comment by Scouze Doggie Dog (U22357)
posted 3 hours, 7 minutes ago
Have you posted similar when someone writes something good a out Liverpool? Ever?
-----
Why, yes. I have.
...
You can clearly remember posting on them. So come on, we’re waiting. No more stalling.
comment by Ruiney (U1005)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Scouze Doggie Dog (U22357)
posted 3 hours, 7 minutes ago
Have you posted similar when someone writes something good a out Liverpool? Ever?
-----
Why, yes. I have.
...
You can clearly remember posting on them. So come on, we’re waiting. No more stalling.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Remembering and finding g ate two different things. It took no effort to remember but it will take effort to find, and since you're the one in need, I suggest you find something to disprove what I said without further delay.
couldn't find any problem with this article. chill out doggie.
comment by Scouze Doggie Dog (U22357)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by Ruiney (U1005)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Scouze Doggie Dog (U22357)
posted 3 hours, 7 minutes ago
Have you posted similar when someone writes something good a out Liverpool? Ever?
-----
Why, yes. I have.
...
You can clearly remember posting on them. So come on, we’re waiting. No more stalling.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Remembering and finding g ate two different things. It took no effort to remember but it will take effort to find, and since you're the one in need, I suggest you find something to disprove what I said without further delay.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Stop embarrassing yourself
Aside from being well prepared for the impact COVID-19 would have, United were adamant from the outset they would continue to pay their employees and not furlough nonplaying staff. Tottenham, Liverpool and Bournemouth have been forced into embarrassing U-turns on their decisions to furlough nonplaying staff, but sources have said United never intended to do so.
====
Sources, yes -
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 6 minutes ago
Aside from being well prepared for the impact COVID-19 would have, United were adamant from the outset they would continue to pay their employees and not furlough nonplaying staff. Tottenham, Liverpool and Bournemouth have been forced into embarrassing U-turns on their decisions to furlough nonplaying staff, but sources have said United never intended to do so.
====
Sources, yes -
----------------------------------------------------------------------
tbf, United did state they wouldn't be furloughing staff. And that was said before Spurs or any of the other clubs decided that they were going to.
It's not often you can say we're an example to other clubs of how it should be done, so well done, United.
Scouze Doggie Dog (U22357) Most of the stuff in the article were already known by the time it was posted. What Rashford, Maguire and others are doing aren't new to United fans. It's been in the media since the lockdown happened. The only thing new in this is that they started preparing for it back in January. That's in contrast to our government who wanted to keep the country open and let the coronavirus spread through the UK.
comment by CurrentlyIntheUK (U11181)
posted 2 minutes ago
Scouze Doggie Dog (U22357) Most of the stuff in the article were already known by the time it was posted. What Rashford, Maguire and others are doing aren't new to United fans. It's been in the media since the lockdown happened. The only thing new in this is that they started preparing for it back in January. That's in contrast to our government who wanted to keep the country open and let the coronavirus spread through the UK.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed. And there's no real source for that either. If they'd just said that in the article, it wouldn't have been as sensational and would've generated less hits. That's what I'm saying.
Whereas United have played it well and their players deserve commendation for their efforts, the article is still click bait capitalising on that fact. Its cringey and poor journalism IMO.
Its not an attack on United the club, it could be these were regular meetings where the issue of Covid came up and now sensationalised, something I'm sure came up in a lot of boardrooms. Perhaps you'd see it my way if it was another club rather than United in the article, and it could easily have been. Apart from the January meetings all the clubs are doing the other stuff.
In short good work United but just because its charity doesn't mean you get away with sheet reporting. Admittedly there's a lot of the same in today's media and since I'm not having a pop at United the club, I don't see a problem here
It's not our reporting, it's espn whoever they are.
But if it's just your opinion on the article, and not intended to wind up United fans, post it on the liv8board. We are intelligent enough to judge it ourselves.
It doesn’t even mention the story in the headline, so the complete opposite of click bait.
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 51 minutes ago
It's not our reporting, it's espn whoever they are.
But if it's just your opinion on the article, and not intended to wind up United fans, post it on the liv8board. We are intelligent enough to judge it ourselves.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you don't want to read views from other fans then perhaps you'd be better off on Redcafe or the likes.
comment by Scouze Doggie Dog (U22357)
posted 1 hour, 38 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 51 minutes ago
It's not our reporting, it's espn whoever they are.
But if it's just your opinion on the article, and not intended to wind up United fans, post it on the liv8board. We are intelligent enough to judge it ourselves.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you don't want to read views from other fans then perhaps you'd be better off on Redcafe or the likes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's always what wummers say. Most articles are derailed by the likes of you.
I prefer to have my conversations on here.
You prefer nothing to be informative.
I made a valid internet forum comment. I'm sorry if you feel otherwise. There's one comment going against the grain here, that's par for the course. What did you expect on a mutliteam forum? We can't all hold hands and sing kumbaya. This is how its supposed to be and you should lighten up.
comment by Scouze Doggie Dog (U22357)
posted 12 hours, 26 minutes ago
I made a valid internet forum comment. I'm sorry if you feel otherwise. There's one comment going against the grain here, that's par for the course. What did you expect on a mutliteam forum? We can't all hold hands and sing kumbaya. This is how its supposed to be and you should lighten up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's good to hold and air your views if they go against the accepted norm, it makes people question things more.
Everyone on here thinks you're a massive bell, I'm sure you disagree.
comment by The Post Nearly Man. 20times, 20legend (U1270)
posted 58 minutes ago
comment by Scouze Doggie Dog (U22357)
posted 12 hours, 26 minutes ago
I made a valid internet forum comment. I'm sorry if you feel otherwise. There's one comment going against the grain here, that's par for the course. What did you expect on a mutliteam forum? We can't all hold hands and sing kumbaya. This is how its supposed to be and you should lighten up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's good to hold and air your views if they go against the accepted norm, it makes people question things more.
Everyone on here thinks you're a massive bell, I'm sure you disagree.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who the fack are you? Of course I disagree because its not true, and even if it was, on this site that means nothing. This is the kind of place where you'd rather be considered a bell than a no mark like you.
comment by Scouze Doggie Dog (U22357)
posted 39 minutes ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man. 20times, 20legend (U1270)
posted 58 minutes ago
comment by Scouze Doggie Dog (U22357)
posted 12 hours, 26 minutes ago
I made a valid internet forum comment. I'm sorry if you feel otherwise. There's one comment going against the grain here, that's par for the course. What did you expect on a mutliteam forum? We can't all hold hands and sing kumbaya. This is how its supposed to be and you should lighten up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's good to hold and air your views if they go against the accepted norm, it makes people question things more.
Everyone on here thinks you're a massive bell, I'm sure you disagree.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who the fack are you? Of course I disagree because its not true, and even if it was, on this site that means nothing. This is the kind of place where you'd rather be considered a bell than a no mark like you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn't realise I was in the presence of greatness. U22357?
comment by The Post Nearly Man. 20times, 20legend (U1270)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by Scouze Doggie Dog (U22357)
posted 39 minutes ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man. 20times, 20legend (U1270)
posted 58 minutes ago
comment by Scouze Doggie Dog (U22357)
posted 12 hours, 26 minutes ago
I made a valid internet forum comment. I'm sorry if you feel otherwise. There's one comment going against the grain here, that's par for the course. What did you expect on a mutliteam forum? We can't all hold hands and sing kumbaya. This is how its supposed to be and you should lighten up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's good to hold and air your views if they go against the accepted norm, it makes people question things more.
Everyone on here thinks you're a massive bell, I'm sure you disagree.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who the fack are you? Of course I disagree because its not true, and even if it was, on this site that means nothing. This is the kind of place where you'd rather be considered a bell than a no mark like you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn't realise I was in the presence of greatness. U22357?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well if you didn't know now you know.
comment by Scouze Doggie Dog (U22357)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man. 20times, 20legend (U1270)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by Scouze Doggie Dog (U22357)
posted 39 minutes ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man. 20times, 20legend (U1270)
posted 58 minutes ago
comment by Scouze Doggie Dog (U22357)
posted 12 hours, 26 minutes ago
I made a valid internet forum comment. I'm sorry if you feel otherwise. There's one comment going against the grain here, that's par for the course. What did you expect on a mutliteam forum? We can't all hold hands and sing kumbaya. This is how its supposed to be and you should lighten up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's good to hold and air your views if they go against the accepted norm, it makes people question things more.
Everyone on here thinks you're a massive bell, I'm sure you disagree.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who the fack are you? Of course I disagree because its not true, and even if it was, on this site that means nothing. This is the kind of place where you'd rather be considered a bell than a no mark like you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn't realise I was in the presence of greatness. U22357?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well if you didn't know now you know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
William Large Testicles indeed.
More like Posticles Nearly a man 20 times
Sign in if you want to comment
United Prepared for Covid-19 in January
Page 2 of 2
posted on 18/4/20
comment by Scouze Doggie Dog (U22357)
posted 3 hours, 7 minutes ago
Have you posted similar when someone writes something good a out Liverpool? Ever?
-----
Why, yes. I have.
...
You can clearly remember posting on them. So come on, we’re waiting. No more stalling.
posted on 18/4/20
comment by Ruiney (U1005)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Scouze Doggie Dog (U22357)
posted 3 hours, 7 minutes ago
Have you posted similar when someone writes something good a out Liverpool? Ever?
-----
Why, yes. I have.
...
You can clearly remember posting on them. So come on, we’re waiting. No more stalling.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Remembering and finding g ate two different things. It took no effort to remember but it will take effort to find, and since you're the one in need, I suggest you find something to disprove what I said without further delay.
posted on 18/4/20
couldn't find any problem with this article. chill out doggie.
posted on 18/4/20
comment by Scouze Doggie Dog (U22357)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by Ruiney (U1005)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Scouze Doggie Dog (U22357)
posted 3 hours, 7 minutes ago
Have you posted similar when someone writes something good a out Liverpool? Ever?
-----
Why, yes. I have.
...
You can clearly remember posting on them. So come on, we’re waiting. No more stalling.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Remembering and finding g ate two different things. It took no effort to remember but it will take effort to find, and since you're the one in need, I suggest you find something to disprove what I said without further delay.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Stop embarrassing yourself
posted on 18/4/20
Aside from being well prepared for the impact COVID-19 would have, United were adamant from the outset they would continue to pay their employees and not furlough nonplaying staff. Tottenham, Liverpool and Bournemouth have been forced into embarrassing U-turns on their decisions to furlough nonplaying staff, but sources have said United never intended to do so.
====
Sources, yes -
posted on 18/4/20
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 6 minutes ago
Aside from being well prepared for the impact COVID-19 would have, United were adamant from the outset they would continue to pay their employees and not furlough nonplaying staff. Tottenham, Liverpool and Bournemouth have been forced into embarrassing U-turns on their decisions to furlough nonplaying staff, but sources have said United never intended to do so.
====
Sources, yes -
----------------------------------------------------------------------
tbf, United did state they wouldn't be furloughing staff. And that was said before Spurs or any of the other clubs decided that they were going to.
posted on 18/4/20
It's not often you can say we're an example to other clubs of how it should be done, so well done, United.
posted on 18/4/20
Scouze Doggie Dog (U22357) Most of the stuff in the article were already known by the time it was posted. What Rashford, Maguire and others are doing aren't new to United fans. It's been in the media since the lockdown happened. The only thing new in this is that they started preparing for it back in January. That's in contrast to our government who wanted to keep the country open and let the coronavirus spread through the UK.
posted on 18/4/20
comment by CurrentlyIntheUK (U11181)
posted 2 minutes ago
Scouze Doggie Dog (U22357) Most of the stuff in the article were already known by the time it was posted. What Rashford, Maguire and others are doing aren't new to United fans. It's been in the media since the lockdown happened. The only thing new in this is that they started preparing for it back in January. That's in contrast to our government who wanted to keep the country open and let the coronavirus spread through the UK.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed. And there's no real source for that either. If they'd just said that in the article, it wouldn't have been as sensational and would've generated less hits. That's what I'm saying.
Whereas United have played it well and their players deserve commendation for their efforts, the article is still click bait capitalising on that fact. Its cringey and poor journalism IMO.
Its not an attack on United the club, it could be these were regular meetings where the issue of Covid came up and now sensationalised, something I'm sure came up in a lot of boardrooms. Perhaps you'd see it my way if it was another club rather than United in the article, and it could easily have been. Apart from the January meetings all the clubs are doing the other stuff.
In short good work United but just because its charity doesn't mean you get away with sheet reporting. Admittedly there's a lot of the same in today's media and since I'm not having a pop at United the club, I don't see a problem here
posted on 18/4/20
It's not our reporting, it's espn whoever they are.
But if it's just your opinion on the article, and not intended to wind up United fans, post it on the liv8board. We are intelligent enough to judge it ourselves.
posted on 18/4/20
It doesn’t even mention the story in the headline, so the complete opposite of click bait.
posted on 18/4/20
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 51 minutes ago
It's not our reporting, it's espn whoever they are.
But if it's just your opinion on the article, and not intended to wind up United fans, post it on the liv8board. We are intelligent enough to judge it ourselves.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you don't want to read views from other fans then perhaps you'd be better off on Redcafe or the likes.
posted on 18/4/20
comment by Scouze Doggie Dog (U22357)
posted 1 hour, 38 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 51 minutes ago
It's not our reporting, it's espn whoever they are.
But if it's just your opinion on the article, and not intended to wind up United fans, post it on the liv8board. We are intelligent enough to judge it ourselves.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you don't want to read views from other fans then perhaps you'd be better off on Redcafe or the likes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's always what wummers say. Most articles are derailed by the likes of you.
I prefer to have my conversations on here.
You prefer nothing to be informative.
posted on 19/4/20
I made a valid internet forum comment. I'm sorry if you feel otherwise. There's one comment going against the grain here, that's par for the course. What did you expect on a mutliteam forum? We can't all hold hands and sing kumbaya. This is how its supposed to be and you should lighten up.
posted on 19/4/20
comment by Scouze Doggie Dog (U22357)
posted 12 hours, 26 minutes ago
I made a valid internet forum comment. I'm sorry if you feel otherwise. There's one comment going against the grain here, that's par for the course. What did you expect on a mutliteam forum? We can't all hold hands and sing kumbaya. This is how its supposed to be and you should lighten up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's good to hold and air your views if they go against the accepted norm, it makes people question things more.
Everyone on here thinks you're a massive bell, I'm sure you disagree.
posted on 19/4/20
comment by The Post Nearly Man. 20times, 20legend (U1270)
posted 58 minutes ago
comment by Scouze Doggie Dog (U22357)
posted 12 hours, 26 minutes ago
I made a valid internet forum comment. I'm sorry if you feel otherwise. There's one comment going against the grain here, that's par for the course. What did you expect on a mutliteam forum? We can't all hold hands and sing kumbaya. This is how its supposed to be and you should lighten up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's good to hold and air your views if they go against the accepted norm, it makes people question things more.
Everyone on here thinks you're a massive bell, I'm sure you disagree.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who the fack are you? Of course I disagree because its not true, and even if it was, on this site that means nothing. This is the kind of place where you'd rather be considered a bell than a no mark like you.
posted on 19/4/20
comment by Scouze Doggie Dog (U22357)
posted 39 minutes ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man. 20times, 20legend (U1270)
posted 58 minutes ago
comment by Scouze Doggie Dog (U22357)
posted 12 hours, 26 minutes ago
I made a valid internet forum comment. I'm sorry if you feel otherwise. There's one comment going against the grain here, that's par for the course. What did you expect on a mutliteam forum? We can't all hold hands and sing kumbaya. This is how its supposed to be and you should lighten up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's good to hold and air your views if they go against the accepted norm, it makes people question things more.
Everyone on here thinks you're a massive bell, I'm sure you disagree.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who the fack are you? Of course I disagree because its not true, and even if it was, on this site that means nothing. This is the kind of place where you'd rather be considered a bell than a no mark like you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn't realise I was in the presence of greatness. U22357?
posted on 19/4/20
comment by The Post Nearly Man. 20times, 20legend (U1270)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by Scouze Doggie Dog (U22357)
posted 39 minutes ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man. 20times, 20legend (U1270)
posted 58 minutes ago
comment by Scouze Doggie Dog (U22357)
posted 12 hours, 26 minutes ago
I made a valid internet forum comment. I'm sorry if you feel otherwise. There's one comment going against the grain here, that's par for the course. What did you expect on a mutliteam forum? We can't all hold hands and sing kumbaya. This is how its supposed to be and you should lighten up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's good to hold and air your views if they go against the accepted norm, it makes people question things more.
Everyone on here thinks you're a massive bell, I'm sure you disagree.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who the fack are you? Of course I disagree because its not true, and even if it was, on this site that means nothing. This is the kind of place where you'd rather be considered a bell than a no mark like you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn't realise I was in the presence of greatness. U22357?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well if you didn't know now you know.
posted on 19/4/20
comment by Scouze Doggie Dog (U22357)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man. 20times, 20legend (U1270)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by Scouze Doggie Dog (U22357)
posted 39 minutes ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man. 20times, 20legend (U1270)
posted 58 minutes ago
comment by Scouze Doggie Dog (U22357)
posted 12 hours, 26 minutes ago
I made a valid internet forum comment. I'm sorry if you feel otherwise. There's one comment going against the grain here, that's par for the course. What did you expect on a mutliteam forum? We can't all hold hands and sing kumbaya. This is how its supposed to be and you should lighten up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's good to hold and air your views if they go against the accepted norm, it makes people question things more.
Everyone on here thinks you're a massive bell, I'm sure you disagree.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who the fack are you? Of course I disagree because its not true, and even if it was, on this site that means nothing. This is the kind of place where you'd rather be considered a bell than a no mark like you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn't realise I was in the presence of greatness. U22357?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well if you didn't know now you know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
William Large Testicles indeed.
posted on 19/4/20
More like Posticles Nearly a man 20 times
Page 2 of 2