comment by Geoff Tipps (U1449)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by (K̇ash) I'm the Mané - PL Champione (U1108)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Geoff Tipps (U1449)
posted 1 minute ago
Salah is not a winger though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Plays wide right, tracks back, is marked by the opposition left back. Sounds very right winger to me. Just the term winger has been evolved into right sided attacker.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who’s your main striker?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The real question is, who is your main striker?
comment by *Michael Edwards FC {Proud owner of the 5 000 000th comment} (U2720)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Geoff Tipps (U1449)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by (K̇ash) I'm the Mané - PL Champione (U1108)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Geoff Tipps (U1449)
posted 1 minute ago
Salah is not a winger though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Plays wide right, tracks back, is marked by the opposition left back. Sounds very right winger to me. Just the term winger has been evolved into right sided attacker.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who’s your main striker?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The real question is, who is your main striker?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Luke Shaw
I bet any money op, if Salah got injured and all your goals dried up, you wouldn’t be coming on here saying, FSG need to put their hands in their pocket and buy us another wide player
Ronaldo
Bale
Salah
Not sure if salah is really a winger like the other 2 were though. Premier league footballs changed in the last 5 years and he’s more of a right forward than a winger
Let me settle all arguments here.
Giggs was absolutely an outstanding winger, one of the best ever for me and would have been recognised as such had he been English instead of Welsh. His role was part of the four midfield players. He was required to get up and down the line the who game, score goals and provide assists. He did this to a world class level.
Wide players in systems nowadays like Salah, are not require to get up and down the line but to stay up top for the quick counter. This ensures teams can't push up as much and gives you an out ball. They also are often inverted as the main part of their role is to score goals, at a strikers' rate and therefore cutting inside on their stronger foot gives them the best opportunity to do this. Giggs was probably a better overall player than Salah but Salah a much better goalscorer.
Agree with Rosso in that Liverpool should be top, even with the injuries due to the quality of our squad, even with the injuries but it's nothing to do with the manager why we aren't. For some reason, all three forwards lost form at the same time for a few weeks in January and we struggled to score goals and at the risk of sounding like Hafi, had we taken the chances we would normally take every week, we'd be sitting top. This can happen, I mean the squad have maintained a crazy level for around three years, a bad period of form was inevitable. They're not robots.
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 1 minute ago
Let me settle all arguments here.
Giggs was absolutely an outstanding winger, one of the best ever for me and would have been recognised as such had he been English instead of Welsh. His role was part of the four midfield players. He was required to get up and down the line the who game, score goals and provide assists. He did this to a world class level.
Wide players in systems nowadays like Salah, are not require to get up and down the line but to stay up top for the quick counter. This ensures teams can't push up as much and gives you an out ball. They also are often inverted as the main part of their role is to score goals, at a strikers' rate and therefore cutting inside on their stronger foot gives them the best opportunity to do this. Giggs was probably a better overall player than Salah but Salah a much better goalscorer.
Agree with Rosso in that Liverpool should be top, even with the injuries due to the quality of our squad, even with the injuries but it's nothing to do with the manager why we aren't. For some reason, all three forwards lost form at the same time for a few weeks in January and we struggled to score goals and at the risk of sounding like Hafi, had we taken the chances we would normally take every week, we'd be sitting top. This can happen, I mean the squad have maintained a crazy level for around three years, a bad period of form was inevitable. They're not robots.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
cant argue with much of that
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 2 minutes ago
Let me settle all arguments here.
Giggs was absolutely an outstanding winger, one of the best ever for me and would have been recognised as such had he been English instead of Welsh. His role was part of the four midfield players. He was required to get up and down the line the who game, score goals and provide assists. He did this to a world class level.
Wide players in systems nowadays like Salah, are not require to get up and down the line but to stay up top for the quick counter. This ensures teams can't push up as much and gives you an out ball. They also are often inverted as the main part of their role is to score goals, at a strikers' rate and therefore cutting inside on their stronger foot gives them the best opportunity to do this. Giggs was probably a better overall player than Salah but Salah a much better goalscorer.
Agree with Rosso in that Liverpool should be top, even with the injuries due to the quality of our squad, even with the injuries but it's nothing to do with the manager why we aren't. For some reason, all three forwards lost form at the same time for a few weeks in January and we struggled to score goals and at the risk of sounding like Hafi, had we taken the chances we would normally take every week, we'd be sitting top. This can happen, I mean the squad have maintained a crazy level for around three years, a bad period of form was inevitable. They're not robots.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Great post
comment by Robbing Cromwell - agent of the hierarchy. (U6374)
posted 33 minutes ago
We don't play with a striker.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Technically this is true. You play with three of them.
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Robbing Cromwell - agent of the hierarchy. (U6374)
posted 33 minutes ago
We don't play with a striker.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Technically this is true. You play with three of them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Cromwell - agent of the hierarchy. (U6374)
posted 33 minutes ago
We don't play with a striker.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Technically this is true. You play with three of them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Actually we don't. We play with a false 9 who spends most of his time in the attacking midfield position, enabling him to provide for the two wide players coming inside. This works in tandem with the full backs who are often covering the whole side of the pitch, due to the wide players going inside.
TOOR
I was being flippant. Good previous post that pretty much sums it up.
Comparing Mo Salah with Ryan Giggs....FML
All comps and entire career (thus far in the case of Salah ofc) and mins per goal/assist
Salah 111mins
Giggs 167mins
Let’s see how Salah does over the next 12 years in the Premier League and see what the numbers look like then.
Salah is clearly a wide forward in a 433
Giggs was a winger in a 442 mostly
Giggs was playing from 1990 to 2014, football changed much over those years?
Mo Salah is a top top wide forward, undoubtedly.
Giggs was a top top winger, undoubtedly.
Comparing the two is just daft. But if pretty much any player apart from the likes of Ronaldo or Messi put in the years that Giggs did, then you’ll see what happens to their numbers.
Honestly, what will Mo Salah be doing in 5 years from now? What was he doing from 17-24 years of age? Giggs was setting the premier league alight and winning titles and just about to win the treble.
comment by *Michael Edwards FC {Proud owner of the 5 000 000th comment} (U2720)
posted 1 hour, 37 minutes ago
Bale
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Prime bale was better than prime giggs
And I’m a united fan but salah is better than giggs was too. Not talking about longevity just who’s better on their day
comment by ttliv87 (U11882)
posted 5 hours, 37 minutes ago
comment by Wahl Tuchel (U22545)
posted 3 minutes ago
1. Ronaldo
2. Hazard
3. Salah
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fatzard
----------------------------------------------------------------------
proof hazard is better:
https://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/431045
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 3 hours, 9 minutes ago
Let me settle all arguments here.
Giggs was absolutely an outstanding winger, one of the best ever for me and would have been recognised as such had he been English instead of Welsh. His role was part of the four midfield players. He was required to get up and down the line the who game, score goals and provide assists. He did this to a world class level.
Wide players in systems nowadays like Salah, are not require to get up and down the line but to stay up top for the quick counter. This ensures teams can't push up as much and gives you an out ball. They also are often inverted as the main part of their role is to score goals, at a strikers' rate and therefore cutting inside on their stronger foot gives them the best opportunity to do this. Giggs was probably a better overall player than Salah but Salah a much better goalscorer.
Agree with Rosso in that Liverpool should be top, even with the injuries due to the quality of our squad, even with the injuries but it's nothing to do with the manager why we aren't. For some reason, all three forwards lost form at the same time for a few weeks in January and we struggled to score goals and at the risk of sounding like Hafi, had we taken the chances we would normally take every week, we'd be sitting top. This can happen, I mean the squad have maintained a crazy level for around three years, a bad period of form was inevitable. They're not robots.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thank you.
Although if you look at the number of quality chances you created through spells of some of those games you were heavy favourites to win and failed to, you’ll see a drop off in production. It hasn’t just been finishing.
Certainly against us, Southampton, Newcastle, Brighton, West Brom you created very few decent chances. It was the same in the first half at the weekend.
From what I’ve seen and what I’ve read on here and elsewhere, as with us, the incisiveness and the quality of the build up play has been as big an issue.
comment by Wahl Tuchel (U22545)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by ttliv87 (U11882)
posted 5 hours, 37 minutes ago
comment by Wahl Tuchel (U22545)
posted 3 minutes ago
1. Ronaldo
2. Hazard
3. Salah
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fatzard
----------------------------------------------------------------------
proof hazard is better:
https://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/431045
----------------------------------------------------------------------
“ comment by Wahl Icht. (U21057)
posted on 26/9/16
I don't even know who signs players for Chelsea, but they didn't sign the players Mourinho wanted, so they're definitely to blame.
Bro wonder. Mourinho didn't buy Biiitch boy, Oscuuunt, Cuuuntois, Ivanoshiiit or Failhill. the only bad one he bought was Matshiiit, who was awesome when he first signed.“
“ comment by No_Wonder (U20205)
posted on 26/9/16
Who is biitch boy?
Reply | Add Comment | Complain | Share
comment by Wahl Icht. (U21057)
posted on 26/9/16
Biiitch boy is Hazard.“
comment by rosso - exterminate the talking heads (U17054)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 3 hours, 9 minutes ago
Let me settle all arguments here.
Giggs was absolutely an outstanding winger, one of the best ever for me and would have been recognised as such had he been English instead of Welsh. His role was part of the four midfield players. He was required to get up and down the line the who game, score goals and provide assists. He did this to a world class level.
Wide players in systems nowadays like Salah, are not require to get up and down the line but to stay up top for the quick counter. This ensures teams can't push up as much and gives you an out ball. They also are often inverted as the main part of their role is to score goals, at a strikers' rate and therefore cutting inside on their stronger foot gives them the best opportunity to do this. Giggs was probably a better overall player than Salah but Salah a much better goalscorer.
Agree with Rosso in that Liverpool should be top, even with the injuries due to the quality of our squad, even with the injuries but it's nothing to do with the manager why we aren't. For some reason, all three forwards lost form at the same time for a few weeks in January and we struggled to score goals and at the risk of sounding like Hafi, had we taken the chances we would normally take every week, we'd be sitting top. This can happen, I mean the squad have maintained a crazy level for around three years, a bad period of form was inevitable. They're not robots.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thank you.
Although if you look at the number of quality chances you created through spells of some of those games you were heavy favourites to win and failed to, you’ll see a drop off in production. It hasn’t just been finishing.
Certainly against us, Southampton, Newcastle, Brighton, West Brom you created very few decent chances. It was the same in the first half at the weekend.
From what I’ve seen and what I’ve read on here and elsewhere, as with us, the incisiveness and the quality of the build up play has been as big an issue.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We missed VVD build up play. He is the one who plays the diagonal ball to Salah to have the 1v1 with the fullback. Virgil allows us to push the fullbacks more forward to make overlapping runs. The spine of Alisson, Virgil, Hendo, Fabinho and Firmino are very important in our build up play and patern of play.
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 33 minutes ago
comment by Wahl Tuchel (U22545)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by ttliv87 (U11882)
posted 5 hours, 37 minutes ago
comment by Wahl Tuchel (U22545)
posted 3 minutes ago
1. Ronaldo
2. Hazard
3. Salah
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fatzard
----------------------------------------------------------------------
proof hazard is better:
https://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/431045
----------------------------------------------------------------------
“ comment by Wahl Icht. (U21057)
posted on 26/9/16
I don't even know who signs players for Chelsea, but they didn't sign the players Mourinho wanted, so they're definitely to blame.
Bro wonder. Mourinho didn't buy Biiitch boy, Oscuuunt, Cuuuntois, Ivanoshiiit or Failhill. the only bad one he bought was Matshiiit, who was awesome when he first signed.“
“ comment by No_Wonder (U20205)
posted on 26/9/16
Who is biitch boy?
Reply | Add Comment | Complain | Share
comment by Wahl Icht. (U21057)
posted on 26/9/16
Biiitch boy is Hazard.“
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Different user number, that’s not me.
comment by rosso - exterminate the talking heads (U17054)
posted 1 hour, 14 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 3 hours, 9 minutes ago
Let me settle all arguments here.
Giggs was absolutely an outstanding winger, one of the best ever for me and would have been recognised as such had he been English instead of Welsh. His role was part of the four midfield players. He was required to get up and down the line the who game, score goals and provide assists. He did this to a world class level.
Wide players in systems nowadays like Salah, are not require to get up and down the line but to stay up top for the quick counter. This ensures teams can't push up as much and gives you an out ball. They also are often inverted as the main part of their role is to score goals, at a strikers' rate and therefore cutting inside on their stronger foot gives them the best opportunity to do this. Giggs was probably a better overall player than Salah but Salah a much better goalscorer.
Agree with Rosso in that Liverpool should be top, even with the injuries due to the quality of our squad, even with the injuries but it's nothing to do with the manager why we aren't. For some reason, all three forwards lost form at the same time for a few weeks in January and we struggled to score goals and at the risk of sounding like Hafi, had we taken the chances we would normally take every week, we'd be sitting top. This can happen, I mean the squad have maintained a crazy level for around three years, a bad period of form was inevitable. They're not robots.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thank you.
Although if you look at the number of quality chances you created through spells of some of those games you were heavy favourites to win and failed to, you’ll see a drop off in production. It hasn’t just been finishing.
Certainly against us, Southampton, Newcastle, Brighton, West Brom you created very few decent chances. It was the same in the first half at the weekend.
From what I’ve seen and what I’ve read on here and elsewhere, as with us, the incisiveness and the quality of the build up play has been as big an issue.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Disagree. We created a host of chances and some really simple chances that our forwards take every week during usual times. I'm talking Mane clean through, ball hitting bobble in the ground, shot goes wide. Salah on numerous occasions doing exactly what he did last night for his trademark goal. Cut inside from the right, drive into the box, faint right, defender moves, curl into left side of goal. Only he was passing it to the keeper. Firmino losing all sense of shooting power and doing feeble shots. General goal mouth scrambles ping pinging everywhere and not going in. Was a crazy few games.
Admittedly we weren't as good in possession but that was through a lack of confidence when the goals weren't going in. Look at our last goal last night and even the second one. They are typical goals you would associate with Liverpool but only come off when full of confidence, especially the last one.
But we've all heard Klopp talk about it before, the character and mental strength of these players and their togetherness is what makes this team. They had a bad period and came through it. We'll be up there. I personally think we'll win it, simply due to having the best team, even with the injuries.
comment by Wahl Tuchel (U22545)
posted 38 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 33 minutes ago
comment by Wahl Tuchel (U22545)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by ttliv87 (U11882)
posted 5 hours, 37 minutes ago
comment by Wahl Tuchel (U22545)
posted 3 minutes ago
1. Ronaldo
2. Hazard
3. Salah
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fatzard
----------------------------------------------------------------------
proof hazard is better:
https://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/431045
----------------------------------------------------------------------
“ comment by Wahl Icht. (U21057)
posted on 26/9/16
I don't even know who signs players for Chelsea, but they didn't sign the players Mourinho wanted, so they're definitely to blame.
Bro wonder. Mourinho didn't buy Biiitch boy, Oscuuunt, Cuuuntois, Ivanoshiiit or Failhill. the only bad one he bought was Matshiiit, who was awesome when he first signed.“
“ comment by No_Wonder (U20205)
posted on 26/9/16
Who is biitch boy?
Reply | Add Comment | Complain | Share
comment by Wahl Icht. (U21057)
posted on 26/9/16
Biiitch boy is Hazard.“
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Different user number, that’s not me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sign in if you want to comment
Mo Salah Yet Again
Page 6 of 6
6
posted on 1/2/21
comment by Geoff Tipps (U1449)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by (K̇ash) I'm the Mané - PL Champione (U1108)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Geoff Tipps (U1449)
posted 1 minute ago
Salah is not a winger though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Plays wide right, tracks back, is marked by the opposition left back. Sounds very right winger to me. Just the term winger has been evolved into right sided attacker.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who’s your main striker?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The real question is, who is your main striker?
posted on 1/2/21
comment by *Michael Edwards FC {Proud owner of the 5 000 000th comment} (U2720)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Geoff Tipps (U1449)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by (K̇ash) I'm the Mané - PL Champione (U1108)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Geoff Tipps (U1449)
posted 1 minute ago
Salah is not a winger though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Plays wide right, tracks back, is marked by the opposition left back. Sounds very right winger to me. Just the term winger has been evolved into right sided attacker.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who’s your main striker?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The real question is, who is your main striker?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Luke Shaw
posted on 1/2/21
I bet any money op, if Salah got injured and all your goals dried up, you wouldn’t be coming on here saying, FSG need to put their hands in their pocket and buy us another wide player
posted on 1/2/21
Ronaldo
Bale
Salah
Not sure if salah is really a winger like the other 2 were though. Premier league footballs changed in the last 5 years and he’s more of a right forward than a winger
posted on 1/2/21
Bale
posted on 1/2/21
Let me settle all arguments here.
Giggs was absolutely an outstanding winger, one of the best ever for me and would have been recognised as such had he been English instead of Welsh. His role was part of the four midfield players. He was required to get up and down the line the who game, score goals and provide assists. He did this to a world class level.
Wide players in systems nowadays like Salah, are not require to get up and down the line but to stay up top for the quick counter. This ensures teams can't push up as much and gives you an out ball. They also are often inverted as the main part of their role is to score goals, at a strikers' rate and therefore cutting inside on their stronger foot gives them the best opportunity to do this. Giggs was probably a better overall player than Salah but Salah a much better goalscorer.
Agree with Rosso in that Liverpool should be top, even with the injuries due to the quality of our squad, even with the injuries but it's nothing to do with the manager why we aren't. For some reason, all three forwards lost form at the same time for a few weeks in January and we struggled to score goals and at the risk of sounding like Hafi, had we taken the chances we would normally take every week, we'd be sitting top. This can happen, I mean the squad have maintained a crazy level for around three years, a bad period of form was inevitable. They're not robots.
posted on 1/2/21
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 1 minute ago
Let me settle all arguments here.
Giggs was absolutely an outstanding winger, one of the best ever for me and would have been recognised as such had he been English instead of Welsh. His role was part of the four midfield players. He was required to get up and down the line the who game, score goals and provide assists. He did this to a world class level.
Wide players in systems nowadays like Salah, are not require to get up and down the line but to stay up top for the quick counter. This ensures teams can't push up as much and gives you an out ball. They also are often inverted as the main part of their role is to score goals, at a strikers' rate and therefore cutting inside on their stronger foot gives them the best opportunity to do this. Giggs was probably a better overall player than Salah but Salah a much better goalscorer.
Agree with Rosso in that Liverpool should be top, even with the injuries due to the quality of our squad, even with the injuries but it's nothing to do with the manager why we aren't. For some reason, all three forwards lost form at the same time for a few weeks in January and we struggled to score goals and at the risk of sounding like Hafi, had we taken the chances we would normally take every week, we'd be sitting top. This can happen, I mean the squad have maintained a crazy level for around three years, a bad period of form was inevitable. They're not robots.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
cant argue with much of that
posted on 1/2/21
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 2 minutes ago
Let me settle all arguments here.
Giggs was absolutely an outstanding winger, one of the best ever for me and would have been recognised as such had he been English instead of Welsh. His role was part of the four midfield players. He was required to get up and down the line the who game, score goals and provide assists. He did this to a world class level.
Wide players in systems nowadays like Salah, are not require to get up and down the line but to stay up top for the quick counter. This ensures teams can't push up as much and gives you an out ball. They also are often inverted as the main part of their role is to score goals, at a strikers' rate and therefore cutting inside on their stronger foot gives them the best opportunity to do this. Giggs was probably a better overall player than Salah but Salah a much better goalscorer.
Agree with Rosso in that Liverpool should be top, even with the injuries due to the quality of our squad, even with the injuries but it's nothing to do with the manager why we aren't. For some reason, all three forwards lost form at the same time for a few weeks in January and we struggled to score goals and at the risk of sounding like Hafi, had we taken the chances we would normally take every week, we'd be sitting top. This can happen, I mean the squad have maintained a crazy level for around three years, a bad period of form was inevitable. They're not robots.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Great post
posted on 1/2/21
comment by Robbing Cromwell - agent of the hierarchy. (U6374)
posted 33 minutes ago
We don't play with a striker.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Technically this is true. You play with three of them.
posted on 1/2/21
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Robbing Cromwell - agent of the hierarchy. (U6374)
posted 33 minutes ago
We don't play with a striker.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Technically this is true. You play with three of them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What
posted on 1/2/21
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Cromwell - agent of the hierarchy. (U6374)
posted 33 minutes ago
We don't play with a striker.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Technically this is true. You play with three of them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Actually we don't. We play with a false 9 who spends most of his time in the attacking midfield position, enabling him to provide for the two wide players coming inside. This works in tandem with the full backs who are often covering the whole side of the pitch, due to the wide players going inside.
posted on 1/2/21
TOOR
I was being flippant. Good previous post that pretty much sums it up.
posted on 1/2/21
Comparing Mo Salah with Ryan Giggs....FML
All comps and entire career (thus far in the case of Salah ofc) and mins per goal/assist
Salah 111mins
Giggs 167mins
Let’s see how Salah does over the next 12 years in the Premier League and see what the numbers look like then.
Salah is clearly a wide forward in a 433
Giggs was a winger in a 442 mostly
Giggs was playing from 1990 to 2014, football changed much over those years?
Mo Salah is a top top wide forward, undoubtedly.
Giggs was a top top winger, undoubtedly.
Comparing the two is just daft. But if pretty much any player apart from the likes of Ronaldo or Messi put in the years that Giggs did, then you’ll see what happens to their numbers.
Honestly, what will Mo Salah be doing in 5 years from now? What was he doing from 17-24 years of age? Giggs was setting the premier league alight and winning titles and just about to win the treble.
posted on 1/2/21
comment by *Michael Edwards FC {Proud owner of the 5 000 000th comment} (U2720)
posted 1 hour, 37 minutes ago
Bale
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Prime bale was better than prime giggs
posted on 1/2/21
And I’m a united fan but salah is better than giggs was too. Not talking about longevity just who’s better on their day
posted on 1/2/21
comment by ttliv87 (U11882)
posted 5 hours, 37 minutes ago
comment by Wahl Tuchel (U22545)
posted 3 minutes ago
1. Ronaldo
2. Hazard
3. Salah
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fatzard
----------------------------------------------------------------------
proof hazard is better:
https://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/431045
posted on 1/2/21
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 3 hours, 9 minutes ago
Let me settle all arguments here.
Giggs was absolutely an outstanding winger, one of the best ever for me and would have been recognised as such had he been English instead of Welsh. His role was part of the four midfield players. He was required to get up and down the line the who game, score goals and provide assists. He did this to a world class level.
Wide players in systems nowadays like Salah, are not require to get up and down the line but to stay up top for the quick counter. This ensures teams can't push up as much and gives you an out ball. They also are often inverted as the main part of their role is to score goals, at a strikers' rate and therefore cutting inside on their stronger foot gives them the best opportunity to do this. Giggs was probably a better overall player than Salah but Salah a much better goalscorer.
Agree with Rosso in that Liverpool should be top, even with the injuries due to the quality of our squad, even with the injuries but it's nothing to do with the manager why we aren't. For some reason, all three forwards lost form at the same time for a few weeks in January and we struggled to score goals and at the risk of sounding like Hafi, had we taken the chances we would normally take every week, we'd be sitting top. This can happen, I mean the squad have maintained a crazy level for around three years, a bad period of form was inevitable. They're not robots.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thank you.
Although if you look at the number of quality chances you created through spells of some of those games you were heavy favourites to win and failed to, you’ll see a drop off in production. It hasn’t just been finishing.
Certainly against us, Southampton, Newcastle, Brighton, West Brom you created very few decent chances. It was the same in the first half at the weekend.
From what I’ve seen and what I’ve read on here and elsewhere, as with us, the incisiveness and the quality of the build up play has been as big an issue.
posted on 1/2/21
comment by Wahl Tuchel (U22545)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by ttliv87 (U11882)
posted 5 hours, 37 minutes ago
comment by Wahl Tuchel (U22545)
posted 3 minutes ago
1. Ronaldo
2. Hazard
3. Salah
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fatzard
----------------------------------------------------------------------
proof hazard is better:
https://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/431045
----------------------------------------------------------------------
“ comment by Wahl Icht. (U21057)
posted on 26/9/16
I don't even know who signs players for Chelsea, but they didn't sign the players Mourinho wanted, so they're definitely to blame.
Bro wonder. Mourinho didn't buy Biiitch boy, Oscuuunt, Cuuuntois, Ivanoshiiit or Failhill. the only bad one he bought was Matshiiit, who was awesome when he first signed.“
“ comment by No_Wonder (U20205)
posted on 26/9/16
Who is biitch boy?
Reply | Add Comment | Complain | Share
comment by Wahl Icht. (U21057)
posted on 26/9/16
Biiitch boy is Hazard.“
posted on 1/2/21
Fannnie Road is back
posted on 1/2/21
comment by rosso - exterminate the talking heads (U17054)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 3 hours, 9 minutes ago
Let me settle all arguments here.
Giggs was absolutely an outstanding winger, one of the best ever for me and would have been recognised as such had he been English instead of Welsh. His role was part of the four midfield players. He was required to get up and down the line the who game, score goals and provide assists. He did this to a world class level.
Wide players in systems nowadays like Salah, are not require to get up and down the line but to stay up top for the quick counter. This ensures teams can't push up as much and gives you an out ball. They also are often inverted as the main part of their role is to score goals, at a strikers' rate and therefore cutting inside on their stronger foot gives them the best opportunity to do this. Giggs was probably a better overall player than Salah but Salah a much better goalscorer.
Agree with Rosso in that Liverpool should be top, even with the injuries due to the quality of our squad, even with the injuries but it's nothing to do with the manager why we aren't. For some reason, all three forwards lost form at the same time for a few weeks in January and we struggled to score goals and at the risk of sounding like Hafi, had we taken the chances we would normally take every week, we'd be sitting top. This can happen, I mean the squad have maintained a crazy level for around three years, a bad period of form was inevitable. They're not robots.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thank you.
Although if you look at the number of quality chances you created through spells of some of those games you were heavy favourites to win and failed to, you’ll see a drop off in production. It hasn’t just been finishing.
Certainly against us, Southampton, Newcastle, Brighton, West Brom you created very few decent chances. It was the same in the first half at the weekend.
From what I’ve seen and what I’ve read on here and elsewhere, as with us, the incisiveness and the quality of the build up play has been as big an issue.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We missed VVD build up play. He is the one who plays the diagonal ball to Salah to have the 1v1 with the fullback. Virgil allows us to push the fullbacks more forward to make overlapping runs. The spine of Alisson, Virgil, Hendo, Fabinho and Firmino are very important in our build up play and patern of play.
posted on 1/2/21
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 33 minutes ago
comment by Wahl Tuchel (U22545)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by ttliv87 (U11882)
posted 5 hours, 37 minutes ago
comment by Wahl Tuchel (U22545)
posted 3 minutes ago
1. Ronaldo
2. Hazard
3. Salah
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fatzard
----------------------------------------------------------------------
proof hazard is better:
https://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/431045
----------------------------------------------------------------------
“ comment by Wahl Icht. (U21057)
posted on 26/9/16
I don't even know who signs players for Chelsea, but they didn't sign the players Mourinho wanted, so they're definitely to blame.
Bro wonder. Mourinho didn't buy Biiitch boy, Oscuuunt, Cuuuntois, Ivanoshiiit or Failhill. the only bad one he bought was Matshiiit, who was awesome when he first signed.“
“ comment by No_Wonder (U20205)
posted on 26/9/16
Who is biitch boy?
Reply | Add Comment | Complain | Share
comment by Wahl Icht. (U21057)
posted on 26/9/16
Biiitch boy is Hazard.“
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Different user number, that’s not me.
posted on 1/2/21
comment by rosso - exterminate the talking heads (U17054)
posted 1 hour, 14 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 3 hours, 9 minutes ago
Let me settle all arguments here.
Giggs was absolutely an outstanding winger, one of the best ever for me and would have been recognised as such had he been English instead of Welsh. His role was part of the four midfield players. He was required to get up and down the line the who game, score goals and provide assists. He did this to a world class level.
Wide players in systems nowadays like Salah, are not require to get up and down the line but to stay up top for the quick counter. This ensures teams can't push up as much and gives you an out ball. They also are often inverted as the main part of their role is to score goals, at a strikers' rate and therefore cutting inside on their stronger foot gives them the best opportunity to do this. Giggs was probably a better overall player than Salah but Salah a much better goalscorer.
Agree with Rosso in that Liverpool should be top, even with the injuries due to the quality of our squad, even with the injuries but it's nothing to do with the manager why we aren't. For some reason, all three forwards lost form at the same time for a few weeks in January and we struggled to score goals and at the risk of sounding like Hafi, had we taken the chances we would normally take every week, we'd be sitting top. This can happen, I mean the squad have maintained a crazy level for around three years, a bad period of form was inevitable. They're not robots.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thank you.
Although if you look at the number of quality chances you created through spells of some of those games you were heavy favourites to win and failed to, you’ll see a drop off in production. It hasn’t just been finishing.
Certainly against us, Southampton, Newcastle, Brighton, West Brom you created very few decent chances. It was the same in the first half at the weekend.
From what I’ve seen and what I’ve read on here and elsewhere, as with us, the incisiveness and the quality of the build up play has been as big an issue.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Disagree. We created a host of chances and some really simple chances that our forwards take every week during usual times. I'm talking Mane clean through, ball hitting bobble in the ground, shot goes wide. Salah on numerous occasions doing exactly what he did last night for his trademark goal. Cut inside from the right, drive into the box, faint right, defender moves, curl into left side of goal. Only he was passing it to the keeper. Firmino losing all sense of shooting power and doing feeble shots. General goal mouth scrambles ping pinging everywhere and not going in. Was a crazy few games.
Admittedly we weren't as good in possession but that was through a lack of confidence when the goals weren't going in. Look at our last goal last night and even the second one. They are typical goals you would associate with Liverpool but only come off when full of confidence, especially the last one.
But we've all heard Klopp talk about it before, the character and mental strength of these players and their togetherness is what makes this team. They had a bad period and came through it. We'll be up there. I personally think we'll win it, simply due to having the best team, even with the injuries.
posted on 1/2/21
comment by Wahl Tuchel (U22545)
posted 38 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 33 minutes ago
comment by Wahl Tuchel (U22545)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by ttliv87 (U11882)
posted 5 hours, 37 minutes ago
comment by Wahl Tuchel (U22545)
posted 3 minutes ago
1. Ronaldo
2. Hazard
3. Salah
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fatzard
----------------------------------------------------------------------
proof hazard is better:
https://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/431045
----------------------------------------------------------------------
“ comment by Wahl Icht. (U21057)
posted on 26/9/16
I don't even know who signs players for Chelsea, but they didn't sign the players Mourinho wanted, so they're definitely to blame.
Bro wonder. Mourinho didn't buy Biiitch boy, Oscuuunt, Cuuuntois, Ivanoshiiit or Failhill. the only bad one he bought was Matshiiit, who was awesome when he first signed.“
“ comment by No_Wonder (U20205)
posted on 26/9/16
Who is biitch boy?
Reply | Add Comment | Complain | Share
comment by Wahl Icht. (U21057)
posted on 26/9/16
Biiitch boy is Hazard.“
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Different user number, that’s not me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 6 of 6
6