or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 759747 comments are related to an article called:

The Arsenal Thread

Page 14 of 30390

posted on 28/2/13

posted on 28/2/13

Gervinho will not be sold.

Arshavin will be let go on a free though

posted on 28/2/13

posted on 28/2/13

Gervinho getting sold?! That would mean Wenger admitting that Gervinho was a sh|t buy and thus meaning Wenger got it wrong.

So in essence, no chance at all.

posted on 28/2/13

why would we sell the best player in africa?

posted on 28/2/13

Nobody will buy Gervinho so he won't be sold.

comment by IAWT (U10012)

posted on 28/2/13

What are the chances of Gervinho being sold this summer?

Decent, or will it require him to hand in a transfer request?
----------------------
None! Unlike Arshavin, Squillaci or Chamakh, Gervinho is not lazy or doesn't go missing in game. He loves football and loves playing. He is just not good at it!

posted on 28/2/13

West Ham might be on the lookout though Bats!

posted on 28/2/13

Don't care about Arshavin anymore. He won't play for us again, and I already view him as an ex-player.

Gervinho however MUST be sold.

He apparently did okay at ACoN, so his shitness is nothing to do with his confidence.

He is just... well, sh/t really.

posted on 28/2/13

posted on 28/2/13

Why the hell would West Ham want Gervinho??

posted on 28/2/13

'cuse me Pete?!

posted on 28/2/13

posted on 28/2/13

posted on 28/2/13

posted on 28/2/13

Why the hell would West Ham want Gervinho??
--------------

Why the hell would they want Chamakh and Carroll??

comment by IAWT (U10012)

posted on 28/2/13

Why the hell would West Ham want Gervinho??
-----------------------
They signed Joe cole so you never know....

posted on 28/2/13

"gervinho could easily go back to france"

No he couldn't because no club will pay his fee and/or wages.

Our best hope is some Russian/Turkish club comes in for him.

posted on 28/2/13

Terminate his contract. Write off his wages and take the hit. His presence is far more damaging to us.

posted on 28/2/13

posted on 28/2/13

Yeah France isn't an option for Gervinho - it's why Squillaci is still on the books.

How long is Diaby's current contract, btw?

comment by IAWT (U10012)

posted on 28/2/13

No he couldn't because no club will pay his fee and/or wages.
-------------------------
Again, I don't see Gervinho as someone who just happy to collect his cheque. He'll be willing to move if it means more play time!

posted on 28/2/13

are you talking about Arshavin Serial?
-------------------

No. I'm talking about Diaby.

posted on 28/2/13

posted on 28/2/13

I am guessing 18 months Lex.

Page 14 of 30390

Sign in if you want to comment