you don't think MP's should act in the national interest?
................
I think you are a cretin of the highest order.
comment by De Gea's Legs (U14210)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
posted 5 minutes ago
MPs should have 'courage' to overrule Brexit vote
---------------
If MP's after such debate feel that it is in the national interest to over rule - they should do so.
As long as they can be open and explain the reasons for it in a reasonable manner the man on the street shouldn't have a problem for it.
They should also make provision that the gripes that 52% of the votes cast identified to be addressed in some way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No way
----------
You could at least try and form a reasoned reply.. as it stands your 'no way' has no value.
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted about a minute ago
you don't think MP's should act in the national interest?
................
I think you are a cretin of the highest order.
------------
you may think that, but the reasonable question still stands.
Do you not think MP's should act in the national interest?
comment by I am gooner now (U16927)
posted 6 minutes ago
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=european+superstate&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-ab&gfe_rd=cr&ei=1h10V7KZJsSN8QfBtYS4Cw
.......................
Never saw that coming. Oh wait a minute, yes I did. In 2006.
Do you not think MP's should act in the national interest?
...................
It would depend on what the issue of national interest is.
Going by the will of the people could well be deemed to be in the interest of the nation. Going against it is not going to happen here.
Best you get used to it. We are leaving the EU.
Shame that MPs never got to grips with immigration in the public interest,they all knew it was causing unrest,so they called a referendum that backfired,so let's ignore the result in the national interest.
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by I am gooner now (U16927)
posted 6 minutes ago
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=european+superstate&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-ab&gfe_rd=cr&ei=1h10V7KZJsSN8QfBtYS4Cw
.......................
Never saw that coming. Oh wait a minute, yes I did. In 2006.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In 2006 you saw that after a Brexit vote in 2016 they would accelerate the plans. Wow.
In 2006 you saw that after a Brexit vote in 2016 they would accelerate the plans. Wow.
------
Referendum on leaving the EU wasn't announced until the last General Election campaign.
comment by Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by De Gea's Legs (U14210)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
posted 5 minutes ago
MPs should have 'courage' to overrule Brexit vote
---------------
If MP's after such debate feel that it is in the national interest to over rule - they should do so.
As long as they can be open and explain the reasons for it in a reasonable manner the man on the street shouldn't have a problem for it.
They should also make provision that the gripes that 52% of the votes cast identified to be addressed in some way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No way
----------
You could at least try and form a reasoned reply.. as it stands your 'no way' has no value.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wheras your always saying other peoples views has no value and not providing facts to back up your agenda driven views dows
comment by Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by De Gea's Legs (U14210)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
posted 5 minutes ago
MPs should have 'courage' to overrule Brexit vote
---------------
If MP's after such debate feel that it is in the national interest to over rule - they should do so.
As long as they can be open and explain the reasons for it in a reasonable manner the man on the street shouldn't have a problem for it.
They should also make provision that the gripes that 52% of the votes cast identified to be addressed in some way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No way
----------
You could at least try and form a reasoned reply.. as it stands your 'no way' has no value.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ooooo sorry didn't know I had to follow your rules.
No way
----------
You could at least try and form a reasoned reply.. as it stands your 'no way' has no value.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wheras your always saying other peoples views has no value and not providing facts to back up your agenda driven views dows
-----------------------------------------------
If you can find another comment from me about someone's comment having 'no value' lets see it.
Could we not find ourselves in a situation where a 2nd referendum could be called, reasonably legitimately and not because 'remain' campaigners want it?
Whoever wins the Conservative leadership campaign, doesn't immediately invoke Article 50, but calls for a General Election to (quite rightly) legitimise his/her position as the new PM.
However, as they are likely to invoke the clause upon election, 'Remain' voters vote for the parties who were pro-remain.
Could we have a situation where, for example, the country is widely split across 3 or 4 political parties and we have to go down the route of a coalition government again.
The Lib-Dems (probably the most pro-EU party) are the leading party, and they put their heads together with the SNP (and perhaps another minority party) to form a new coalition government, which then has a new mandate to have a fresh referendum on Brexit?
Which option would be better for the Leave supporters on here?:
- Staying in with all that that meant, but significant controls introduced on EU immigration to the UK
- Leaving, with the ability to pick and choose which EU laws and regulations we retained, but having to keep the 'four freedoms' to retain access to the single market
- Complete severance, with the ability to pick and choose which EU laws and regulations we retained and without the 'four freedoms', meaning starting from scratch with trade agreements
I don't think they'll call for an election. Too disruptive. They'll say the people have spoken and we need to get on with it.
comment by rossobianchi - carry me back to the Stretford ... (U17054)
posted about a minute ago
Which option would be better for the Leave supporters on here?:
- Staying in with all that that meant, but significant controls introduced on EU immigration to the UK
- Leaving, with the ability to pick and choose which EU laws and regulations we retained, but having to keep the 'four freedoms' to retain access to the single market
- Complete severance, with the ability to pick and choose which EU laws and regulations we retained and without the 'four freedoms', meaning starting from scratch with trade agreements
----------------------------------------------------------------------
3rd option
comment by Serge Muhmenthaler (U15867)
posted 1 minute ago
Could we not find ourselves in a situation where a 2nd referendum could be called, reasonably legitimately and not because 'remain' campaigners want it?
Whoever wins the Conservative leadership campaign, doesn't immediately invoke Article 50, but calls for a General Election to (quite rightly) legitimise his/her position as the new PM.
However, as they are likely to invoke the clause upon election, 'Remain' voters vote for the parties who were pro-remain.
Could we have a situation where, for example, the country is widely split across 3 or 4 political parties and we have to go down the route of a coalition government again.
The Lib-Dems (probably the most pro-EU party) are the leading party, and they put their heads together with the SNP (and perhaps another minority party) to form a new coalition government, which then has a new mandate to have a fresh referendum on Brexit?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Possible. Very highly unlikely.
The Tories will avoid this by selecting a popular, pro-Brexit MP...
I don't think another election will happen anytime soon
comment by rossobianchi - carry me back to the Stretford End (U17054)
posted 42 seconds ago
Which option would be better for the Leave supporters on here?:
- Staying in with all that that meant, but significant controls introduced on EU immigration to the UK
- Leaving, with the ability to pick and choose which EU laws and regulations we retained, but having to keep the 'four freedoms' to retain access to the single market
- Complete severance, with the ability to pick and choose which EU laws and regulations we retained and without the 'four freedoms', meaning starting from scratch with trade agreements
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was remain but now looking forward to brexit
I don't like any of those
We are out,let's just get on with going forward,on our own if necessary,the EU will start to unravel in the not too distant future,let's get started.
comment by De Gea's Legs (U14210)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by rossobianchi - carry me back to the Stretford ... (U17054)
posted about a minute ago
Which option would be better for the Leave supporters on here?:
- Staying in with all that that meant, but significant controls introduced on EU immigration to the UK
- Leaving, with the ability to pick and choose which EU laws and regulations we retained, but having to keep the 'four freedoms' to retain access to the single market
- Complete severance, with the ability to pick and choose which EU laws and regulations we retained and without the 'four freedoms', meaning starting from scratch with trade agreements
----------------------------------------------------------------------
3rd option
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There's a man who knows what he wants - no mucking about there!
You should get yourself on the train to London mate and head up the negotiation planning.
comment by The Kaiser's Trainers (U5676)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by rossobianchi - carry me back to the Stretford End (U17054)
posted 42 seconds ago
Which option would be better for the Leave supporters on here?:
- Staying in with all that that meant, but significant controls introduced on EU immigration to the UK
- Leaving, with the ability to pick and choose which EU laws and regulations we retained, but having to keep the 'four freedoms' to retain access to the single market
- Complete severance, with the ability to pick and choose which EU laws and regulations we retained and without the 'four freedoms', meaning starting from scratch with trade agreements
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was remain but now looking forward to brexit
I don't like any of those
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This ain't the candy store sonny
Pick a least worst then.
comment by rossobianchi - carry me back to the Stretford ... (U17054)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by De Gea's Legs (U14210)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by rossobianchi - carry me back to the Stretford ... (U17054)
posted about a minute ago
Which option would be better for the Leave supporters on here?:
- Staying in with all that that meant, but significant controls introduced on EU immigration to the UK
- Leaving, with the ability to pick and choose which EU laws and regulations we retained, but having to keep the 'four freedoms' to retain access to the single market
- Complete severance, with the ability to pick and choose which EU laws and regulations we retained and without the 'four freedoms', meaning starting from scratch with trade agreements
----------------------------------------------------------------------
3rd option
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There's a man who knows what he wants - no mucking about there!
You should get yourself on the train to London mate and head up the negotiation planning.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
😊
comment by groovyduringthewar (U1054)
posted 1 minute ago
We are out,let's just get on with going forward,on our own if necessary,the EU will start to unravel in the not too distant future,let's get started.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That sounds like another vote for option three to me.
They are all pants
3 is the least crap
Sign in if you want to comment
LIVE: Great Britain EU Referendum
Page 277 of 395
278 | 279 | 280 | 281 | 282
posted on 29/6/16
you don't think MP's should act in the national interest?
................
I think you are a cretin of the highest order.
posted on 29/6/16
comment by De Gea's Legs (U14210)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
posted 5 minutes ago
MPs should have 'courage' to overrule Brexit vote
---------------
If MP's after such debate feel that it is in the national interest to over rule - they should do so.
As long as they can be open and explain the reasons for it in a reasonable manner the man on the street shouldn't have a problem for it.
They should also make provision that the gripes that 52% of the votes cast identified to be addressed in some way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No way
----------
You could at least try and form a reasoned reply.. as it stands your 'no way' has no value.
posted on 29/6/16
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted about a minute ago
you don't think MP's should act in the national interest?
................
I think you are a cretin of the highest order.
------------
you may think that, but the reasonable question still stands.
Do you not think MP's should act in the national interest?
posted on 29/6/16
comment by I am gooner now (U16927)
posted 6 minutes ago
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=european+superstate&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-ab&gfe_rd=cr&ei=1h10V7KZJsSN8QfBtYS4Cw
.......................
Never saw that coming. Oh wait a minute, yes I did. In 2006.
posted on 29/6/16
Do you not think MP's should act in the national interest?
...................
It would depend on what the issue of national interest is.
Going by the will of the people could well be deemed to be in the interest of the nation. Going against it is not going to happen here.
Best you get used to it. We are leaving the EU.
posted on 29/6/16
Shame that MPs never got to grips with immigration in the public interest,they all knew it was causing unrest,so they called a referendum that backfired,so let's ignore the result in the national interest.
posted on 29/6/16
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by I am gooner now (U16927)
posted 6 minutes ago
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=european+superstate&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-ab&gfe_rd=cr&ei=1h10V7KZJsSN8QfBtYS4Cw
.......................
Never saw that coming. Oh wait a minute, yes I did. In 2006.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In 2006 you saw that after a Brexit vote in 2016 they would accelerate the plans. Wow.
posted on 29/6/16
In 2006 you saw that after a Brexit vote in 2016 they would accelerate the plans. Wow.
------
Referendum on leaving the EU wasn't announced until the last General Election campaign.
posted on 29/6/16
comment by Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by De Gea's Legs (U14210)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
posted 5 minutes ago
MPs should have 'courage' to overrule Brexit vote
---------------
If MP's after such debate feel that it is in the national interest to over rule - they should do so.
As long as they can be open and explain the reasons for it in a reasonable manner the man on the street shouldn't have a problem for it.
They should also make provision that the gripes that 52% of the votes cast identified to be addressed in some way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No way
----------
You could at least try and form a reasoned reply.. as it stands your 'no way' has no value.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wheras your always saying other peoples views has no value and not providing facts to back up your agenda driven views dows
posted on 29/6/16
comment by Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by De Gea's Legs (U14210)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
posted 5 minutes ago
MPs should have 'courage' to overrule Brexit vote
---------------
If MP's after such debate feel that it is in the national interest to over rule - they should do so.
As long as they can be open and explain the reasons for it in a reasonable manner the man on the street shouldn't have a problem for it.
They should also make provision that the gripes that 52% of the votes cast identified to be addressed in some way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No way
----------
You could at least try and form a reasoned reply.. as it stands your 'no way' has no value.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ooooo sorry didn't know I had to follow your rules.
posted on 29/6/16
No way
----------
You could at least try and form a reasoned reply.. as it stands your 'no way' has no value.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wheras your always saying other peoples views has no value and not providing facts to back up your agenda driven views dows
-----------------------------------------------
If you can find another comment from me about someone's comment having 'no value' lets see it.
posted on 29/6/16
Could we not find ourselves in a situation where a 2nd referendum could be called, reasonably legitimately and not because 'remain' campaigners want it?
Whoever wins the Conservative leadership campaign, doesn't immediately invoke Article 50, but calls for a General Election to (quite rightly) legitimise his/her position as the new PM.
However, as they are likely to invoke the clause upon election, 'Remain' voters vote for the parties who were pro-remain.
Could we have a situation where, for example, the country is widely split across 3 or 4 political parties and we have to go down the route of a coalition government again.
The Lib-Dems (probably the most pro-EU party) are the leading party, and they put their heads together with the SNP (and perhaps another minority party) to form a new coalition government, which then has a new mandate to have a fresh referendum on Brexit?
posted on 29/6/16
Which option would be better for the Leave supporters on here?:
- Staying in with all that that meant, but significant controls introduced on EU immigration to the UK
- Leaving, with the ability to pick and choose which EU laws and regulations we retained, but having to keep the 'four freedoms' to retain access to the single market
- Complete severance, with the ability to pick and choose which EU laws and regulations we retained and without the 'four freedoms', meaning starting from scratch with trade agreements
posted on 29/6/16
I don't think they'll call for an election. Too disruptive. They'll say the people have spoken and we need to get on with it.
posted on 29/6/16
comment by rossobianchi - carry me back to the Stretford ... (U17054)
posted about a minute ago
Which option would be better for the Leave supporters on here?:
- Staying in with all that that meant, but significant controls introduced on EU immigration to the UK
- Leaving, with the ability to pick and choose which EU laws and regulations we retained, but having to keep the 'four freedoms' to retain access to the single market
- Complete severance, with the ability to pick and choose which EU laws and regulations we retained and without the 'four freedoms', meaning starting from scratch with trade agreements
----------------------------------------------------------------------
3rd option
posted on 29/6/16
comment by Serge Muhmenthaler (U15867)
posted 1 minute ago
Could we not find ourselves in a situation where a 2nd referendum could be called, reasonably legitimately and not because 'remain' campaigners want it?
Whoever wins the Conservative leadership campaign, doesn't immediately invoke Article 50, but calls for a General Election to (quite rightly) legitimise his/her position as the new PM.
However, as they are likely to invoke the clause upon election, 'Remain' voters vote for the parties who were pro-remain.
Could we have a situation where, for example, the country is widely split across 3 or 4 political parties and we have to go down the route of a coalition government again.
The Lib-Dems (probably the most pro-EU party) are the leading party, and they put their heads together with the SNP (and perhaps another minority party) to form a new coalition government, which then has a new mandate to have a fresh referendum on Brexit?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Possible. Very highly unlikely.
The Tories will avoid this by selecting a popular, pro-Brexit MP...
posted on 29/6/16
I don't think another election will happen anytime soon
posted on 29/6/16
comment by rossobianchi - carry me back to the Stretford End (U17054)
posted 42 seconds ago
Which option would be better for the Leave supporters on here?:
- Staying in with all that that meant, but significant controls introduced on EU immigration to the UK
- Leaving, with the ability to pick and choose which EU laws and regulations we retained, but having to keep the 'four freedoms' to retain access to the single market
- Complete severance, with the ability to pick and choose which EU laws and regulations we retained and without the 'four freedoms', meaning starting from scratch with trade agreements
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was remain but now looking forward to brexit
I don't like any of those
posted on 29/6/16
We are out,let's just get on with going forward,on our own if necessary,the EU will start to unravel in the not too distant future,let's get started.
posted on 29/6/16
comment by De Gea's Legs (U14210)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by rossobianchi - carry me back to the Stretford ... (U17054)
posted about a minute ago
Which option would be better for the Leave supporters on here?:
- Staying in with all that that meant, but significant controls introduced on EU immigration to the UK
- Leaving, with the ability to pick and choose which EU laws and regulations we retained, but having to keep the 'four freedoms' to retain access to the single market
- Complete severance, with the ability to pick and choose which EU laws and regulations we retained and without the 'four freedoms', meaning starting from scratch with trade agreements
----------------------------------------------------------------------
3rd option
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There's a man who knows what he wants - no mucking about there!
You should get yourself on the train to London mate and head up the negotiation planning.
posted on 29/6/16
comment by The Kaiser's Trainers (U5676)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by rossobianchi - carry me back to the Stretford End (U17054)
posted 42 seconds ago
Which option would be better for the Leave supporters on here?:
- Staying in with all that that meant, but significant controls introduced on EU immigration to the UK
- Leaving, with the ability to pick and choose which EU laws and regulations we retained, but having to keep the 'four freedoms' to retain access to the single market
- Complete severance, with the ability to pick and choose which EU laws and regulations we retained and without the 'four freedoms', meaning starting from scratch with trade agreements
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was remain but now looking forward to brexit
I don't like any of those
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This ain't the candy store sonny
Pick a least worst then.
posted on 29/6/16
comment by rossobianchi - carry me back to the Stretford ... (U17054)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by De Gea's Legs (U14210)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by rossobianchi - carry me back to the Stretford ... (U17054)
posted about a minute ago
Which option would be better for the Leave supporters on here?:
- Staying in with all that that meant, but significant controls introduced on EU immigration to the UK
- Leaving, with the ability to pick and choose which EU laws and regulations we retained, but having to keep the 'four freedoms' to retain access to the single market
- Complete severance, with the ability to pick and choose which EU laws and regulations we retained and without the 'four freedoms', meaning starting from scratch with trade agreements
----------------------------------------------------------------------
3rd option
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There's a man who knows what he wants - no mucking about there!
You should get yourself on the train to London mate and head up the negotiation planning.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
😊
posted on 29/6/16
comment by groovyduringthewar (U1054)
posted 1 minute ago
We are out,let's just get on with going forward,on our own if necessary,the EU will start to unravel in the not too distant future,let's get started.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That sounds like another vote for option three to me.
posted on 29/6/16
They are all pants
3 is the least crap
posted on 29/6/16
Out
Page 277 of 395
278 | 279 | 280 | 281 | 282