We don’t know what that transfer was valued at, but I’d be surprised if it were £30m as Mkhi’s value had depreciated. Cut above Lingard is a laugh. Lingard’s been a far better player for us than Mkhi was. In hindsight we could have done with keeping him, though. But not because he’s any good now, but because Sanchez is that bad and harder to shift.

comment by Ed The King Woodward (U10026)
posted 7 minutes ago
We don’t know what that transfer was valued at, but I’d be surprised if it were £30m as Mkhi’s value had depreciated. Cut above Lingard is a laugh. Lingard’s been a far better player for us than Mkhi was. In hindsight we could have done with keeping him, though. But not because he’s any good now, but because Sanchez is that bad and harder to shift.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"I wish I hadn't had my gangrenous leg amputated, because now I've contracted MRSA."

Mkhi was nowhere near the standard Lingard has been playing at this season. Not even close.

Or last season. I don’t really get how anyone can come out with shiiiit like that.

Mkhi was terrible for us. No better than Sanchez in truth