Massive massive signing this. And Man Utd fans - why didn’t Woodward come in for him at £40m? Seems bonkers

Massive signing and shows our intent for the coming season along with Rodgers it's clear the club want to break into the top 6.

comment by The Artist formerly known as Black Starr (U12353)
posted 2 minutes ago
Massive massive signing this. And Man Utd fans - why didn’t Woodward come in for him at £40m? Seems bonkers
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The weird workings of Ed Woodward.

We'll probably try and buy him off you next summer for £100m...

comment by Steve Beaglehole (U15867)
posted 21 seconds ago
comment by The Artist formerly known as Black Starr (U12353)
posted 2 minutes ago
Massive massive signing this. And Man Utd fans - why didn’t Woodward come in for him at £40m? Seems bonkers
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The weird workings of Ed Woodward.

We'll probably try and buy him off you next summer for £100m...
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Ed and Ole are dumassas that's why

What an excellent weekend so far,,
Tomorrow they can announce the arrival of Gareth bale 🤷‍♂️

comment by The Artist formerly known as Black Starr (U12353)
posted 6 minutes ago
Massive massive signing this. And Man Utd fans - why didn’t Woodward come in for him at £40m? Seems bonkers
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because it’s woodward, he’s an idiot. Not shiny shiny enough for him. Good signing for you, very good player.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Ace (U18814)
posted 3 minutes ago
Good signing, very good player. Ridiculous that Utd or even Arsenal weren’t all over that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s Arsenal’s full budget!

Meanwhile Man United are preparing an official bid for Sean Longstaff

It depends who we get in that position as to whether we should have gone for him or not. We can't sign every good player, we have to be sélectif. We may wish we had, like Kante or have chosen not to wisely.

You don't like Longstaff then Neo. He's seemed very good to me the couple of times I've seen him. What's the problem with him?

comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 7 minutes ago
It depends who we get in that position as to whether we should have gone for him or not. We can't sign every good player, we have to be sélectif. We may wish we had, like Kante or have chosen not to wisely.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s not like Tielemans is an unknown, he’s been terrific for us and is will suited to the PL. Hes a top 6 player already and only 22.

You can't sign every good player but if reports are to be believed he was offered to United. At 40 million it's stupis to turn him down.

comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 7 minutes ago
You don't like Longstaff then Neo. He's seemed very good to me the couple of times I've seen him. What's the problem with him?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No problem with him at all mate. Seems we both want him to go to United then.

Newcastle want in excess of £50m for him, claim Sky.

comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 8 minutes ago
You don't like Longstaff then Neo. He's seemed very good to me the couple of times I've seen him. What's the problem with him?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’d actually prefer mcginn of villa than longstaff.

I agree with all that, but he's not the only good player in that position. Ole may well prefer another.

I haven't said I want Longstaff and not at that price, mind you that's Sky the lie. I would have preferred Tielsman, but the point is Ole may well think Longstaff suits the way he wants to play, and he does look good.

comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 13 minutes ago
You don't like Longstaff then Neo. He's seemed very good to me the couple of times I've seen him. What's the problem with him?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

He's English which means he's rubbish on football forums.

Longstaffio from Argentina would have everyone salivating. That's how it works isn't it?

The fact that he’s gone for £40m is a good indicator that we were never actually in for him. We wouldn’t lose a player to Leicester for that few notes.

If Newcastle want £50m for Longstaff then we shouldnt bother, no value there.

If we don't end up with a player as good as Rabiot, Tielemans or Fernandes in CM I fear for our top 4 Hope's nthis coming season

comment by The Lambeau Leap (U21050)
posted 12 minutes ago
The fact that he’s gone for £40m is a good indicator that we were never actually in for him. We wouldn’t lose a player to Leicester for that few notes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m just waiting for the media to claim “Tielemans rejects United for Leicester”. Will be a great signing for them if it does go through

this signing would have made too much sense for utd.

every indication is that utd are being run by clueless monkey atm, i will like to be proven wrong but won't hold my breath

Ed Woodward having another mare of a transfer window