comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 42 minutes ago
Fields seems to think illegal workers get work from the Job Centre.
He certainly doesn't grasp the concept that unscrupulous people are queuing up to exploit the most vulnerable for their own gain, he's more concerned about these Billionaires.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Billionaires do far worse than this.
comment by RED666.. 🏴 Roll on 2029! 🇬🇧. (U6562)
posted 54 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 8 hours, 53 minutes ago
"People working illegally are undercutting the millions who actually do work legally and pay tax.
Who gives a fek about a handful of Billonaires getting favourable benefits, most of us aren’t in a Race to The Bottom with them."
And there it is
Who undercuts the legal employment market by offering below legal wages to employees, the person looking for work (if a newly arrived migrant I would describe as vulnerable) or the employer?
If it's not billionaire's vs the plebs in your race to the bottom why do they, billionaire's, fund RW gaslighters and shiitestirrers to posit the debate as 'those brown people are coming for your jobs, look over there'?
Didn't think you were this niave tbh Boris.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yawn! ‘RW gaslighters’ does this boring cvnt ever manage to post without the RW shiiite?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The state of this mef
comment by No Løve - Give them an inch they take a yard (U1282)
posted 1 hour, 27 minutes ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 31 minutes ago
comment by Sir Charles Lampwick Carruthers (U22980)
posted 2 hours, 14 minutes ago
If the central system for digital id cards gets hacked then everybody is double facked
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As I said earlier, 74% of adults in the UK already have this information digitally stored by having drivers licenses. 76% by having passports.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So what's the use of new IDs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To get those who don’t have the above.
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by RED666.. 🏴 Roll on 2029! 🇬🇧. (U6562)
posted 54 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 8 hours, 53 minutes ago
"People working illegally are undercutting the millions who actually do work legally and pay tax.
Who gives a fek about a handful of Billonaires getting favourable benefits, most of us aren’t in a Race to The Bottom with them."
And there it is
Who undercuts the legal employment market by offering below legal wages to employees, the person looking for work (if a newly arrived migrant I would describe as vulnerable) or the employer?
If it's not billionaire's vs the plebs in your race to the bottom why do they, billionaire's, fund RW gaslighters and shiitestirrers to posit the debate as 'those brown people are coming for your jobs, look over there'?
Didn't think you were this niave tbh Boris.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yawn! ‘RW gaslighters’ does this boring cvnt ever manage to post without the RW shiiite?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The state of this mef
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I suggest you move ti a thread about the first amendment rights on some far right US forum. I don’t think this one is for you. 👍🏻
Why is the digital ID being linked to the boat crossings in the news? Have the government said this?
If there's a problem there, wouldn't it be cheaper and more economically prudent to let them work legally?
Not that i intend to or have any need to, but bypassing these proposed rules seems fairly straighforward
Unless they are going to increase police stops and/or get rid of cash entirely
People with no smart phone, or any mobile phone
comment by Darren The King Fletcher (U10026)
posted 1 hour, 32 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 42 minutes ago
Fields seems to think illegal workers get work from the Job Centre.
He certainly doesn't grasp the concept that unscrupulous people are queuing up to exploit the most vulnerable for their own gain, he's more concerned about these Billionaires.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Billionaires do far worse than this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why bother?
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 hour, 48 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
"Fields seems to think illegal workers get work from the Job Centre"
What now Boris?
Literally haven't said this. You crack on making shiite up though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You've mentioned things like minimum wage and conditions as if these people go through some sort of formal job interview
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No i mentioned employers being to blame for paying below MW and not employees which you were crying about.
No wonder a fresh off the boat, can't speak the lingo, migrant is affecting your income with reading skills like this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
FFS
Force Starmer out now! How has he and this government even lasted this long? The British public have let far too much slide over the past several years. Online Safety Act was one thing but this is a million times worse. It’s time we collectively said ‘no’ for once and I’m hopeful people will from the reactions I’ve already seen.
This is getting close to the Mark of the Beast scenario. They can shove it!
comment by 1 Father- 1 Love - 2 Reds (U13312)
posted 3 minutes ago
Force Starmer out now! How has he and this government even lasted this long? The British public have let far too much slide over the past several years. Online Safety Act was one thing but this is a million times worse. It’s time we collectively said ‘no’ for once and I’m hopeful people will from the reactions I’ve already seen.
This is getting close to the Mark of the Beast scenario. They can shove it!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
chortle
posted 3 weeks, 6 days ago
comment by Playmaker (U22780)
posted 4 hours, 33 minutes ago
Why is the digital ID being linked to the boat crossings in the news? Have the government said this?
If there's a problem there, wouldn't it be cheaper and more economically prudent to let them work legally?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because SMAAAALLLLL BOOOOAAAATTTTTSSSS!!!
<purplefacehyperventilation>
SSSSMMMMMMMAAAAAAAALLLLLLLLLLLLLL BBBBBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAATTTTTTTTTTTSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!
<headexplodes>
That’s where we’re at, basically. It’s just the latest incarnation of British Moral Panic.
posted 3 weeks, 6 days ago
Stanley Cohen's stages of moral panic:
1. An event, condition, episode, person, or group of persons [in this case ‘illegal’ immigrants] is perceived and defined as a threat to societal values, safety, and interests.
2. The nature of these apparent threats are amplified by the mass media, who present the supposed threat through simplistic, symbolic rhetoric. Such portrayals appeal to public prejudices, creating an evil in need of social control (folk devils) and victims (the moral majority).
3. A sense of social anxiety and concern among the public is aroused through these symbolic representations of the threat.
4. The gatekeepers of morality – editors, politicians, and other "moral"-thinking people – respond to the threat, with *socially-accredited* experts pronouncing their diagnoses and solutions to the "threat". This includes new laws or policies.
(Definitions lifted from Wikipedia with my emphases.)
I think we’re already firmly at stage four.
posted 3 weeks, 6 days ago
comment by 1 Father- 1 Love - 2 Reds (U13312)
posted 3 hours, 22 minutes ago
Force Starmer out now! How has he and this government even lasted this long? The British public have let far too much slide over the past several years. Online Safety Act was one thing but this is a million times worse. It’s time we collectively said ‘no’ for once and I’m hopeful people will from the reactions I’ve already seen.
This is getting close to the Mark of the Beast scenario. They can shove it!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This isn't a tory leadership now dude where every six months we oust the latest absolute waste of space for the next.
posted 3 weeks, 6 days ago
comment by EVERYTHING’S POTE! (U17054)
posted 35 minutes ago
Stanley Cohen's stages of moral panic:
1. An event, condition, episode, person, or group of persons [in this case ‘illegal’ immigrants] is perceived and defined as a threat to societal values, safety, and interests.
2. The nature of these apparent threats are amplified by the mass media, who present the supposed threat through simplistic, symbolic rhetoric. Such portrayals appeal to public prejudices, creating an evil in need of social control (folk devils) and victims (the moral majority).
3. A sense of social anxiety and concern among the public is aroused through these symbolic representations of the threat.
4. The gatekeepers of morality – editors, politicians, and other "moral"-thinking people – respond to the threat, with *socially-accredited* experts pronouncing their diagnoses and solutions to the "threat". This includes new laws or policies.
(Definitions lifted from Wikipedia with my emphases.)
I think we’re already firmly at stage four.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sociology 101
posted 3 weeks, 6 days ago
comment by EVERYTHING’S POTE! (U17054)
posted 55 minutes ago
comment by Playmaker (U22780)
posted 4 hours, 33 minutes ago
Why is the digital ID being linked to the boat crossings in the news? Have the government said this?
If there's a problem there, wouldn't it be cheaper and more economically prudent to let them work legally?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because SMAAAALLLLL BOOOOAAAATTTTTSSSS!!!
<purplefacehyperventilation>
SSSSMMMMMMMAAAAAAAALLLLLLLLLLLLLL BBBBBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAATTTTTTTTTTTSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!
<headexplodes>
That’s where we’re at, basically. It’s just the latest incarnation of British Moral Panic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where ppl are literally zero affected by asylum seekers in their day to day lives.
posted 3 weeks, 6 days ago
comment by Playmaker (U22780)
posted 1 hour, 43 minutes ago
comment by EVERYTHING’S POTE! (U17054)
posted 55 minutes ago
comment by Playmaker (U22780)
posted 4 hours, 33 minutes ago
Why is the digital ID being linked to the boat crossings in the news? Have the government said this?
If there's a problem there, wouldn't it be cheaper and more economically prudent to let them work legally?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because SMAAAALLLLL BOOOOAAAATTTTTSSSS!!!
<purplefacehyperventilation>
SSSSMMMMMMMAAAAAAAALLLLLLLLLLLLLL BBBBBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAATTTTTTTTTTTSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!
<headexplodes>
That’s where we’re at, basically. It’s just the latest incarnation of British Moral Panic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where ppl are literally zero affected by asylum seekers in their day to day lives.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No different out here. The guys furthest away from the border are the ones who kick and scream the most about illegals
posted 3 weeks, 6 days ago
comment by EVERYTHING’S POTE! (U17054)
posted 5 hours, 57 minutes ago
Stanley Cohen's stages of moral panic:
1. An event, condition, episode, person, or group of persons [in this case ‘illegal’ immigrants] is perceived and defined as a threat to societal values, safety, and interests.
2. The nature of these apparent threats are amplified by the mass media, who present the supposed threat through simplistic, symbolic rhetoric. Such portrayals appeal to public prejudices, creating an evil in need of social control (folk devils) and victims (the moral majority).
3. A sense of social anxiety and concern among the public is aroused through these symbolic representations of the threat.
4. The gatekeepers of morality – editors, politicians, and other "moral"-thinking people – respond to the threat, with *socially-accredited* experts pronouncing their diagnoses and solutions to the "threat". This includes new laws or policies.
(Definitions lifted from Wikipedia with my emphases.)
I think we’re already firmly at stage four.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I remember having a badge with "The Moral Majority Is Neither" on it.
posted 3 weeks, 6 days ago
comment by Cinciwolf-----JA606 NFL fantasy champ 2023 (U11551)
posted 4 hours, 28 minutes ago
comment by Playmaker (U22780)
posted 1 hour, 43 minutes ago
comment by EVERYTHING’S POTE! (U17054)
posted 55 minutes ago
comment by Playmaker (U22780)
posted 4 hours, 33 minutes ago
Why is the digital ID being linked to the boat crossings in the news? Have the government said this?
If there's a problem there, wouldn't it be cheaper and more economically prudent to let them work legally?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because SMAAAALLLLL BOOOOAAAATTTTTSSSS!!!
<purplefacehyperventilation>
SSSSMMMMMMMAAAAAAAALLLLLLLLLLLLLL BBBBBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAATTTTTTTTTTTSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!
<headexplodes>
That’s where we’re at, basically. It’s just the latest incarnation of British Moral Panic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where ppl are literally zero affected by asylum seekers in their day to day lives.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No different out here. The guys furthest away from the border are the ones who kick and scream the most about illegals
---------------------------------------------------------------
We have people like this in England
https://youtube.com/shorts/5M6_lxgbtaA?si=9tm4tY0jCVhiZWgK
posted 3 weeks, 6 days ago
The mark of the beast
FFS
posted 3 weeks, 6 days ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 hours, 55 minutes ago
comment by Cinciwolf-----JA606 NFL fantasy champ 2023 (U11551)
posted 4 hours, 28 minutes ago
comment by Playmaker (U22780)
posted 1 hour, 43 minutes ago
comment by EVERYTHING’S POTE! (U17054)
posted 55 minutes ago
comment by Playmaker (U22780)
posted 4 hours, 33 minutes ago
Why is the digital ID being linked to the boat crossings in the news? Have the government said this?
If there's a problem there, wouldn't it be cheaper and more economically prudent to let them work legally?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because SMAAAALLLLL BOOOOAAAATTTTTSSSS!!!
<purplefacehyperventilation>
SSSSMMMMMMMAAAAAAAALLLLLLLLLLLLLL BBBBBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAATTTTTTTTTTTSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!
<headexplodes>
That’s where we’re at, basically. It’s just the latest incarnation of British Moral Panic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where ppl are literally zero affected by asylum seekers in their day to day lives.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No different out here. The guys furthest away from the border are the ones who kick and scream the most about illegals
---------------------------------------------------------------
We have people like this in England
https://youtube.com/shorts/5M6_lxgbtaA?si=9tm4tY0jCVhiZWgK
----------------------------------------------------------------------
its the logic that the regular suspects on here insist that you have to have an intellectual debate about that lasts 3 days in order to justify our flippant mockery of people like this plank. Im sorry. He's just thick. And racist. If you agree with him, you are just as thick and racist.
posted 3 weeks, 6 days ago
RB&W
Insert 'legitimate concerns'/semantic argument about the definition of racism/mental gymnastics/word salad here. It's the 2025 version of 'I'm not racist but.....'
Apparently there's serious debate to be had with the bloke that thinks 1/4 is a majority and Gurkha's, who fight for our country, should leave their families at home in Nepal (although I bet he doesn't know where they come from).
posted 3 weeks, 6 days ago
I wonder what his views are on Joanna Lumley?
She was born in India, her father was born in India and actually served with the Gurkhas at one stage.
posted 3 weeks, 6 days ago
It's the fact that he moans that when he walks around Aldershot he can see up to 9000 brown Gurka faces. And its not just because they are brown its also because none of them can speak English. (So incredibly he must have engaged with all of them!). As Basil Fawlty said once... 'what do you expect to see from a hotel bedroom in Torquay?'. Likewise, what do you expect to see on the High Street in Aldershot where 9000 Gurkas are based serving in the British Army?
Moronic answer to both questions. 'Well it's just not good enough"
posted 3 weeks, 6 days ago
Odd fact
When Joanna Lumley's family moved from India to the UK, they travelled on the Windrush.
Sign in if you want to comment
Compulsory digital ID cards
Page 10 of 20
11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15
posted 4 weeks ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 42 minutes ago
Fields seems to think illegal workers get work from the Job Centre.
He certainly doesn't grasp the concept that unscrupulous people are queuing up to exploit the most vulnerable for their own gain, he's more concerned about these Billionaires.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Billionaires do far worse than this.
posted 4 weeks ago
comment by RED666.. 🏴 Roll on 2029! 🇬🇧. (U6562)
posted 54 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 8 hours, 53 minutes ago
"People working illegally are undercutting the millions who actually do work legally and pay tax.
Who gives a fek about a handful of Billonaires getting favourable benefits, most of us aren’t in a Race to The Bottom with them."
And there it is
Who undercuts the legal employment market by offering below legal wages to employees, the person looking for work (if a newly arrived migrant I would describe as vulnerable) or the employer?
If it's not billionaire's vs the plebs in your race to the bottom why do they, billionaire's, fund RW gaslighters and shiitestirrers to posit the debate as 'those brown people are coming for your jobs, look over there'?
Didn't think you were this niave tbh Boris.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yawn! ‘RW gaslighters’ does this boring cvnt ever manage to post without the RW shiiite?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The state of this mef
posted 4 weeks ago
comment by No Løve - Give them an inch they take a yard (U1282)
posted 1 hour, 27 minutes ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 31 minutes ago
comment by Sir Charles Lampwick Carruthers (U22980)
posted 2 hours, 14 minutes ago
If the central system for digital id cards gets hacked then everybody is double facked
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As I said earlier, 74% of adults in the UK already have this information digitally stored by having drivers licenses. 76% by having passports.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So what's the use of new IDs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To get those who don’t have the above.
posted 4 weeks ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by RED666.. 🏴 Roll on 2029! 🇬🇧. (U6562)
posted 54 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 8 hours, 53 minutes ago
"People working illegally are undercutting the millions who actually do work legally and pay tax.
Who gives a fek about a handful of Billonaires getting favourable benefits, most of us aren’t in a Race to The Bottom with them."
And there it is
Who undercuts the legal employment market by offering below legal wages to employees, the person looking for work (if a newly arrived migrant I would describe as vulnerable) or the employer?
If it's not billionaire's vs the plebs in your race to the bottom why do they, billionaire's, fund RW gaslighters and shiitestirrers to posit the debate as 'those brown people are coming for your jobs, look over there'?
Didn't think you were this niave tbh Boris.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yawn! ‘RW gaslighters’ does this boring cvnt ever manage to post without the RW shiiite?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The state of this mef
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I suggest you move ti a thread about the first amendment rights on some far right US forum. I don’t think this one is for you. 👍🏻
posted 4 weeks ago
Why is the digital ID being linked to the boat crossings in the news? Have the government said this?
If there's a problem there, wouldn't it be cheaper and more economically prudent to let them work legally?
posted 4 weeks ago
Not that i intend to or have any need to, but bypassing these proposed rules seems fairly straighforward
Unless they are going to increase police stops and/or get rid of cash entirely
posted 4 weeks ago
People with no smart phone, or any mobile phone
posted 4 weeks ago
comment by Darren The King Fletcher (U10026)
posted 1 hour, 32 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 42 minutes ago
Fields seems to think illegal workers get work from the Job Centre.
He certainly doesn't grasp the concept that unscrupulous people are queuing up to exploit the most vulnerable for their own gain, he's more concerned about these Billionaires.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Billionaires do far worse than this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why bother?
posted 4 weeks ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 hour, 48 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
"Fields seems to think illegal workers get work from the Job Centre"
What now Boris?
Literally haven't said this. You crack on making shiite up though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You've mentioned things like minimum wage and conditions as if these people go through some sort of formal job interview
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No i mentioned employers being to blame for paying below MW and not employees which you were crying about.
No wonder a fresh off the boat, can't speak the lingo, migrant is affecting your income with reading skills like this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
FFS
posted 4 weeks ago
Force Starmer out now! How has he and this government even lasted this long? The British public have let far too much slide over the past several years. Online Safety Act was one thing but this is a million times worse. It’s time we collectively said ‘no’ for once and I’m hopeful people will from the reactions I’ve already seen.
This is getting close to the Mark of the Beast scenario. They can shove it!
posted 4 weeks ago
comment by 1 Father- 1 Love - 2 Reds (U13312)
posted 3 minutes ago
Force Starmer out now! How has he and this government even lasted this long? The British public have let far too much slide over the past several years. Online Safety Act was one thing but this is a million times worse. It’s time we collectively said ‘no’ for once and I’m hopeful people will from the reactions I’ve already seen.
This is getting close to the Mark of the Beast scenario. They can shove it!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
chortle
posted 3 weeks, 6 days ago
comment by Playmaker (U22780)
posted 4 hours, 33 minutes ago
Why is the digital ID being linked to the boat crossings in the news? Have the government said this?
If there's a problem there, wouldn't it be cheaper and more economically prudent to let them work legally?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because SMAAAALLLLL BOOOOAAAATTTTTSSSS!!!
<purplefacehyperventilation>
SSSSMMMMMMMAAAAAAAALLLLLLLLLLLLLL BBBBBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAATTTTTTTTTTTSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!
<headexplodes>
That’s where we’re at, basically. It’s just the latest incarnation of British Moral Panic.
posted 3 weeks, 6 days ago
Stanley Cohen's stages of moral panic:
1. An event, condition, episode, person, or group of persons [in this case ‘illegal’ immigrants] is perceived and defined as a threat to societal values, safety, and interests.
2. The nature of these apparent threats are amplified by the mass media, who present the supposed threat through simplistic, symbolic rhetoric. Such portrayals appeal to public prejudices, creating an evil in need of social control (folk devils) and victims (the moral majority).
3. A sense of social anxiety and concern among the public is aroused through these symbolic representations of the threat.
4. The gatekeepers of morality – editors, politicians, and other "moral"-thinking people – respond to the threat, with *socially-accredited* experts pronouncing their diagnoses and solutions to the "threat". This includes new laws or policies.
(Definitions lifted from Wikipedia with my emphases.)
I think we’re already firmly at stage four.
posted 3 weeks, 6 days ago
comment by 1 Father- 1 Love - 2 Reds (U13312)
posted 3 hours, 22 minutes ago
Force Starmer out now! How has he and this government even lasted this long? The British public have let far too much slide over the past several years. Online Safety Act was one thing but this is a million times worse. It’s time we collectively said ‘no’ for once and I’m hopeful people will from the reactions I’ve already seen.
This is getting close to the Mark of the Beast scenario. They can shove it!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This isn't a tory leadership now dude where every six months we oust the latest absolute waste of space for the next.
posted 3 weeks, 6 days ago
comment by EVERYTHING’S POTE! (U17054)
posted 35 minutes ago
Stanley Cohen's stages of moral panic:
1. An event, condition, episode, person, or group of persons [in this case ‘illegal’ immigrants] is perceived and defined as a threat to societal values, safety, and interests.
2. The nature of these apparent threats are amplified by the mass media, who present the supposed threat through simplistic, symbolic rhetoric. Such portrayals appeal to public prejudices, creating an evil in need of social control (folk devils) and victims (the moral majority).
3. A sense of social anxiety and concern among the public is aroused through these symbolic representations of the threat.
4. The gatekeepers of morality – editors, politicians, and other "moral"-thinking people – respond to the threat, with *socially-accredited* experts pronouncing their diagnoses and solutions to the "threat". This includes new laws or policies.
(Definitions lifted from Wikipedia with my emphases.)
I think we’re already firmly at stage four.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sociology 101
posted 3 weeks, 6 days ago
comment by EVERYTHING’S POTE! (U17054)
posted 55 minutes ago
comment by Playmaker (U22780)
posted 4 hours, 33 minutes ago
Why is the digital ID being linked to the boat crossings in the news? Have the government said this?
If there's a problem there, wouldn't it be cheaper and more economically prudent to let them work legally?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because SMAAAALLLLL BOOOOAAAATTTTTSSSS!!!
<purplefacehyperventilation>
SSSSMMMMMMMAAAAAAAALLLLLLLLLLLLLL BBBBBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAATTTTTTTTTTTSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!
<headexplodes>
That’s where we’re at, basically. It’s just the latest incarnation of British Moral Panic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where ppl are literally zero affected by asylum seekers in their day to day lives.
posted 3 weeks, 6 days ago
comment by Playmaker (U22780)
posted 1 hour, 43 minutes ago
comment by EVERYTHING’S POTE! (U17054)
posted 55 minutes ago
comment by Playmaker (U22780)
posted 4 hours, 33 minutes ago
Why is the digital ID being linked to the boat crossings in the news? Have the government said this?
If there's a problem there, wouldn't it be cheaper and more economically prudent to let them work legally?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because SMAAAALLLLL BOOOOAAAATTTTTSSSS!!!
<purplefacehyperventilation>
SSSSMMMMMMMAAAAAAAALLLLLLLLLLLLLL BBBBBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAATTTTTTTTTTTSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!
<headexplodes>
That’s where we’re at, basically. It’s just the latest incarnation of British Moral Panic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where ppl are literally zero affected by asylum seekers in their day to day lives.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No different out here. The guys furthest away from the border are the ones who kick and scream the most about illegals
posted 3 weeks, 6 days ago
comment by EVERYTHING’S POTE! (U17054)
posted 5 hours, 57 minutes ago
Stanley Cohen's stages of moral panic:
1. An event, condition, episode, person, or group of persons [in this case ‘illegal’ immigrants] is perceived and defined as a threat to societal values, safety, and interests.
2. The nature of these apparent threats are amplified by the mass media, who present the supposed threat through simplistic, symbolic rhetoric. Such portrayals appeal to public prejudices, creating an evil in need of social control (folk devils) and victims (the moral majority).
3. A sense of social anxiety and concern among the public is aroused through these symbolic representations of the threat.
4. The gatekeepers of morality – editors, politicians, and other "moral"-thinking people – respond to the threat, with *socially-accredited* experts pronouncing their diagnoses and solutions to the "threat". This includes new laws or policies.
(Definitions lifted from Wikipedia with my emphases.)
I think we’re already firmly at stage four.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I remember having a badge with "The Moral Majority Is Neither" on it.
posted 3 weeks, 6 days ago
comment by Cinciwolf-----JA606 NFL fantasy champ 2023 (U11551)
posted 4 hours, 28 minutes ago
comment by Playmaker (U22780)
posted 1 hour, 43 minutes ago
comment by EVERYTHING’S POTE! (U17054)
posted 55 minutes ago
comment by Playmaker (U22780)
posted 4 hours, 33 minutes ago
Why is the digital ID being linked to the boat crossings in the news? Have the government said this?
If there's a problem there, wouldn't it be cheaper and more economically prudent to let them work legally?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because SMAAAALLLLL BOOOOAAAATTTTTSSSS!!!
<purplefacehyperventilation>
SSSSMMMMMMMAAAAAAAALLLLLLLLLLLLLL BBBBBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAATTTTTTTTTTTSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!
<headexplodes>
That’s where we’re at, basically. It’s just the latest incarnation of British Moral Panic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where ppl are literally zero affected by asylum seekers in their day to day lives.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No different out here. The guys furthest away from the border are the ones who kick and scream the most about illegals
---------------------------------------------------------------
We have people like this in England
https://youtube.com/shorts/5M6_lxgbtaA?si=9tm4tY0jCVhiZWgK
posted 3 weeks, 6 days ago
The mark of the beast
FFS
posted 3 weeks, 6 days ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 hours, 55 minutes ago
comment by Cinciwolf-----JA606 NFL fantasy champ 2023 (U11551)
posted 4 hours, 28 minutes ago
comment by Playmaker (U22780)
posted 1 hour, 43 minutes ago
comment by EVERYTHING’S POTE! (U17054)
posted 55 minutes ago
comment by Playmaker (U22780)
posted 4 hours, 33 minutes ago
Why is the digital ID being linked to the boat crossings in the news? Have the government said this?
If there's a problem there, wouldn't it be cheaper and more economically prudent to let them work legally?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because SMAAAALLLLL BOOOOAAAATTTTTSSSS!!!
<purplefacehyperventilation>
SSSSMMMMMMMAAAAAAAALLLLLLLLLLLLLL BBBBBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAATTTTTTTTTTTSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!
<headexplodes>
That’s where we’re at, basically. It’s just the latest incarnation of British Moral Panic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where ppl are literally zero affected by asylum seekers in their day to day lives.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No different out here. The guys furthest away from the border are the ones who kick and scream the most about illegals
---------------------------------------------------------------
We have people like this in England
https://youtube.com/shorts/5M6_lxgbtaA?si=9tm4tY0jCVhiZWgK
----------------------------------------------------------------------
its the logic that the regular suspects on here insist that you have to have an intellectual debate about that lasts 3 days in order to justify our flippant mockery of people like this plank. Im sorry. He's just thick. And racist. If you agree with him, you are just as thick and racist.
posted 3 weeks, 6 days ago
RB&W
Insert 'legitimate concerns'/semantic argument about the definition of racism/mental gymnastics/word salad here. It's the 2025 version of 'I'm not racist but.....'
Apparently there's serious debate to be had with the bloke that thinks 1/4 is a majority and Gurkha's, who fight for our country, should leave their families at home in Nepal (although I bet he doesn't know where they come from).
posted 3 weeks, 6 days ago
I wonder what his views are on Joanna Lumley?
She was born in India, her father was born in India and actually served with the Gurkhas at one stage.
posted 3 weeks, 6 days ago
It's the fact that he moans that when he walks around Aldershot he can see up to 9000 brown Gurka faces. And its not just because they are brown its also because none of them can speak English. (So incredibly he must have engaged with all of them!). As Basil Fawlty said once... 'what do you expect to see from a hotel bedroom in Torquay?'. Likewise, what do you expect to see on the High Street in Aldershot where 9000 Gurkas are based serving in the British Army?
Moronic answer to both questions. 'Well it's just not good enough"
posted 3 weeks, 6 days ago
Odd fact
When Joanna Lumley's family moved from India to the UK, they travelled on the Windrush.
Page 10 of 20
11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15