https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/sport/football/5527512/rangers-pursuing-inquiry-court-action-spfl/

We are likely to resume behind closed doors so what is the point?

Irvine you’re getting like heed

Irvine you’re getting like heed
===================

In the Avril Lavine sense?

So it was not independent then and the SPFL paid someone to say that the SPFL were innocent of wrongdoing!! Are they not the SPFL auditors?

comment by (U22371)
posted 1 hour, 26 minutes ago
So it was not independent then and the SPFL paid someone to say that the SPFL were innocent of wrongdoing!! Are they not the SPFL auditors?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course it is. They are an independant company

comment by Poli (U14278)
posted 40 minutes ago
comment by (U22371)
posted 1 hour, 26 minutes ago
So it was not independent then and the SPFL paid someone to say that the SPFL were innocent of wrongdoing!! Are they not the SPFL auditors?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course it is. They are an independant company
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Not if they are paid by the company being investigated!! If you pay me money I will produce a report that says you are not a smelly tim!!

comment by (U22371)
posted 1 day, 14 hours ago
comment by Poli (U14278)
posted 40 minutes ago
comment by (U22371)
posted 1 hour, 26 minutes ago
So it was not independent then and the SPFL paid someone to say that the SPFL were innocent of wrongdoing!! Are they not the SPFL auditors?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course it is. They are an independant company
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Not if they are paid by the company being investigated!! If you pay me money I will produce a report that says you are not a smelly tim!!

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well in that case tangers should pay for the enquiry

comment by Poli (U14278)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by (U22371)
posted 1 day, 14 hours ago
comment by Poli (U14278)
posted 40 minutes ago
comment by (U22371)
posted 1 hour, 26 minutes ago
So it was not independent then and the SPFL paid someone to say that the SPFL were innocent of wrongdoing!! Are they not the SPFL auditors?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course it is. They are an independant company
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Not if they are paid by the company being investigated!! If you pay me money I will produce a report that says you are not a smelly tim!!

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well in that case tangers should pay for the enquiry
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I concur - 'tangers' should dip in their pocket for any nquiree.

If they are so certain what have they got to lose

comment by Poli (U14278)
posted 5 minutes ago
If they are so certain what have they got to lose

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Who knows, huh?

So, according to some on here, the gist of it is -

1 Rangers are quite right to demand an independent enquiry

2 An enquiry cannot be independent if it is paid for by anyone.

3 Therefore Rangers are demanding something that is impossible unless we can find some truly independent bunch of saps to volunteer to do it buckshee.

4 Of course, Rangers could pay for it (snigger). Then it would definitely be independent.


Brilliant. Maybe you could crowdfund it.
Hope you are well. Stay safe.

comment by * (U22266)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Poli (U14278)
posted 5 minutes ago
If they are so certain what have they got to lose

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Who knows, huh?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nothing so why dont they?

They have a point in that it was a shambles but they know amd we know it wont change a thing. Dundee could vote yes at anytime anyway.

Other countries will play behind closed doors so we should also.

Scotland has hardly any cases so the question of the lockdown seems pointless. We should follow sweden route.

Point 1. Correct

Point 2 incorrect it can be independent as long as those being investigated don’t arrange and pay for

Point 3 incorrect clearly possible , see point 2

Point 4 ‘snigger’ same old same old

Stay safe

Until rangers agree to pay for it no one will take them seriously

Its the old saying

Put your money where your mouth is

comment by Poli (U14278)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by * (U22266)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Poli (U14278)
posted 5 minutes ago
If they are so certain what have they got to lose

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Who knows, huh?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nothing so why dont they?

They have a point in that it was a shambles but they know amd we know it wont change a thing. Dundee could vote yes at anytime anyway.

Other countries will play behind closed doors so we should also.

Scotland has hardly any cases so the question of the lockdown seems pointless. We should follow sweden route.
----------------------------------------------------------------------



Brilliant!

Just watched the Deputy PM of Sweden (Isabella Lovin, nonetheless) on the Marr show, justifying/explaining the Swedish strategy. Essentially - they put their faith in the population to self-isolate/maintain social-distancing.

I put zero faith in the population of the UK to toe the line.

comment by Poli (U14278)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by * (U22266)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Poli (U14278)
posted 5 minutes ago
If they are so certain what have they got to lose

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Who knows, huh?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nothing so why dont they?

They have a point in that it was a shambles but they know amd we know it wont change a thing. Dundee could vote yes at anytime anyway.

Other countries will play behind closed doors so we should also.

Scotland has hardly any cases so the question of the lockdown seems pointless. We should follow sweden route.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

There's a shocker!

comment by The Duke (U10059)
posted 2 minutes ago
Point 1. Correct

Point 2 incorrect it can be independent as long as those being investigated don’t arrange and pay for

Point 3 incorrect clearly possible , see point 2

Point 4 ‘snigger’ same old same old

Stay safe
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good to see you disagree with the moonhowlers.

I'll let my 'snigger' stand until Rangers volunteer to pay for an independent inquiry.

Be fair, i could have mentioned the season tickets going on sale next week.

Any way. That's me away.

comment by New Magnum. The Mild Drover (U16400)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by The Duke (U10059)
posted 2 minutes ago
Point 1. Correct

Point 2 incorrect it can be independent as long as those being investigated don’t arrange and pay for

Point 3 incorrect clearly possible , see point 2

Point 4 ‘snigger’ same old same old

Stay safe
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good to see you disagree with the moonhowlers.

I'll let my 'snigger' stand until Rangers volunteer to pay for an independent inquiry.

Be fair, i could have mentioned the season tickets going on sale next week.

Any way. That's me away.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I'll indulge you.

In any normal environment - is the accuser/whistleblower (delete where applicable) compelled to pay for any enquiry?

You see - when you go down that route - then all you will see is bullying/harassing/strong-arming at every level as no-one will take on the 'establishment'.

Other than that - your points are gash.

comment by * (U22266)
posted 41 seconds ago
comment by New Magnum. The Mild Drover (U16400)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by The Duke (U10059)
posted 2 minutes ago
Point 1. Correct

Point 2 incorrect it can be independent as long as those being investigated don’t arrange and pay for

Point 3 incorrect clearly possible , see point 2

Point 4 ‘snigger’ same old same old

Stay safe
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good to see you disagree with the moonhowlers.

I'll let my 'snigger' stand until Rangers volunteer to pay for an independent inquiry.

Be fair, i could have mentioned the season tickets going on sale next week.

Any way. That's me away.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I'll indulge you.

In any normal environment - is the accuser/whistleblower (delete where applicable) compelled to pay for any enquiry?

You see - when you go down that route - then all you will see is bullying/harassing/strong-arming at every level as no-one will take on the 'establishment'.

Other than that - your points are gash.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The accuser always has to pay for it. Thats common sense.

comment by Poli (U14278)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by * (U22266)
posted 41 seconds ago
comment by New Magnum. The Mild Drover (U16400)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by The Duke (U10059)
posted 2 minutes ago
Point 1. Correct

Point 2 incorrect it can be independent as long as those being investigated don’t arrange and pay for

Point 3 incorrect clearly possible , see point 2

Point 4 ‘snigger’ same old same old

Stay safe
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good to see you disagree with the moonhowlers.

I'll let my 'snigger' stand until Rangers volunteer to pay for an independent inquiry.

Be fair, i could have mentioned the season tickets going on sale next week.

Any way. That's me away.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I'll indulge you.

In any normal environment - is the accuser/whistleblower (delete where applicable) compelled to pay for any enquiry?

You see - when you go down that route - then all you will see is bullying/harassing/strong-arming at every level as no-one will take on the 'establishment'.

Other than that - your points are gash.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The accuser always has to pay for it. Thats common sense.
----------------------------------------------------------------------


You are funny, Timmy.

comment by * (U22266)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Poli (U14278)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by * (U22266)
posted 41 seconds ago
comment by New Magnum. The Mild Drover (U16400)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by The Duke (U10059)
posted 2 minutes ago
Point 1. Correct

Point 2 incorrect it can be independent as long as those being investigated don’t arrange and pay for

Point 3 incorrect clearly possible , see point 2

Point 4 ‘snigger’ same old same old

Stay safe
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good to see you disagree with the moonhowlers.

I'll let my 'snigger' stand until Rangers volunteer to pay for an independent inquiry.

Be fair, i could have mentioned the season tickets going on sale next week.

Any way. That's me away.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I'll indulge you.

In any normal environment - is the accuser/whistleblower (delete where applicable) compelled to pay for any enquiry?

You see - when you go down that route - then all you will see is bullying/harassing/strong-arming at every level as no-one will take on the 'establishment'.

Other than that - your points are gash.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The accuser always has to pay for it. Thats common sense.
----------------------------------------------------------------------


You are funny, Timmy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well think about it.

Your the one making the accusation so why shpuldnt you pay?

If the spfl have to pay then every club could make accusations and they would go bust.

I couldnt demand an investigation into say a pharmaceutical company and expect them to pay for it. Obviously i would have to pay for it.

comment by Poli (U14278)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by * (U22266)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Poli (U14278)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by * (U22266)
posted 41 seconds ago
comment by New Magnum. The Mild Drover (U16400)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by The Duke (U10059)
posted 2 minutes ago
Point 1. Correct

Point 2 incorrect it can be independent as long as those being investigated don’t arrange and pay for

Point 3 incorrect clearly possible , see point 2

Point 4 ‘snigger’ same old same old

Stay safe
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good to see you disagree with the moonhowlers.

I'll let my 'snigger' stand until Rangers volunteer to pay for an independent inquiry.

Be fair, i could have mentioned the season tickets going on sale next week.

Any way. That's me away.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I'll indulge you.

In any normal environment - is the accuser/whistleblower (delete where applicable) compelled to pay for any enquiry?

You see - when you go down that route - then all you will see is bullying/harassing/strong-arming at every level as no-one will take on the 'establishment'.

Other than that - your points are gash.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The accuser always has to pay for it. Thats common sense.
----------------------------------------------------------------------


You are funny, Timmy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well think about it.

Your the one making the accusation so why shpuldnt you pay?

If the spfl have to pay then every club could make accusations and they would go bust.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I have indulged you more than I would prefer.

Stay safe you tulpamancer, you!