posted 1 week, 6 days ago
No one will be dumb enough to have any sort of paper trail. It will be an off the record chat and impossible to prove anything.
What's weird is that all the media were reporting the release clause...so who told them?
posted 1 week, 6 days ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 minute ago
No one will be dumb enough to have any sort of paper trail. It will be an off the record chat and impossible to prove anything.
What's weird is that all the media were reporting the release clause...so who told them?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just have to hope Charlie Kane isn't MGWs agent
posted 1 week, 5 days ago
It's fairly clear what's happened
When the news broken we told Spurs are paying a £60m release clause and MGW is having a medical on the Friday.
Now if Forest genuinely didn't know or agree and there is a confidential agreement in place then either Spurs or MGW camp has breached agreements or the governing body rules around approaching players.
I totally get that Spurs fans want the best for Spurs, and I don't expect a great deal of sympathy from other fans particularly as we feature in other news at the moment! But legal agreements and laws set out by the governing body should be stuck to by everyone right?
posted 1 week, 5 days ago
Seems to me that either both or Mgw or his agent revealed to Tottenham about the release cause
I don’t see what Tottenham have done wrong
It’s the player and or agent that’s in the wrong ….if that has then made the release clause nil and void I would understand that
I guess the punishment to the player is now you don’t get your release fee option and the move
Keeping him would be a disaster for Forest though….he won’t ever sign a new deal and you aren’t gonna have a very happy player
posted 1 week, 5 days ago
Just seen a vid of him playing in a double pivot against Brentford. Class.
posted 1 week, 5 days ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 1 hour, 50 minutes ago
Seems to me that either both or Mgw or his agent revealed to Tottenham about the release cause
I don’t see what Tottenham have done wrong
It’s the player and or agent that’s in the wrong ….if that has then made the release clause nil and void I would understand that
I guess the punishment to the player is now you don’t get your release fee option and the move
Keeping him would be a disaster for Forest though….he won’t ever sign a new deal and you aren’t gonna have a very happy player
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Completely agree that he has to go now, it's just about reasonable compensation for Forest.
Don't blame Spurs for this at all
If their is confidential agreement the player signed up to it, if he breached it then it's on him.
posted 1 week, 5 days ago
comment by Luka "The List" Brasi (U22178)
posted 24 minutes ago
Just seen a vid of him playing in a double pivot against Brentford. Class.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Does that really well
Personally think he is one of the best around and receiving the ball in his own half and moving the team forward, he can one touch with others, long pass or beat players with drop of shoulder and pace/skills.
Only question mark is his finishing, numbers speak for themselves.
posted 1 week, 5 days ago
“ it's just about reasonable compensation for Forest.”
What like paying is release clause
posted 1 week, 5 days ago
comment by Hengy (U9129)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
“ it's just about reasonable compensation for Forest.”
What like paying is release clause
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Breaking the confidential agreement, if it actually exists in the way Forest seems to think
You can't break a legal agreements with consequences
posted 1 week, 5 days ago
comment by There is only one real Igor and he is the boy from Brazil (U20074)
posted 37 minutes ago
comment by Hengy (U9129)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
“ it's just about reasonable compensation for Forest.”
What like paying is release clause
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Breaking the confidential agreement, if it actually exists in the way Forest seems to think
You can't break a legal agreements with consequences
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They don’t get a penny more lol
They literally can’t prove anything. The one axe they hold is asking for the full amount up front
posted 1 week, 5 days ago
comment by There is only one real Igor and he is the boy ... (U20074)
posted 59 minutes ago
comment by Hengy (U9129)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
“ it's just about reasonable compensation for Forest.”
What like paying is release clause
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Breaking the confidential agreement, if it actually exists in the way Forest seems to think
You can't break a legal agreements with consequences
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why should Spurs pay a higher fee because the player or his agent has breached a confidentiality agreement, Spurs have done nothing wrong.
posted 1 week, 5 days ago
comment by There is only one real Igor and he is the boy from Brazil (U20074)
posted 3 hours, 25 minutes ago
comment by Luka "The List" Brasi (U22178)
posted 24 minutes ago
Just seen a vid of him playing in a double pivot against Brentford. Class.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Does that really well
Personally think he is one of the best around and receiving the ball in his own half and moving the team forward, he can one touch with others, long pass or beat players with drop of shoulder and pace/skills.
Only question mark is his finishing, numbers speak for themselves.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
👍🏻 He really is an all round baller. He can do everything to a level. He would be a incredible signing.
posted 1 week, 5 days ago
Confidential agreements exist only if parties agree to them. If MGW & his agent disclosed to Spurs what the release fee clause was then it is not down to Spurs at all.
However it is a very fine line if the agent has contacted Spurs then it should have been clarified as to whether Forest were aware of this contact. If not then it becomes a grey area legally.
Everyone and their dog knows that tapping up happens and I don’t doubt that Forest have done their fair share of this in the past.
Having said that, the Forest owner is a disgrace with his behaviour and this threat is typical of him.
There is no way that MGW could stay at Forest now over potentially being blocked from joining Spurs.
posted 1 week, 5 days ago
comment by Hengy (U9129)
posted 35 minutes ago
comment by There is only one real Igor and he is the boy from Brazil (U20074)
posted 37 minutes ago
comment by Hengy (U9129)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
“ it's just about reasonable compensation for Forest.”
What like paying is release clause
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Breaking the confidential agreement, if it actually exists in the way Forest seems to think
You can't break a legal agreements with consequences
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They don’t get a penny more lol
They literally can’t prove anything. The one axe they hold is asking for the full amount up front
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think you are fully understanding the point
Of course Spurs wouldn't pay more, they didn't breach an agreement
The compensation will be owed by the party who breached it! (Assuming it's proven etc)
posted 1 week, 5 days ago
comment by GeniusGreaves (U1302)
posted 1 minute ago
Confidential agreements exist only if parties agree to them. If MGW & his agent disclosed to Spurs what the release fee clause was then it is not down to Spurs at all.
However it is a very fine line if the agent has contacted Spurs then it should have been clarified as to whether Forest were aware of this contact. If not then it becomes a grey area legally.
Everyone and their dog knows that tapping up happens and I don’t doubt that Forest have done their fair share of this in the past.
Having said that, the Forest owner is a disgrace with his behaviour and this threat is typical of him.
There is no way that MGW could stay at Forest now over potentially being blocked from joining Spurs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agree with this
Just add that if there is a confidential agreement assume it was set out when he signed, obviously kept quiet for 3 seasons.
Worth remembering that as crazy as Forest must seem from the outside, within the leadership group is Nicholas Randle QC who practices in sport, if he is saying there is a breach fair to assume he knows what he is talking about!
Of course he might not be directly involved and it's all the owner shouting the odds, hard to tell at this point
posted 1 week, 5 days ago
comment by There is only one real Igor and he is the boy from Brazil (U20074)
posted 3 hours, 45 minutes ago
comment by Hengy (U9129)
posted 35 minutes ago
comment by There is only one real Igor and he is the boy from Brazil (U20074)
posted 37 minutes ago
comment by Hengy (U9129)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
“ it's just about reasonable compensation for Forest.”
What like paying is release clause
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Breaking the confidential agreement, if it actually exists in the way Forest seems to think
You can't break a legal agreements with consequences
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They don’t get a penny more lol
They literally can’t prove anything. The one axe they hold is asking for the full amount up front
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think you are fully understanding the point
Of course Spurs wouldn't pay more, they didn't breach an agreement
The compensation will be owed by the party who breached it! (Assuming it's proven etc)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No one breached it that what your not getting
posted 1 week, 5 days ago
comment by Hengy (U9129)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by There is only one real Igor and he is the boy from Brazil (U20074)
posted 3 hours, 45 minutes ago
comment by Hengy (U9129)
posted 35 minutes ago
comment by There is only one real Igor and he is the boy from Brazil (U20074)
posted 37 minutes ago
comment by Hengy (U9129)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
“ it's just about reasonable compensation for Forest.”
What like paying is release clause
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Breaking the confidential agreement, if it actually exists in the way Forest seems to think
You can't break a legal agreements with consequences
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They don’t get a penny more lol
They literally can’t prove anything. The one axe they hold is asking for the full amount up front
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think you are fully understanding the point
Of course Spurs wouldn't pay more, they didn't breach an agreement
The compensation will be owed by the party who breached it! (Assuming it's proven etc)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No one breached it that what your not getting
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry in Ibiza.
I mean to say Tottenham haven’t breached anything and Forrest won’t getting anything from us
posted 1 week, 5 days ago
Sorry in Ibiza.
---
Lo siento
posted 1 week, 5 days ago
comment by Bãleș left boot - Europa Champions 2025 (U22081)
posted 56 minutes ago
Sorry in Ibiza.
---
Lo siento
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is this Canadian
posted 1 week, 5 days ago
comment by Hengy (U9129)
posted 3 hours, 57 minutes ago
comment by Hengy (U9129)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by There is only one real Igor and he is the boy from Brazil (U20074)
posted 3 hours, 45 minutes ago
comment by Hengy (U9129)
posted 35 minutes ago
comment by There is only one real Igor and he is the boy from Brazil (U20074)
posted 37 minutes ago
comment by Hengy (U9129)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
“ it's just about reasonable compensation for Forest.”
What like paying is release clause
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Breaking the confidential agreement, if it actually exists in the way Forest seems to think
You can't break a legal agreements with consequences
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They don’t get a penny more lol
They literally can’t prove anything. The one axe they hold is asking for the full amount up front
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think you are fully understanding the point
Of course Spurs wouldn't pay more, they didn't breach an agreement
The compensation will be owed by the party who breached it! (Assuming it's proven etc)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No one breached it that what your not getting
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry in Ibiza.
I mean to say Tottenham haven’t breached anything and Forrest won’t getting anything from us
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We have already agreed that's the case, no clue why you keep going on about it 🤣🤣
posted 1 week, 4 days ago
Nottingham Forest have now made their legal complaint over #Tottenham's move for Gibbs-White.
@TomBarclay_
posted 1 week, 4 days ago
The problem we've got with this deal is that Forest are under no obligation to accept the terms of the payment. They have to accept the overall amount but they could just easily say "we want the full 60m now" which would make it near on impossible for us to match, given how payments are often amortised in the game.
Maybe there's detail in the contract that outlines how the deal can be structured as part of the release clause but if it doesn't have that, were screwed. The owner could just screw us over and demand it all at once.
posted 1 week, 4 days ago
Is it a case of Forrest will string this "victim strategy" for as long as they can just to pee us off.
Should we call their bluff and just say fek off to them.
posted 1 week, 4 days ago
comment by JimmyGreaves (U21183)
posted 2 minutes ago
Is it a case of Forrest will string this "victim strategy" for as long as they can just to pee us off.
Should we call their bluff and just say fek off to them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No because the deal on the table from Spurs is the very least he can get from any team, unless MGW were to decide to sign a new watertight deal on better terms. If Spurs were to threaten to drop out, another club will take him for 60m easily.
Like I say, I think the difficulty will be the payment structure. He could just be a major cvnt about it and keep MGW shackled to the club.
posted 1 week, 4 days ago
comment by fridgeboy (U1053)
posted 56 seconds ago
comment by JimmyGreaves (U21183)
posted 2 minutes ago
Is it a case of Forrest will string this "victim strategy" for as long as they can just to pee us off.
Should we call their bluff and just say fek off to them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No because the deal on the table from Spurs is the very least he can get from any team, unless MGW were to decide to sign a new watertight deal on better terms. If Spurs were to threaten to drop out, another club will take him for 60m easily.
Like I say, I think the difficulty will be the payment structure. He could just be a major cvnt about it and keep MGW shackled to the club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
yeah I get that, I mean in the current circs it looks like forrest will mess us about for as long as they can in the hope someone else puts a bid in. ...... unless of course MGW has set his heart on coming to us.
Sign in if you want to comment
MGW to spurs ??
Page 4 of 5
posted 1 week, 6 days ago
No one will be dumb enough to have any sort of paper trail. It will be an off the record chat and impossible to prove anything.
What's weird is that all the media were reporting the release clause...so who told them?
posted 1 week, 6 days ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 minute ago
No one will be dumb enough to have any sort of paper trail. It will be an off the record chat and impossible to prove anything.
What's weird is that all the media were reporting the release clause...so who told them?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just have to hope Charlie Kane isn't MGWs agent
posted 1 week, 5 days ago
It's fairly clear what's happened
When the news broken we told Spurs are paying a £60m release clause and MGW is having a medical on the Friday.
Now if Forest genuinely didn't know or agree and there is a confidential agreement in place then either Spurs or MGW camp has breached agreements or the governing body rules around approaching players.
I totally get that Spurs fans want the best for Spurs, and I don't expect a great deal of sympathy from other fans particularly as we feature in other news at the moment! But legal agreements and laws set out by the governing body should be stuck to by everyone right?
posted 1 week, 5 days ago
Seems to me that either both or Mgw or his agent revealed to Tottenham about the release cause
I don’t see what Tottenham have done wrong
It’s the player and or agent that’s in the wrong ….if that has then made the release clause nil and void I would understand that
I guess the punishment to the player is now you don’t get your release fee option and the move
Keeping him would be a disaster for Forest though….he won’t ever sign a new deal and you aren’t gonna have a very happy player
posted 1 week, 5 days ago
Just seen a vid of him playing in a double pivot against Brentford. Class.
posted 1 week, 5 days ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 1 hour, 50 minutes ago
Seems to me that either both or Mgw or his agent revealed to Tottenham about the release cause
I don’t see what Tottenham have done wrong
It’s the player and or agent that’s in the wrong ….if that has then made the release clause nil and void I would understand that
I guess the punishment to the player is now you don’t get your release fee option and the move
Keeping him would be a disaster for Forest though….he won’t ever sign a new deal and you aren’t gonna have a very happy player
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Completely agree that he has to go now, it's just about reasonable compensation for Forest.
Don't blame Spurs for this at all
If their is confidential agreement the player signed up to it, if he breached it then it's on him.
posted 1 week, 5 days ago
comment by Luka "The List" Brasi (U22178)
posted 24 minutes ago
Just seen a vid of him playing in a double pivot against Brentford. Class.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Does that really well
Personally think he is one of the best around and receiving the ball in his own half and moving the team forward, he can one touch with others, long pass or beat players with drop of shoulder and pace/skills.
Only question mark is his finishing, numbers speak for themselves.
posted 1 week, 5 days ago
“ it's just about reasonable compensation for Forest.”
What like paying is release clause
posted 1 week, 5 days ago
comment by Hengy (U9129)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
“ it's just about reasonable compensation for Forest.”
What like paying is release clause
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Breaking the confidential agreement, if it actually exists in the way Forest seems to think
You can't break a legal agreements with consequences
posted 1 week, 5 days ago
comment by There is only one real Igor and he is the boy from Brazil (U20074)
posted 37 minutes ago
comment by Hengy (U9129)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
“ it's just about reasonable compensation for Forest.”
What like paying is release clause
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Breaking the confidential agreement, if it actually exists in the way Forest seems to think
You can't break a legal agreements with consequences
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They don’t get a penny more lol
They literally can’t prove anything. The one axe they hold is asking for the full amount up front
posted 1 week, 5 days ago
comment by There is only one real Igor and he is the boy ... (U20074)
posted 59 minutes ago
comment by Hengy (U9129)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
“ it's just about reasonable compensation for Forest.”
What like paying is release clause
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Breaking the confidential agreement, if it actually exists in the way Forest seems to think
You can't break a legal agreements with consequences
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why should Spurs pay a higher fee because the player or his agent has breached a confidentiality agreement, Spurs have done nothing wrong.
posted 1 week, 5 days ago
comment by There is only one real Igor and he is the boy from Brazil (U20074)
posted 3 hours, 25 minutes ago
comment by Luka "The List" Brasi (U22178)
posted 24 minutes ago
Just seen a vid of him playing in a double pivot against Brentford. Class.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Does that really well
Personally think he is one of the best around and receiving the ball in his own half and moving the team forward, he can one touch with others, long pass or beat players with drop of shoulder and pace/skills.
Only question mark is his finishing, numbers speak for themselves.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
👍🏻 He really is an all round baller. He can do everything to a level. He would be a incredible signing.
posted 1 week, 5 days ago
Confidential agreements exist only if parties agree to them. If MGW & his agent disclosed to Spurs what the release fee clause was then it is not down to Spurs at all.
However it is a very fine line if the agent has contacted Spurs then it should have been clarified as to whether Forest were aware of this contact. If not then it becomes a grey area legally.
Everyone and their dog knows that tapping up happens and I don’t doubt that Forest have done their fair share of this in the past.
Having said that, the Forest owner is a disgrace with his behaviour and this threat is typical of him.
There is no way that MGW could stay at Forest now over potentially being blocked from joining Spurs.
posted 1 week, 5 days ago
comment by Hengy (U9129)
posted 35 minutes ago
comment by There is only one real Igor and he is the boy from Brazil (U20074)
posted 37 minutes ago
comment by Hengy (U9129)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
“ it's just about reasonable compensation for Forest.”
What like paying is release clause
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Breaking the confidential agreement, if it actually exists in the way Forest seems to think
You can't break a legal agreements with consequences
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They don’t get a penny more lol
They literally can’t prove anything. The one axe they hold is asking for the full amount up front
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think you are fully understanding the point
Of course Spurs wouldn't pay more, they didn't breach an agreement
The compensation will be owed by the party who breached it! (Assuming it's proven etc)
posted 1 week, 5 days ago
comment by GeniusGreaves (U1302)
posted 1 minute ago
Confidential agreements exist only if parties agree to them. If MGW & his agent disclosed to Spurs what the release fee clause was then it is not down to Spurs at all.
However it is a very fine line if the agent has contacted Spurs then it should have been clarified as to whether Forest were aware of this contact. If not then it becomes a grey area legally.
Everyone and their dog knows that tapping up happens and I don’t doubt that Forest have done their fair share of this in the past.
Having said that, the Forest owner is a disgrace with his behaviour and this threat is typical of him.
There is no way that MGW could stay at Forest now over potentially being blocked from joining Spurs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agree with this
Just add that if there is a confidential agreement assume it was set out when he signed, obviously kept quiet for 3 seasons.
Worth remembering that as crazy as Forest must seem from the outside, within the leadership group is Nicholas Randle QC who practices in sport, if he is saying there is a breach fair to assume he knows what he is talking about!
Of course he might not be directly involved and it's all the owner shouting the odds, hard to tell at this point
posted 1 week, 5 days ago
comment by There is only one real Igor and he is the boy from Brazil (U20074)
posted 3 hours, 45 minutes ago
comment by Hengy (U9129)
posted 35 minutes ago
comment by There is only one real Igor and he is the boy from Brazil (U20074)
posted 37 minutes ago
comment by Hengy (U9129)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
“ it's just about reasonable compensation for Forest.”
What like paying is release clause
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Breaking the confidential agreement, if it actually exists in the way Forest seems to think
You can't break a legal agreements with consequences
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They don’t get a penny more lol
They literally can’t prove anything. The one axe they hold is asking for the full amount up front
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think you are fully understanding the point
Of course Spurs wouldn't pay more, they didn't breach an agreement
The compensation will be owed by the party who breached it! (Assuming it's proven etc)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No one breached it that what your not getting
posted 1 week, 5 days ago
comment by Hengy (U9129)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by There is only one real Igor and he is the boy from Brazil (U20074)
posted 3 hours, 45 minutes ago
comment by Hengy (U9129)
posted 35 minutes ago
comment by There is only one real Igor and he is the boy from Brazil (U20074)
posted 37 minutes ago
comment by Hengy (U9129)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
“ it's just about reasonable compensation for Forest.”
What like paying is release clause
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Breaking the confidential agreement, if it actually exists in the way Forest seems to think
You can't break a legal agreements with consequences
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They don’t get a penny more lol
They literally can’t prove anything. The one axe they hold is asking for the full amount up front
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think you are fully understanding the point
Of course Spurs wouldn't pay more, they didn't breach an agreement
The compensation will be owed by the party who breached it! (Assuming it's proven etc)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No one breached it that what your not getting
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry in Ibiza.
I mean to say Tottenham haven’t breached anything and Forrest won’t getting anything from us
posted 1 week, 5 days ago
Sorry in Ibiza.
---
Lo siento
posted 1 week, 5 days ago
comment by Bãleș left boot - Europa Champions 2025 (U22081)
posted 56 minutes ago
Sorry in Ibiza.
---
Lo siento
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is this Canadian
posted 1 week, 5 days ago
comment by Hengy (U9129)
posted 3 hours, 57 minutes ago
comment by Hengy (U9129)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by There is only one real Igor and he is the boy from Brazil (U20074)
posted 3 hours, 45 minutes ago
comment by Hengy (U9129)
posted 35 minutes ago
comment by There is only one real Igor and he is the boy from Brazil (U20074)
posted 37 minutes ago
comment by Hengy (U9129)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
“ it's just about reasonable compensation for Forest.”
What like paying is release clause
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Breaking the confidential agreement, if it actually exists in the way Forest seems to think
You can't break a legal agreements with consequences
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They don’t get a penny more lol
They literally can’t prove anything. The one axe they hold is asking for the full amount up front
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think you are fully understanding the point
Of course Spurs wouldn't pay more, they didn't breach an agreement
The compensation will be owed by the party who breached it! (Assuming it's proven etc)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No one breached it that what your not getting
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry in Ibiza.
I mean to say Tottenham haven’t breached anything and Forrest won’t getting anything from us
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We have already agreed that's the case, no clue why you keep going on about it 🤣🤣
posted 1 week, 4 days ago
Nottingham Forest have now made their legal complaint over #Tottenham's move for Gibbs-White.
@TomBarclay_
posted 1 week, 4 days ago
The problem we've got with this deal is that Forest are under no obligation to accept the terms of the payment. They have to accept the overall amount but they could just easily say "we want the full 60m now" which would make it near on impossible for us to match, given how payments are often amortised in the game.
Maybe there's detail in the contract that outlines how the deal can be structured as part of the release clause but if it doesn't have that, were screwed. The owner could just screw us over and demand it all at once.
posted 1 week, 4 days ago
Is it a case of Forrest will string this "victim strategy" for as long as they can just to pee us off.
Should we call their bluff and just say fek off to them.
posted 1 week, 4 days ago
comment by JimmyGreaves (U21183)
posted 2 minutes ago
Is it a case of Forrest will string this "victim strategy" for as long as they can just to pee us off.
Should we call their bluff and just say fek off to them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No because the deal on the table from Spurs is the very least he can get from any team, unless MGW were to decide to sign a new watertight deal on better terms. If Spurs were to threaten to drop out, another club will take him for 60m easily.
Like I say, I think the difficulty will be the payment structure. He could just be a major cvnt about it and keep MGW shackled to the club.
posted 1 week, 4 days ago
comment by fridgeboy (U1053)
posted 56 seconds ago
comment by JimmyGreaves (U21183)
posted 2 minutes ago
Is it a case of Forrest will string this "victim strategy" for as long as they can just to pee us off.
Should we call their bluff and just say fek off to them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No because the deal on the table from Spurs is the very least he can get from any team, unless MGW were to decide to sign a new watertight deal on better terms. If Spurs were to threaten to drop out, another club will take him for 60m easily.
Like I say, I think the difficulty will be the payment structure. He could just be a major cvnt about it and keep MGW shackled to the club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
yeah I get that, I mean in the current circs it looks like forrest will mess us about for as long as they can in the hope someone else puts a bid in. ...... unless of course MGW has set his heart on coming to us.
Page 4 of 5