How Jon Moss is still a Premier League referee is beyond me.
"Moss knew a Liverpool player had touched the ball but not that it was Lovren."
Thats a massive cop out.
Smart: "All I need to know is, did Lovren touch the ball?"
Moss: "I don't know."
Smart: "If he's not touched the ball, it is offside, so you're chalking off the penalty. It has to be offside if Lovren has not touched the ball.
Moss: "Just talk to me again."
Smart: "You know what I'm asking; I need to clarify, has Lovren touched the ball? If he has, it's a deliberate action and, therefore, it's a penalty. If he has not, it is offside.
Moss: "I have no idea whether Lovren touched the ball to be honest with you. Martin (Atkinson), have you got anything from TV? I'm giving the penalty."
That has sorted that out then.
Hope this is the last article on the matter.As it panned out it cost Liverpool absolutely nothing at the end of the day
Confirmation he wasn't offside.
Can't see how he wasn't offside. Can't see how he didn't dive.
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 1 minute ago
Confirmation he wasn't offside.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Confirmation that the ref had no idea so took a guess.
comment by Cornelius Oofterom (U15867)
posted 1 minute ago
Can't see how he wasn't offside. Can't see how he didn't dive.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The offside call has been cleared up. It's done and been shown to be the correct call.
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by Cornelius Oofterom (U15867)
posted 1 minute ago
Can't see how he wasn't offside. Can't see how he didn't dive.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The offside call has been cleared up. It's done and been shown to be the correct call.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wrongly in my view.
comment by Manfrombelmonty (U1705)
posted 39 seconds ago
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 1 minute ago
Confirmation he wasn't offside.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Confirmation that the ref had no idea so took a guess.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Came to the correct decision though which is the most important aspect
Moss should really be reffing in the Championship next weekend but he won't be.
Any comment on the PGMOL on the other offside decision for the other penalty?
comment by Cornelius Oofterom (U15867)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by Cornelius Oofterom (U15867)
posted 1 minute ago
Can't see how he wasn't offside. Can't see how he didn't dive.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The offside call has been cleared up. It's done and been shown to be the correct call.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wrongly in my view.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fortunately, a ja606 users view isn't valued the same as those that wrote and enforce the laws.
The statement only proves that Jon Moss lied and the PGMOLs only intention is to protect him.
comment by Manfrombelmonty (U1705)
posted 23 seconds ago
Any comment on the PGMOL on the other offside decision for the other penalty?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What, should they comment on every single decision against Liverpool just because you can't handle it? Excellent from the ref to stand by the correct decision, as now proven.
We’re all football fans here.
We should all be angry at this statement.
comment by Metro.⚽️ (U6770)
posted 37 seconds ago
The statement only proves that Jon Moss lied and the PGMOLs only intention is to protect him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The plot thickens. Everyone is against Liverpool
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 45 seconds ago
comment by Manfrombelmonty (U1705)
posted 23 seconds ago
Any comment on the PGMOL on the other offside decision for the other penalty?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What, should they comment on every single decision against Liverpool just because you can't handle it? Excellent from the ref to stand by the correct decision, as now proven.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wow.
What a complete load of old b0ll0x.
So Moss now says, 'Oh yes, of course I knew a Liverpool player had touched the ball'.
So why the conversation with the linesman, and asking Martin Atkinson to look at the TV ?
What exactly was he asking Atkinson to look at, if he had seen a Liverpool player touch the ball ?
Its a blatant lie from Moss, and a pure cover up of a statement from PGMOL.
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Manfrombelmonty (U1705)
posted 39 seconds ago
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 1 minute ago
Confirmation he wasn't offside.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Confirmation that the ref had no idea so took a guess.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Came to the correct decision though which is the most important aspect
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No it isnt.
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by Metro.⚽️ (U6770)
posted 37 seconds ago
The statement only proves that Jon Moss lied and the PGMOLs only intention is to protect him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The plot thickens. Everyone is against Liverpool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No. Nothing to do with Liverpool. It’s a case of protectionism at the expense of the game.
This is why the old 606 was great. People actually engaged with content.
Now we get garbage responses like this.
comment by jlou1978 (U15376)
posted 16 seconds ago
Wow.
What a complete load of old b0ll0x.
So Moss now says, 'Oh yes, of course I knew a Liverpool player had touched the ball'.
So why the conversation with the linesman, and asking Martin Atkinson to look at the TV ?
What exactly was he asking Atkinson to look at, if he had seen a Liverpool player touch the ball ?
Its a blatant lie from Moss, and a pure cover up of a statement from PGMOL.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But the correct decision non the less as now proven. Now your argument changes to how he made the decision, nor whether it was right or not.
comment by jlou1978 (U15376)
posted 44 seconds ago
Wow.
What a complete load of old b0ll0x.
So Moss now says, 'Oh yes, of course I knew a Liverpool player had touched the ball'.
So why the conversation with the linesman, and asking Martin Atkinson to look at the TV ?
What exactly was he asking Atkinson to look at, if he had seen a Liverpool player touch the ball ?
Its a blatant lie from Moss, and a pure cover up of a statement from PGMOL.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Precisely. Heads should roll.
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Manfrombelmonty (U1705)
posted 23 seconds ago
Any comment on the PGMOL on the other offside decision for the other penalty?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What, should they comment on every single decision against Liverpool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No.
No one said that. no one even hinted at suggesting it.
But for some reason you decided to insert it into the conversation.
Odd.
comment by Metro.⚽️ (U6770)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by Metro.⚽️ (U6770)
posted 37 seconds ago
The statement only proves that Jon Moss lied and the PGMOLs only intention is to protect him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The plot thickens. Everyone is against Liverpool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No. Nothing to do with Liverpool. It’s a case of protectionism at the expense of the game.
This is why the old 606 was great. People actually engaged with content.
Now we get garbage responses like this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Like the content you quote Joker.
comment by Manfrombelmonty (U1705)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Manfrombelmonty (U1705)
posted 23 seconds ago
Any comment on the PGMOL on the other offside decision for the other penalty?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What, should they comment on every single decision against Liverpool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No.
No one said that. no one even hinted at suggesting it.
But for some reason you decided to insert it into the conversation.
Odd.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Now the first offside call us been proven to be correct, this poster now moved on to the 2nd one and expects a statement on it
Sign in if you want to comment
PGMOL Statement on.. that Offside
Page 1 of 6
6
posted on 5/2/18
How Jon Moss is still a Premier League referee is beyond me.
posted on 5/2/18
"Moss knew a Liverpool player had touched the ball but not that it was Lovren."
Thats a massive cop out.
Smart: "All I need to know is, did Lovren touch the ball?"
Moss: "I don't know."
Smart: "If he's not touched the ball, it is offside, so you're chalking off the penalty. It has to be offside if Lovren has not touched the ball.
Moss: "Just talk to me again."
Smart: "You know what I'm asking; I need to clarify, has Lovren touched the ball? If he has, it's a deliberate action and, therefore, it's a penalty. If he has not, it is offside.
Moss: "I have no idea whether Lovren touched the ball to be honest with you. Martin (Atkinson), have you got anything from TV? I'm giving the penalty."
posted on 5/2/18
That has sorted that out then.
Hope this is the last article on the matter.As it panned out it cost Liverpool absolutely nothing at the end of the day
posted on 5/2/18
Confirmation he wasn't offside.
posted on 5/2/18
Can't see how he wasn't offside. Can't see how he didn't dive.
posted on 5/2/18
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 1 minute ago
Confirmation he wasn't offside.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Confirmation that the ref had no idea so took a guess.
posted on 5/2/18
comment by Cornelius Oofterom (U15867)
posted 1 minute ago
Can't see how he wasn't offside. Can't see how he didn't dive.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The offside call has been cleared up. It's done and been shown to be the correct call.
posted on 5/2/18
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by Cornelius Oofterom (U15867)
posted 1 minute ago
Can't see how he wasn't offside. Can't see how he didn't dive.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The offside call has been cleared up. It's done and been shown to be the correct call.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wrongly in my view.
posted on 5/2/18
comment by Manfrombelmonty (U1705)
posted 39 seconds ago
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 1 minute ago
Confirmation he wasn't offside.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Confirmation that the ref had no idea so took a guess.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Came to the correct decision though which is the most important aspect
posted on 5/2/18
Moss should really be reffing in the Championship next weekend but he won't be.
posted on 5/2/18
Any comment on the PGMOL on the other offside decision for the other penalty?
posted on 5/2/18
comment by Cornelius Oofterom (U15867)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by Cornelius Oofterom (U15867)
posted 1 minute ago
Can't see how he wasn't offside. Can't see how he didn't dive.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The offside call has been cleared up. It's done and been shown to be the correct call.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wrongly in my view.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fortunately, a ja606 users view isn't valued the same as those that wrote and enforce the laws.
posted on 5/2/18
The statement only proves that Jon Moss lied and the PGMOLs only intention is to protect him.
posted on 5/2/18
comment by Manfrombelmonty (U1705)
posted 23 seconds ago
Any comment on the PGMOL on the other offside decision for the other penalty?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What, should they comment on every single decision against Liverpool just because you can't handle it? Excellent from the ref to stand by the correct decision, as now proven.
posted on 5/2/18
We’re all football fans here.
We should all be angry at this statement.
posted on 5/2/18
comment by Metro.⚽️ (U6770)
posted 37 seconds ago
The statement only proves that Jon Moss lied and the PGMOLs only intention is to protect him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The plot thickens. Everyone is against Liverpool
posted on 5/2/18
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 45 seconds ago
comment by Manfrombelmonty (U1705)
posted 23 seconds ago
Any comment on the PGMOL on the other offside decision for the other penalty?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What, should they comment on every single decision against Liverpool just because you can't handle it? Excellent from the ref to stand by the correct decision, as now proven.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 5/2/18
Wow.
What a complete load of old b0ll0x.
So Moss now says, 'Oh yes, of course I knew a Liverpool player had touched the ball'.
So why the conversation with the linesman, and asking Martin Atkinson to look at the TV ?
What exactly was he asking Atkinson to look at, if he had seen a Liverpool player touch the ball ?
Its a blatant lie from Moss, and a pure cover up of a statement from PGMOL.
posted on 5/2/18
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Manfrombelmonty (U1705)
posted 39 seconds ago
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 1 minute ago
Confirmation he wasn't offside.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Confirmation that the ref had no idea so took a guess.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Came to the correct decision though which is the most important aspect
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No it isnt.
posted on 5/2/18
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by Metro.⚽️ (U6770)
posted 37 seconds ago
The statement only proves that Jon Moss lied and the PGMOLs only intention is to protect him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The plot thickens. Everyone is against Liverpool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No. Nothing to do with Liverpool. It’s a case of protectionism at the expense of the game.
This is why the old 606 was great. People actually engaged with content.
Now we get garbage responses like this.
posted on 5/2/18
comment by jlou1978 (U15376)
posted 16 seconds ago
Wow.
What a complete load of old b0ll0x.
So Moss now says, 'Oh yes, of course I knew a Liverpool player had touched the ball'.
So why the conversation with the linesman, and asking Martin Atkinson to look at the TV ?
What exactly was he asking Atkinson to look at, if he had seen a Liverpool player touch the ball ?
Its a blatant lie from Moss, and a pure cover up of a statement from PGMOL.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But the correct decision non the less as now proven. Now your argument changes to how he made the decision, nor whether it was right or not.
posted on 5/2/18
comment by jlou1978 (U15376)
posted 44 seconds ago
Wow.
What a complete load of old b0ll0x.
So Moss now says, 'Oh yes, of course I knew a Liverpool player had touched the ball'.
So why the conversation with the linesman, and asking Martin Atkinson to look at the TV ?
What exactly was he asking Atkinson to look at, if he had seen a Liverpool player touch the ball ?
Its a blatant lie from Moss, and a pure cover up of a statement from PGMOL.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Precisely. Heads should roll.
posted on 5/2/18
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Manfrombelmonty (U1705)
posted 23 seconds ago
Any comment on the PGMOL on the other offside decision for the other penalty?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What, should they comment on every single decision against Liverpool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No.
No one said that. no one even hinted at suggesting it.
But for some reason you decided to insert it into the conversation.
Odd.
posted on 5/2/18
comment by Metro.⚽️ (U6770)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by Metro.⚽️ (U6770)
posted 37 seconds ago
The statement only proves that Jon Moss lied and the PGMOLs only intention is to protect him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The plot thickens. Everyone is against Liverpool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No. Nothing to do with Liverpool. It’s a case of protectionism at the expense of the game.
This is why the old 606 was great. People actually engaged with content.
Now we get garbage responses like this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Like the content you quote Joker.
posted on 5/2/18
comment by Manfrombelmonty (U1705)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Manfrombelmonty (U1705)
posted 23 seconds ago
Any comment on the PGMOL on the other offside decision for the other penalty?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What, should they comment on every single decision against Liverpool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No.
No one said that. no one even hinted at suggesting it.
But for some reason you decided to insert it into the conversation.
Odd.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Now the first offside call us been proven to be correct, this poster now moved on to the 2nd one and expects a statement on it
Page 1 of 6
6