comment by Raptor✡ (U1071)
comment by No Love - Monumentally Dope (U1282)
posted 20 minutes ago
Cockneys have arrived too late and bottled the opportunity.
A zebra never changes its stripes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cockney’s are East Londoners, Mamba
=======
Huge bite Raptwat
comment by No Love - Monumentally Dope (U1282)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Raptor✡ (U1071)
comment by No Love - Monumentally Dope (U1282)
posted 20 minutes ago
Cockneys have arrived too late and bottled the opportunity.
A zebra never changes its stripes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cockney’s are East Londoners, Mamba
=======
Huge bite Raptwat
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 4 hours, 30 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 2 minutes ago
Suits me. I'm off out on the lash anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn’t suit you when you were arguing though. How odd.
Have a good day.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Had to pass the time somehow.
Cheers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeh, course you did.
Or maybe you got it wrong, realised I was right and couldn’t admit it.
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 2 hours, 53 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 hour, 45 minutes ago
TOOR, a player knows he has been touched.
It is not his decision as to whether he’s been fouled or not.
No, we don’t have to accept it. It’s cheating and it should be punished.
The idea that we should give players allowance to cheat just because of a few times where a referee makes a mistake is completely bonkers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't say it was his decision. Nobody thinks it is. I'm saying if he is fouled he goes down, otherwise he doesn't get the penalty. Everybody knows this, every player therefore does this and yet you seem oblivious to it. Until penalties are given without going down, then players will continue to do this and continue not to be punished for it, which is exactly what happened.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You said he knows he’s been fouled.
You’re wrong.
For two reasons (as I have already explained):
1. He THINKS he has been fouled. The referee may not agree and as per the challenge yesterday, it’s a matter of opinion and so the referee is entitled to his own opinion.
2. You really think players go through that thought process? No. Players like Salah will go down at any opportunity, regardless of the extent of contact and whether he ‘knows he has been fouled’. He cheats.
It’s quite simple but you seem to be struggling.
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 2 hours, 55 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 hour, 45 minutes ago
TOOR, a player knows he has been touched.
It is not his decision as to whether he’s been fouled or not.
No, we don’t have to accept it. It’s cheating and it should be punished.
The idea that we should give players allowance to cheat just because of a few times where a referee makes a mistake is completely bonkers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't say it was his decision. Nobody thinks it is. I'm saying if he is fouled he goes down, otherwise he doesn't get the penalty. Everybody knows this, every player therefore does this and yet you seem oblivious to it. Until penalties are given without going down, then players will continue to do this and continue not to be punished for it, which is exactly what happened.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
‘Until you give me every penalty that I think I am entitled to, I will cheat and tell everyone that I’m justified in my cheating’
The logic of a moron.
So TOOR, how do we decide when the ‘problem’ of not being given a penalty without going down is solved?
Would love to hear your thoughts on that.
Interesting you ignored the opportunity to prove your ignorance with regards to the laws of the game as well.
Go on, tell me again why anyone who didn’t believe Salah was fouled is wrong? Good luck with that.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 2 hours, 53 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 hour, 45 minutes ago
TOOR, a player knows he has been touched.
It is not his decision as to whether he’s been fouled or not.
No, we don’t have to accept it. It’s cheating and it should be punished.
The idea that we should give players allowance to cheat just because of a few times where a referee makes a mistake is completely bonkers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't say it was his decision. Nobody thinks it is. I'm saying if he is fouled he goes down, otherwise he doesn't get the penalty. Everybody knows this, every player therefore does this and yet you seem oblivious to it. Until penalties are given without going down, then players will continue to do this and continue not to be punished for it, which is exactly what happened.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You said he knows he’s been fouled.
You’re wrong.
For two reasons (as I have already explained):
1. He THINKS he has been fouled. The referee may not agree and as per the challenge yesterday, it’s a matter of opinion and so the referee is entitled to his own opinion.
2. You really think players go through that thought process? No. Players like Salah will go down at any opportunity, regardless of the extent of contact and whether he ‘knows he has been fouled’. He cheats.
It’s quite simple but you seem to be struggling.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course he knows he was fouled otherwise he wouldn't go down. Would you not feel somebody pulling you back from behind? This idea you have that players don't know they've been fouled is laughable. Have you ever played the game? Jesus.
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 2 minutes ago
Jesus wept.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good day out then?
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 2 hours, 55 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 hour, 45 minutes ago
TOOR, a player knows he has been touched.
It is not his decision as to whether he’s been fouled or not.
No, we don’t have to accept it. It’s cheating and it should be punished.
The idea that we should give players allowance to cheat just because of a few times where a referee makes a mistake is completely bonkers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't say it was his decision. Nobody thinks it is. I'm saying if he is fouled he goes down, otherwise he doesn't get the penalty. Everybody knows this, every player therefore does this and yet you seem oblivious to it. Until penalties are given without going down, then players will continue to do this and continue not to be punished for it, which is exactly what happened.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
‘Until you give me every penalty that I think I am entitled to, I will cheat and tell everyone that I’m justified in my cheating’
The logic of a moron.
So TOOR, how do we decide when the ‘problem’ of not being given a penalty without going down is solved?
Would love to hear your thoughts on that.
Interesting you ignored the opportunity to prove your ignorance with regards to the laws of the game as well.
Go on, tell me again why anyone who didn’t believe Salah was fouled is wrong? Good luck with that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We decide it's solved when officials start giving penalties without players needing to go down and start punishing players who do. That hasn't happened which is why Salah got a penalty and wasn't punished retrospectively. This is really simple stuff. You're weird.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 56 seconds ago
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 2 minutes ago
Jesus wept.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good day out then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Great so far thanks, just had a break for food and will now resume.
‘Of course he knows he’s been fouled otherwise he wouldn’t go down’
TOOR taking stupid to a new level.
Ever heard of cheating, TOOR? You know some players feel contact and go down because they’re cheats, right?
Also, he cannot ‘know’ he’s been fouled. Because it’s a matter of opinion and the referee may not have seen that as a foul. That pull was not a foul in my view. It’s subjective. Therefore how can he know?
You really are stupid.
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 56 seconds ago
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 2 minutes ago
Jesus wept.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good day out then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Great so far thanks, just had a break for food and will now resume.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Checking a forum while on a day out drinking.
Each to their own.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 2 hours, 55 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 hour, 45 minutes ago
TOOR, a player knows he has been touched.
It is not his decision as to whether he’s been fouled or not.
No, we don’t have to accept it. It’s cheating and it should be punished.
The idea that we should give players allowance to cheat just because of a few times where a referee makes a mistake is completely bonkers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't say it was his decision. Nobody thinks it is. I'm saying if he is fouled he goes down, otherwise he doesn't get the penalty. Everybody knows this, every player therefore does this and yet you seem oblivious to it. Until penalties are given without going down, then players will continue to do this and continue not to be punished for it, which is exactly what happened.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
‘Until you give me every penalty that I think I am entitled to, I will cheat and tell everyone that I’m justified in my cheating’
The logic of a moron.
So TOOR, how do we decide when the ‘problem’ of not being given a penalty without going down is solved?
Would love to hear your thoughts on that.
Interesting you ignored the opportunity to prove your ignorance with regards to the laws of the game as well.
Go on, tell me again why anyone who didn’t believe Salah was fouled is wrong? Good luck with that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tell you how they're wrong?
He was pulled back, how is it even a debate? They studied the video and concluded this, how could they not? It's there in black and white. Of course, as we know, you'd argue black is white. That's why you're struggling.
A player doesn't know if he's fouled
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
‘Of course he knows he’s been fouled otherwise he wouldn’t go down’
TOOR taking stupid to a new level.
Ever heard of cheating, TOOR? You know some players feel contact and go down because they’re cheats, right?
Also, he cannot ‘know’ he’s been fouled. Because it’s a matter of opinion and the referee may not have seen that as a foul. That pull was not a foul in my view. It’s subjective. Therefore how can he know?
You really are stupid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes I have. However if you're in front of a player and can't see him, how do you know when to go down if you're not fouled? To cheat you need to see it in front of you to dive when the challenge comes in, like Kane against Karius last season, for example. You're clueless.
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 17 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
‘Of course he knows he’s been fouled otherwise he wouldn’t go down’
TOOR taking stupid to a new level.
Ever heard of cheating, TOOR? You know some players feel contact and go down because they’re cheats, right?
Also, he cannot ‘know’ he’s been fouled. Because it’s a matter of opinion and the referee may not have seen that as a foul. That pull was not a foul in my view. It’s subjective. Therefore how can he know?
You really are stupid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes I have. However if you're in front of a player and can't see him, how do you know when to go down if you're not fouled? To cheat you need to see it in front of you to dive when the challenge comes in, like Kane against Karius last season, for example. You're clueless.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because you feel a touch and go down.
It’s not complicated, you absolute muppet.
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 2 hours, 55 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 hour, 45 minutes ago
TOOR, a player knows he has been touched.
It is not his decision as to whether he’s been fouled or not.
No, we don’t have to accept it. It’s cheating and it should be punished.
The idea that we should give players allowance to cheat just because of a few times where a referee makes a mistake is completely bonkers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't say it was his decision. Nobody thinks it is. I'm saying if he is fouled he goes down, otherwise he doesn't get the penalty. Everybody knows this, every player therefore does this and yet you seem oblivious to it. Until penalties are given without going down, then players will continue to do this and continue not to be punished for it, which is exactly what happened.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
‘Until you give me every penalty that I think I am entitled to, I will cheat and tell everyone that I’m justified in my cheating’
The logic of a moron.
So TOOR, how do we decide when the ‘problem’ of not being given a penalty without going down is solved?
Would love to hear your thoughts on that.
Interesting you ignored the opportunity to prove your ignorance with regards to the laws of the game as well.
Go on, tell me again why anyone who didn’t believe Salah was fouled is wrong? Good luck with that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tell you how they're wrong?
He was pulled back, how is it even a debate? They studied the video and concluded this, how could they not? It's there in black and white. Of course, as we know, you'd argue black is white. That's why you're struggling.
A player doesn't know if he's fouled
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There is no rule that says that any pull is a foul. Same with a push, same with a kick.
It requires a certain degree of force and effect.
Thanks for proving you don’t know the laws.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 56 seconds ago
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 2 minutes ago
Jesus wept.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good day out then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Great so far thanks, just had a break for food and will now resume.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Checking a forum while on a day out drinking.
Each to their own.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What a freak. In what world do you get to decide on the norm on how people use a forum? You come on to argue black is white, with your weird debating style that everybody, including your own, pull you up on. You then have the audacity to question how others use it. Wind your neck in you muppet.
‘A player knows he has been fouled’
What if the referee disagrees?
Does TOOR have the deciding vote?
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 56 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 56 seconds ago
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 2 minutes ago
Jesus wept.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good day out then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Great so far thanks, just had a break for food and will now resume.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Checking a forum while on a day out drinking.
Each to their own.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What a freak. In what world do you get to decide on the norm on how people use a forum? You come on to argue black is white, with your weird debating style that everybody, including your own, pull you up on. You then have the audacity to question how others use it. Wind your neck in you muppet.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where did I say that I get to decide the norm?
I’m laughing because I find it funny.
I think it must be a crap day out if he’s on his phone using a forum.
And I’ll continue to laugh, as well as laughing at you.
This is often where debates get to with TOOR, he does not understand this simple point.
Two people can watch the same incident (supposed foul) and disagree. Neither need necessarily be wrong.
TOOR, until you understand that, you’ll forever be labelled an idiot.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
‘A player knows he has been fouled’
What if the referee disagrees?
Does TOOR have the deciding vote?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Then he doesn't get the foul. Obviously. In this case he did, they reviewed it and judged it was a foul and therefore no punishment for Salah. And yet here you are arguing it. Typical Winston.
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
‘A player knows he has been fouled’
What if the referee disagrees?
Does TOOR have the deciding vote?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Then he doesn't get the foul. Obviously. In this case he did, they reviewed it and judged it was a foul and therefore no punishment for Salah. And yet here you are arguing it. Typical Winston.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s not how the retrospective panel works actually.
So if the referee disagrees then how can Salah ‘know’ he has been fouled?
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 29 seconds ago
This is often where debates get to with TOOR, he does not understand this simple point.
Two people can watch the same incident (supposed foul) and disagree. Neither need necessarily be wrong.
TOOR, until you understand that, you’ll forever be labelled an idiot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I never said people can't disagree. I said it was a foul. The referee agreed and gave the penalty. They reviewed it and agreed. Simple.
Sign in if you want to comment
Reeks of cover up and helping the old boys!
Page 10 of 15
11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15
posted on 28/12/18
comment by Raptor✡ (U1071)
comment by No Love - Monumentally Dope (U1282)
posted 20 minutes ago
Cockneys have arrived too late and bottled the opportunity.
A zebra never changes its stripes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cockney’s are East Londoners, Mamba
=======
Huge bite Raptwat
posted on 28/12/18
comment by No Love - Monumentally Dope (U1282)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Raptor✡ (U1071)
comment by No Love - Monumentally Dope (U1282)
posted 20 minutes ago
Cockneys have arrived too late and bottled the opportunity.
A zebra never changes its stripes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cockney’s are East Londoners, Mamba
=======
Huge bite Raptwat
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 28/12/18
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/12/18
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 4 hours, 30 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 2 minutes ago
Suits me. I'm off out on the lash anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn’t suit you when you were arguing though. How odd.
Have a good day.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Had to pass the time somehow.
Cheers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeh, course you did.
Or maybe you got it wrong, realised I was right and couldn’t admit it.
posted on 28/12/18
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 2 hours, 53 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 hour, 45 minutes ago
TOOR, a player knows he has been touched.
It is not his decision as to whether he’s been fouled or not.
No, we don’t have to accept it. It’s cheating and it should be punished.
The idea that we should give players allowance to cheat just because of a few times where a referee makes a mistake is completely bonkers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't say it was his decision. Nobody thinks it is. I'm saying if he is fouled he goes down, otherwise he doesn't get the penalty. Everybody knows this, every player therefore does this and yet you seem oblivious to it. Until penalties are given without going down, then players will continue to do this and continue not to be punished for it, which is exactly what happened.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You said he knows he’s been fouled.
You’re wrong.
For two reasons (as I have already explained):
1. He THINKS he has been fouled. The referee may not agree and as per the challenge yesterday, it’s a matter of opinion and so the referee is entitled to his own opinion.
2. You really think players go through that thought process? No. Players like Salah will go down at any opportunity, regardless of the extent of contact and whether he ‘knows he has been fouled’. He cheats.
It’s quite simple but you seem to be struggling.
posted on 28/12/18
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 2 hours, 55 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 hour, 45 minutes ago
TOOR, a player knows he has been touched.
It is not his decision as to whether he’s been fouled or not.
No, we don’t have to accept it. It’s cheating and it should be punished.
The idea that we should give players allowance to cheat just because of a few times where a referee makes a mistake is completely bonkers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't say it was his decision. Nobody thinks it is. I'm saying if he is fouled he goes down, otherwise he doesn't get the penalty. Everybody knows this, every player therefore does this and yet you seem oblivious to it. Until penalties are given without going down, then players will continue to do this and continue not to be punished for it, which is exactly what happened.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
‘Until you give me every penalty that I think I am entitled to, I will cheat and tell everyone that I’m justified in my cheating’
The logic of a moron.
So TOOR, how do we decide when the ‘problem’ of not being given a penalty without going down is solved?
Would love to hear your thoughts on that.
Interesting you ignored the opportunity to prove your ignorance with regards to the laws of the game as well.
Go on, tell me again why anyone who didn’t believe Salah was fouled is wrong? Good luck with that.
posted on 28/12/18
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/12/18
Jesus wept.
posted on 28/12/18
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 2 hours, 53 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 hour, 45 minutes ago
TOOR, a player knows he has been touched.
It is not his decision as to whether he’s been fouled or not.
No, we don’t have to accept it. It’s cheating and it should be punished.
The idea that we should give players allowance to cheat just because of a few times where a referee makes a mistake is completely bonkers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't say it was his decision. Nobody thinks it is. I'm saying if he is fouled he goes down, otherwise he doesn't get the penalty. Everybody knows this, every player therefore does this and yet you seem oblivious to it. Until penalties are given without going down, then players will continue to do this and continue not to be punished for it, which is exactly what happened.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You said he knows he’s been fouled.
You’re wrong.
For two reasons (as I have already explained):
1. He THINKS he has been fouled. The referee may not agree and as per the challenge yesterday, it’s a matter of opinion and so the referee is entitled to his own opinion.
2. You really think players go through that thought process? No. Players like Salah will go down at any opportunity, regardless of the extent of contact and whether he ‘knows he has been fouled’. He cheats.
It’s quite simple but you seem to be struggling.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course he knows he was fouled otherwise he wouldn't go down. Would you not feel somebody pulling you back from behind? This idea you have that players don't know they've been fouled is laughable. Have you ever played the game? Jesus.
posted on 28/12/18
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 2 minutes ago
Jesus wept.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good day out then?
posted on 28/12/18
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 2 hours, 55 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 hour, 45 minutes ago
TOOR, a player knows he has been touched.
It is not his decision as to whether he’s been fouled or not.
No, we don’t have to accept it. It’s cheating and it should be punished.
The idea that we should give players allowance to cheat just because of a few times where a referee makes a mistake is completely bonkers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't say it was his decision. Nobody thinks it is. I'm saying if he is fouled he goes down, otherwise he doesn't get the penalty. Everybody knows this, every player therefore does this and yet you seem oblivious to it. Until penalties are given without going down, then players will continue to do this and continue not to be punished for it, which is exactly what happened.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
‘Until you give me every penalty that I think I am entitled to, I will cheat and tell everyone that I’m justified in my cheating’
The logic of a moron.
So TOOR, how do we decide when the ‘problem’ of not being given a penalty without going down is solved?
Would love to hear your thoughts on that.
Interesting you ignored the opportunity to prove your ignorance with regards to the laws of the game as well.
Go on, tell me again why anyone who didn’t believe Salah was fouled is wrong? Good luck with that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We decide it's solved when officials start giving penalties without players needing to go down and start punishing players who do. That hasn't happened which is why Salah got a penalty and wasn't punished retrospectively. This is really simple stuff. You're weird.
posted on 28/12/18
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 56 seconds ago
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 2 minutes ago
Jesus wept.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good day out then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Great so far thanks, just had a break for food and will now resume.
posted on 28/12/18
‘Of course he knows he’s been fouled otherwise he wouldn’t go down’
TOOR taking stupid to a new level.
Ever heard of cheating, TOOR? You know some players feel contact and go down because they’re cheats, right?
Also, he cannot ‘know’ he’s been fouled. Because it’s a matter of opinion and the referee may not have seen that as a foul. That pull was not a foul in my view. It’s subjective. Therefore how can he know?
You really are stupid.
posted on 28/12/18
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 56 seconds ago
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 2 minutes ago
Jesus wept.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good day out then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Great so far thanks, just had a break for food and will now resume.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Checking a forum while on a day out drinking.
Each to their own.
posted on 28/12/18
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 2 hours, 55 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 hour, 45 minutes ago
TOOR, a player knows he has been touched.
It is not his decision as to whether he’s been fouled or not.
No, we don’t have to accept it. It’s cheating and it should be punished.
The idea that we should give players allowance to cheat just because of a few times where a referee makes a mistake is completely bonkers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't say it was his decision. Nobody thinks it is. I'm saying if he is fouled he goes down, otherwise he doesn't get the penalty. Everybody knows this, every player therefore does this and yet you seem oblivious to it. Until penalties are given without going down, then players will continue to do this and continue not to be punished for it, which is exactly what happened.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
‘Until you give me every penalty that I think I am entitled to, I will cheat and tell everyone that I’m justified in my cheating’
The logic of a moron.
So TOOR, how do we decide when the ‘problem’ of not being given a penalty without going down is solved?
Would love to hear your thoughts on that.
Interesting you ignored the opportunity to prove your ignorance with regards to the laws of the game as well.
Go on, tell me again why anyone who didn’t believe Salah was fouled is wrong? Good luck with that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tell you how they're wrong?
He was pulled back, how is it even a debate? They studied the video and concluded this, how could they not? It's there in black and white. Of course, as we know, you'd argue black is white. That's why you're struggling.
A player doesn't know if he's fouled
posted on 28/12/18
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
‘Of course he knows he’s been fouled otherwise he wouldn’t go down’
TOOR taking stupid to a new level.
Ever heard of cheating, TOOR? You know some players feel contact and go down because they’re cheats, right?
Also, he cannot ‘know’ he’s been fouled. Because it’s a matter of opinion and the referee may not have seen that as a foul. That pull was not a foul in my view. It’s subjective. Therefore how can he know?
You really are stupid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes I have. However if you're in front of a player and can't see him, how do you know when to go down if you're not fouled? To cheat you need to see it in front of you to dive when the challenge comes in, like Kane against Karius last season, for example. You're clueless.
posted on 28/12/18
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 17 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
‘Of course he knows he’s been fouled otherwise he wouldn’t go down’
TOOR taking stupid to a new level.
Ever heard of cheating, TOOR? You know some players feel contact and go down because they’re cheats, right?
Also, he cannot ‘know’ he’s been fouled. Because it’s a matter of opinion and the referee may not have seen that as a foul. That pull was not a foul in my view. It’s subjective. Therefore how can he know?
You really are stupid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes I have. However if you're in front of a player and can't see him, how do you know when to go down if you're not fouled? To cheat you need to see it in front of you to dive when the challenge comes in, like Kane against Karius last season, for example. You're clueless.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because you feel a touch and go down.
It’s not complicated, you absolute muppet.
posted on 28/12/18
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 2 hours, 55 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 hour, 45 minutes ago
TOOR, a player knows he has been touched.
It is not his decision as to whether he’s been fouled or not.
No, we don’t have to accept it. It’s cheating and it should be punished.
The idea that we should give players allowance to cheat just because of a few times where a referee makes a mistake is completely bonkers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't say it was his decision. Nobody thinks it is. I'm saying if he is fouled he goes down, otherwise he doesn't get the penalty. Everybody knows this, every player therefore does this and yet you seem oblivious to it. Until penalties are given without going down, then players will continue to do this and continue not to be punished for it, which is exactly what happened.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
‘Until you give me every penalty that I think I am entitled to, I will cheat and tell everyone that I’m justified in my cheating’
The logic of a moron.
So TOOR, how do we decide when the ‘problem’ of not being given a penalty without going down is solved?
Would love to hear your thoughts on that.
Interesting you ignored the opportunity to prove your ignorance with regards to the laws of the game as well.
Go on, tell me again why anyone who didn’t believe Salah was fouled is wrong? Good luck with that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tell you how they're wrong?
He was pulled back, how is it even a debate? They studied the video and concluded this, how could they not? It's there in black and white. Of course, as we know, you'd argue black is white. That's why you're struggling.
A player doesn't know if he's fouled
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There is no rule that says that any pull is a foul. Same with a push, same with a kick.
It requires a certain degree of force and effect.
Thanks for proving you don’t know the laws.
posted on 28/12/18
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 56 seconds ago
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 2 minutes ago
Jesus wept.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good day out then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Great so far thanks, just had a break for food and will now resume.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Checking a forum while on a day out drinking.
Each to their own.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What a freak. In what world do you get to decide on the norm on how people use a forum? You come on to argue black is white, with your weird debating style that everybody, including your own, pull you up on. You then have the audacity to question how others use it. Wind your neck in you muppet.
posted on 28/12/18
‘A player knows he has been fouled’
What if the referee disagrees?
Does TOOR have the deciding vote?
posted on 28/12/18
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 56 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 56 seconds ago
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 2 minutes ago
Jesus wept.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good day out then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Great so far thanks, just had a break for food and will now resume.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Checking a forum while on a day out drinking.
Each to their own.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What a freak. In what world do you get to decide on the norm on how people use a forum? You come on to argue black is white, with your weird debating style that everybody, including your own, pull you up on. You then have the audacity to question how others use it. Wind your neck in you muppet.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where did I say that I get to decide the norm?
I’m laughing because I find it funny.
I think it must be a crap day out if he’s on his phone using a forum.
And I’ll continue to laugh, as well as laughing at you.
posted on 28/12/18
This is often where debates get to with TOOR, he does not understand this simple point.
Two people can watch the same incident (supposed foul) and disagree. Neither need necessarily be wrong.
TOOR, until you understand that, you’ll forever be labelled an idiot.
posted on 28/12/18
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
‘A player knows he has been fouled’
What if the referee disagrees?
Does TOOR have the deciding vote?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Then he doesn't get the foul. Obviously. In this case he did, they reviewed it and judged it was a foul and therefore no punishment for Salah. And yet here you are arguing it. Typical Winston.
posted on 28/12/18
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
‘A player knows he has been fouled’
What if the referee disagrees?
Does TOOR have the deciding vote?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Then he doesn't get the foul. Obviously. In this case he did, they reviewed it and judged it was a foul and therefore no punishment for Salah. And yet here you are arguing it. Typical Winston.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s not how the retrospective panel works actually.
So if the referee disagrees then how can Salah ‘know’ he has been fouled?
posted on 28/12/18
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 29 seconds ago
This is often where debates get to with TOOR, he does not understand this simple point.
Two people can watch the same incident (supposed foul) and disagree. Neither need necessarily be wrong.
TOOR, until you understand that, you’ll forever be labelled an idiot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I never said people can't disagree. I said it was a foul. The referee agreed and gave the penalty. They reviewed it and agreed. Simple.
Page 10 of 15
11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15