comment by Robbing_Hoody (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
Yoy don't look like you care
----------------------------------------------------------------------
takes me 15 seconds to tap away on here, you're the one spending half an hour of your life on it
Yep you're just better and the man and writing hundress of words ain't no thang. The onminopotent patriarch of 606 and not to be confused for nauseating arrogance. I'm surprised no-one has picked up on this actually.
comment by Robbing_Hoody (U6374)
posted 25 seconds ago
Yep you're just better and the man and writing hundress of words ain't no thang. The onminopotent patriarch of 606 and not to be confused for nauseating arrogance. I'm surprised no-one has picked up on this actually.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
there there, get it all off your chest, it will make you feel better.
I'm fine. For someone not bothered you seem eager to reply. Probably some altruistic higher plain of existence for this of course. Welcome to the cheap seats and feel free to rattle your jewellery.
comment by Robbing_Hoody (U6374)
posted 31 seconds ago
I'm fine. For someone not bothered you seem eager to reply. Probably some altruistic higher plain of existence for this of course. Welcome to the cheap seats and feel free to rattle your jewellery.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
classic, wanders onto thread, opening statement snidely refers to "Just facts and stuff though so carry on.", and 5 hours later hasn't even got round to working out whether he was talking b@ll@cks or not.
but sure, keep making personal attacks, i'm not the one embarrassing myself here.
Weeeellll I think you'll find you were the one with the personal atracks but it's okay you're not bothered. Just 15 secs and probably have some plebeian type it up anyway.
Of course the hypocrisy, pretentiousness and arrogance is not embarrasing to you. You just come on 606 cutting a swathe through the post you consider, and as such are, nonsense.
As said I'm surprised no-one has picked up on this.
comment by Robbing_Hoody (U6374)
You just come on 606 cutting a swathe through the post you consider nonsense.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
some swathes are easier to cut than others of course.
i'm not a hypocrite, sometimes i know what i'm talking about, other times i don't, but i won't stridently come on talking about "facts", and challenging other people to give their evidence (when i'd already done that of course), without bothering to make at least a token effort to check my own facts.
as i said, 4 hours ago you were offering a guarantee of something, and you still aren't even in a position to demonstrate anything.
But you posted first and didn't back it up so.....
Unless your links are your evidence and if so then as are mine which would make you a hypocrite or clueless. You'll have to decide that though as I'm just one of the bottom feeders.
You're still amazing though of course and your approach is obviously the bench mark and correct one.
How very dare me eh?
Hands up who thinks he'll be 33% better than Sissoko 🙋
comment by Robbing_Hoody (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
But you posted first and didn't back it up so.....
Unless your links are your evidence and if so then as are mine which would make you a hypocrite or clueless. You'll have to decide that though as I'm just one of the bottom feeders.
You're still amazing though of course and your approach is obviously the bench mark and correct one.
How very dare me eh?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
how is posting a link to completed transfer deals proof or otherwise that in every PL season united had a more expensive squad than liverpool?
you should spend a bit less time making personal attacks and a bit more time thinking through your flawed logic.
you really are bitter aren't you?
you should spend a bit less time making personal attacks and a bit more time thinking through your flawed logic.
==============
Another life hack from the bench mark Don here.
You should write a book.
comment by Don Draper's dandruff (U20155)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
But you posted first and didn't back it up so.....
Unless your links are your evidence and if so then as are mine which would make you a hypocrite or clueless. You'll have to decide that though as I'm just one of the bottom feeders.
You're still amazing though of course and your approach is obviously the bench mark and correct one.
How very dare me eh?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
how is posting a link to completed transfer deals proof or otherwise that in every PL season united had a more expensive squad than liverpool?
you should spend a bit less time making personal attacks and a bit more time thinking through your flawed logic.
you really are bitter aren't you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don, even as a Utd fan you don't need proof to see we've spent more cash. You just don't, why even argue?
comment by Quincey peacock, esq. (U19119)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don, even as a Utd fan you don't need proof to see we've spent more cash. You just don't, why even argue?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
in case you haven't noticed, i'm not even arguing whether it is true or not. i don't really care, i can see that over the course of the PL united have spent more than pool - albeit that wasn't the case as recently as 2 years ago.
but hoody's claim - which he personally guaranteed as a fact - is that for every single season of the PL united have had a more expensive squad than pool have had. that's his claim, let him get on with proving it.
comment by Don Draper's dandruff (U20155)
posted 21 seconds ago
comment by Quincey peacock, esq. (U19119)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don, even as a Utd fan you don't need proof to see we've spent more cash. You just don't, why even argue?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
in case you haven't noticed, i'm not even arguing whether it is true or not. i don't really care, i can see that over the course of the PL united have spent more than pool - albeit that wasn't the case as recently as 2 years ago.
but hoody's claim - which he personally guaranteed as a fact - is that for every single season of the PL united have had a more expensive squad than pool have had. that's his claim, let him get on with proving it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair enough. Looks like he's having trouble. Although I'd have to say he may be right on that, perhaps maybe not at the start of the prem era, but arguably most seasons. We've been the better team, and they generally cost /are worth more.,
I'm having trouble to find the time to source and add up pre prem squads on my phone whilst travelling I guess.
Did you know Don you have questioned why people think and care about stuff whilst also saying what people should do around six times?
I checked that
comment by Quincey peacock, esq. (U19119)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair enough. Looks like he's having trouble. Although I'd have to say he may be right on that, perhaps maybe not at the start of the prem era, but arguably most seasons. We've been the better team, and they generally cost /are worth more.,
----------------------------------------------------------------------
most seasons i have no doubt whatsoever about. all seasons, as i said 5 hours ago, "may or may not be true".
if he hadn't wandered on here as if he was handing down the ten commandments i would barely have paid any attention, but he seems to see himself as the deliver of truths, despite the fact that he hands out truths and untruths with equal abandon.
ironically of course the longer he spends now trying to prove himself right, the more it illustrates how he frequently refers to a fact without having any idea whether it is true or not.
but he seems to see himself as the deliver of truths
===============
Lollington
Has he worked out whether his fact is actually a fact yet?
You'd expect prior research to a fact claim.
Robbing
How's the number crunching going?
Very well thank you:
Man Utd Squad Cost: 1992/1993 = £19.941m
Liverpool Squad Cost: 1992/1993 = 15.29m
Sauce:
https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/manchester-united/alletransfers/verein/985
https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/liverpool-fc/alletransfers/verein/31
Now having shown you all up I'd like to move onto this statement from Don which I asked him to address earlier but he didn't because he's a maggot
"yes, that seems to be the way it works with you, you make a statement without any evidence to back it up, then put the burden on other people to do the work to disprove your assertion."
Hmmmm. So obviously he has evidence of this, to hand, about this otherwise he'd be a massive hypocrite which would add to the ever increasing list of idiosyncrasies like pretentiousness, arrogance and petulance.
I await.
comment by Robbing_Hoody (U6374)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
Very well thank you:
Man Utd Squad Cost: 1992/1993 = £19.941m
Liverpool Squad Cost: 1992/1993 = 15.29m
Sauce:
https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/manchester-united/alletransfers/verein/985
https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/liverpool-fc/alletransfers/verein/31
Now having shown you all up I'd like to move onto this statement from Don which I asked him to address earlier but he didn't because he's a maggot
"yes, that seems to be the way it works with you, you make a statement without any evidence to back it up, then put the burden on other people to do the work to disprove your assertion."
Hmmmm. So obviously he has evidence of this, to hand, about this otherwise he'd be a massive hypocrite which would add to the ever increasing list of idiosyncrasies like pretentiousness, arrogance and petulance.
I await.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's just the 1st season though isn't it?
Sign in if you want to comment
Transfer fees
Page 3 of 4
posted on 20/6/17
comment by Robbing_Hoody (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
Yoy don't look like you care
----------------------------------------------------------------------
takes me 15 seconds to tap away on here, you're the one spending half an hour of your life on it
posted on 20/6/17
Yep you're just better and the man and writing hundress of words ain't no thang. The onminopotent patriarch of 606 and not to be confused for nauseating arrogance. I'm surprised no-one has picked up on this actually.
posted on 20/6/17
comment by Robbing_Hoody (U6374)
posted 25 seconds ago
Yep you're just better and the man and writing hundress of words ain't no thang. The onminopotent patriarch of 606 and not to be confused for nauseating arrogance. I'm surprised no-one has picked up on this actually.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
there there, get it all off your chest, it will make you feel better.
posted on 20/6/17
I'm fine. For someone not bothered you seem eager to reply. Probably some altruistic higher plain of existence for this of course. Welcome to the cheap seats and feel free to rattle your jewellery.
posted on 20/6/17
comment by Robbing_Hoody (U6374)
posted 31 seconds ago
I'm fine. For someone not bothered you seem eager to reply. Probably some altruistic higher plain of existence for this of course. Welcome to the cheap seats and feel free to rattle your jewellery.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
classic, wanders onto thread, opening statement snidely refers to "Just facts and stuff though so carry on.", and 5 hours later hasn't even got round to working out whether he was talking b@ll@cks or not.
but sure, keep making personal attacks, i'm not the one embarrassing myself here.
posted on 20/6/17
Weeeellll I think you'll find you were the one with the personal atracks but it's okay you're not bothered. Just 15 secs and probably have some plebeian type it up anyway.
Of course the hypocrisy, pretentiousness and arrogance is not embarrasing to you. You just come on 606 cutting a swathe through the post you consider, and as such are, nonsense.
As said I'm surprised no-one has picked up on this.
posted on 20/6/17
comment by Robbing_Hoody (U6374)
You just come on 606 cutting a swathe through the post you consider nonsense.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
some swathes are easier to cut than others of course.
i'm not a hypocrite, sometimes i know what i'm talking about, other times i don't, but i won't stridently come on talking about "facts", and challenging other people to give their evidence (when i'd already done that of course), without bothering to make at least a token effort to check my own facts.
as i said, 4 hours ago you were offering a guarantee of something, and you still aren't even in a position to demonstrate anything.
posted on 20/6/17
But you posted first and didn't back it up so.....
Unless your links are your evidence and if so then as are mine which would make you a hypocrite or clueless. You'll have to decide that though as I'm just one of the bottom feeders.
You're still amazing though of course and your approach is obviously the bench mark and correct one.
How very dare me eh?
posted on 20/6/17
Salah £40m
posted on 20/6/17
Hands up who thinks he'll be 33% better than Sissoko 🙋
posted on 20/6/17
comment by Robbing_Hoody (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
But you posted first and didn't back it up so.....
Unless your links are your evidence and if so then as are mine which would make you a hypocrite or clueless. You'll have to decide that though as I'm just one of the bottom feeders.
You're still amazing though of course and your approach is obviously the bench mark and correct one.
How very dare me eh?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
how is posting a link to completed transfer deals proof or otherwise that in every PL season united had a more expensive squad than liverpool?
you should spend a bit less time making personal attacks and a bit more time thinking through your flawed logic.
you really are bitter aren't you?
posted on 20/6/17
you should spend a bit less time making personal attacks and a bit more time thinking through your flawed logic.
==============
Another life hack from the bench mark Don here.
You should write a book.
posted on 20/6/17
comment by Don Draper's dandruff (U20155)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
But you posted first and didn't back it up so.....
Unless your links are your evidence and if so then as are mine which would make you a hypocrite or clueless. You'll have to decide that though as I'm just one of the bottom feeders.
You're still amazing though of course and your approach is obviously the bench mark and correct one.
How very dare me eh?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
how is posting a link to completed transfer deals proof or otherwise that in every PL season united had a more expensive squad than liverpool?
you should spend a bit less time making personal attacks and a bit more time thinking through your flawed logic.
you really are bitter aren't you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don, even as a Utd fan you don't need proof to see we've spent more cash. You just don't, why even argue?
posted on 20/6/17
posted on 20/6/17
comment by Quincey peacock, esq. (U19119)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don, even as a Utd fan you don't need proof to see we've spent more cash. You just don't, why even argue?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
in case you haven't noticed, i'm not even arguing whether it is true or not. i don't really care, i can see that over the course of the PL united have spent more than pool - albeit that wasn't the case as recently as 2 years ago.
but hoody's claim - which he personally guaranteed as a fact - is that for every single season of the PL united have had a more expensive squad than pool have had. that's his claim, let him get on with proving it.
posted on 20/6/17
comment by Don Draper's dandruff (U20155)
posted 21 seconds ago
comment by Quincey peacock, esq. (U19119)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don, even as a Utd fan you don't need proof to see we've spent more cash. You just don't, why even argue?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
in case you haven't noticed, i'm not even arguing whether it is true or not. i don't really care, i can see that over the course of the PL united have spent more than pool - albeit that wasn't the case as recently as 2 years ago.
but hoody's claim - which he personally guaranteed as a fact - is that for every single season of the PL united have had a more expensive squad than pool have had. that's his claim, let him get on with proving it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair enough. Looks like he's having trouble. Although I'd have to say he may be right on that, perhaps maybe not at the start of the prem era, but arguably most seasons. We've been the better team, and they generally cost /are worth more.,
posted on 20/6/17
I'm having trouble to find the time to source and add up pre prem squads on my phone whilst travelling I guess.
Did you know Don you have questioned why people think and care about stuff whilst also saying what people should do around six times?
I checked that
posted on 20/6/17
comment by Quincey peacock, esq. (U19119)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair enough. Looks like he's having trouble. Although I'd have to say he may be right on that, perhaps maybe not at the start of the prem era, but arguably most seasons. We've been the better team, and they generally cost /are worth more.,
----------------------------------------------------------------------
most seasons i have no doubt whatsoever about. all seasons, as i said 5 hours ago, "may or may not be true".
if he hadn't wandered on here as if he was handing down the ten commandments i would barely have paid any attention, but he seems to see himself as the deliver of truths, despite the fact that he hands out truths and untruths with equal abandon.
ironically of course the longer he spends now trying to prove himself right, the more it illustrates how he frequently refers to a fact without having any idea whether it is true or not.
posted on 20/6/17
posted on 20/6/17
but he seems to see himself as the deliver of truths
===============
Lollington
posted on 20/6/17
Has he worked out whether his fact is actually a fact yet?
You'd expect prior research to a fact claim.
posted on 21/6/17
Still we wait.
posted on 22/6/17
Robbing
How's the number crunching going?
posted on 22/6/17
Very well thank you:
Man Utd Squad Cost: 1992/1993 = £19.941m
Liverpool Squad Cost: 1992/1993 = 15.29m
Sauce:
https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/manchester-united/alletransfers/verein/985
https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/liverpool-fc/alletransfers/verein/31
Now having shown you all up I'd like to move onto this statement from Don which I asked him to address earlier but he didn't because he's a maggot
"yes, that seems to be the way it works with you, you make a statement without any evidence to back it up, then put the burden on other people to do the work to disprove your assertion."
Hmmmm. So obviously he has evidence of this, to hand, about this otherwise he'd be a massive hypocrite which would add to the ever increasing list of idiosyncrasies like pretentiousness, arrogance and petulance.
I await.
posted on 22/6/17
comment by Robbing_Hoody (U6374)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
Very well thank you:
Man Utd Squad Cost: 1992/1993 = £19.941m
Liverpool Squad Cost: 1992/1993 = 15.29m
Sauce:
https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/manchester-united/alletransfers/verein/985
https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/liverpool-fc/alletransfers/verein/31
Now having shown you all up I'd like to move onto this statement from Don which I asked him to address earlier but he didn't because he's a maggot
"yes, that seems to be the way it works with you, you make a statement without any evidence to back it up, then put the burden on other people to do the work to disprove your assertion."
Hmmmm. So obviously he has evidence of this, to hand, about this otherwise he'd be a massive hypocrite which would add to the ever increasing list of idiosyncrasies like pretentiousness, arrogance and petulance.
I await.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's just the 1st season though isn't it?
Page 3 of 4