Partick and somewhat ironically Queen's Park fans gave a splendid rendition tonight. Perhaps not the one Chas would want but it is nice to know the coronation is still in people's minds, I suppose?
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 54 minutes ago
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 hour, 45 minutes ago
Everyone can choose how they behave, and it’s not really a big issue.
Personally I’d just stay quiet rather than making a scene, but some of have the ability to act with decent more than others.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m with you in that I’d stay quiet also.
But staying silent as a way to make a point (such as not singing the national anthem) doesn’t work in a crowd environment. Unless every one else stays silent also.
Booing to express an opinion of negativity towards an establishment can also be seen as a respectful form of protest. It is a non-violent form of protest, and if the numbers are large enough, then their point has been made.
I’m with the Liverpool fans in this respect. I don’t think they can be regarded as not being decent because they vocalised their objections (and being simply vocal is just about the most civilised way any group or individual can make their opinion known).
And as such, they don’t deserve negative criticism for this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I wasn’t suggesting I’d stay quiet to make a point.
I was just saying if I didn’t want to sing the anthem, I’d stay quiet.
I have no issue with those who genuinely wish to protest, but I suspect the majority of the crowd don’t fit that description.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You've pretty much summed up my entire position on this.
Feel free to not join in if you wish, but booing in protest when most don't know what they're booing. Even on here the only real attempted justification is a protest basically against a Tory policy from the 80s...half the crowd probably weren't even born then and it has little to do with King Charles who is actually more actively inclusive and likely to question the Govt where he sees policy that fails to deliver this than ERII was.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 12 hours, 1 minute ago
comment by Vladimikel Artutin - committing war crimes against football since 2019 (U18355)
posted 1 minute ago
The majority of fans are from Liverpool though and all have the same gripe with the Royal family so why would they not fit that description?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think much of the animosity is based on what was going on 30-40 years ago, at least, and most younger fans have far less reason to take issue… and suspect the majority of those fans just like causing a scene.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Things don't work like that though. Financial, economic policies and that sort of thing can have three types of effects
1)Immediate effects
2)Prolonged/Long lasting effects
3)Delayed effects which don't kick in immediately and might be felt decades later.
In fact, the younger fans probably would have more reason to protest as they could be the generation that is impacted the most.
I think most of those fans do want to take the (very rare) opportunity to demonstrate the feeling in Liverpool. Of you are at that game it's your job to demonstrate that on behalf of the city, but at the same time, they're also very much looking forward to the scenes and pandemonium, as you pointed out. As I said, it's not that clear cut IMO.
Even on here the only real attempted justification is a protest basically against a Tory policy from the 80s...half the crowd probably weren't even born then
====
Classic Tory logic. If you ever wanted to see why Tories are thick then this is it.
Because half the crowd weren't born in the 80's means they don't have reason to protest and can't understand the reason for the protest. Genius.
On the face of it, it looks logical and obvious, but upon critical dissection, you find that it's utter horse dung. That's how the Tories captured the majority of votes as they knew most people are thick and tickled these people in just the right place to make them laugh, and schools aren't really teaching kids the ability to critically dissect information too.
I mean, the people saying this aren't scousers so I wonder how stupid are the youth in their cities that they wouldn't expect them to understand something like that and how it affects them.
“ I have no issue with those who genuinely wish to protest, but I suspect the majority of the crowd don’t fit that description.”
Of course you do. Have a day off FFS. What would your suspicions based on?
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
“ I have no issue with those who genuinely wish to protest, but I suspect the majority of the crowd don’t fit that description.”
Of course you do. Have a day off FFS. What would your suspicions based on?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Someone said something slightly critical of Liverpool
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
Even on here the only real attempted justification is a protest basically against a Tory policy from the 80s...half the crowd probably weren't even born then
====
Classic Tory logic. If you ever wanted to see why Tories are thick then this is it.
Because half the crowd weren't born in the 80's means they don't have reason to protest and can't understand the reason for the protest. Genius.
On the face of it, it looks logical and obvious, but upon critical dissection, you find that it's utter horse dung. That's how the Tories captured the majority of votes as they knew most people are thick and tickled these people in just the right place to make them laugh, and schools aren't really teaching kids the ability to critically dissect information too.
I mean, the people saying this aren't scousers so I wonder how stupid are the youth in their cities that they wouldn't expect them to understand something like that and how it affects them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Scouse logic: booing the National Anthem on the Kings Coronation because of something a Tory government did 40 years ago and before you were born! What a mixed up bitter lot you are ! Fecking move on.
What if Labour were in power, would you have booed then?
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
“ I have no issue with those who genuinely wish to protest, but I suspect the majority of the crowd don’t fit that description.”
Of course you do. Have a day off FFS. What would your suspicions based on?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Someone said something slightly critical of Liverpool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Slightly critical, you’ve just made that up to suit an argument no on on here was having
You’re a sad little man aren’t you.
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
“ I have no issue with those who genuinely wish to protest, but I suspect the majority of the crowd don’t fit that description.”
Of course you do. Have a day off FFS. What would your suspicions based on?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Someone said something slightly critical of Liverpool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Slightly critical, you’ve just made that up to suit an argument no on on here was having
You’re a sad little man aren’t you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Coming from you?
Go and have a cry somewhere.
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
Even on here the only real attempted justification is a protest basically against a Tory policy from the 80s...half the crowd probably weren't even born then
====
Classic Tory logic. If you ever wanted to see why Tories are thick then this is it.
Because half the crowd weren't born in the 80's means they don't have reason to protest and can't understand the reason for the protest. Genius.
On the face of it, it looks logical and obvious, but upon critical dissection, you find that it's utter horse dung. That's how the Tories captured the majority of votes as they knew most people are thick and tickled these people in just the right place to make them laugh, and schools aren't really teaching kids the ability to critically dissect information too.
I mean, the people saying this aren't scousers so I wonder how stupid are the youth in their cities that they wouldn't expect them to understand something like that and how it affects them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Scouse logic: booing the National Anthem on the Kings Coronation because of something a Tory government did 40 years ago and before you were born! What a mixed up bitter lot you are ! Fecking move on.
What if Labour were in power, would you have booed then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Anfield was the safest place to hold a legal and peaceful protest on Saturday. Meanwhile in London having a van full of placards is a criminal offence nowadays.
Sooner live in a democracy thanks. You can keep weird your Tory fever dream to yourself
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
“ I have no issue with those who genuinely wish to protest, but I suspect the majority of the crowd don’t fit that description.”
Of course you do. Have a day off FFS. What would your suspicions based on?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Someone said something slightly critical of Liverpool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Slightly critical, you’ve just made that up to suit an argument no on on here was having
You’re a sad little man aren’t you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Coming from you?
Go and have a cry somewhere.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Crying with laughter at your sad attempt to start an argument over nothing.
Classic Winston
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
“ I have no issue with those who genuinely wish to protest, but I suspect the majority of the crowd don’t fit that description.”
Of course you do. Have a day off FFS. What would your suspicions based on?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Someone said something slightly critical of Liverpool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Slightly critical, you’ve just made that up to suit an argument no on on here was having
You’re a sad little man aren’t you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Coming from you?
Go and have a cry somewhere.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Crying with laughter at your sad attempt to start an argument over nothing.
Classic Winston
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Says the guy who logs into a forum just to have a dig at me.
I’m sorry you’re so obsessed by me but really, you need to take a long hard look at your life and try to sort yourself out. It’s not healthy.
All the best with it.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
“ I have no issue with those who genuinely wish to protest, but I suspect the majority of the crowd don’t fit that description.”
Of course you do. Have a day off FFS. What would your suspicions based on?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Someone said something slightly critical of Liverpool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Slightly critical, you’ve just made that up to suit an argument no on on here was having
You’re a sad little man aren’t you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Coming from you?
Go and have a cry somewhere.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Crying with laughter at your sad attempt to start an argument over nothing.
Classic Winston
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Says the guy who logs into a forum just to have a dig at me.
I’m sorry you’re so obsessed by me but really, you need to take a long hard look at your life and try to sort yourself out. It’s not healthy.
All the best with it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You were saying about crying
I commented on this article yesterday, before you even commented, logged in to see what was up. That okay with you tiny tears?
You’ve been blatantly caught out making up shiite to start an argument, your usual MO, and now you’re lashing out, classic Winston
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
Even on here the only real attempted justification is a protest basically against a Tory policy from the 80s...half the crowd probably weren't even born then
====
Classic Tory logic. If you ever wanted to see why Tories are thick then this is it.
Because half the crowd weren't born in the 80's means they don't have reason to protest and can't understand the reason for the protest. Genius.
On the face of it, it looks logical and obvious, but upon critical dissection, you find that it's utter horse dung. That's how the Tories captured the majority of votes as they knew most people are thick and tickled these people in just the right place to make them laugh, and schools aren't really teaching kids the ability to critically dissect information too.
I mean, the people saying this aren't scousers so I wonder how stupid are the youth in their cities that they wouldn't expect them to understand something like that and how it affects them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Scouse logic: booing the National Anthem on the Kings Coronation because of something a Tory government did 40 years ago and before you were born! What a mixed up bitter lot you are ! Fecking move on.
What if Labour were in power, would you have booed then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Anfield was the safest place to hold a legal and peaceful protest on Saturday. Meanwhile in London having a van full of placards is a criminal offence nowadays.
Sooner live in a democracy thanks. You can keep weird your Tory fever dream to yourself
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So what were you protesting against?
As for the 6 people arrested in London, out of about 2000 peaceful protestors, I'd agree that was unnecessary by the MET but keep it in perspective
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
“ I have no issue with those who genuinely wish to protest, but I suspect the majority of the crowd don’t fit that description.”
Of course you do. Have a day off FFS. What would your suspicions based on?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Someone said something slightly critical of Liverpool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Slightly critical, you’ve just made that up to suit an argument no on on here was having
You’re a sad little man aren’t you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Coming from you?
Go and have a cry somewhere.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Crying with laughter at your sad attempt to start an argument over nothing.
Classic Winston
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Says the guy who logs into a forum just to have a dig at me.
I’m sorry you’re so obsessed by me but really, you need to take a long hard look at your life and try to sort yourself out. It’s not healthy.
All the best with it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You were saying about crying
I commented on this article yesterday, before you even commented, logged in to see what was up. That okay with you tiny tears?
You’ve been blatantly caught out making up shiite to start an argument, your usual MO, and now you’re lashing out, classic Winston
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Doesn’t change the fact that you logged into today just to post a dig at me.
Do you want to deny it again?
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
Even on here the only real attempted justification is a protest basically against a Tory policy from the 80s...half the crowd probably weren't even born then
====
Classic Tory logic. If you ever wanted to see why Tories are thick then this is it.
Because half the crowd weren't born in the 80's means they don't have reason to protest and can't understand the reason for the protest. Genius.
On the face of it, it looks logical and obvious, but upon critical dissection, you find that it's utter horse dung. That's how the Tories captured the majority of votes as they knew most people are thick and tickled these people in just the right place to make them laugh, and schools aren't really teaching kids the ability to critically dissect information too.
I mean, the people saying this aren't scousers so I wonder how stupid are the youth in their cities that they wouldn't expect them to understand something like that and how it affects them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Scouse logic: booing the National Anthem on the Kings Coronation because of something a Tory government did 40 years ago and before you were born! What a mixed up bitter lot you are ! Fecking move on.
What if Labour were in power, would you have booed then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Anfield was the safest place to hold a legal and peaceful protest on Saturday. Meanwhile in London having a van full of placards is a criminal offence nowadays.
Sooner live in a democracy thanks. You can keep weird your Tory fever dream to yourself
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So what were you protesting against?
As for the 6 people arrested in London, out of about 2000 peaceful protestors, I'd agree that was unnecessary by the MET but keep it in perspective
----------------------------------------------------------------------
‘They’ weren’t.
That’s the issue here isn’t it.
We’ve got a bunch of Liverpool fans who have rarely, if ever, been to Anfield, telling us why the crowd were doing what they were doing with utmost confidence.
It’s all a bit silly.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
“ I have no issue with those who genuinely wish to protest, but I suspect the majority of the crowd don’t fit that description.”
Of course you do. Have a day off FFS. What would your suspicions based on?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Someone said something slightly critical of Liverpool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Slightly critical, you’ve just made that up to suit an argument no on on here was having
You’re a sad little man aren’t you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Coming from you?
Go and have a cry somewhere.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Crying with laughter at your sad attempt to start an argument over nothing.
Classic Winston
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Says the guy who logs into a forum just to have a dig at me.
I’m sorry you’re so obsessed by me but really, you need to take a long hard look at your life and try to sort yourself out. It’s not healthy.
All the best with it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You were saying about crying
I commented on this article yesterday, before you even commented, logged in to see what was up. That okay with you tiny tears?
You’ve been blatantly caught out making up shiite to start an argument, your usual MO, and now you’re lashing out, classic Winston
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Doesn’t change the fact that you logged into today just to post a dig at me.
Do you want to deny it again?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I logged in before knowing you’d commented on a thread I posted on yesterday. Fookin ell you will argue about anything.
What a sad little man
Course you did Fields… course you did.
And yet here we are.
You’re a mess and your profile page shows you just ruin threads wherever you go.
Well done… another one chalked up to your obsession and your desire to argue like a child.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
Even on here the only real attempted justification is a protest basically against a Tory policy from the 80s...half the crowd probably weren't even born then
====
Classic Tory logic. If you ever wanted to see why Tories are thick then this is it.
Because half the crowd weren't born in the 80's means they don't have reason to protest and can't understand the reason for the protest. Genius.
On the face of it, it looks logical and obvious, but upon critical dissection, you find that it's utter horse dung. That's how the Tories captured the majority of votes as they knew most people are thick and tickled these people in just the right place to make them laugh, and schools aren't really teaching kids the ability to critically dissect information too.
I mean, the people saying this aren't scousers so I wonder how stupid are the youth in their cities that they wouldn't expect them to understand something like that and how it affects them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Scouse logic: booing the National Anthem on the Kings Coronation because of something a Tory government did 40 years ago and before you were born! What a mixed up bitter lot you are ! Fecking move on.
What if Labour were in power, would you have booed then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Anfield was the safest place to hold a legal and peaceful protest on Saturday. Meanwhile in London having a van full of placards is a criminal offence nowadays.
Sooner live in a democracy thanks. You can keep weird your Tory fever dream to yourself
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So what were you protesting against?
As for the 6 people arrested in London, out of about 2000 peaceful protestors, I'd agree that was unnecessary by the MET but keep it in perspective
----------------------------------------------------------------------
‘They’ weren’t.
That’s the issue here isn’t it.
We’ve got a bunch of Liverpool fans who have rarely, if ever, been to Anfield, telling us why the crowd were doing what they were doing with utmost confidence.
It’s all a bit silly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
#Winstonfact
What’s wrong with booing your national anthem if you don’t like the idea of a monarchy?
It’s a dirge of a tune anyway
Kings & Queens, ffs, it’s not the Middle Ages
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 21 seconds ago
Course you did Fields… course you did.
And yet here we are.
You’re a mess and your profile page shows you just ruin threads wherever you go.
Well done… another one chalked up to your obsession and your desire to argue like a child.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Prove I knew you’d commented on this article before I logged in or fook off, simple.
You making up shiite to start arguments is just a happy accident/par for the course. It’s just what sad little people like you do.
comment by Bobby Dazzler (U1449)
posted 1 minute ago
What’s wrong with booing your national anthem if you don’t like the idea of a monarchy?
It’s a dirge of a tune anyway
Kings & Queens, ffs, it’s not the Middle Ages
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For all the comments, none are more succinct and also spot on than this.
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 21 seconds ago
Course you did Fields… course you did.
And yet here we are.
You’re a mess and your profile page shows you just ruin threads wherever you go.
Well done… another one chalked up to your obsession and your desire to argue like a child.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Prove I knew you’d commented on this article before I logged in or fook off, simple.
You making up shiite to start arguments is just a happy accident/par for the course. It’s just what sad little people like you do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Doesn’t really matter, does it?
Either you checked the page and logged in to have a pop at me, or you logged in and then decided that all you wanted to contribute this morning was to have a pop at me.
I’d forgotten quite how thick you are.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 21 seconds ago
Course you did Fields… course you did.
And yet here we are.
You’re a mess and your profile page shows you just ruin threads wherever you go.
Well done… another one chalked up to your obsession and your desire to argue like a child.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Prove I knew you’d commented on this article before I logged in or fook off, simple.
You making up shiite to start arguments is just a happy accident/par for the course. It’s just what sad little people like you do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Doesn’t really matter, does it?
Either you checked the page and logged in to have a pop at me, or you logged in and then decided that all you wanted to contribute this morning was to have a pop at me.
I’d forgotten quite how thick you are.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh it doesn’t matter now. It was a fact ten minutes ago. Keep tying yourself in knots you sadact
You seem upset I called out the shiite you were spouting, sorry about that
Sign in if you want to comment
Booing your own National Anthem.....
Page 7 of 21
8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12
posted on 9/5/23
Partick and somewhat ironically Queen's Park fans gave a splendid rendition tonight. Perhaps not the one Chas would want but it is nice to know the coronation is still in people's minds, I suppose?
posted on 9/5/23
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 54 minutes ago
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 hour, 45 minutes ago
Everyone can choose how they behave, and it’s not really a big issue.
Personally I’d just stay quiet rather than making a scene, but some of have the ability to act with decent more than others.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m with you in that I’d stay quiet also.
But staying silent as a way to make a point (such as not singing the national anthem) doesn’t work in a crowd environment. Unless every one else stays silent also.
Booing to express an opinion of negativity towards an establishment can also be seen as a respectful form of protest. It is a non-violent form of protest, and if the numbers are large enough, then their point has been made.
I’m with the Liverpool fans in this respect. I don’t think they can be regarded as not being decent because they vocalised their objections (and being simply vocal is just about the most civilised way any group or individual can make their opinion known).
And as such, they don’t deserve negative criticism for this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I wasn’t suggesting I’d stay quiet to make a point.
I was just saying if I didn’t want to sing the anthem, I’d stay quiet.
I have no issue with those who genuinely wish to protest, but I suspect the majority of the crowd don’t fit that description.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You've pretty much summed up my entire position on this.
Feel free to not join in if you wish, but booing in protest when most don't know what they're booing. Even on here the only real attempted justification is a protest basically against a Tory policy from the 80s...half the crowd probably weren't even born then and it has little to do with King Charles who is actually more actively inclusive and likely to question the Govt where he sees policy that fails to deliver this than ERII was.
posted on 10/5/23
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 12 hours, 1 minute ago
comment by Vladimikel Artutin - committing war crimes against football since 2019 (U18355)
posted 1 minute ago
The majority of fans are from Liverpool though and all have the same gripe with the Royal family so why would they not fit that description?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think much of the animosity is based on what was going on 30-40 years ago, at least, and most younger fans have far less reason to take issue… and suspect the majority of those fans just like causing a scene.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Things don't work like that though. Financial, economic policies and that sort of thing can have three types of effects
1)Immediate effects
2)Prolonged/Long lasting effects
3)Delayed effects which don't kick in immediately and might be felt decades later.
In fact, the younger fans probably would have more reason to protest as they could be the generation that is impacted the most.
I think most of those fans do want to take the (very rare) opportunity to demonstrate the feeling in Liverpool. Of you are at that game it's your job to demonstrate that on behalf of the city, but at the same time, they're also very much looking forward to the scenes and pandemonium, as you pointed out. As I said, it's not that clear cut IMO.
posted on 10/5/23
Even on here the only real attempted justification is a protest basically against a Tory policy from the 80s...half the crowd probably weren't even born then
====
Classic Tory logic. If you ever wanted to see why Tories are thick then this is it.
Because half the crowd weren't born in the 80's means they don't have reason to protest and can't understand the reason for the protest. Genius.
On the face of it, it looks logical and obvious, but upon critical dissection, you find that it's utter horse dung. That's how the Tories captured the majority of votes as they knew most people are thick and tickled these people in just the right place to make them laugh, and schools aren't really teaching kids the ability to critically dissect information too.
I mean, the people saying this aren't scousers so I wonder how stupid are the youth in their cities that they wouldn't expect them to understand something like that and how it affects them.
posted on 10/5/23
“ I have no issue with those who genuinely wish to protest, but I suspect the majority of the crowd don’t fit that description.”
Of course you do. Have a day off FFS. What would your suspicions based on?
posted on 10/5/23
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
“ I have no issue with those who genuinely wish to protest, but I suspect the majority of the crowd don’t fit that description.”
Of course you do. Have a day off FFS. What would your suspicions based on?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Someone said something slightly critical of Liverpool
posted on 10/5/23
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
Even on here the only real attempted justification is a protest basically against a Tory policy from the 80s...half the crowd probably weren't even born then
====
Classic Tory logic. If you ever wanted to see why Tories are thick then this is it.
Because half the crowd weren't born in the 80's means they don't have reason to protest and can't understand the reason for the protest. Genius.
On the face of it, it looks logical and obvious, but upon critical dissection, you find that it's utter horse dung. That's how the Tories captured the majority of votes as they knew most people are thick and tickled these people in just the right place to make them laugh, and schools aren't really teaching kids the ability to critically dissect information too.
I mean, the people saying this aren't scousers so I wonder how stupid are the youth in their cities that they wouldn't expect them to understand something like that and how it affects them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Scouse logic: booing the National Anthem on the Kings Coronation because of something a Tory government did 40 years ago and before you were born! What a mixed up bitter lot you are ! Fecking move on.
What if Labour were in power, would you have booed then?
posted on 10/5/23
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
“ I have no issue with those who genuinely wish to protest, but I suspect the majority of the crowd don’t fit that description.”
Of course you do. Have a day off FFS. What would your suspicions based on?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Someone said something slightly critical of Liverpool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Slightly critical, you’ve just made that up to suit an argument no on on here was having
You’re a sad little man aren’t you.
posted on 10/5/23
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
“ I have no issue with those who genuinely wish to protest, but I suspect the majority of the crowd don’t fit that description.”
Of course you do. Have a day off FFS. What would your suspicions based on?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Someone said something slightly critical of Liverpool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Slightly critical, you’ve just made that up to suit an argument no on on here was having
You’re a sad little man aren’t you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Coming from you?
Go and have a cry somewhere.
posted on 10/5/23
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
Even on here the only real attempted justification is a protest basically against a Tory policy from the 80s...half the crowd probably weren't even born then
====
Classic Tory logic. If you ever wanted to see why Tories are thick then this is it.
Because half the crowd weren't born in the 80's means they don't have reason to protest and can't understand the reason for the protest. Genius.
On the face of it, it looks logical and obvious, but upon critical dissection, you find that it's utter horse dung. That's how the Tories captured the majority of votes as they knew most people are thick and tickled these people in just the right place to make them laugh, and schools aren't really teaching kids the ability to critically dissect information too.
I mean, the people saying this aren't scousers so I wonder how stupid are the youth in their cities that they wouldn't expect them to understand something like that and how it affects them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Scouse logic: booing the National Anthem on the Kings Coronation because of something a Tory government did 40 years ago and before you were born! What a mixed up bitter lot you are ! Fecking move on.
What if Labour were in power, would you have booed then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Anfield was the safest place to hold a legal and peaceful protest on Saturday. Meanwhile in London having a van full of placards is a criminal offence nowadays.
Sooner live in a democracy thanks. You can keep weird your Tory fever dream to yourself
posted on 10/5/23
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
“ I have no issue with those who genuinely wish to protest, but I suspect the majority of the crowd don’t fit that description.”
Of course you do. Have a day off FFS. What would your suspicions based on?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Someone said something slightly critical of Liverpool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Slightly critical, you’ve just made that up to suit an argument no on on here was having
You’re a sad little man aren’t you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Coming from you?
Go and have a cry somewhere.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Crying with laughter at your sad attempt to start an argument over nothing.
Classic Winston
posted on 10/5/23
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
“ I have no issue with those who genuinely wish to protest, but I suspect the majority of the crowd don’t fit that description.”
Of course you do. Have a day off FFS. What would your suspicions based on?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Someone said something slightly critical of Liverpool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Slightly critical, you’ve just made that up to suit an argument no on on here was having
You’re a sad little man aren’t you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Coming from you?
Go and have a cry somewhere.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Crying with laughter at your sad attempt to start an argument over nothing.
Classic Winston
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Says the guy who logs into a forum just to have a dig at me.
I’m sorry you’re so obsessed by me but really, you need to take a long hard look at your life and try to sort yourself out. It’s not healthy.
All the best with it.
posted on 10/5/23
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
“ I have no issue with those who genuinely wish to protest, but I suspect the majority of the crowd don’t fit that description.”
Of course you do. Have a day off FFS. What would your suspicions based on?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Someone said something slightly critical of Liverpool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Slightly critical, you’ve just made that up to suit an argument no on on here was having
You’re a sad little man aren’t you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Coming from you?
Go and have a cry somewhere.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Crying with laughter at your sad attempt to start an argument over nothing.
Classic Winston
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Says the guy who logs into a forum just to have a dig at me.
I’m sorry you’re so obsessed by me but really, you need to take a long hard look at your life and try to sort yourself out. It’s not healthy.
All the best with it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You were saying about crying
I commented on this article yesterday, before you even commented, logged in to see what was up. That okay with you tiny tears?
You’ve been blatantly caught out making up shiite to start an argument, your usual MO, and now you’re lashing out, classic Winston
posted on 10/5/23
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
Even on here the only real attempted justification is a protest basically against a Tory policy from the 80s...half the crowd probably weren't even born then
====
Classic Tory logic. If you ever wanted to see why Tories are thick then this is it.
Because half the crowd weren't born in the 80's means they don't have reason to protest and can't understand the reason for the protest. Genius.
On the face of it, it looks logical and obvious, but upon critical dissection, you find that it's utter horse dung. That's how the Tories captured the majority of votes as they knew most people are thick and tickled these people in just the right place to make them laugh, and schools aren't really teaching kids the ability to critically dissect information too.
I mean, the people saying this aren't scousers so I wonder how stupid are the youth in their cities that they wouldn't expect them to understand something like that and how it affects them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Scouse logic: booing the National Anthem on the Kings Coronation because of something a Tory government did 40 years ago and before you were born! What a mixed up bitter lot you are ! Fecking move on.
What if Labour were in power, would you have booed then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Anfield was the safest place to hold a legal and peaceful protest on Saturday. Meanwhile in London having a van full of placards is a criminal offence nowadays.
Sooner live in a democracy thanks. You can keep weird your Tory fever dream to yourself
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So what were you protesting against?
As for the 6 people arrested in London, out of about 2000 peaceful protestors, I'd agree that was unnecessary by the MET but keep it in perspective
posted on 10/5/23
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
“ I have no issue with those who genuinely wish to protest, but I suspect the majority of the crowd don’t fit that description.”
Of course you do. Have a day off FFS. What would your suspicions based on?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Someone said something slightly critical of Liverpool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Slightly critical, you’ve just made that up to suit an argument no on on here was having
You’re a sad little man aren’t you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Coming from you?
Go and have a cry somewhere.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Crying with laughter at your sad attempt to start an argument over nothing.
Classic Winston
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Says the guy who logs into a forum just to have a dig at me.
I’m sorry you’re so obsessed by me but really, you need to take a long hard look at your life and try to sort yourself out. It’s not healthy.
All the best with it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You were saying about crying
I commented on this article yesterday, before you even commented, logged in to see what was up. That okay with you tiny tears?
You’ve been blatantly caught out making up shiite to start an argument, your usual MO, and now you’re lashing out, classic Winston
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Doesn’t change the fact that you logged into today just to post a dig at me.
Do you want to deny it again?
posted on 10/5/23
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
Even on here the only real attempted justification is a protest basically against a Tory policy from the 80s...half the crowd probably weren't even born then
====
Classic Tory logic. If you ever wanted to see why Tories are thick then this is it.
Because half the crowd weren't born in the 80's means they don't have reason to protest and can't understand the reason for the protest. Genius.
On the face of it, it looks logical and obvious, but upon critical dissection, you find that it's utter horse dung. That's how the Tories captured the majority of votes as they knew most people are thick and tickled these people in just the right place to make them laugh, and schools aren't really teaching kids the ability to critically dissect information too.
I mean, the people saying this aren't scousers so I wonder how stupid are the youth in their cities that they wouldn't expect them to understand something like that and how it affects them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Scouse logic: booing the National Anthem on the Kings Coronation because of something a Tory government did 40 years ago and before you were born! What a mixed up bitter lot you are ! Fecking move on.
What if Labour were in power, would you have booed then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Anfield was the safest place to hold a legal and peaceful protest on Saturday. Meanwhile in London having a van full of placards is a criminal offence nowadays.
Sooner live in a democracy thanks. You can keep weird your Tory fever dream to yourself
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So what were you protesting against?
As for the 6 people arrested in London, out of about 2000 peaceful protestors, I'd agree that was unnecessary by the MET but keep it in perspective
----------------------------------------------------------------------
‘They’ weren’t.
That’s the issue here isn’t it.
We’ve got a bunch of Liverpool fans who have rarely, if ever, been to Anfield, telling us why the crowd were doing what they were doing with utmost confidence.
It’s all a bit silly.
posted on 10/5/23
boooooooo
posted on 10/5/23
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
“ I have no issue with those who genuinely wish to protest, but I suspect the majority of the crowd don’t fit that description.”
Of course you do. Have a day off FFS. What would your suspicions based on?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Someone said something slightly critical of Liverpool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Slightly critical, you’ve just made that up to suit an argument no on on here was having
You’re a sad little man aren’t you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Coming from you?
Go and have a cry somewhere.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Crying with laughter at your sad attempt to start an argument over nothing.
Classic Winston
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Says the guy who logs into a forum just to have a dig at me.
I’m sorry you’re so obsessed by me but really, you need to take a long hard look at your life and try to sort yourself out. It’s not healthy.
All the best with it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You were saying about crying
I commented on this article yesterday, before you even commented, logged in to see what was up. That okay with you tiny tears?
You’ve been blatantly caught out making up shiite to start an argument, your usual MO, and now you’re lashing out, classic Winston
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Doesn’t change the fact that you logged into today just to post a dig at me.
Do you want to deny it again?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I logged in before knowing you’d commented on a thread I posted on yesterday. Fookin ell you will argue about anything.
What a sad little man
posted on 10/5/23
Course you did Fields… course you did.
And yet here we are.
You’re a mess and your profile page shows you just ruin threads wherever you go.
Well done… another one chalked up to your obsession and your desire to argue like a child.
posted on 10/5/23
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
Even on here the only real attempted justification is a protest basically against a Tory policy from the 80s...half the crowd probably weren't even born then
====
Classic Tory logic. If you ever wanted to see why Tories are thick then this is it.
Because half the crowd weren't born in the 80's means they don't have reason to protest and can't understand the reason for the protest. Genius.
On the face of it, it looks logical and obvious, but upon critical dissection, you find that it's utter horse dung. That's how the Tories captured the majority of votes as they knew most people are thick and tickled these people in just the right place to make them laugh, and schools aren't really teaching kids the ability to critically dissect information too.
I mean, the people saying this aren't scousers so I wonder how stupid are the youth in their cities that they wouldn't expect them to understand something like that and how it affects them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Scouse logic: booing the National Anthem on the Kings Coronation because of something a Tory government did 40 years ago and before you were born! What a mixed up bitter lot you are ! Fecking move on.
What if Labour were in power, would you have booed then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Anfield was the safest place to hold a legal and peaceful protest on Saturday. Meanwhile in London having a van full of placards is a criminal offence nowadays.
Sooner live in a democracy thanks. You can keep weird your Tory fever dream to yourself
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So what were you protesting against?
As for the 6 people arrested in London, out of about 2000 peaceful protestors, I'd agree that was unnecessary by the MET but keep it in perspective
----------------------------------------------------------------------
‘They’ weren’t.
That’s the issue here isn’t it.
We’ve got a bunch of Liverpool fans who have rarely, if ever, been to Anfield, telling us why the crowd were doing what they were doing with utmost confidence.
It’s all a bit silly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
#Winstonfact
posted on 10/5/23
What’s wrong with booing your national anthem if you don’t like the idea of a monarchy?
It’s a dirge of a tune anyway
Kings & Queens, ffs, it’s not the Middle Ages
posted on 10/5/23
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 21 seconds ago
Course you did Fields… course you did.
And yet here we are.
You’re a mess and your profile page shows you just ruin threads wherever you go.
Well done… another one chalked up to your obsession and your desire to argue like a child.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Prove I knew you’d commented on this article before I logged in or fook off, simple.
You making up shiite to start arguments is just a happy accident/par for the course. It’s just what sad little people like you do.
posted on 10/5/23
comment by Bobby Dazzler (U1449)
posted 1 minute ago
What’s wrong with booing your national anthem if you don’t like the idea of a monarchy?
It’s a dirge of a tune anyway
Kings & Queens, ffs, it’s not the Middle Ages
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For all the comments, none are more succinct and also spot on than this.
posted on 10/5/23
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 21 seconds ago
Course you did Fields… course you did.
And yet here we are.
You’re a mess and your profile page shows you just ruin threads wherever you go.
Well done… another one chalked up to your obsession and your desire to argue like a child.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Prove I knew you’d commented on this article before I logged in or fook off, simple.
You making up shiite to start arguments is just a happy accident/par for the course. It’s just what sad little people like you do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Doesn’t really matter, does it?
Either you checked the page and logged in to have a pop at me, or you logged in and then decided that all you wanted to contribute this morning was to have a pop at me.
I’d forgotten quite how thick you are.
posted on 10/5/23
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 21 seconds ago
Course you did Fields… course you did.
And yet here we are.
You’re a mess and your profile page shows you just ruin threads wherever you go.
Well done… another one chalked up to your obsession and your desire to argue like a child.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Prove I knew you’d commented on this article before I logged in or fook off, simple.
You making up shiite to start arguments is just a happy accident/par for the course. It’s just what sad little people like you do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Doesn’t really matter, does it?
Either you checked the page and logged in to have a pop at me, or you logged in and then decided that all you wanted to contribute this morning was to have a pop at me.
I’d forgotten quite how thick you are.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh it doesn’t matter now. It was a fact ten minutes ago. Keep tying yourself in knots you sadact
You seem upset I called out the shiite you were spouting, sorry about that
Page 7 of 21
8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12