------------------------------------------
The point is very clear. That this "boring" Chelsea could end with more points and score more goals than our much vaunted invincibles. Not really had to figure out, is it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you cannot even explain why you added two different seasons points together to make a comparison.
posted on 3/5/15
Clown will do anything to dig at Arsenal, time to stop playing into one of JA's greatest WUM trails of all time he isn't one of us
Also you can be very entertaining in two 3-0 wins whereas another team can win 7-0 one game and awful and boring in the next 5 games which still results in them having the superior goal difference.
Goals scored is no measure of entertainment. All about using your fackin eyes to assess what is entertaining or not throughout a season and if you think this Chelsea side is just as entertaining as The Invincibles... then you're clueless, lost, confused and a moron that needs serious help
posted on 3/5/15
5
posted on 3/5/15
What have Chelsea done to be deemed not boring?
posted on 3/5/15
So you cannot even explain why you added two different seasons points together to make a comparison.
------------------------------------------
I simply picked 2 of our historic sides in the PL era to compare cos I felt like using them for reference. It's bizarre you feel entitled to some explanation on why I picked them.
posted on 3/5/15
comment by Oxlade-Chambers (Inventor) (U6157)
posted 41 seconds ago
Clown will do anything to dig at Arsenal, time to stop playing into one of JA's greatest WUM trails of all time he isn't one of us
Also you can be very entertaining in two 3-0 wins whereas another team can win 7-0 one game and awful and boring in the next 5 games which still results in them having the superior goal difference.
Goals scored is no measure of entertainment. All about using your fackin eyes to assess what is entertaining or not throughout a season and if you think this Chelsea side is just as entertaining as The Invincibles... then you're clueless, lost, confused and a moron that needs serious help
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Preston North End are the invincibles you clown!
They didn't lose a league or cup game!
posted on 3/5/15
Also you can be very entertaining in two 3-0 wins whereas another team can win 7-0 one game and awful and boring in the next 5 games which still results in them having the superior goal difference.
-----------------------------------
A stupid argument. A 7-0 followed by a 1-0 still shows you're about as entertaining as a team with two 3-0 wins in the same fixtures.
posted on 3/5/15
Entertainment and Chelsea is a taboo no one in their right mind should ever utter.
posted on 3/5/15
Goals scored is no measure of entertainment. All about using your fackin eyes to assess what is entertaining or not throughout a season and if you think this Chelsea side is just as entertaining as The Invincibles... then you're clueless, lost, confused and a moron that needs serious help
------------------------------------
The most entertaining teams in history are prolific scorers. Goals are the most "objective" measure cos all other bs is subject to the personal bias of cretins like you. I would say watching Hazard is about as exciting as watching anything in the league.
Oh, and our '97/98 team was more boring than this Chelsea side. Easily.
posted on 3/5/15
comment by Scyther (U17162)
posted 5 minutes ago
What have Chelsea done to be deemed not boring?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What have utd done to be deemed not bang average?
posted on 3/5/15
comment by Sheriff John Brown - bring back David Dein (U7482)
posted 3 minutes ago
So you cannot even explain why you added two different seasons points together to make a comparison.
------------------------------------------
I simply picked 2 of our historic sides in the PL era to compare cos I felt like using them for reference. It's bizarre you feel entitled to some explanation on why I picked them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is bizarre that you think points difference equates to style of play.
The fact is the 97/98 was a far more exciting and interesting season than this. The 1 point difference between us and the team that was a year away from the treble does not make the Arsenal team of 97/98 boring, or indeed crap.
Again, you are not making a point with your ridiculous choices of stats to compare.
A nonsense article.
Page 1 of 7
6 | 7