Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Is me knowing who drink is going to put food on my table? Don't make big deal out of nothing.
So this cosmic guy is a scouser. How did I not see that earlier. What are you even doing here? Do you see me on that Scouser board talking nonsense??
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Who is The Rock facing at WM?
It wont be taker vs shane come mania hopefully shane is gunna stay with wwe though. Taker just isnt a heel for it to work
--------------------------------------------------------
Before Brock vs. Taker I would've agreed with you. Taker can't turn heel, he literarily can't, fans won't let him. But WWE tested the waters when he was feuding with Lesnar, they're more than capable of being stupid enough to try.
I won't be surprised if the match gets doctored/Shane is playing interim incase Cena gets a green light, because the match is just weird. It's booking you'd make while you were dreaming
comment by The Devil's Advocate's Advocate - I Represent Him (U6522)
posted 2 hours, 6 minutes ago
It wont be taker vs shane come mania hopefully shane is gunna stay with wwe though. Taker just isnt a heel for it to work
--------------------------------------------------------
Before Brock vs. Taker I would've agreed with you. Taker can't turn heel, he literarily can't, fans won't let him. But WWE tested the waters when he was feuding with Lesnar, they're more than capable of being stupid enough to try.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Trust me, stupidity and WWE go hand in hand. Never question that
I think Dean Ambrose should go over Lesnar at Mania 32. A win would benefit Ambrose way more than Brock. But then how do you make Lesnar lose? He's too good to lose to Ambrose but then, l don't see how Lesnar winning would benefit anything. Have Ambrose go over at Mania, then at Payback, Lesnar wins and then at Extreme Rules, Lesnar wins again to put the feud to bed.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Who the feck thinks WWE is wrestling?
Are there still people in this world who think that prancing around a boxing ring pretending to be wrestlers is a sport?
FFS even the former CEO of WWE has gone on the record to tell the world IT'S FAKE.
http://www.tvguide.com/news/wwe-wrestling-fake-1019915/
From the linked article:
A WWE rep says the network has maintained since the mid 1990s that its programming is "scripted entertainment."
It's fake people. Grow up, go spend your money watching a real sport.
Wrestling is real.
Well it was when I watched it, back in the days of Jackie Pallo, Mick McManus, Big Daddy and Rollerball Rocco.
Now they were real wrestlers not like these pansies you see today.
WWE on the other hand is just pure unadulterated carp.
A multi-billion dollar scam to rip gullible idiots off by charging them a fortune to watch a choreographed 'match' where the outcome has already been decided by the scam artists WWE.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Just to set the record straight.
Majestic knows absolutely feck all about anything.
A multi-billion dollar scam to rip gullible idiots off by charging them a fortune to watch a choreographed 'match' where the outcome has already been decided by the scam artists WWE.
---------------------------------------------------------------
You acknowledge Vince has publicly stated it's fake. Everyone and his dog knew it was fake years before anyway. So they're scamming people out of what exactly? It doesn't present itself as a legitimate sport, whenever WWE have the opportunity they categorically refer to themselves as 'entertainment', no fan in the last 30 years has ever argued a case that WWE is a serious competition between athletes. If it's a scam, it's the worst one in the world
The problem wrestling fans have with the term 'fake' is it creates a perception that they're merely dancing with no risk of physical injury. It's not so much a slight on us, many of us still watch it out of nothing more than habit, it's a disrespectful term towards the wrestlers themselves. When someone flies between the ropes and smacks their head on the barricade, that's a REAL stuntman manoeuvre with REAL risk to someone's head and neck.
He's too good to lose to Ambrose
----
Its not real
--------------------------------
But in a real fight, Lesnar would kill Ambrose. Hence to keep suspension of disbelief, they must tread carefully.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Silicone boobies aren't real... but you'd still motorboat a pair. I guess the people so bothered about the reality of wrestling have never visited xhamster, read a book or watched a movie, or eaten or drank anything blue
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Sign in if you want to comment
WWE!
Page 2 of 3
posted on 23/2/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 23/2/16
Who the hell is Drinky??
posted on 23/2/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 23/2/16
Is me knowing who drink is going to put food on my table? Don't make big deal out of nothing.
posted on 23/2/16
So this cosmic guy is a scouser. How did I not see that earlier. What are you even doing here? Do you see me on that Scouser board talking nonsense??
posted on 23/2/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 23/2/16
Who is The Rock facing at WM?
posted on 24/2/16
It wont be taker vs shane come mania hopefully shane is gunna stay with wwe though. Taker just isnt a heel for it to work
--------------------------------------------------------
Before Brock vs. Taker I would've agreed with you. Taker can't turn heel, he literarily can't, fans won't let him. But WWE tested the waters when he was feuding with Lesnar, they're more than capable of being stupid enough to try.
I won't be surprised if the match gets doctored/Shane is playing interim incase Cena gets a green light, because the match is just weird. It's booking you'd make while you were dreaming
posted on 24/2/16
comment by The Devil's Advocate's Advocate - I Represent Him (U6522)
posted 2 hours, 6 minutes ago
It wont be taker vs shane come mania hopefully shane is gunna stay with wwe though. Taker just isnt a heel for it to work
--------------------------------------------------------
Before Brock vs. Taker I would've agreed with you. Taker can't turn heel, he literarily can't, fans won't let him. But WWE tested the waters when he was feuding with Lesnar, they're more than capable of being stupid enough to try.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Trust me, stupidity and WWE go hand in hand. Never question that
posted on 24/2/16
I think Dean Ambrose should go over Lesnar at Mania 32. A win would benefit Ambrose way more than Brock. But then how do you make Lesnar lose? He's too good to lose to Ambrose but then, l don't see how Lesnar winning would benefit anything. Have Ambrose go over at Mania, then at Payback, Lesnar wins and then at Extreme Rules, Lesnar wins again to put the feud to bed.
posted on 24/2/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 24/2/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 24/2/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 24/2/16
Wrestling isnt real
posted on 24/2/16
Who the feck thinks WWE is wrestling?
Are there still people in this world who think that prancing around a boxing ring pretending to be wrestlers is a sport?
FFS even the former CEO of WWE has gone on the record to tell the world IT'S FAKE.
http://www.tvguide.com/news/wwe-wrestling-fake-1019915/
From the linked article:
A WWE rep says the network has maintained since the mid 1990s that its programming is "scripted entertainment."
It's fake people. Grow up, go spend your money watching a real sport.
posted on 24/2/16
Wrestling is real.
Well it was when I watched it, back in the days of Jackie Pallo, Mick McManus, Big Daddy and Rollerball Rocco.
Now they were real wrestlers not like these pansies you see today.
WWE on the other hand is just pure unadulterated carp.
A multi-billion dollar scam to rip gullible idiots off by charging them a fortune to watch a choreographed 'match' where the outcome has already been decided by the scam artists WWE.
posted on 24/2/16
posted on 24/2/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 24/2/16
Just to set the record straight.
Majestic knows absolutely feck all about anything.
posted on 24/2/16
A multi-billion dollar scam to rip gullible idiots off by charging them a fortune to watch a choreographed 'match' where the outcome has already been decided by the scam artists WWE.
---------------------------------------------------------------
You acknowledge Vince has publicly stated it's fake. Everyone and his dog knew it was fake years before anyway. So they're scamming people out of what exactly? It doesn't present itself as a legitimate sport, whenever WWE have the opportunity they categorically refer to themselves as 'entertainment', no fan in the last 30 years has ever argued a case that WWE is a serious competition between athletes. If it's a scam, it's the worst one in the world
The problem wrestling fans have with the term 'fake' is it creates a perception that they're merely dancing with no risk of physical injury. It's not so much a slight on us, many of us still watch it out of nothing more than habit, it's a disrespectful term towards the wrestlers themselves. When someone flies between the ropes and smacks their head on the barricade, that's a REAL stuntman manoeuvre with REAL risk to someone's head and neck.
posted on 24/2/16
He's too good to lose to Ambrose
----
Its not real
--------------------------------
But in a real fight, Lesnar would kill Ambrose. Hence to keep suspension of disbelief, they must tread carefully.
posted on 24/2/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 24/2/16
Silicone boobies aren't real... but you'd still motorboat a pair. I guess the people so bothered about the reality of wrestling have never visited xhamster, read a book or watched a movie, or eaten or drank anything blue
posted on 24/2/16
I'm not into WWE
posted on 24/2/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Page 2 of 3