comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 7 minutes ago
Just watching the Big Match 1977, Chelsea v Hull, 2nd division match. Four pitch invasions. Manager having to make an announcement on the pitch. Disgraceful really, and the ground was half full. Small time club, with small time supporters.
Brummie and Summer and one or two others aside.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
lol the rubbish this moron writes you just have to laugh...first of all shock horror there was football hooligans in the 70s
and during that era let me tell you of the time when the Spurs fans broke into the West Stand at Stamford Bridge in the 70s...I was a terrified 13 year old kid wondering if i was gonna get badly hurt as a huge mob of Spurs hooligans rushed in.
As i said earlier, many Spurs fans on this forum just love to throw stones at glass houses...they can't stand the success of other teams just a bunch of resentful,bitter tools.
comment by 2-4-5 Trioxin (U22016)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 2 hours, 56 minutes ago
comment by Devil D.A. (U6522)
posted 3 minutes ago
Always remember fella you will always for evermore still only be recognised as the 3rd biggest club in London, outside the big two. You haven't even got a meaningful derby, unless you call your match ups with Fulham big.
-------------------------------------------------------
Arsenal vs. Spurs - most wins, Arsenal
Chelsea vs. Spurs - most wins, Chelsea
Arsenal vs. Chelsea - most wins, Arsenal
Arsenal - 30 major trophies
Chelsea - 24 major trophies
Spurs - 17 major trophies
Spurs = 3rd best
Deal with it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah, Spurs and Arsenal will always be the two biggest clubs in London, regardless of trophies.
Most of Chelsea's were purchased with their lottery win. Always only the third biggest club in London, although West Ham may dispute that with a bigger stadium.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's true mate without the lottery money they'd never have won the Premier league or Champions league odd Fa Cup and League Cup here and there maybe yer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
but guess what....we did And spurs fans are still crying about it even today
God knows I'm no Chelsea fan, but I've never understood condemning them for the investment they have received from Abramovich.
If you can find a single professional club in the country which has from it's set up only got revenue from ticket and player sales, advertising, sponsorship and so on then pop off and support them. No however, all the clubs have to some degree or other at one point or many in there history received outside investment.
Having a go at Chelsea simply because they have done so well (out of something every club has done) from investment recently displays a real pettiness and frankly makes those who indulge in it look like they have no understanding of football as a business or indeed business at all.
That's true mate without the lottery money they'd never have won the Premier league or Champions league odd Fa Cup and League Cup here and there maybe yer.
----------------------------------------------------------
Knowing Spurs even with Roman's money they still wouldn't have won the PL or CL by now
Biggish - shame Tottenham "looks worse than parts of Siberia" or it might've been them
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 18 minutes ago
Just watching the Big Match 1977, Chelsea v Hull, 2nd division match. Four pitch invasions. Manager having to make an announcement on the pitch. Disgraceful really, and the ground was half full. Small time club, with small time supporters.
Brummie and Summer and one or two others aside.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
More lies from Sandra. I watched that yesterday. Stamford B had 43k in it, it was actually mentioned that it was packed bt the match commentators so was not half full.
Pitch invasions grim tho tbf
The ground was half full because the fans were on the pitch by the sounds of it.
Sandy exposed for lying....surely not
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 38 seconds ago
The ground was half full because the fans were on the pitch by the sounds of it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 24 seconds ago
The ground was half full because the fans were on the pitch by the sounds of it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sandra just says stuff to win an argument. Like a little child. Disappears when you pull him up on it. Spurs board are decent but he's a Super Waankker and let's them down
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 2 minutes ago
Sandy exposed for lying....surely not
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its the last episode if the big match on itv4 catchup if anyone wants to have a look. My relative Tommy Langley plays in it
The best thing about Sandy is he will comment on one thread saying something, then will be on another saying the exact opposite.
One of the times he filtered me was because I was arguing with him using the comments he used on another article. He didn't suss he was basically arguing with himself.
The innocent Spurs fans from the 70s
https://flashbak.com/police-and-british-football-hooligans-1970-to-1980-3350/
comment by Dan Arsenal (U21084)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 2 minutes ago
Sandy exposed for lying....surely not
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its the last episode if the big match on itv4 catchup if anyone wants to have a look. My relative Tommy Langley plays in it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I remember Tommy well
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 2 minutes ago
The best thing about Sandy is he will comment on one thread saying something, then will be on another saying the exact opposite.
One of the times he filtered me was because I was arguing with him using the comments he used on another article. He didn't suss he was basically arguing with himself.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ditto
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 55 seconds ago
The best thing about Sandy is he will comment on one thread saying something, then will be on another saying the exact opposite.
One of the times he filtered me was because I was arguing with him using the comments he used on another article. He didn't suss he was basically arguing with himself.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He's a mug. Thinks he is superior coz he went to matches for 50 years when just makes it all the more embarrassing thar he knows feck all about the game
comment by Sanity is overrated (U21166)
posted 14 minutes ago
God knows I'm no Chelsea fan, but I've never understood condemning them for the investment they have received from Abramovich.
If you can find a single professional club in the country which has from it's set up only got revenue from ticket and player sales, advertising, sponsorship and so on then pop off and support them. No however, all the clubs have to some degree or other at one point or many in there history received outside investment.
Having a go at Chelsea simply because they have done so well (out of something every club has done) from investment recently displays a real pettiness and frankly makes those who indulge in it look like they have no understanding of football as a business or indeed business at all.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because he’s a Russian criminal and we’ve had enough of these people infecting our country and politics with their filthy money.
I said what I said.
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 5 minutes ago
The innocent Spurs fans from the 70s
https://flashbak.com/police-and-british-football-hooligans-1970-to-1980-3350/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And yet Chelsea was still the club of choice for the NF.
Automatic For The People #BLM (U21889)
Because he’s a Russian criminal and we’ve had enough of these people infecting our country and politics with their filthy money.
----
Is that criminal and filthy money like Spurs owners ENIC? Who are registered in The Bahamas so they can avoid paying tax for our schools, NHS, social services etc.
nice racist phraseology again by Sizzle...earlier it was "its in their DNA" now its "these people"
Frightening and heading in the right direction for yet another ban for using racist and inflammatory language on this forum
By thier tax avoidance(Bahamas registered) you could argue that ENIC and to use member U21889s argument anyone associated with Spurs is guilty of....
For not paying tax to fund.
1. The N.H.S - murder.
2. Schools - child neglect, possibly abuse.
3. Social Services - neglect and possible abuse of the elderly and those with disabilities.
What frightful people.
comment by Sanity is overrated (U21166)
posted 53 minutes ago
God knows I'm no Chelsea fan, but I've never understood condemning them for the investment they have received from Abramovich.
If you can find a single professional club in the country which has from it's set up only got revenue from ticket and player sales, advertising, sponsorship and so on then pop off and support them. No however, all the clubs have to some degree or other at one point or many in there history received outside investment.
Having a go at Chelsea simply because they have done so well (out of something every club has done) from investment recently displays a real pettiness and frankly makes those who indulge in it look like they have no understanding of football as a business or indeed business at all.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well Abramivich is a crook for starters. Everyone knows where he got his wealth from, and it wasn't by hard graft. An ex jailbird with lots of money stashed away, who would have thought.
comment by montleeds (U18330)
posted 2 hours, 10 minutes ago
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 1 hour ago
comment by montleeds (U18330)
posted 25 minutes ago
as a football fan in a country where hockey fans dominate, im always looking for people to talk football with. iv'e met many man utd , liverpool , arsenal, leeds, chelsea and even a bolton fan. but no tottenham fans.
i guess winning things is the way to get known..
maybe spurs could try that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hilarious from a Leeds fan , who have spent most of the century in the lower leagues.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
but still won more than spurs. sandy stop helping me here. you're embarrassing the good spurs fans.
looking foward to six points from our games this year.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah fella, you had a six year period in your history 50 years ago, and then one decent season since then. Leeds have never been a big club, other than those six years. Spurs have played more times in the CL in the last four years, than Leeds have in their history.
comment by montleeds (U18330)
posted 2 hours, 15 minutes ago
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 1 hour ago
comment by montleeds (U18330)
posted 25 minutes ago
as a football fan in a country where hockey fans dominate, im always looking for people to talk football with. iv'e met many man utd , liverpool , arsenal, leeds, chelsea and even a bolton fan. but no tottenham fans.
i guess winning things is the way to get known..
maybe spurs could try that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hilarious from a Leeds fan , who have spent most of the century in the lower leagues.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
but still won more than spurs. sandy stop helping me here. you're embarrassing the good spurs fans.
looking foward to six points from our games this year.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Won more than Spurs.
You don't even know your clubs history. Spurs rank in the top half a dozen trophy winners of all time in England. I doubt Leeds make the top 20
Sign in if you want to comment
FA Cup or Top 4?
Page 8 of 12
8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12
posted on 6/8/20
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 7 minutes ago
Just watching the Big Match 1977, Chelsea v Hull, 2nd division match. Four pitch invasions. Manager having to make an announcement on the pitch. Disgraceful really, and the ground was half full. Small time club, with small time supporters.
Brummie and Summer and one or two others aside.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
lol the rubbish this moron writes you just have to laugh...first of all shock horror there was football hooligans in the 70s
and during that era let me tell you of the time when the Spurs fans broke into the West Stand at Stamford Bridge in the 70s...I was a terrified 13 year old kid wondering if i was gonna get badly hurt as a huge mob of Spurs hooligans rushed in.
As i said earlier, many Spurs fans on this forum just love to throw stones at glass houses...they can't stand the success of other teams just a bunch of resentful,bitter tools.
posted on 6/8/20
comment by 2-4-5 Trioxin (U22016)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 2 hours, 56 minutes ago
comment by Devil D.A. (U6522)
posted 3 minutes ago
Always remember fella you will always for evermore still only be recognised as the 3rd biggest club in London, outside the big two. You haven't even got a meaningful derby, unless you call your match ups with Fulham big.
-------------------------------------------------------
Arsenal vs. Spurs - most wins, Arsenal
Chelsea vs. Spurs - most wins, Chelsea
Arsenal vs. Chelsea - most wins, Arsenal
Arsenal - 30 major trophies
Chelsea - 24 major trophies
Spurs - 17 major trophies
Spurs = 3rd best
Deal with it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah, Spurs and Arsenal will always be the two biggest clubs in London, regardless of trophies.
Most of Chelsea's were purchased with their lottery win. Always only the third biggest club in London, although West Ham may dispute that with a bigger stadium.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's true mate without the lottery money they'd never have won the Premier league or Champions league odd Fa Cup and League Cup here and there maybe yer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
but guess what....we did And spurs fans are still crying about it even today
posted on 6/8/20
God knows I'm no Chelsea fan, but I've never understood condemning them for the investment they have received from Abramovich.
If you can find a single professional club in the country which has from it's set up only got revenue from ticket and player sales, advertising, sponsorship and so on then pop off and support them. No however, all the clubs have to some degree or other at one point or many in there history received outside investment.
Having a go at Chelsea simply because they have done so well (out of something every club has done) from investment recently displays a real pettiness and frankly makes those who indulge in it look like they have no understanding of football as a business or indeed business at all.
posted on 6/8/20
That's true mate without the lottery money they'd never have won the Premier league or Champions league odd Fa Cup and League Cup here and there maybe yer.
----------------------------------------------------------
Knowing Spurs even with Roman's money they still wouldn't have won the PL or CL by now
posted on 6/8/20
Biggish - shame Tottenham "looks worse than parts of Siberia" or it might've been them
posted on 6/8/20
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 18 minutes ago
Just watching the Big Match 1977, Chelsea v Hull, 2nd division match. Four pitch invasions. Manager having to make an announcement on the pitch. Disgraceful really, and the ground was half full. Small time club, with small time supporters.
Brummie and Summer and one or two others aside.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
More lies from Sandra. I watched that yesterday. Stamford B had 43k in it, it was actually mentioned that it was packed bt the match commentators so was not half full.
Pitch invasions grim tho tbf
posted on 6/8/20
The ground was half full because the fans were on the pitch by the sounds of it.
posted on 6/8/20
Sandy exposed for lying....surely not
posted on 6/8/20
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 38 seconds ago
The ground was half full because the fans were on the pitch by the sounds of it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 6/8/20
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 24 seconds ago
The ground was half full because the fans were on the pitch by the sounds of it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sandra just says stuff to win an argument. Like a little child. Disappears when you pull him up on it. Spurs board are decent but he's a Super Waankker and let's them down
posted on 6/8/20
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 2 minutes ago
Sandy exposed for lying....surely not
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its the last episode if the big match on itv4 catchup if anyone wants to have a look. My relative Tommy Langley plays in it
posted on 6/8/20
The best thing about Sandy is he will comment on one thread saying something, then will be on another saying the exact opposite.
One of the times he filtered me was because I was arguing with him using the comments he used on another article. He didn't suss he was basically arguing with himself.
posted on 6/8/20
The innocent Spurs fans from the 70s
https://flashbak.com/police-and-british-football-hooligans-1970-to-1980-3350/
posted on 6/8/20
comment by Dan Arsenal (U21084)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 2 minutes ago
Sandy exposed for lying....surely not
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its the last episode if the big match on itv4 catchup if anyone wants to have a look. My relative Tommy Langley plays in it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I remember Tommy well
posted on 6/8/20
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 2 minutes ago
The best thing about Sandy is he will comment on one thread saying something, then will be on another saying the exact opposite.
One of the times he filtered me was because I was arguing with him using the comments he used on another article. He didn't suss he was basically arguing with himself.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ditto
posted on 6/8/20
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 55 seconds ago
The best thing about Sandy is he will comment on one thread saying something, then will be on another saying the exact opposite.
One of the times he filtered me was because I was arguing with him using the comments he used on another article. He didn't suss he was basically arguing with himself.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He's a mug. Thinks he is superior coz he went to matches for 50 years when just makes it all the more embarrassing thar he knows feck all about the game
posted on 6/8/20
comment by Sanity is overrated (U21166)
posted 14 minutes ago
God knows I'm no Chelsea fan, but I've never understood condemning them for the investment they have received from Abramovich.
If you can find a single professional club in the country which has from it's set up only got revenue from ticket and player sales, advertising, sponsorship and so on then pop off and support them. No however, all the clubs have to some degree or other at one point or many in there history received outside investment.
Having a go at Chelsea simply because they have done so well (out of something every club has done) from investment recently displays a real pettiness and frankly makes those who indulge in it look like they have no understanding of football as a business or indeed business at all.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because he’s a Russian criminal and we’ve had enough of these people infecting our country and politics with their filthy money.
I said what I said.
posted on 6/8/20
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 5 minutes ago
The innocent Spurs fans from the 70s
https://flashbak.com/police-and-british-football-hooligans-1970-to-1980-3350/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And yet Chelsea was still the club of choice for the NF.
posted on 6/8/20
Automatic For The People #BLM (U21889)
Because he’s a Russian criminal and we’ve had enough of these people infecting our country and politics with their filthy money.
----
Is that criminal and filthy money like Spurs owners ENIC? Who are registered in The Bahamas so they can avoid paying tax for our schools, NHS, social services etc.
posted on 6/8/20
nice racist phraseology again by Sizzle...earlier it was "its in their DNA" now its "these people"
Frightening and heading in the right direction for yet another ban for using racist and inflammatory language on this forum
posted on 6/8/20
By thier tax avoidance(Bahamas registered) you could argue that ENIC and to use member U21889s argument anyone associated with Spurs is guilty of....
For not paying tax to fund.
1. The N.H.S - murder.
2. Schools - child neglect, possibly abuse.
3. Social Services - neglect and possible abuse of the elderly and those with disabilities.
What frightful people.
posted on 6/8/20
comment by Sanity is overrated (U21166)
posted 53 minutes ago
God knows I'm no Chelsea fan, but I've never understood condemning them for the investment they have received from Abramovich.
If you can find a single professional club in the country which has from it's set up only got revenue from ticket and player sales, advertising, sponsorship and so on then pop off and support them. No however, all the clubs have to some degree or other at one point or many in there history received outside investment.
Having a go at Chelsea simply because they have done so well (out of something every club has done) from investment recently displays a real pettiness and frankly makes those who indulge in it look like they have no understanding of football as a business or indeed business at all.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well Abramivich is a crook for starters. Everyone knows where he got his wealth from, and it wasn't by hard graft. An ex jailbird with lots of money stashed away, who would have thought.
posted on 6/8/20
comment by montleeds (U18330)
posted 2 hours, 10 minutes ago
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 1 hour ago
comment by montleeds (U18330)
posted 25 minutes ago
as a football fan in a country where hockey fans dominate, im always looking for people to talk football with. iv'e met many man utd , liverpool , arsenal, leeds, chelsea and even a bolton fan. but no tottenham fans.
i guess winning things is the way to get known..
maybe spurs could try that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hilarious from a Leeds fan , who have spent most of the century in the lower leagues.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
but still won more than spurs. sandy stop helping me here. you're embarrassing the good spurs fans.
looking foward to six points from our games this year.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah fella, you had a six year period in your history 50 years ago, and then one decent season since then. Leeds have never been a big club, other than those six years. Spurs have played more times in the CL in the last four years, than Leeds have in their history.
posted on 6/8/20
199
posted on 6/8/20
comment by montleeds (U18330)
posted 2 hours, 15 minutes ago
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 1 hour ago
comment by montleeds (U18330)
posted 25 minutes ago
as a football fan in a country where hockey fans dominate, im always looking for people to talk football with. iv'e met many man utd , liverpool , arsenal, leeds, chelsea and even a bolton fan. but no tottenham fans.
i guess winning things is the way to get known..
maybe spurs could try that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hilarious from a Leeds fan , who have spent most of the century in the lower leagues.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
but still won more than spurs. sandy stop helping me here. you're embarrassing the good spurs fans.
looking foward to six points from our games this year.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Won more than Spurs.
You don't even know your clubs history. Spurs rank in the top half a dozen trophy winners of all time in England. I doubt Leeds make the top 20
Page 8 of 12
8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12