2

I wouldn't leave Brentford or Bournemouth to work for Levy

Pretty certain it will be Potter

If you sack Ange you should be all over Iraola

Gareth Southgate would be the perfect fit
Could even tempt Harry Kane back for next season.
Developing youngsters is one of the key attributes you will need, and I think Gareth has that in his locker.

2 votes for Ange already. When it goes past 1 vote (Luka) you know it's just going to be rival fans voting.

comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 1 minute ago
If you sack Ange you should be all over Iraola
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed I’d wait till the summer and see if can get him outta Bournemouth if Ange can’t improve things

comment by Phenom (U20037)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 1 minute ago
If you sack Ange you should be all over Iraola
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed I’d wait till the summer and see if can get him outta Bournemouth if Ange can’t improve things
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The trouble with waiting it out is someone else could come in for him and Bournemouth could do well enough by the end of the season that Spurs just isn't worth moving for.

4, 3 more windows

A couple of questions of my own:

Does changing manager midseason somehow guarantee success?

Secondly, when is the last time that Spurs recruited a manager that then went on to be successful (other than Poch)?

Getting back on the manager merry go round mid season does not appeal to me personally. We need to stick with Ange, back him in the January window and see where it takes us this season.

How long does each manager get before the inevitable

"He is out of depth" "Tactically clueless" comments?

comment by Gezza-Spurs (U18952)
posted 7 minutes ago
A couple of questions of my own:

Does changing manager midseason somehow guarantee success?

Secondly, when is the last time that Spurs recruited a manager that then went on to be successful (other than Poch)?

Getting back on the manager merry go round mid season does not appeal to me personally. We need to stick with Ange, back him in the January window and see where it takes us this season.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Poch was not successful.

comment by Luka Bosh Brasi (U22178)
posted 14 minutes ago
How long does each manager get before the inevitable

"He is out of depth" "Tactically clueless" comments?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ange really is

comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by Luka Bosh Brasi (U22178)
posted 14 minutes ago
How long does each manager get before the inevitable

"He is out of depth" "Tactically clueless" comments?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ange really is
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yesturday was not a great advert for Ange changing the game at 2 nil up, but he was not helped by the wreckless and hapless Bissouma who threw the team under the bus with that Pen.

Also watch him stand still for Sancho's goal. Prefer my DM to able to sniff out danger and put his body on the line. Biss waved a leg.

comment by Luka Bosh Brasi (U22178)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Gezza-Spurs (U18952)
posted 7 minutes ago
A couple of questions of my own:

Does changing manager midseason somehow guarantee success?

Secondly, when is the last time that Spurs recruited a manager that then went on to be successful (other than Poch)?

Getting back on the manager merry go round mid season does not appeal to me personally. We need to stick with Ange, back him in the January window and see where it takes us this season.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Poch was not successful.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Success is relative. Getting top 4 for 4 consecutive seasons, a title race, 86 point tally and a CL final is all success compared to what we've been used to.

Been banging the Iraola drum for ages - whether we get him or not, he will be managing at a high level in this league.

I hope we pounce before West Ham or Newcastle do as missing out to one of those 2 could set us back further.

To answer Luka’s question about how long does a new manager get - it depends on what we see. We all knew Nuno wasn’t who we wanted after 10 games, if Iraola comes in and performs similarly then I will say 10 games.

The problem with Ange is I see no improvement during the time he has been here. It’s at best stood still, but if you add his explosive start at Spurs then it could be argued we have regressed under him this season. The lack of plan B is a disaster time and again.

One thing I will say and have done all season is that I like that he has put stronger sides out in the cups this season compared to our previous managers and himself in his first season.

I think Ange gets 3 more games - win them all and it probably gives him until March time. Drop any of them and I cant see how he can improve it long term.

sell Bentancur, Bissouma and Richarlison and sign a top midfielder and forward who walk into the first xi and improve it

but as we wont do that we probably need a manager who can get Archie Gray excelling earlier than expected in midfield and improving the young wingers we have so they become valuable first teamers

Sacking Ange would be the worst decision imo.

This is a rebuild.

4

comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by Luka Bosh Brasi (U22178)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Gezza-Spurs (U18952)
posted 7 minutes ago
A couple of questions of my own:

Does changing manager midseason somehow guarantee success?

Secondly, when is the last time that Spurs recruited a manager that then went on to be successful (other than Poch)?

Getting back on the manager merry go round mid season does not appeal to me personally. We need to stick with Ange, back him in the January window and see where it takes us this season.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Poch was not successful.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Success is relative. Getting top 4 for 4 consecutive seasons, a title race, 86 point tally and a CL final is all success compared to what we've been used to.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Success is not relative , especially in football.

You either win a trophy or you don't. Second and below are all losers.

Success is not relative , especially in football.
=======
What a lot of tosh. Ipswich will have had a successful season if they stay up. Forest will have had a successful season if they get European football. Mental to suggest the likes of Ipswich and Forest have to win the league to be deemed successful.

comment by Luka Bosh Brasi (U22178)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by Luka Bosh Brasi (U22178)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Gezza-Spurs (U18952)
posted 7 minutes ago
A couple of questions of my own:

Does changing manager midseason somehow guarantee success?

Secondly, when is the last time that Spurs recruited a manager that then went on to be successful (other than Poch)?

Getting back on the manager merry go round mid season does not appeal to me personally. We need to stick with Ange, back him in the January window and see where it takes us this season.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Poch was not successful.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Success is relative. Getting top 4 for 4 consecutive seasons, a title race, 86 point tally and a CL final is all success compared to what we've been used to.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Success is not relative , especially in football.

You either win a trophy or you don't. Second and below are all losers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Of course it's relative.

For some staying in the league is success. Others, making Europe.

If you are pushing and stepping over the boundaries of what you club has done in the past, or what your clubs resources or status can realistically deliver then that is success.

The vast majority of teams have won nothing, ever!

Iraola and Frank's football is too direct.

Potter is too Chelsea

comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 44 seconds ago
Success is not relative , especially in football.
=======
What a lot of tosh. Ipswich will have had a successful season if they stay up. Forest will have had a successful season if they get European football. Mental to suggest the likes of Ipswich and Forest have to win the league to be deemed successful.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Fair enough, I think it’s fair to say Dan Levy would consider CL qualification a success. Ange looks very short of that currently

comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 5 minutes ago
Iraola and Frank's football is too direct.

Potter is too Chelsea
----------------------------------------------------------------------
direct football is pretty good and effective when done right and isn't just long ball

wouldnt want Frank though tbf

Own up rival fans who’ve obviously skewed the voting. I refuse to believe our fans are this stupid 😂