This to me sums up today. We don't know our best team. City already do. They seem to have a pattern and a style solidified already. We don't.
 
                    
                                
               
                                      
                      
                     comment by Stretford_Ender85 (U10955) 
posted 1 minute ago
This to me sums up today. We don't know our best team. City already do. They seem to have a pattern and a style solidified already. We don't.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think today wont have done jesse's chances any good, Mikhi, being a Jose signing might get a bit more leeway but in his post match interview he blamed one or two for not being switched on and up to speed
 
                    
                                
               
                                      
                      
                     Despite my general ABUness, I like him.
He should start
Ddefenders hate him, bags pace, and very good with the ball at his feet
 
                    
                                
               
                                      
                      
                     Jose openly blaming individuals already .Didn't take long. 
But yes we still don't know our best team or how to get the best out of certain individuals.
 
                    
                                
               
                                      
                      
                     comment by Genius_AppleCart_Space_Dude_Featuring_Zorak (U19099) 
posted 7 minutes ago
Jose openly blaming individuals already .Didn't take long.
But yes we still don't know our best team or how to get the best out of certain individuals.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
i should qualify it by saying jose then went on to blame himself, for picking said players
 
                    
                                
               
                                      
                      
                     He should be starting. He is the player that out opponents would least like to have running at them and he makes things happen. 
 
                    
                                
               
                                      
                      
                     The only bad thing about starting Rashford is that it means you can't bring him on later in the game.
 
                    
                                
               
                                      
                      
                     comment by Jalisco Red - Team PoGBa (U4195) 
posted 1 minute ago
The only bad thing about starting Rashford is that it means you can't bring him on later in the game.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I can live with that.
 
                    
                                
               
                                      
                      
                     Can he last a whole game, regularly?
 
                    
                                
               
                                      
                      
                     Watched the game in a red pub, and whenever he, or Pogba got the ball, even if it was just a simple pass it was like they had just invented the Cruyff turn... I get that, he's a local lad who fans want to do well, but there was a bloke next to me saying Rashford "changed the pace of the game" when he came on - wrong, United's goal just before half time changed the pace of the game, Rashford 'did' Sagna fairly early on, and after that was kept reasonably well under raps.
 
                    
                                
               
                                      
                      
                     Been saying he should start since the start of the season... We're just hamstringing ourselves any other way.
And he needs to be starting down the middle...
 
                    
                                
               
                                      
                      
                     comment by gratedbean (U4885) 
posted 2 hours, 53 minutes ago
Watched the game in a red pub, and whenever he, or Pogba got the ball, even if it was just a simple pass it was like they had just invented the Cruyff turn... I get that, he's a local lad who fans want to do well, but there was a bloke next to me saying Rashford "changed the pace of the game" when he came on - wrong, United's goal just before half time changed the pace of the game, Rashford 'did' Sagna fairly early on, and after that was kept reasonably well under raps.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A red pub?
Surely you weren't in Manc grated?
 
                    
                                
               
                                      
                      
                     Think he should be starting for England too.
 
                    
                                
               
                                      
                      
                     Personally I'd be cautious with ever throwing too much expectation on someone his age when inconsistency is an inevitable consequence of the age. Ox looked a world beater as a teenager and has regressed badly since, so playing regularly at 19 didn't do him much good. Rashford is probably best served by being your impact sub at the moment IMO.
 
                    
                                
               
                                      
                      
                     Should Rashford be starting? In short, Yes.
 
                    
                	
        
            Page 1 of 1 
            
                First
 
                Previous
 
                
                    1                
                Next
 
                Latest
 
             
            
         
        
                            
                                        Sign in if you want to comment
                                	
           
		            
Rashford, should he be starting?
Page 1 of 1
posted on 10/9/16
This to me sums up today. We don't know our best team. City already do. They seem to have a pattern and a style solidified already. We don't.
posted on 10/9/16
comment by Stretford_Ender85 (U10955)
posted 1 minute ago
This to me sums up today. We don't know our best team. City already do. They seem to have a pattern and a style solidified already. We don't.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think today wont have done jesse's chances any good, Mikhi, being a Jose signing might get a bit more leeway but in his post match interview he blamed one or two for not being switched on and up to speed
posted on 10/9/16
Despite my general ABUness, I like him.
He should start
Ddefenders hate him, bags pace, and very good with the ball at his feet
posted on 10/9/16
Jose openly blaming individuals already .Didn't take long.
But yes we still don't know our best team or how to get the best out of certain individuals.
posted on 10/9/16
comment by Genius_AppleCart_Space_Dude_Featuring_Zorak (U19099)
posted 7 minutes ago
Jose openly blaming individuals already .Didn't take long.
But yes we still don't know our best team or how to get the best out of certain individuals.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
i should qualify it by saying jose then went on to blame himself, for picking said players
posted on 10/9/16
He should be starting. He is the player that out opponents would least like to have running at them and he makes things happen.
posted on 10/9/16
The only bad thing about starting Rashford is that it means you can't bring him on later in the game.
posted on 10/9/16
comment by Jalisco Red - Team PoGBa (U4195)
posted 1 minute ago
The only bad thing about starting Rashford is that it means you can't bring him on later in the game.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I can live with that.
posted on 10/9/16
Can he last a whole game, regularly?
posted on 10/9/16
Watched the game in a red pub, and whenever he, or Pogba got the ball, even if it was just a simple pass it was like they had just invented the Cruyff turn... I get that, he's a local lad who fans want to do well, but there was a bloke next to me saying Rashford "changed the pace of the game" when he came on - wrong, United's goal just before half time changed the pace of the game, Rashford 'did' Sagna fairly early on, and after that was kept reasonably well under raps.
posted on 10/9/16
Been saying he should start since the start of the season... We're just hamstringing ourselves any other way.
And he needs to be starting down the middle...
posted on 11/9/16
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 2 hours, 53 minutes ago
Watched the game in a red pub, and whenever he, or Pogba got the ball, even if it was just a simple pass it was like they had just invented the Cruyff turn... I get that, he's a local lad who fans want to do well, but there was a bloke next to me saying Rashford "changed the pace of the game" when he came on - wrong, United's goal just before half time changed the pace of the game, Rashford 'did' Sagna fairly early on, and after that was kept reasonably well under raps.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A red pub?
Surely you weren't in Manc grated?
posted on 11/9/16
Think he should be starting for England too.
posted on 11/9/16
Personally I'd be cautious with ever throwing too much expectation on someone his age when inconsistency is an inevitable consequence of the age. Ox looked a world beater as a teenager and has regressed badly since, so playing regularly at 19 didn't do him much good. Rashford is probably best served by being your impact sub at the moment IMO.
posted on 12/9/16
Should Rashford be starting? In short, Yes.
Page 1 of 1