or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 217 comments are related to an article called:

Jurgen Klopp?

Page 8 of 9

posted on 16/8/19

comment by (U22183)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - tell me I can't and I'll show you I can (U6374)
posted 3 minutes ago
a discussion about TITLES infers winners and thus to be relevant to said discussion you must of been a winner
=========

To suggest Liverpool were not relevant to the title last season is simply wrong whether you like it or not. Sorry.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the original point that you've taken off on some tangent fo reasons I don't think even you understand, was that Liverpool haven't been relevant to a discussion about English titles ergo winners for a long time.

coming second doesn't make you relevant to a discussion about winners.

but if you need to feel like you can somehow be involved in a discussion about title winners because you finished second be my guest, just makes you look silly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It's fairly clear that you don't know what relevant means but in summary if you google (google is your friend) the 2018/2019 title you will see mutiple references to Liverpool which does indeed mean relevance. It just does kid.

It wasn't a discussion about winners, you simply (and literally incorrectly) said Liverpool have not been relevant to the title. That's not true and the reason for that is words mean things.

posted on 16/8/19

comment by Robbing Hoody - tell me I can't and I'll show you I can (U6374)
posted 45 seconds ago
comment by (U22183)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - tell me I can't and I'll show you I can (U6374)
posted 3 minutes ago
a discussion about TITLES infers winners and thus to be relevant to said discussion you must of been a winner
=========

To suggest Liverpool were not relevant to the title last season is simply wrong whether you like it or not. Sorry.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the original point that you've taken off on some tangent fo reasons I don't think even you understand, was that Liverpool haven't been relevant to a discussion about English titles ergo winners for a long time.

coming second doesn't make you relevant to a discussion about winners.

but if you need to feel like you can somehow be involved in a discussion about title winners because you finished second be my guest, just makes you look silly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It's fairly clear that you don't know what relevant means but in summary if you google (google is your friend) the 2018/2019 title you will see mutiple references to Liverpool which does indeed mean relevance. It just does kid.

It wasn't a discussion about winners, you simply (and literally incorrectly) said Liverpool have not been relevant to the title. That's not true and the reason for that is words mean things.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
hy can't you wrap your head around what I said.

I said titles, not title races. if we want to talk about title races sure, you're relevant to two or three of them in the last 3 decades.

if we have a discussion about title winners, you are not relevant. no matter how you try and twist your logic into this.

you seem to think because you came second that makes you relevant to a discussion about titles, you are mistaken, it makes you relevant to a title race specific to last year.

posted on 16/8/19

hy can't you wrap your head around what I said.
=======

Because it's wrong you dunce.

Haven't read the rest. True story.

posted on 16/8/19

comment by Robbing Hoody - tell me I can't and I'll show you I can (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
hy can't you wrap your head around what I said.
=======

Because it's wrong you dunce.

Haven't read the rest. True story.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
well I hope you enjoyed demonstrating your clear lack of intelligence then.

English League title winners....you haven't been relevant in 30 years.

now if I want to talk about pub quiz questions you'd be relevant for,

name the only English team to of led at xmas and gone on to not win the league 3 times?

name the only English team to of been top in new year and not won the league?

you can google those champ while you're learning basic English.

posted on 16/8/19

This is actually a bit painful. I'm tempted to draw a simple diagram or some kibd of process map but you've obviously had a drink or a smoke or both. I'm all for it, enjoy yourself, but it's done you no favours here.

posted on 16/8/19

comment by Robbing Hoody - tell me I can't and I'll show you I can (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
This is actually a bit painful. I'm tempted to draw a simple diagram or some kibd of process map but you've obviously had a drink or a smoke or both. I'm all for it, enjoy yourself, but it's done you no favours here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
im thoroughly enjoying you demonstrating your ineptitude.

you actually, and scarily, believe that in a conversation about English title winners, Liverpool would be relevant because they came second a couple times.

if I was to start a discussion about heavyweight champions of the world, would a contender who lost and never held the title be relevant to that discussion?

I feel you don't grasp your own irrelevance to discussions about title winners and I know that talksport phone in was (hopefully) a joke but conversations like this are why people thought it was real.

you are relevant to a discussion about a specific title run in, not relevant to a discussion about English title winners.

posted on 16/8/19

It wasn't a discussion about title winners. You simply said Liverpool haven't been relevant to the title. If you accept Liverpool were relevant to the title last year, which is a given let alone other years, then by proxy LFC have been relevant.

All you had to say was "I meant relevant to a discussion to title winners", not that anyone was actually having one, and you'd have been fine but don't sit there calling me rētarded and suggesting I don't understand the language when it's your laziness with it that has caused you to come across as a fvcking moron.

posted on 16/8/19

comment by Robbing Hoody - tell me I can't and I'll show you I can (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
It wasn't a discussion about title winners. You simply said Liverpool haven't been relevant to the title. If you accept Liverpool were relevant to the title last year, which is a given let alone other years, then by proxy LFC have been relevant.

All you had to say was "I meant relevant to a discussion to title winners", not that anyone was actually having one, and you'd have been fine but don't sit there calling me rētarded and suggesting I don't understand the language when it's your laziness with it that has caused you to come across as a fvcking moron.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
no you misread what I said and then carried on with your own bizarre logic.

"Liverpool haven't been relevant to English titles in 30 years."

you haven't won a title in 30 years.

if you can't get that my statement infers title winners and you need everything broken down to a 6 year olds level for you to understand then fine, but you should put that disclaimer in your bio to avoid more people assuming you are at least adult level intelligent, which is clearly not the case as demonstrated here.

posted on 16/8/19

oK m8

posted on 16/8/19

Why are Liverpool fans still seeking validation from United fans ffs go and celebrate the European Community Shield!

Night Night xx

posted on 16/8/19

comment by (U22183)
posted 2 hours, 9 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - tell me I can't and I'll show you I can (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
hy can't you wrap your head around what I said.
=======

Because it's wrong you dunce.

Haven't read the rest. True story.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
well I hope you enjoyed demonstrating your clear lack of intelligence then.

English League title winners....you haven't been relevant in 30 years.

now if I want to talk about pub quiz questions you'd be relevant for,

name the only English team to of led at xmas and gone on to not win the league 3 times?

name the only English team to of been top in new year and not won the league?

you can google those champ while you're learning basic English.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Man who doesn’t know the difference between the words “of” and “have” wants others to learn basic English.

Oh.

Dear.

posted on 16/8/19

comment by (U22183)
comment by Klopptimus Prime - Die Unerträglichen (U1282)
posted 1 hour, 35 minutes ago
History this, history that, historychester, history cack

Enjoy Thursday nights.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the last time Liverpool were relevant in English titles was ancient history....so not sure what your point is?
you've won 3 "major" cup competitions in the last 15 years

in that time United have won 8

in the last 5 years your best performance in the one title you actually want is 2nd...so is ours
so we're clearly as irrelevant as each other.
=====
Irrelevant as each other?

We just won the CL.

Sorry, but these mancs are facking deluded. First they don't mind being a Ropey League team and now this.

comment by Rouge (U19907)

posted on 16/8/19

Liverpool currently the most successful english club with 43 competitive trophies.

posted on 16/8/19

Man who doesn’t know the difference between the words “of” and “have” wants others to learn basic English.

Oh.

Dear.
====
I've always wondered how people from the country that originated the language can actually type "of" instead of "have".

Crazy.

posted on 16/8/19

Pool fans chomping through the night it would seem





posted on 16/8/19

comment by Klopptimus Prime - Die Unerträglichen (U1282)
posted 3 hours, 17 minutes ago
comment by (U22183)
comment by Klopptimus Prime - Die Unerträglichen (U1282)
posted 1 hour, 35 minutes ago
History this, history that, historychester, history cack

Enjoy Thursday nights.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the last time Liverpool were relevant in English titles was ancient history....so not sure what your point is?
you've won 3 "major" cup competitions in the last 15 years

in that time United have won 8

in the last 5 years your best performance in the one title you actually want is 2nd...so is ours
so we're clearly as irrelevant as each other.
=====
Irrelevant as each other?

We just won the CL.

Sorry, but these mancs are facking deluded. First they don't mind being a Ropey League team and now this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
in a conversation discussing English league titles you think the CL is relevant ......sums up the intellect of your weird cult following

posted on 16/8/19

comment by Roys Keane (U11635)
posted 1 hour, 27 minutes ago
Pool fans chomping through the night it would seem






----------------------------------------------------------------------

🤣

posted on 16/8/19

comment by Roys Keane (U11635)
Pool fans chomping through the night it would seem
=====
We don't get sent to bed early like you.

posted on 16/8/19

comment by Roys Keane (U11635)
posted 2 hours, 32 minutes ago
Pool fans chomping through the night it would seem






----------------------------------------------------------------------

Great post as always lately Roy. Yes chomping on an article made by a Liverpool fan about saying Jurgen Klopp is Jurgen Top.

What happened to you mate?

posted on 16/8/19

comment by Roys Keane (U11635)
posted 18 hours, 55 minutes ago
comment by 1maneontherun (U4291)
posted 4 hours, 6 minutes ago
comment by der kloppites Hi, wie geht es dir (U13373)
posted 14 minutes ago
isn't this a take on that didi pidi poster
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes where is he? He normally loves this type of article?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You normally dont

Wasnt his jurgen article banned from your board


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah thats why I havent seen it for a while.. I thought it was due to something else

posted on 16/8/19

I blew it wide open when I made that first Jose Flopinho article.

It was the start of a modern JA606 legendary trend.


https://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/browseByTag/8674

posted on 16/8/19

comment by Roys Keane (U11635)
posted 4 hours, 46 minutes ago

Pool fans chomping through the night it would seem

..............

The prat Hoody was bashing away at his keyboard way past midnight.

What a sad little individual allowing himself to be consumed by United.

posted on 16/8/19

comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Roys Keane (U11635)
posted 4 hours, 46 minutes ago

Pool fans chomping through the night it would seem

..............

The prat Hoody was bashing away at his keyboard way past midnight.

What a sad little individual allowing himself to be consumed by United.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not past midnight

posted on 16/8/19

Is this still going?? Jesus you Utd fans need to get back in your place. We are on the perch and you lot have to deal with the fact you are 2nd best to our club.

posted on 16/8/19

comment by TBone Steak Roysters (U3947)
posted 6 minutes ago
Is this still going?? Jesus you Utd fans need to get back in your place. We are on the perch and you lot have to deal with the fact you are 2nd best to our club.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
They have their history though!

thats what they always used to say to us

Page 8 of 9

Sign in if you want to comment