This explains so much about your stance on football Sandy. It's jut so one dimensional. You look at the table and say "oooh, they're doing well" without even considering whether a manager is the right fit for a club. It's a really, really basic understanding of the game.
Nuno's style of football was never going to work with Spurs particularly as he was instructed to play a way he was less familiar with.
Also, what I find curious is that you never see the broader picture. In your head, it's all down to Nuno, even though when you want to paint a picture that suits a narrative, you're happy to flip it and blame or laud players for success. Which is it? Because from where I'm looking Forest's success really is built on truly good recruitment. Hudson Odoi, Elanga, Gibbs White, Murillo, Milenkovic, Anderson. It's not a miracle they're where they are. They've just quietly gone about their business very well, including fleecing us for 47m for Johnson.
I've heard you say stuff like "manager x is just flavour of the month" so why not apply that same logic to Nuno? Why is he beyond the same criticism? Probably because it wouldn't suit your need to troll, right?
comment by fridgeboy (U1053)
posted 12 minutes ago
This explains so much about your stance on football Sandy. It's jut so one dimensional. You look at the table and say "oooh, they're doing well" without even considering whether a manager is the right fit for a club. It's a really, really basic understanding of the game.
Nuno's style of football was never going to work with Spurs particularly as he was instructed to play a way he was less familiar with.
Also, what I find curious is that you never see the broader picture. In your head, it's all down to Nuno, even though when you want to paint a picture that suits a narrative, you're happy to flip it and blame or laud players for success. Which is it? Because from where I'm looking Forest's success really is built on truly good recruitment. Hudson Odoi, Elanga, Gibbs White, Murillo, Milenkovic, Anderson. It's not a miracle they're where they are. They've just quietly gone about their business very well, including fleecing us for 47m for Johnson.
I've heard you say stuff like "manager x is just flavour of the month" so why not apply that same logic to Nuno? Why is he beyond the same criticism? Probably because it wouldn't suit your need to troll, right?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He accuses fans of being to blame for Nuno getting the sack and accuses fans of hounding out Ange now. One had 10 games in charge, the other is being given close to 2 seasons. Of course who he won't blame for this is Levy, who is directly deciding how much time each manager gets.
Very obviously just a troll.
comment by fridgeboy (U1053)
posted 31 minutes ago
This explains so much about your stance on football Sandy. It's jut so one dimensional. You look at the table and say "oooh, they're doing well" without even considering whether a manager is the right fit for a club. It's a really, really basic understanding of the game.
Nuno's style of football was never going to work with Spurs particularly as he was instructed to play a way he was less familiar with.
Also, what I find curious is that you never see the broader picture. In your head, it's all down to Nuno, even though when you want to paint a picture that suits a narrative, you're happy to flip it and blame or laud players for success. Which is it? Because from where I'm looking Forest's success really is built on truly good recruitment. Hudson Odoi, Elanga, Gibbs White, Murillo, Milenkovic, Anderson. It's not a miracle they're where they are. They've just quietly gone about their business very well, including fleecing us for 47m for Johnson.
I've heard you say stuff like "manager x is just flavour of the month" so why not apply that same logic to Nuno? Why is he beyond the same criticism? Probably because it wouldn't suit your need to troll, right?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
good comment
comment by Automatic For The People (U21889)
posted 3 hours, 33 minutes ago
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 31 minutes ago
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 31 minutes ago
Comparing Poch to Ange is like comparing a Range Rover (admittedly not perfect or without fault) to a Fiat Multipla.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If Ange wins the Europa, it will be like comparing a Ferrari to a Robin Reliant.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, and Ange will STILL be the Robin Reliant.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So a manager who wins a European trophy in his 2nd season, is worse than one that won nothing in five seasons. Give your head a wobble fella.
comment by fridgeboy (U1053)
posted 3 hours, 17 minutes ago
This explains so much about your stance on football Sandy. It's jut so one dimensional. You look at the table and say "oooh, they're doing well" without even considering whether a manager is the right fit for a club. It's a really, really basic understanding of the game.
Nuno's style of football was never going to work with Spurs particularly as he was instructed to play a way he was less familiar with.
Also, what I find curious is that you never see the broader picture. In your head, it's all down to Nuno, even though when you want to paint a picture that suits a narrative, you're happy to flip it and blame or laud players for success. Which is it? Because from where I'm looking Forest's success really is built on truly good recruitment. Hudson Odoi, Elanga, Gibbs White, Murillo, Milenkovic, Anderson. It's not a miracle they're where they are. They've just quietly gone about their business very well, including fleecing us for 47m for Johnson.
I've heard you say stuff like "manager x is just flavour of the month" so why not apply that same logic to Nuno? Why is he beyond the same criticism? Probably because it wouldn't suit your need to troll, right?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pochettino was also not the right fit. Five years and delivered nothing. But that doesn't suit your agenda. Works both ways.
comment by Automatic For The People (U21889)
posted 6 hours, 14 minutes ago
comment by Bãleș left boot (U22081)
posted 1 hour, 1 minute ago
Poch got beat by Panama and Canada in big games. Meh
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cool story,
Good job we’ve not been beaten by loads of $hit teams this season eh?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not really a story is it. It's fact.
And I'm not saying Ange is good either but just because we sack Ange doesn't mean we hire any old caant
im happy for Nuno clearly a good manager in his own right and seems a great bloke
should be cert for manager of the year
comment by Bãleș left boot (U22081)
posted 2 hours, 14 minutes ago
comment by Automatic For The People (U21889)
posted 6 hours, 14 minutes ago
comment by Bãleș left boot (U22081)
posted 1 hour, 1 minute ago
Poch got beat by Panama and Canada in big games. Meh
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cool story,
Good job we’ve not been beaten by loads of $hit teams this season eh?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not really a story is it. It's fact.
And I'm not saying Ange is good either but just because we sack Ange doesn't mean we hire any old caant
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The states are a horrible team, not much to do with poch yet. Canada should have won by 3 or 4 goals.
Aside from Davies who went off injured early on, and David, they're better than Canada. No idea about Panama tbf.
comment by Bãleș left boot (U22081)
posted 4 minutes ago
Aside from Davies who went off injured early on, and David, they're better than Canada. No idea about Panama tbf.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Last few years we've outplayed them nearly every game. We're higher rated than Panama and beat them most of the time.
If i had my choice i'd trade managers with the states.
This guy we have now is following me around,
Montreal to Leeds to Canada.
Sign in if you want to comment
Nuno, the manager Spurs fans hounded
Page 3 of 3
posted on 31/3/25
This explains so much about your stance on football Sandy. It's jut so one dimensional. You look at the table and say "oooh, they're doing well" without even considering whether a manager is the right fit for a club. It's a really, really basic understanding of the game.
Nuno's style of football was never going to work with Spurs particularly as he was instructed to play a way he was less familiar with.
Also, what I find curious is that you never see the broader picture. In your head, it's all down to Nuno, even though when you want to paint a picture that suits a narrative, you're happy to flip it and blame or laud players for success. Which is it? Because from where I'm looking Forest's success really is built on truly good recruitment. Hudson Odoi, Elanga, Gibbs White, Murillo, Milenkovic, Anderson. It's not a miracle they're where they are. They've just quietly gone about their business very well, including fleecing us for 47m for Johnson.
I've heard you say stuff like "manager x is just flavour of the month" so why not apply that same logic to Nuno? Why is he beyond the same criticism? Probably because it wouldn't suit your need to troll, right?
posted on 31/3/25
comment by fridgeboy (U1053)
posted 12 minutes ago
This explains so much about your stance on football Sandy. It's jut so one dimensional. You look at the table and say "oooh, they're doing well" without even considering whether a manager is the right fit for a club. It's a really, really basic understanding of the game.
Nuno's style of football was never going to work with Spurs particularly as he was instructed to play a way he was less familiar with.
Also, what I find curious is that you never see the broader picture. In your head, it's all down to Nuno, even though when you want to paint a picture that suits a narrative, you're happy to flip it and blame or laud players for success. Which is it? Because from where I'm looking Forest's success really is built on truly good recruitment. Hudson Odoi, Elanga, Gibbs White, Murillo, Milenkovic, Anderson. It's not a miracle they're where they are. They've just quietly gone about their business very well, including fleecing us for 47m for Johnson.
I've heard you say stuff like "manager x is just flavour of the month" so why not apply that same logic to Nuno? Why is he beyond the same criticism? Probably because it wouldn't suit your need to troll, right?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He accuses fans of being to blame for Nuno getting the sack and accuses fans of hounding out Ange now. One had 10 games in charge, the other is being given close to 2 seasons. Of course who he won't blame for this is Levy, who is directly deciding how much time each manager gets.
Very obviously just a troll.
posted on 31/3/25
comment by fridgeboy (U1053)
posted 31 minutes ago
This explains so much about your stance on football Sandy. It's jut so one dimensional. You look at the table and say "oooh, they're doing well" without even considering whether a manager is the right fit for a club. It's a really, really basic understanding of the game.
Nuno's style of football was never going to work with Spurs particularly as he was instructed to play a way he was less familiar with.
Also, what I find curious is that you never see the broader picture. In your head, it's all down to Nuno, even though when you want to paint a picture that suits a narrative, you're happy to flip it and blame or laud players for success. Which is it? Because from where I'm looking Forest's success really is built on truly good recruitment. Hudson Odoi, Elanga, Gibbs White, Murillo, Milenkovic, Anderson. It's not a miracle they're where they are. They've just quietly gone about their business very well, including fleecing us for 47m for Johnson.
I've heard you say stuff like "manager x is just flavour of the month" so why not apply that same logic to Nuno? Why is he beyond the same criticism? Probably because it wouldn't suit your need to troll, right?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
good comment
posted on 31/3/25
comment by Automatic For The People (U21889)
posted 3 hours, 33 minutes ago
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 31 minutes ago
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 31 minutes ago
Comparing Poch to Ange is like comparing a Range Rover (admittedly not perfect or without fault) to a Fiat Multipla.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If Ange wins the Europa, it will be like comparing a Ferrari to a Robin Reliant.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, and Ange will STILL be the Robin Reliant.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So a manager who wins a European trophy in his 2nd season, is worse than one that won nothing in five seasons. Give your head a wobble fella.
posted on 31/3/25
comment by fridgeboy (U1053)
posted 3 hours, 17 minutes ago
This explains so much about your stance on football Sandy. It's jut so one dimensional. You look at the table and say "oooh, they're doing well" without even considering whether a manager is the right fit for a club. It's a really, really basic understanding of the game.
Nuno's style of football was never going to work with Spurs particularly as he was instructed to play a way he was less familiar with.
Also, what I find curious is that you never see the broader picture. In your head, it's all down to Nuno, even though when you want to paint a picture that suits a narrative, you're happy to flip it and blame or laud players for success. Which is it? Because from where I'm looking Forest's success really is built on truly good recruitment. Hudson Odoi, Elanga, Gibbs White, Murillo, Milenkovic, Anderson. It's not a miracle they're where they are. They've just quietly gone about their business very well, including fleecing us for 47m for Johnson.
I've heard you say stuff like "manager x is just flavour of the month" so why not apply that same logic to Nuno? Why is he beyond the same criticism? Probably because it wouldn't suit your need to troll, right?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pochettino was also not the right fit. Five years and delivered nothing. But that doesn't suit your agenda. Works both ways.
posted on 31/3/25
comment by Automatic For The People (U21889)
posted 6 hours, 14 minutes ago
comment by Bãleș left boot (U22081)
posted 1 hour, 1 minute ago
Poch got beat by Panama and Canada in big games. Meh
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cool story,
Good job we’ve not been beaten by loads of $hit teams this season eh?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not really a story is it. It's fact.
And I'm not saying Ange is good either but just because we sack Ange doesn't mean we hire any old caant
posted on 31/3/25
im happy for Nuno clearly a good manager in his own right and seems a great bloke
should be cert for manager of the year
posted on 31/3/25
comment by Bãleș left boot (U22081)
posted 2 hours, 14 minutes ago
comment by Automatic For The People (U21889)
posted 6 hours, 14 minutes ago
comment by Bãleș left boot (U22081)
posted 1 hour, 1 minute ago
Poch got beat by Panama and Canada in big games. Meh
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cool story,
Good job we’ve not been beaten by loads of $hit teams this season eh?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not really a story is it. It's fact.
And I'm not saying Ange is good either but just because we sack Ange doesn't mean we hire any old caant
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The states are a horrible team, not much to do with poch yet. Canada should have won by 3 or 4 goals.
posted on 31/3/25
Aside from Davies who went off injured early on, and David, they're better than Canada. No idea about Panama tbf.
posted on 31/3/25
comment by Bãleș left boot (U22081)
posted 4 minutes ago
Aside from Davies who went off injured early on, and David, they're better than Canada. No idea about Panama tbf.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Last few years we've outplayed them nearly every game. We're higher rated than Panama and beat them most of the time.
If i had my choice i'd trade managers with the states.
This guy we have now is following me around,
Montreal to Leeds to Canada.
Page 3 of 3