He neutralised Porter on the inside by using his strength, at range the fight was one side and up close Porter was unable to get anything clean through the Brook defence. Working on the inside is not always an offensive tool, you can still work there defensively but i'm sure someone with your know how knew that already.
Here you are ghosty, you seem to like hugs
"He neutralised Porter on the inside by using his strength, at range the fight was one side and up close Porter was unable to get anything clean through the Brook defence. Working on the inside is not always an offensive tool, you can still work there defensively but i'm sure someone with your know how knew that already."
===
I haven't laughed this hard in weeks. Do you even know what you're saying?
The only thing he done on the inside is clinch excessively, that is illegal in boxing. It wasn't just 2 or 3 times, whenever Porter got close, Brook clinched. That's showing a lack of inside game. He didn't show any offence or defence on the inside.
He's basically just gave a essay definition of clinching.
comment by John Locke (U1204)
posted 41 seconds ago
"He neutralised Porter on the inside by using his strength, at range the fight was one side and up close Porter was unable to get anything clean through the Brook defence. Working on the inside is not always an offensive tool, you can still work there defensively but i'm sure someone with your know how knew that already."
===
I haven't laughed this hard in weeks. Do you even know what you're saying?
The only thing he done on the inside is clinch excessively, that is illegal in boxing. It wasn't just 2 or 3 times, whenever Porter got close, Brook clinched. That's showing a lack of inside game. He didn't show any offence or defence on the inside.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's only illegal if the ref calls you up on it, there were no warnings so he carried on doing what he had to do which shows a sound mind and tactical awareness. Neutralising and spoiling is as much a part as boxing as a solid jab but do carry on laughing, i'm yet to learn anything from you oh might John Locke.
So Wladimir Klitschko produced a tactical masterclass against Povetkin. Ghosty continues to dig himself a bigger hole
Oh boy, I'm talking to a brick wall here
Clinching is not showing an inside game mate
Do you honestly think putting that smiley on every single comment makes you appear to know more than you actually do. I appreciate you're a bit thick so can't differentiate between an offensive inside game and a defensive inside game but it's not that hard to understand.
You could always stop replying but your need for attention won't allow you to do that.
Wound up?
You've been well and truly schooled young buck. You're finished on this platform.
How many times does Kamran have to say it to you clinching isnt a inside game you facking t!t. You just cant take it that Kamran has shown you up.
If you are so all knowing why do you post on a forum with only six members, surely the world needs you to reach out to a wider audience, i'll carry on showing you up for as long as you reply.
does that somehow reaffirm my point?
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Definitely, the fact I don't stalk each and every boxing forum means i'm a t1t, any forum where you three post is well not worth a lot, Derby knows more than you put together, hell VIK knows more than you.
http://firstrows.biz/boxing/canelo-alvarez-vs-james-kirkland-frs10b36e
I'd like to see Canelo fight Cotto next and then move up to fight GGG.
I want to see Canelo vs Andrade
I would love to see that but cant see it happening, I think Cotto is definitely next for him
Andrade vs Lara would be good
Max Kellerman was spot on with assessment of Pacquiao and his shoulder injury
Roy Jones was talking bull
I scored it 8-4 again Floyd, honestly don't think he was that dominant. Still think a prime, non hesitant Pac outworks him.
The commentators were calling punches that didn't land, and those compubox numbers were clearly inaccurate
Kirkland guy's facking messed up in the head
Kellerman was talking about the shoulders injury.
Roy was saying Floyd was more attacking than normal and was catching Manny with hard straight right.
Archie Moore used to do that
Sign in if you want to comment
Canelo vs Kirkland predictions
Page 9 of 12
8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12
posted on 10/5/15
He neutralised Porter on the inside by using his strength, at range the fight was one side and up close Porter was unable to get anything clean through the Brook defence. Working on the inside is not always an offensive tool, you can still work there defensively but i'm sure someone with your know how knew that already.
posted on 10/5/15
Here you are ghosty, you seem to like hugs
posted on 10/5/15
"He neutralised Porter on the inside by using his strength, at range the fight was one side and up close Porter was unable to get anything clean through the Brook defence. Working on the inside is not always an offensive tool, you can still work there defensively but i'm sure someone with your know how knew that already."
===
I haven't laughed this hard in weeks. Do you even know what you're saying?
The only thing he done on the inside is clinch excessively, that is illegal in boxing. It wasn't just 2 or 3 times, whenever Porter got close, Brook clinched. That's showing a lack of inside game. He didn't show any offence or defence on the inside.
posted on 10/5/15
He's basically just gave a essay definition of clinching.
posted on 10/5/15
comment by John Locke (U1204)
posted 41 seconds ago
"He neutralised Porter on the inside by using his strength, at range the fight was one side and up close Porter was unable to get anything clean through the Brook defence. Working on the inside is not always an offensive tool, you can still work there defensively but i'm sure someone with your know how knew that already."
===
I haven't laughed this hard in weeks. Do you even know what you're saying?
The only thing he done on the inside is clinch excessively, that is illegal in boxing. It wasn't just 2 or 3 times, whenever Porter got close, Brook clinched. That's showing a lack of inside game. He didn't show any offence or defence on the inside.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's only illegal if the ref calls you up on it, there were no warnings so he carried on doing what he had to do which shows a sound mind and tactical awareness. Neutralising and spoiling is as much a part as boxing as a solid jab but do carry on laughing, i'm yet to learn anything from you oh might John Locke.
posted on 10/5/15
So Wladimir Klitschko produced a tactical masterclass against Povetkin. Ghosty continues to dig himself a bigger hole
posted on 10/5/15
Oh boy, I'm talking to a brick wall here
Clinching is not showing an inside game mate
posted on 10/5/15
Do you honestly think putting that smiley on every single comment makes you appear to know more than you actually do. I appreciate you're a bit thick so can't differentiate between an offensive inside game and a defensive inside game but it's not that hard to understand.
You could always stop replying but your need for attention won't allow you to do that.
posted on 10/5/15
Wound up?
You've been well and truly schooled young buck. You're finished on this platform.
posted on 10/5/15
How many times does Kamran have to say it to you clinching isnt a inside game you facking t!t. You just cant take it that Kamran has shown you up.
posted on 10/5/15
If you are so all knowing why do you post on a forum with only six members, surely the world needs you to reach out to a wider audience, i'll carry on showing you up for as long as you reply.
does that somehow reaffirm my point?
posted on 10/5/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 10/5/15
Definitely, the fact I don't stalk each and every boxing forum means i'm a t1t, any forum where you three post is well not worth a lot, Derby knows more than you put together, hell VIK knows more than you.
posted on 10/5/15
let it all out mate
posted on 10/5/15
http://firstrows.biz/boxing/canelo-alvarez-vs-james-kirkland-frs10b36e
posted on 10/5/15
I'd like to see Canelo fight Cotto next and then move up to fight GGG.
posted on 10/5/15
I want to see Canelo vs Andrade
posted on 10/5/15
I would love to see that but cant see it happening, I think Cotto is definitely next for him
Andrade vs Lara would be good
posted on 10/5/15
Max Kellerman was spot on with assessment of Pacquiao and his shoulder injury
posted on 10/5/15
Roy Jones was talking bull
posted on 10/5/15
I scored it 8-4 again Floyd, honestly don't think he was that dominant. Still think a prime, non hesitant Pac outworks him.
posted on 10/5/15
The commentators were calling punches that didn't land, and those compubox numbers were clearly inaccurate
posted on 10/5/15
Kirkland guy's facking messed up in the head
posted on 10/5/15
Kellerman was talking about the shoulders injury.
Roy was saying Floyd was more attacking than normal and was catching Manny with hard straight right.
posted on 10/5/15
Archie Moore used to do that
Page 9 of 12
8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12